Epstein Data Wiki

Bill Clinton

Properties2
tagsperson, politics, united-states, clinton-foundation, clinton-global-initiative
aliasesWilliam Jefferson Clinton, WJC, President Clinton

46 min read

Office42nd President of the United States, 1993–2001
Post-presidencyOffice of President William J. Clinton, New York; the William J. Clinton Foundation and its Clinton Global Initiative
In the recordAlmost entirely at one remove. The operational correspondence is carried by his personal aide’s account, which the production tags “(WJC wjc)” — 493 pages — and by Ghislaine Maxwell’s replies to it, 2001–20041
Documented actsNone by him directly. Two documents report his own words secondhand: an aide’s message and a job candidate’s account of a conversation with him23
AllegationAn FBI FD-302 of a 17 March 2011 interview records the interviewee saying she met him at Epstein’s island4
DenialEpstein circulated the line “Clinton was never on the island” to named contacts in March 2011, January 2015 and September 20165678

Bill Clinton was the 42nd President of the United States. After leaving office in 2001 he ran a personal office in New York and the philanthropic foundation that carried his name, whose Clinton Global Initiative held its first annual meeting in 2005. He is among the most frequently named individuals in the Epstein release, and almost none of that naming is his own act: the great bulk of it is press clippings, litigation filings and third-party correspondence about him.

The documents in which the Clinton operation does act are correspondence between his personal aide and Ghislaine Maxwell, running from October 2001 to October 2004, in which he is seldom named: 20 of the 493 pages the production tags to his office account carry the name at all.1 He is “my boss,” “your boss,” “wjc,” “the President.” This page is built from those documents, from the 2004 Publicis Events file that grew out of them, from a single FBI interview record, from Epstein’s own denials, and from two Deutsche Bank compliance records that name Clinton as the reason Epstein was treated as a politically exposed person. What that material shows, and what it does not, are set out separately below.

Finding the record: the office and the aide, not the name

A search of the full-text index for the phrase "Bill Clinton" returns 3,315 pages across 2,304 documents, and a search for "President Clinton" returns 1,089 pages across 749 documents.9 Those populations are dominated by newspaper and wire copy filed into the productions, by court papers, and by third parties discussing him; they are a fact about what this release collected, not about what he did. An act-test applied to his name alone returns almost nothing, and a page built from it would conclude that there is nothing here to write about.

The operational record is found instead through the producing party’s own custodian tag. Messages to and from the Clinton office account are stamped (WJC wjc) beside the barred address, on the From: line when the office is sending and on the To: line when it is receiving.1011 That string returns 493 pages in 493 documents, every one of them a single sheet, split between two Bates ranges.1 Of those 493, 296 carry a resolvable date stamp, and they run from 4 October 2001 to 14 October 2003; the remaining 197 carry either no stamp or the placeholder Sat, 01 Jan 4501 05:00:00 +0000, which several copies of the same message print where a real date appears on another copy.1

Other forms, with what each returned: "Doug Band" 253 pages / 216 documents; the display-name form "DougBand" 51 pages; "owjc" 19; "Office of William Jefferson Clinton" 1; "Clinton Global Initiative" 156 / 136; "Clinton Foundation" 137 / 131; "Richard Attias" 40; "Mary Morrison" 18; "Clinton Project" 5 pages / 4 documents.9

Two of those forms are traps, and they matter because they look like the answer. "your boss" returns 451 pages and "my boss" returns 1,366, and neither is a Clinton count. A twelve-page sample of the "your boss" returns, read in full, contained no reference to Clinton of any kind: Gmail help text, a repeat correspondent’s complaint emails to a securities regulator, a lighting vendor’s price negotiation, a deposition transcript, a car-shipping enquiry.12 Scoped to the tagged set, the possessives are small and readable: "your boss" co-occurs with the tag on 4 pages and "my boss" on 15, and all nineteen were read for this page.12 A count of an English idiom is not a count of a subject.

Two of the sheets read for this page identify the tagged account’s user in the clear. EFTA00578888 prints the sender display name "DougBand" above a message of 13 April 2003.13 And on 9 December 2001 Maxwell, replying to the tagged account, opens: “Just spoke to Andrew … Doug, do you want him to call you ?”14 The tag is Doug Band’s office account; he was Clinton’s personal aide and later a co-founder of Teneo.

A note on these sheets. The 2001–2003 messages were produced as the raw HTML source of the e-mail, not as the rendered message: <html>, <br>, &nbsp; and <blockquote type=cite class=cite cite> print on the face of the page, verified at the image.1114 Quotations on this page are taken from spans of plain text between those tags. Nothing has been repaired, and nothing printed inside a quoted span has been removed.

The office’s own correspondence with Maxwell

On 10 September 2002 David T. Slade, whose signature block reads “Deputy Director of Scheduling & Advance / Director, Intern Program / Office of President William J. Clinton,” emailed Maxwell under the subject “Africa Trip Information,” copying Band.15 He wrote that “Doug asked me to email you the following information for planning purposes as we approach our departure date for Africa”, set out an added Italian leg, relayed that “Dan Rather with CBS has requested that he along with 3 crew fly aboard the plane with President Clinton for the Cape Town to Johannesburg, South Africa leg on Saturday, Sept 28”, and then gave what he called “our proposed plane manifest (excluding your package) for the Africa trip”, which the sheet follows with a colon.15 Eight legs follow, each headed by the two lines “1.President Clinton” and “2.Doug Band”, each closing with a count of Secret Service personnel: five on the first leg, seven on four of them, two on three.15 Two contact-number values on that sheet are barred.15

The manifest is a proposal made eleven days before departure and not a record of who flew; the flights as recorded in the plaintiff’s flight chart in Giuffre v. Maxwell differ from it, and that chart and the trip are set out at Casey Wasserman, who appears on both.15 The phrase that matters here is the parenthesis. Clinton’s own scheduling office sent Maxwell the president’s leg-by-leg passenger list and Secret Service counts, and treated her travelling party as a separate block it did not need to enumerate.

December 2001: Prince Andrew, golf, and who “my boss” is

On Sunday 9 December 2001 at 10:46 a.m. Eastern the tagged account wrote to Maxwell:

Andrew is staying in our hotel in scotland and we are reaching out to him to see if he wants to play golf with me and my boss tom. If you talk to him today let him know. My folks are tring to reach him now16

Twenty minutes later Maxwell replied:

Just spoke to Andrew. He is not currently in Scotland but is going to m. He says if I give him a no. he will ring Clinton. Doug, do you want him to call you ?14

The reply resolves the referent. “My boss” in the outgoing message is the person Andrew proposes to telephone, and Maxwell names him: Clinton.14 Maxwell’s reply was read at the image at 400 dpi and reproduces the earlier message inside a <blockquote> beneath the header “At 10:46 AM 12/9/2001 -0500,” which is the source of the Eastern times here.1417 Andrew is the Duke of York; the exchange is an aide in Clinton’s office using Maxwell to reach him.

February 2002: Miami, the plane and the motorcade

A date-scoped search of the tagged set for 6 to 8 February 2002 returns 30 pages, all read; they resolve to six messages, and the six are a complete thread.18 The Eastern times below are derived from the +0000 stamps, which on this account’s sheets are genuine UTC: the first message of the day survives in a second copy whose trailing header block gives the same minute and second as 16:24:45 -0500, and two further messages convert to the -0500 clocks quoted back at them in reply.17

Wednesday 6 February, 4:24 p.m. The tagged account to Maxwell:

Looks like the shore club in miami tom night around midnight for 13 or so long time friends from miami, pls tell tom and give him my cell. Ican call him tom also.

Looking forward to our weekend my dear19

That sentence is also the key to the December exchange above. Within one line the aide writes “tom” twice as an abbreviation for tomorrow and once as a man’s name, and the man is the Tom who appears by surname the following morning.1920 “Play golf with me and my boss tom” is therefore the same abbreviation, and Maxwell’s reply reads it that way.

5:08 p.m.

Hopefully, 830 or 9 departure from phils. We will take you guys from phils to the plane obviously in our motorcade.10

“Phils” is not identified on any sheet read for this page.

7:16 p.m. “We can work on times bc he is now saying no rush to leave so we will play it by ear.”18

9:48 p.m. Maxwell:

Just an FYI - JE is not coming to the party as he is a hermit. This means that I am going to drive to Miami for the party and he will fly in to Miami to pick us up -  I will need to give him a time to be in position - alternatively maybe the answer is that once at the party your boss gives you a heads up 45 mins before he wants to leave and then that gives me time to tell everyone and get the plane in position - any thoughts? + Tom is not feeling well and is back up in NY so that is him out for the night11

The message continues past that line with a social invitation to the aide: “On a totally separate note - I am planning a dinner party at my house 20th - Are you around?”, on the same sheet and on the same subject as the rest of this page.11

Thursday 7 February, 10:27 a.m. “Can we split it at 930? So pritzker is not in miami tonight?”18 10:54 a.m. Maxwell: “Your wish is my command  9.30 it is - Yes you are right Tom is not in Miami”.20

The last exchange identifies the “Tom” of the previous evening as Tom Pritzker, and it settles the arrangement at 9.30. What the thread records is a Clinton-office aide offering to move Maxwell’s party from a private party to Epstein’s aircraft in the protective motorcade, Maxwell asking for forty-five minutes’ warning of when “your boss” wants to leave so that she can have Epstein’s plane in position, and a departure time agreed. It does not say that Clinton flew, that he was told of the arrangement, or that any of it happened. Nine forms of words that a next-morning acknowledgement would use were written down and then searched against the tagged set before this paragraph was drafted, and none returned anything bearing on this trip.21

April 2003: a guest list for a dinner at Epstein’s house

On Saturday 12 April 2003 at 1:58 p.m. the tagged account wrote to Maxwell: “Doubtful be he may just come in for a lunch that day / I need a full list and bios of everyone coming, time and at je’s house?”22 Maxwell supplied names. At 4:47 p.m. the account replied:

Got em all Anyone else invited that may come? Fyi, eric schmidt is founder of google, big supporter of ours23

The quoted line beneath it, from Maxwell, reads ”+ Sergey Brin founding father of Google - not really father as he is annoyingly only 30”23 The following afternoon the account conceded: “My bad, you were right as always, eric just runs google, assume you saw front page of biz section of nyt today”.24 A message in the same run, sent from Maxwell on the evening of 12 April, begins “Booboo — JE invited Fred Fekkai and sd he could invite whom ever he wanted,” and is answered the next day.13

The act here is small and specific: Clinton’s personal aide, writing from the office account, requested a full guest list with biographies for a dinner at Epstein’s house, said his principal might come for lunch that day, and vetted the names he was sent. Whether Clinton attended anything is not recorded on any sheet read for this page.

2004: Publicis, “Mary,” and the Clinton Project

The 2004 file is the only place in this material where money, a Clinton staffer and Maxwell appear in a single documented sequence, and it can be dated closely.

18 March 2004, 3:45 a.m. Doug Band, named in the clear on this sheet, wrote to Maxwell:

Attias met with mary today She likes him a lot, smart of him They talked money and mary was shy about it and they talked low six figures, I would like to see her do better Thx, its imp for wjc/me to get her taken care of She did a lot in the old days… Surely he’s paying people tons so 250k shouldn’t be out of the question2

“Attias” is Richard Attias, then running Publicis Events, which organised Clinton Global Initiative meetings; he signs a later message in this run “Richard”.25 “Mary” is Mary Morrison. The message is a request that Maxwell help raise a job offer from “low six figures” to $250,000 for a former Clinton staffer, on the stated ground that it is “imp for wjc/me”.

29 March 2004. Morrison wrote to Maxwell: “Okay - it is final - I have accepted the job. I am excited about working with him and hopefully with you finally (obviously you will be playing a large role in the Clinton Project).”3 She attached her negotiation with Attias, in which she records a conversation with Clinton himself:

The President and I talked today and he asked me if you and I had come to an agreement yet. I said that we were almost there. That you had come back to me with a salary which was lower than what I had asked for but offered some good bonuses and I had negotiated that I wanted the ability to continue to help him on his issues and you were agreeable to that. The President said I should move forward with the offer because he thought I would enjoy working with you and would learn a lot and on a selfish side he thought the agreement was wonderful because he wanted me to continue to help him on some issues and this way I could.3

That passage is Morrison’s account of what Clinton said, written the same day to Attias and forwarded to Maxwell; it is not a document Clinton wrote, and nothing corroborates it. It is the closest the release comes to placing Clinton personally inside this arrangement, and its evidentiary weight is that of a contemporaneous first-person report and no more. Attias’s offer is on the same run, and it is the documented answer to Band’s request. He wrote: *“I think we must work on a 130 000$ fixed salary plus two different bonuses: 5% of the Gross margin of the new business that you bring / * 50 000 $ based on the quality of the work and the optimisation of the costs and the achievements of some objectives that we will define together … That structure could allow you to win at least 220 000/ 250 000 $ if you bring good deals.”3 Fixed pay of $130,000 against Band’s “250k”, with the figure reachable only on performance. In the same message Morrison asked for the title “Director of Global Operations”;3 by October her signature block read “Director of Special Projects / Publicis Events Worldwide”, with no terminal stop.26

2 April 2004. Band wrote to Attias: “Richard, I understand your in ny next week / Let’s plan on getting together and also having you into our office to meet with my team / Congratulations on getting Mary”. The forward that carried the message to Maxwell two days later is the sheet that names both correspondents.27

7–9 October 2004. Morrison sent Maxwell wire instructions: “Here is the information on how to wire transfer the money. Will you let me know when this is done so we can tell our people to be on the look out. I told them to be expecting $1million USA dollars… and that it would be coming in the next few days.”26 The instruction block names Bank of America, an account in the name of Philadelphia Merger Corp, and the reference “Publicis Events. Project Id # 2060400019 (Clinton Project).”26 The account and routing values and the contact values on the sheet are barred, and none is reproduced here.26 Maxwell replied on 8 October: “Plse liase w/darren as I am still in Europe.”26 The direction of payment on the face of the sheet is towards Publicis Events, not from it: Maxwell’s side is being asked to send the million.

On 9 October 2004 at 6:35 a.m., one day later, a message signed “Richard” reached Maxwell under the subject line “Busget for WJC”:

Darren is starting to make my life a nightmare. I don t know who is his boss but please tell him that he must stay out of that now! He is asking for a much more detailed budget with the details of item per item wich cosot will be spens inside Publicis and wich one outside, etc… … We ( Publicis Events) are financing since months that project and investing a big amount of time.. I have no idea of what will be the Publicis profit at this stage and I hope that at the end of the day we will be able to keep our honoraria as a profit for Publicis Events.. So as I trust you and JE at 300% they must trust us!25

The subject line is as printed, misspelling and all. The “Darren” of that message and the “darren” Maxwell names the day before are given no surname on either sheet. No document read for this page supplies one, and this page does not.

13 October 2004. Maxwell to Band: “Je says mon night at 6 his house - does that work for you”. Band: “Perfecto”.28 That is the latest message in the Band–Maxwell run read for this page.

The island allegation

The release contains an FBI FD-302a continuation sheet, form revision 05-08-10, under case number 31E-MM-108062, recording an interview conducted on 17 March 2011. The interviewee’s name is barred at every occurrence, and this page does not identify her. On the sheet printed as page 18 of the run (the 302’s own continuation numbering gives it as “Page 10 of 12”), the record reads:

[name barred] met numerous famous people while she was with EPSTEIN including academics, politicians, and celebrities. She met BILL CLINTON and AL GORE and TIPPER GORE at EPSTEIN’s private island. [name barred] did not engage in sexual activity with CLINTON or GORE.4

That is the whole of what this page takes from that document. It is an allegation recorded by an investigator, not a finding; the interviewee is not named on the sheet, was not cross-examined, and the document itself contains no corroboration of the passage. It is also flatly denied, and the denial is set out in the next section.

A separate and narrower question can be answered cleanly. Searching the full-text index for "WJC" together with "island" returns 11 pages, and all eleven were read. They resolve to three messages, each held in several copies. Band, on 25 August 2002, declined an island invitation: “Island looks unlikely for me. Going with wjc on a brief vacation then back for 2 days”; and two from Maxwell to the office account, “Remember I have been on the Island for a week - translation - no papers and sporadic phone” and “Booboo, I am in PB - we came back form the Island for a few days and may come to NY tom”.29 None of the three places Clinton on the island. That result is bounded to that search: "Clinton" with "Little St. James" returns 139 pages and "president clinton" with "island" returns 247, and this page has not read those sets and makes no claim about them.

The denials, 2011 to 2016

Epstein’s denial of the island allegation is not a single event. The same sentence appears in his outgoing mail across more than five years, each time as material offered to someone else to use.

6 March 2011. Under the subject line “feel fre to pass this to your presss people,” Epstein wrote to a recipient the sheet names only as “The Duke,” the address barred:

you ok? these stories are complete ant utter fantasy,, I don’t know and have never met Al gore, CLinton was never on the island.. the telephone book is not mine, it was stolen by my houseman that is currently in prison for doing so.5

The Andrew page records that Andrew corresponded with Epstein under the sender name “The Duke” in this period and that eight days earlier he had forwarded Epstein his press secretary’s denial letter to the Mail on Sunday. The message is dated eleven days before the FBI interview that recorded the allegation.

4 January 2015. Epstein sent the denial to two correspondents on one day. To David Stern, at 08:23: “pa people could showcase the lack of her credibility as in the story she details a dinner with clinton on my island down to where he was sitting howver it never ever happened CLINTON was never on the island the story , heli is all a total fiction. it could help shred her story.”6 To Joi Ito, then director of the MIT Media Lab: “bad press in fulll swing . she also claims to have dinner on my island with clinton. lots of details where he was sitting etc however he was NEVER on the island NEVER. its silly, but she has lots of traction”30 Ito replied that he had heard “they picked the wrong adversary in Dersh. It will be his new life mission.”, a reference to Alan Dershowitz.30

16 January 2015. Twelve days later Epstein drafted a statement built around a former girlfriend he proposed to put forward as a witness. On the copy sent to Wolff it is numbered 1 to 8 with the number 6 used twice; the copy sent to Maxwell carries an additional Ghislaine-specific item numbered 1 ahead of the 1.317 Its fifth point reads “she knows clinton was never on the island.”7 Over about thirty-two minutes that morning the same text went to at least five recipients under four subject lines: to Kathy Ruemmler at 09:06 as “thoughts?”;32 to Maxwell at 09:21 as “joint defense agreement”;33 to Michael Wolff at 09:36 as “thoughts”;31 to Mortimer Zuckerman at 09:37 as “thoughts?”;34 and to Martin Weinberg, whose copy quotes the message at 4:05 a.m. Eastern under the subject “PRIVILEDGED , new development , not sure how to publish.”35 Three of those five stamps are +0000 values and two are unlabelled clocks that agree with them to the minute; Eastern is five hours earlier.1732 The former girlfriend is not named on this page.

Five replies are in the record, from four people, and two of them bear directly on this page.

Maxwell answered twice. Her first reply, at 13:19, was tactical and partly a refusal: its second line is her own proposed answer, “My job was to manage contruction of the houses and manage households”; its third asks “What photos does she have?”; and its fourth is “Do not attachk jane doe’s makes you look bad”.7 Her second, at 14:08, proposes the Clinton denial as the witness’s own line:

In principle I like it […] If she can disporve anything for a fact then it might help ie she can say euhud and clinton were never at island36

That sentence is Maxwell herself nominating the island denial as the thing the proposed witness should say, and it is the most Clinton-specific line in the January 2015 material.

Two of the five recipients answered by declining to put the woman forward. Michael Wolff: “I don’t think I would put her out there. It probably seems too self-serving. But let’s discuss. I have an idea about how to best use.”37 And Kathy Ruemmler, who had been White House Counsel to President Obama until 2014 and who had received the statement thirty-four minutes earlier:

For media purposes? I think it will be very difficult to change the narrative at this point, her comments will be discounted as biased (e.g., do you provide any ongoing financial support?), and it would bring her much unwanted attention. I think the only way we would want to use this (potentially) is in the context of the longer, smarter piece that we have talked about considering — New Yorker, etc. Depending on what happens with the CVRA case, this could be important in that context too.38

Martin Weinberg answered on the practical question instead: “Is she ready for depositions investigation media”, and went on to the expected court filing.35 Neither sheet states his role; Epstein sent him the statement under the subject line “PRIVILEDGED” and his reply turns on depositions, what is filed, and opposing counsel.35

24 September 2016. To Michael Wolff: “you can also add , fresh politcal juice by stating that Clinton was never on the island. I never met Al gore. no diiners on the island with either , no matter how much detail has been in the press.”8

The same denial also went on a court record, and in that form it is the one place where a document outside Epstein’s own correspondence is put behind it. It is not, however, an independent one. The instrument is the Reply Declaration of Alan M. Dershowitz in Further Support of Motion to Intervene and Unseal, sworn under penalty of perjury and filed in Giuffre v. Maxwell, Index No. 15 Civ. 7433 (S.D.N.Y.), on 15 September 2016. It is a third-party intervenor’s declaration, not a filing by either party, and its declarant is the man the same accuser accused, and the man Joi Ito named to Epstein in the 4 January exchange quoted above. It states that the “entire account is fabricated out of whole cloth: President Clinton was never on the island during the relevant period”, and continues:

A FOIA request submitted by former FBI Director Louis Freeh for “all shift logs, travel records, itineraries, reports, and other records for USSS personnel travelling with former President Bill Clinton to Little St. James Island and the US Virgin Islands” revealed that “Bill Clinton did not in fact travel to, nor was he present on, Little St. James Island between January 1, 2001, and January 1, 2003.”39

That is Dershowitz’s characterisation of Dershowitz’s own exhibit, ¶54’s citation being “See Dershowitz Decl., Ex. I”, and neither the exhibit nor the underlying Freeh material is read for this page. And it is bounded in a way the allegation is not. The stated range is two years, 1 January 2001 to 1 January 2003; the FD-302 passage gives the meeting no date at all, the Band–Maxwell correspondence on this page runs to October 2004, and Epstein had owned the island since 1998. A record covering 2001 and 2002 does not speak to any other year.

Neither side of this is settled by the documents, and this page does not settle it. The allegation is a recorded interview statement, uncorroborated in the document that carries it. The denial is asserted repeatedly by an interested party and, for a two-year window, supported at two removes: by an adverse intervenor’s sworn characterisation of an exhibit of his own, which this page has not seen.

Deutsche Bank, 2017 to 2018

Two Deutsche Bank records name Clinton as a reason for treating Epstein as a politically exposed person.

A “KYC Print” for four related accountholders (Southern Financial LLC, Southern Trust Company Inc, Jeffrey Epstein and J. Epstein Virgin Islands Foundation Inc) carries a case comment dated 8 August 2017 setting out “the reasons why we are comfortable with approving this KYC.” Under the heading “Negative Media & PEP” it reads: “There is some negative media against Mr Epstein and he is also maintains a close relationship with Bill Clinton and Prince Andrew. Please see risk calculator for more information. Appropriate approval was obtained.” The same comment adds: “Our review did not identify any red flags and thus there was no need to escalate this case further.”40 The comment is entered under the name of Kshitij Golani, and four other entries in the same block are under Cynthia Rodriguez.40 The approval block records four names with dates: the client-facing professional stewart oldfield on 5 July 2017, the office director/business head Andrew F Gallivan on 6 July, and Golani and Yoonsun Chung for AML Compliance on 8 August. It leaves the Regional Office Director and AML Business Risk rows blank; every entry is printed type in a system-generated print, not ink.40

On 16 November 2018, fifteen months later and eight months before Epstein’s arrest, Yoonsun Chung, a vice president in AML Compliance, wrote to Stewart Oldfield and Bradley Gillin about the Epstein insurance trust:

Do we think he is still a PEP? Is he still associated with prince Andrew? If you make a good case where he is no longer a PEP… then we can verify him in an alternative means — Lexis smartlinx—which you get when you run full searches. If you want to go this route, I would send an email to Andrew Gallivan stating why you think he should no longer be a PEP. He is technically an RCA (relative and close associate) to Prince Andrew and Bill clinton. Is he still associated with them? To the best of your knowledge, do you think he is exerting influence based on his connection to these PEPs? Etc. Once Andrew approves, please forward the email to me.41

The “Andrew” who approves is Andrew F Gallivan, the office director whose printed approval sits on the KYC sheet above; he is not Prince Andrew, who is named separately twice in the same message.4140

The message sets out a route by which the bank could stop treating Epstein as politically exposed, and the condition is a judgement about whether his association with Clinton and Andrew still holds. Nothing on these sheets records Clinton doing anything; what they record is the institutional value of the association to the man claiming it.

What these documents do not establish

  • No document read for this page records an act by Clinton. Two report his words secondhand: an aide’s “its imp for wjc/me to get her taken care of”, and Morrison’s account of a conversation about her salary.23 Everything else is his office, his aide, his foundation’s event contractor, or other people discussing him.
  • Travel, dinners and logistics are not an allegation. A motorcade offer, a guest list, an aircraft manifest and a scheduling request are what the sheets show. What they meant is not supplied here.
  • The aide’s messages are not the principal’s. Where the record says “my boss” it is Band’s characterisation; on 9 December 2001 Maxwell’s reply names Clinton, and elsewhere it does not.
  • The island question is open, and the search reported above is bounded to the eleven "WJC" and "island" pages that were read. Larger conjunctions exist and were not read.
  • Much of the material filed under Clinton’s name elsewhere concerns Hillary Clinton, not him. A November 2013 request that Epstein arrange a “discreet meeting” between Nicolas Sarkozy and Hillary Clinton, and Epstein’s January 2012 rearrangement of an Ivory Coast trip to avoid overlapping with her, are documents about a different person and are not evidence about Bill Clinton.4243
  • Clinton Global Initiative material is thin and oblique. In September 2011 Epstein asked Maxwell “are you going to cgi?”; in August 2013 Boris Nikolic wrote to Ehud Barak, copying Epstein, that he expected to see him in New York “most likely at Jeffrey’s” because “it is more interesting there than at CGI ;)”.4445 Neither names Clinton.
  • The clocks on the 2001–2004 sheets are unreliable and are mostly not printed here. Where an Eastern time appears above, it is taken from a zone-labelled -0500 or -0400 header quoted inside a reply, not from the top-of-message stamp.17

Timeline

DateEventSource
4 October 2001Earliest dated message in the (WJC wjc) tagged setEFTA005784341
9 December 2001Aide asks Maxwell to reach Prince Andrew for golf “with me and my boss” EFTA0057843516; she replies that Andrew “will ring Clinton” EFTA0058192714Both sheets
6–7 February 2002A six-message thread: the aide offers to take Maxwell’s party “from phils to the plane obviously in our motorcade” EFTA0057846910; Maxwell asks for 45 minutes’ warning of when “your boss” wants to leave EFTA0058201411; the departure is settled at 9.30 EFTA0233339220Three sheets
25 August 2002Aide declines an island invitation: “Going with wjc on a brief vacation”EFTA0057846129
10 September 2002Clinton’s scheduling office sends Maxwell the proposed Africa manifest “(excluding your package)“EFTA0057862915
12–13 April 2003Aide requests “a full list and bios of everyone coming” for a dinner “at je’s house” and vets the namesEFTA0233256522 · EFTA0233256923
14 October 2003Latest dated message in the (WJC wjc) tagged setEFTA005789541
18 March 2004Band to Maxwell: “its imp for wjc/me to get her taken care of … 250k shouldn’t be out of the question”EFTA023326712
29 March 2004Morrison accepts the Publicis job and reports Clinton’s view of her salary negotiation to MaxwellEFTA005789883
2 April 2004Band to Attias: “Congratulations on getting Mary”EFTA0233275827
7–8 October 2004Morrison sends wire instructions for $1 million referenced “(Clinton Project)”; Maxwell replies “Plse liase w/darren”EFTA0233301226
9 October 2004”Busget for WJC”: Attias complains to Maxwell that “Darren” is demanding an itemised budgetEFTA0233301325
13 October 2004Maxwell: “Je says mon night at 6 his house”; Band: “Perfecto”EFTA0233311328
6 March 2011Epstein to “The Duke”: “CLinton was never on the island”EFTA018368785
17 March 2011FBI FD-302 interview records the island allegationEFTA016883594
4 January 2015The denial sent to David Stern and to Joi ItoEFTA017479126 · EFTA0174768930
16 January 2015The eight-point statement, point 5 “she knows clinton was never on the island”, sent to Maxwell, Wolff and Zuckerman; Ruemmler replies on media strategyEFTA017473667 · EFTA0239238938
15 September 2016Alan Dershowitz’s reply declaration in Giuffre v. Maxwell carries the Freeh FOIA result, bounded to 2001–2002EFTA0280094739
24 September 2016Epstein to Wolff: “you can also add , fresh politcal juice by stating that Clinton was never on the island”EFTA008174388
8 August 2017Deutsche Bank KYC: Epstein “maintains a close relationship with Bill Clinton and Prince Andrew”EFTA0135600840
16 November 2018Deutsche Bank AML: Epstein “technically an RCA … to Prince Andrew and Bill clinton”EFTA0142071341

Coverage

  • The desk’s own report, /reports/individuals/BILL_CLINTON_INVESTIGATION.html, indexes much of this material and was used as a lead list. Where it and the sheets disagree, the sheets govern; five disagreements are noted in the footnotes below: the page the FBI passage sits on, the reading of a wire reference, the addressee of one message, one truncated quotation, and the date of the January 2015 statement.

Footnotes

  1. Search of pages_fts for text_content:"wjc wjc", run 11 September 2026: 493 pages in 493 documents, every one a single sheet, in two Bates ranges (EFTA0057–EFTA0058, 315 pages; EFTA0233, 178). Of 493, 296 carry a resolvable Date: or Sent: stamp; those run 4 October 2001 (EFTA00578434) to 14 October 2003 (EFTA00578954). 135 of the 493 pages carry the placeholder year 4501. Counts taken with select rowid from pages_fts, identifiers resolved in batches; no LIMIT applied. Not read in full: a keyword census was run over all 493 rows — 187 carry the sender name “G. Max” exactly, 7 more “G Max” and 2 “Gmax”, 20 carry “Clinton” in any case, 135 carry the placeholder year 4501 — and 19 pages were read individually (see [^possessives]). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6

  2. Doug Band to Ghislaine Maxwell, Sent Thur 3/18/2004 3:45:28 AM, zoneless; one address value is barred. Read at the image at 400 dpi. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA02332671 p.1. The quotation follows the sheet’s line breaks; the message continues with three further social lines and “Sent via BlackBerry”. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  3. Mary Morrison to Ghislaine Maxwell, Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 13:53:38 +0000, forwarding her exchange with Richard Attias of the same morning. Read at the image at 400 dpi, pp.1–2. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00578988 pp.1–2. The quoted passage runs across the sheet break: it begins on p.1 and continues from “were almost there” on p.2. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6 ↩7

  4. FBI FD-302a (Rev. 05-08-10), case 31E-MM-108062, continuation sheet for an interview of 17 March 2011, headed “Page 10 of 12.” Read at the image at 300 dpi. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA01688359 p.18. The interviewee’s name is barred at both occurrences in the quoted paragraph. The desk’s report cites this passage as page 17; the passage is on the sheet printed as page 18 of the run. Nothing else in this 37-sheet document is used on this page. ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  5. Jeffrey Epstein to “The Duke,” Sent Sun 3/6/2011 8:51:04 AM, zoneless, subject “feel fre to pass this to your presss people,”; one address value is barred and the display name is the only identification on the sheet. Read at the image at 400 dpi and the first body line again at 600 dpi. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA01836878 p.1. The sheet prints two comma glyphs after “fantasy”; the corpus extraction collapses them into a single low-double-quote character. Nothing here is repaired: the doubled commas and the doubled full stop after “island” are what the sheet prints. ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  6. David Stern to Jeffrey Epstein, Sent Sunday, January 4, 2015 8:31:36 AM, quoting Epstein’s message of “4 Jan 2015, at 08:23.” Unverified at the image. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA01747912 p.1. ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  7. G Maxwell to Jeffrey Epstein, “Re: joint defense agreement,” Sent Friday, January 16, 2015 1:19:56 PM, quoting Epstein’s message of “Friday, January 16, 2015 at 4:21 AM”. Unverified at the image. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA01747366 pp.1–2. The former girlfriend’s name is barred throughout. The desk’s report places this document, and the “coordinated denial,” on 4 January 2015; it is dated 16 January 2015, twelve days later. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5

  8. Jeffrey Epstein to Michael Wolff, Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2016 13:26:51 +0000. Read at the image at 400 dpi. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00817438 p.1. The quotation stops at “in the press.”; the message continues with an attack on the accuser’s credibility and on a named lawyer, which is left out deliberately and not because the sheet ends. ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  9. All counts from pages_fts, 11 September 2026, phrase form, no limit: "Bill Clinton" 3,315 pages / 2,304 documents; "President Clinton" 1,089 / 749; "Doug Band" 253 / 216; "DougBand" 51 / 51; "owjc" 19 / 19; "Office of William Jefferson Clinton" 1 / 1; "Clinton Global Initiative" 156 / 136; "Clinton Foundation" 137 / 131; "Richard Attias" 40 / 40; "Attias" 134 / 130; "Mary Morrison" 18 / 18; "Clinton Project" 5 / 4; "Publicis" 104 / 79. Documents counted by distinct identifier, not by documents.dataset, which drops 8,717 of 30,507 House Oversight rows carrying a NULL dataset. No count here was read in full; the characterisation of the "Bill Clinton" population as predominantly press and litigation material rests on a twelve-page sample, not an enumeration, and is stated as an impression rather than a measurement. ↩ ↩2

  10. Message of 6 February 2002, Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2002 22:08:17 +0000, two address values barred, with the tag (WJC wjc) printed beside the first. Read at the image at 400 dpi. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00578469 p.1. Seven further copies carry the same text, including https://epstein-data.com/EFTA02332312 p.1, which the desk’s report cites and which prints the zoneless form Sent Wed 2/6/2002 10:08:17 PM. ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  11. Maxwell to the tagged account, 6 February 2002, Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2002 21:48:31 +0000; two address values barred; the quoted header inside reads &nbsp;At 07:16 PM 2/6/2002 -0500, you wrote:. Read at the image at 400 dpi; the HTML tags quoted above print on the face of the sheet. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00582014 p.1. Five further copies exist: four carry the placeholder date Sat, 01 Jan 4501 05:00:00 +0000 and one carries no date field at all. The desk’s report quotes this passage from https://epstein-data.com/EFTA02333390 and stops at “get the plane in position”, omitting “any thoughts? + Tom is not feeling well and is back up in NY so that is him out for the night” — the clause that explains the Pritzker exchange the report then treats as a separate finding. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5

  12. "your boss" returns 451 pages / 398 documents and "my boss" 1,366 / 1,066. A random twelve-page sample of the "your boss" returns was read in full: none concerned Clinton. Conjoined with the custodian tag, "your boss" AND "wjc wjc" returns 4 pages (EFTA00579580, EFTA00581391, EFTA00582014, EFTA02333390) and "my boss" AND "wjc wjc" returns 15; all 19 were read. ↩ ↩2

  13. “DougBand” to “G. Max,” 13 April 2003, quoting Maxwell’s message of the previous evening beginning “Booboo - JE invited Fred Fekkai and sd he could invite whom ever he wanted.” Read at the image at 400 dpi. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00578888 p.1. ↩ ↩2

  14. Maxwell to the tagged account, 9 December 2001, Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2001 11:06:04 +0000, quoting &nbsp;At 10:46 AM 12/9/2001 -0500, you wrote:. Read at the image at 400 dpi. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00581927 p.1. The image prints “is going to m.” with a space and a full stop; the corpus extraction of this same sheet renders it “is going tom.” Four pages carry this text. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6

  15. David T. Slade to Ghislaine Maxwell, “Africa Trip Information,” 10 September 2002, copied to “DougBand” and to one further recipient, for whom no display name is printed at all and whose address value is barred. Read at the image at 400 dpi, pp.1 and 3. Four address values are barred on p.1; two contact-number values on p.3 are barred. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00578629 pp.1–3. The same document is cited at Casey Wasserman, which sets out how the proposal differs from the flights as recorded in the Giuffre v. Maxwell flight chart. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6

  16. Message of 9 December 2001, Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2001 15:46:03 +0000, tag (WJC wjc) printed beside the first of two barred address values. Unverified at the image on this copy; the identical text is verified at 400 dpi inside the quoted block of https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00581927 p.1. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00578435 p.1. Eight pages carry this text. ↩ ↩2

  17. The +0000 stamps on these sheets are not all the same clock, and the difference was settled at the document rather than assumed. On the office account’s own messages the stamp is genuine UTC: the 6 February message stamped Wed, 06 Feb 2002 21:24:45 +0000 on the sheet cited at the next note survives on EFTA02333867 as a trailing header block, read at the image at 400 dpi, carrying Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2002 16:24:45 -0500 and a receipt chain at 16:18 to 16:23 -0500 (EST) — the same sender tag and the same minute and second, five hours apart; the 9 December 2001 message stamped 15:46:03 +0000 is quoted back as “At 10:46 AM 12/9/2001 -0500”; the 23 October 2002 message stamped 15:14:27 +0000 is quoted back as “At 11:14 AM 10/23/2002 -0400”; and the 7 February 2002 message stamped 15:27:45 +0000 is quoted back as “At 10:27 AM 2/7/2002 -0500”. On Maxwell’s sheets the same field is the local Eastern clock mislabelled +0000: her 9 December reply stamped 11:06:04 +0000 and her 6 February reply stamped 21:48:31 +0000 would each, read as UTC, precede the message they quote, and both are consistent read as Eastern. A third of the tagged set carries the placeholder 01 Jan 4501 and has no clock at all. Clock times on this page are given only where this test resolves them or where an explicit offset prints on the face of a sheet. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  18. Date-scoped search of the (WJC wjc) tagged set for 6, 7 and 8 February 2002: 30 pages, all read. Twenty-nine resolve to six messages, each held in three to eight copies; the thirtieth, EFTA02333867, is a 14 January 2002 message that carries one of the six as a trailing header fragment, which is how this page uses it at the clock note. The two quoted here that are not separately footnoted are at https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00578474 p.1 (7:16 p.m.) and https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00578543 p.1 (10:27 a.m.), both unverified at the image. The nine forms of words written down before searching, and what each returned, are at the next note. ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  19. Message of 6 February 2002, Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2002 21:24:45 +0000, tag (WJC wjc) printed beside the first of two barred address values. Read at the image at 400 dpi. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00578468 p.1. The sheet prints “Ican call him tom also” as one word and carries a second paragraph that the corpus extraction of one other copy drops; a further copy’s extraction reads “Ivan” for “Ican”. ↩ ↩2

  20. Maxwell to the tagged account, 7 February 2002, quoting “Can we split it at 930? So pritzker is not in miami tonight?” and answering “Yes you are right Tom is not in Miami”. Unverified at the image; from the text layer. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA02333392 p.1. ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  21. Nine forms of words a next-morning acknowledgement would use were written down before any of them was run, and each was run against the tagged set: great seeing you; thanks for last night; safe flight; made it back; got in late; the plane was; fun last night; last night was; thanks for the ride. Seven returned nothing inside the tagged set. Two returned four pages each, and both resolve to unrelated messages of 23 October 2002, read and excluded. No form returned anything bearing on the February 2002 trip. ↩

  22. Tagged account to Maxwell, Sent Sat 4/12/2003 1:58:59 PM, zoneless. Unverified at the image. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA02332565 p.1. The sheet prints “Doubtful be he may just come in for a lunch that day”; on the same document family the extraction elsewhere renders a printed “bc” as “be,” and that reading is not resolved here. ↩ ↩2

  23. Tagged account to Maxwell, Sent Sat 4/12/2003 4:47:29 PM, zoneless, quoting Maxwell’s ”+ Sergey Brin founding father of Google - not really father as he is annoyingly only 30.” Rendered at 400 dpi. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA02332569 p.1. ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  24. Tagged account to Maxwell, Sent Sun 4/13/2003 5:55:18 PM, zoneless. Unverified at the image. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA02332575 p.1. ↩

  25. Message signed “Richard”, Sent Sat 10/9/2004 6:35:53 AM, zoneless, subject “Busget for WJC”; two address values are barred. Read at the image at 400 dpi. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA02333013 p.1. The attribution to Richard Attias rests on the signature, the Publicis Events content and the March 2004 message naming him; the sheet itself carries no surname. ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  26. Mary Morrison to Ghislaine Maxwell, Sent Fri 10/8/2004 11:13:03 PM, carrying Maxwell’s message of 10/08/2004 12:06 PM and Morrison’s of Thu, 7 Oct 2004 17:09:24, all zoneless. Read at the image at 400 dpi. The account and routing values and the contact values on the sheet are barred; none is reproduced here. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA02333012 p.1. The image prints “Project Id # 2060400019”; the corpus extraction reads “Project Id A 2060400019”, and the desk’s report reproduces the extraction’s reading. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6

  27. Forward carrying “Doug Band” to “Richard Attias,” Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 12:05:53. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00579065 p.1, read at the image at 400 dpi, is the sheet cited for the correspondents: it is headed From: "Doug Band" / To: "Ghislaine Maxwell" / Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2004 01:39:50 +0000. A second copy, not rendered by this pass, is at https://epstein-data.com/EFTA02332758 p.1, Sent Sun 4/4/2004 1:39:50 AM. The desk’s report describes this as Band forwarding congratulations to Maxwell; the congratulation itself is addressed to Attias. ↩ ↩2

  28. Doug Band to Ghislaine Maxwell, Sent Wed 10/13/2004 7:24:36 PM, quoting “Gmax” at Wed, 13 Oct 2004 19:04:05, both zoneless. Unverified at the image. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA02333113 p.1. ↩ ↩2

  29. Search of pages_fts for text_content:"WJC" AND text_content:"island": 11 pages, all read. They resolve to three messages: the tagged account’s of 25 August 2002 (EFTA00578461, EFTA00578566, EFTA00580082, EFTA02332339, EFTA02333889); Maxwell’s “Remember I have been on the Island for a week” (EFTA00579682, EFTA00581436); and Maxwell’s “Booboo, I am in PB” (EFTA00579795, EFTA00581569, EFTA02333590, EFTA02335718). Unverified at the image. Wider conjunctions were run and not read: "Clinton" AND "Little St. James" 139 pages, "Clinton" AND "Little Saint James" 82, "Clinton" AND "LSJ" 47, "president clinton" AND "island" 247. ↩ ↩2

  30. Joi Ito to Jeffrey Epstein, Sent Sunday, January 4, 2015 8:34:13 PM, quoting Epstein’s earlier messages of the same day. Unverified at the image. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA01747689 p.1. The outer stamp and the quoted inner headers on this sheet are not in the same zone; only the date is relied on. ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  31. Jeffrey Epstein to Michael Wolff, “thoughts,” Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 09:36:05 +0000, carrying the statement text numbered 1 to 8 with the number 6 used twice. Read at the image at 400 dpi by the re-gate of 2026-09-11, not by this pass. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00866516 p.1. ↩ ↩2

  32. Jeffrey Epstein to Kathy Ruemmler, “thoughts?,” Sent: Friday, January 16, 2015 9:06 AM, carrying the same statement text. Read at the image at 400 dpi. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA02512948 p.1. The stamp carries no zone label; it agrees to the minute with the +0000 stamps on the other copies of the same run — EFTA02513067 renders the Wolff send as 9:36 AM against EFTA00866516’s 09:36:05 +0000, and EFTA02513092 renders the Zuckerman send as 9:37 AM against EFTA00866517’s 09:37:20 +0000. ↩ ↩2

  33. Jeffrey Epstein to “Gmax,” “joint defense agreement,” Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 09:21:21 +0000, carrying the statement text. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00866513 p.1. Read at the image at 400 dpi by the re-gate of 2026-09-11, not by this pass. The copy at https://epstein-data.com/EFTA01747366 renders the same send as “Friday, January 16, 2015 at 4:21 AM”, five hours earlier. ↩

  34. Jeffrey Epstein to Mortimer Zuckerman, “thoughts?,” Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 09:37:20 +0000, carrying the same eight-point text. Rendered at 400 dpi. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00866517 p.1. ↩

  35. Martin Weinberg to Jeffrey Epstein, copying himself, “Re: PRIVILEDGED , new development , not sure how to publish.” — the subject line as printed — Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 11:48:35 +0000. Read at the image at 400 dpi. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00866519 p.1. The copy carries the same statement text and quotes Epstein at 4:05 a.m., which is 09:05 on the +0000 clock. The reply is two lines; the second, not quoted here, concerns what is expected to be filed and names opposing counsel. ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  36. G Maxwell to Jeffrey Epstein, “Re: joint defense agreement,” Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 14:08:58 +0000, her second reply of the day. Read at the image at 400 dpi. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00638272 p.1. The elision covers two lines, one of which names the accuser by her initials; nothing else is omitted between the first and last lines quoted, and the message ends one line after the last of them. A second copy is at https://epstein-data.com/EFTA02348919. ↩

  37. Michael Wolff to Jeffrey Epstein, “Re: thoughts,” Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 14:54:05 +0000. Read at the image at 400 dpi. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00638227 p.1. The message continues “Do you have time to continue our conversation post-3:00 today or tomorrow?”, and Epstein answered “today ok.” ↩

  38. Kathy Ruemmler to Jeffrey Epstein, “Re: thoughts?,” Sent: Friday, January 16, 2015 9:40 AM, quoting the statement. Read at the image at 400 dpi. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA02392389 p.1. The stamp carries no zone label, and the header quoted inside the same sheet gives Epstein’s message as “at 10:05 AM” against a send of 09:05/09:06 — so the two clocks on this one sheet are an hour apart and only the +0000 value is used here. ↩ ↩2

  39. “Reply Declaration of Alan M. Dershowitz in Further Support of Motion to Intervene and Unseal,” [caption barred] v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Index No. 15 Civ. 7433, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, Doc. 435, filed 15 September 2016, at ¶54; the header stamp on the quoted sheet reads 1:15-cv-07433-LAP. The caption page opens “ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ declares under penalty of perjury that the following is true and correct”. Read at the image at 400 dpi, pp.1 and 23. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA02800947 pp.1, 23. The same paragraph appears at https://epstein-data.com/EFTA02786934 p.23 (Doc. 1218-49) and https://epstein-data.com/EFTA02794403 p.23 (Doc. 1330-4), checked page by page. ↩ ↩2

  40. Deutsche Bank “KYC Print,” page 21 of 22, printed 11 January 2018, marked “CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e).” Read at the image at 400 dpi. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA01356008 p.1. The case-comment dates print as “8/8/117,” “7/7/117” and “6/30/117” on the face of the sheet; the approval column gives 2017 dates. Two comment rows carry a barred KYC case reference. The names in this table were taken from the image and not from the text layer, which truncates “Kshitij Golani” to “Kshitij Golan/” and “Kshitij Golan’” — so a search for the surname misses the sheet and a search for the forename finds it — and reads “stewart oldfield” as “s:ewart oldfield” and “stewart afield”. “Cynthia Rodriguez” prints four times on the image and survives three times in the extraction. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5

  41. “RE: Epstein Insurance Trust,” Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 12:17:27 -0500, from a vice president in AML Compliance at Deutsche Bank to two named colleagues, marked “Classification: Public”. Read at the image at 400 dpi. The address values in the header and the telephone, fax and e-mail values beneath the signature are barred; none is reproduced here. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA01420713 p.1. The sheet prints “Bill clinton”, lower case. ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  42. Olivier Colom to Jeffrey Epstein, 5 November 2013, and Epstein’s reply. Unverified at the image; cited here only to distinguish it from the subject of this page. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA01949592 p.1. ↩

  43. Correspondence of January 2012 concerning a visit to Ivory Coast. Unverified at the image; cited here only to distinguish it from the subject of this page. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA01843361 p.1. ↩

  44. Jeffrey Epstein to Maxwell, Sent Thur 9/8/2011 10:39:46 PM, zoneless. Rendered at 400 dpi. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA01853411 p.1. ↩

  45. Boris Nikolic to Ehud Barak, copying Jeffrey Epstein, “RE: Parasight Ltd.,” Sent Fri 8/16/2013 5:59:36 AM, zoneless. Unverified at the image. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA01961765 p.1. ↩

Backlinks