home

epstein-data
Research ▼
🤖 Ask AIAI research assistant 🔎 Evidence MapFBI serial resolution 📷 Reverse Image SearchCLIP + face across 614K images 💻 Run Your OwnDownload & search locally 🔍 SearchFull-text document search
Visualize ▼
🌌AtlasSemantic map · 1.29M docs ✈Flights15,328 flights · 1991–2019 🕸NetworkFused graph · 18K people · 4 layers 🌎Global Heatmap145 countries mentioned 📈Coverage MapWhat's here ▦Grid160K photos · zoomable mosaic
Data ▼
📚Full Text Corpus1.43M docs, 2.9M pages 🗃All Databases14 searchable databases 📷Images92K analyzed photographs 🔍Scanned TextOCR text from scanned pages 🔓Recovered from RedactionsText under failed redactions 🎬Audio & VideoTranscribed media
Voices ▼
🎤DepositionsTranscribed audio & video 💬Hear from the SurvivorsSurvivors in their own words ⚖Cases53 federal & state cases 📖Cover to Cover-Up24-hour public reading ✉Wolff–Epstein Emails2,009 messages · 2009–2019
Entities Reports
News ▼
📰 NewsCoverage & reporting 🕵 SleuthsletterWeekly digest of sleuth activity 📡 Epstein Fallout Trackerepstein.observer · community ⚖ Justice MonitorArrests, charges, lawsuits, firings 🗳 Where Congress StandsEFTA votes + sourced statements
Source ▼
🏛 DOJ ProductionOfficial EFTA disclosures 📜 EFTA Law TextPublic Law 119-38 📁 Source Data (GitHub)Open source databases
🌐 Community ResourcesCurated external projects ✉ ContactGeneral · privacy · DMCA · press
❤️ Donate 🎧 Podcast

Research

🤖 Ask AI 🔎 Evidence Map 📷 Reverse Image Search 💻 Run Your Own Investigator 🔍 Search Documents

Visualize

🌌 Atlas ✈ Flights 🕸 Network 🌎 Global Heatmap 📈 Coverage Map ▦ Grid

Data

📚 Full Text Corpus 🗃 All Databases 📷 Images 🔍 Scanned Text 🔓 Recovered from Redactions 🎬 Audio & Video

Voices

🎤 Depositions 💬 Hear from the Survivors ⚖ Cases 📖 Cover to Cover-Up ✉ Wolff–Epstein Emails

Entities

👥 Entity Directory

Reports

Browse All Reports 📡 Epstein Fallout Tracker community ⚖ Justice Monitor 🗳 Where Congress Stands 📰 News 🕵 Sleuthsletter

Source

🌐 Community Resources ✉ Contact 🏛 DOJ Production 📜 EFTA Law 📁 Source Data (GitHub)
🎧 Podcast & Newsletter ❤️ Donate Privacy Policy
The signal is in who talks
One bubble per person — the silent sit on the baseline · size = number of statements · obeys the filters below.
(?)Methodology & sources
Drag a box on the plot to select · shift-drag to add.
Search depth. Sitting members and FEC-qualified 2026 candidates had a deep, multi-source search (news, press releases, the Congressional Record, and indexed posts on X). Lower-tier candidates not yet FEC-qualified had a lighter single-pass screen. Either way a blank means nothing surfaced in our search, not confirmed silence — especially for statements made only on X.
No one matches those filters.
Methodology & sources

The Epstein Files Transparency Act, across everyone on the ballot: how every current member of Congress voted, where every 2026 federal candidate stands, and a sourced record of what they've publicly said. Votes are primary-source; statements are a compiled research map, not an exhaustive record.

The vote

  • Bill: Epstein Files Transparency Act, H.R. 4405, 119th Congress.
  • House: Roll Call 289, "motion to suspend the rules and pass," passed 427–1 (Nov 18, 2025). Each member's vote is read directly from the U.S. House Clerk's official record — clerk.house.gov/evs/2025/roll289.xml.
  • Senate: passed by unanimous consent — no recorded roll call, so senators have no individual vote.
  • Not eligible: the six non-voting delegates (DC, PR, VI, GU, AS, MP) can't vote on final passage; five current House members won special elections after the vote ("not seated").
  • Roster from the open unitedstates/congress-legislators dataset, joined by Bioguide ID; candidates from the FEC 2026 candidate master file (cn26).

The statements — and what counts as one

A statement is a person personally saying or doing something about the Epstein files / the Act — a press release, floor remark, interview, tweet, or being directly quoted. A bare mention of their name does not count. There is no viewpoint filter: statements pushing for release, opposing it, or deflecting are all included equally.

  • Source of the sweep: automated search across the open web (DuckDuckGo) and news (Google News RSS) — no paid API. Each sitting member and FEC-qualified candidate got four targeted queries: general, Act-specific, their posts on X (site:x.com), and their official .gov press page. Lower-tier candidates got a single query.
  • Filtering: language models read each result and keep only items clearly attributable to that person, discarding generic "Epstein files" database/search pages, vote-tally roundups, bare profile pages, and — a frequent trap — same-named different people (a candidate "James King" is not Stephen King; "Charles Summers" is not Larry Summers). Results are then spot-checked by hand.
  • Every statement links to its source; each is tagged news / press release / X / interview / floor.

Limits — read before citing

  • Not exhaustive. A blank means "nothing surfaced in our search," not proof the person said nothing.
  • X is partial. X blocks deep indexing, so a statement made only in a tweet is often invisible to any search.
  • Summaries are drawn from source headlines — confirm the primary source and pull the exact quote before quoting anyone.
  • Candidate depth varies: deep for FEC-qualified candidates, single-pass for the rest.

Last updated Aug 30, 2026 · refreshed periodically. Corrections and additions welcome.

Method & sourcing — full methodology & reproducibility ↗

Votes are primary-source: the U.S. House Clerk's Roll Call 289 on H.R. 4405 (passed 427–1). The Senate passed by unanimous consent, so senators have no individual recorded vote; delegates cannot vote on final passage; five current members won special elections after the vote.

Statements were compiled by automated and targeted search across news, official press releases, interviews, the Congressional Record, and indexed posts on X — each links to its source. A research map, not an exhaustive record: summaries are drawn from source titles, so confirm the primary source and pull the exact quote before citing any single line. No statements listed means none were found, not that none exist.

This record is not exhaustive. A member or candidate may have made additional statements not captured here — particularly on social media or in local outlets — and a blank should be read as "none surfaced in our search," not proof of silence. Corrections and additions are welcome.

Source Data Investigation Reports DOJ EFTA Privacy Contact
Independent research project. Not affiliated with the U.S. Department of Justice, FBI, any government agency, or Anthropic. All investigation reports and analytical text on this site are AI-generated (Claude, Anthropic) and iteratively fact-checked against source documents, but may contain errors. This is not legal advice. Verify all claims against the linked EFTA source documents before citing.
Powered by Datasette  ·  ❤️ Buy me a coffee