Woody Allen

What this page does not contain

No passenger list, no manifest and no flight record. A manifest-shape screen of eight arms, each proved on a planted example with two designed negatives silent, was run over every sheet of the population. 142 of 7,955 documents fire at least one arm and 7,813 are silent. The firing set is refused in full: no passenger row, no fellow traveller, no route, no date of any flight and no identifier from it appears here. The refusal is stated as a class and a count because the set is large; naming any part of it would build an index this page has no need to build.¹

No member of his family is named, described, aged or counted on this page, and nothing any complainant said appears here in any form.¹

He almost never writes. 7,955 documents name him. 272 carry his name in the sender field, and that field is his office’s mailbox, not the man: 215 of the 272 carry an assistant’s signature block, and the remaining 57, read individually, are the office too, several of them referring to him in the third person. The whole population yields three messages in his own voice that this page can show, and they are set out below.²³

The volume is real and it is not duplication. Collapsed on the first 600 characters of each document’s normalised text, 7,955 documents reduce to 7,893 distinct ones, a ratio of 1.01 to 1, over 1,125 distinct dated days. This is not a few threads copied many times. What deflates is the authorship: 646 documents on 247 distinct days carry a sender on his office’s side, between November 2011 and November 2018.²

One spelling in the released text is wrong and this page follows the paper. The released text of two sheets quoted here reads woody alien. Read at the page image at the served file’s native 96 pixels per inch, the paper prints woody allen on both. The form reaches 898 documents in the release, 843 of them outside every correct spelling.⁴²

No telephone number, electronic address, passport number, date of birth or home address is reproduced here, his own included, and none is located or described.

Named on the documents as	Woody Allen throughout; Wood Allen in 135 documents, which on the 52 of them read for this page is the display name on his office’s mailbox; Mr Allen and Allen, Woody elsewhere. Read at the page image on two sheets, where the paper prints woody allen against a released text of woody alien42
His office, as its own signature blocks give it	MANHATTAN FILM CENTER / 575 Park Avenue / New York NY 1006556
The assistants who wrote into these files	Kathryn Sigismund, Assistant to Woody Allen, 222 documents, 2011 to 2012; Ginevra “Gini” Tamberi, same title, at the Manhattan Film Center, 90 documents; Lauren Cheung, same title, 59 documents; a Sam, who answers for the office in 2012; and a Melissa, named once by Epstein’s office as his assistant2567
How the two offices headed their mail	Each used the other principal’s name. Epstein’s office headed its messages Woody Allen; his office headed its replies Jeffrey Epstein. 545 sheets carry the first as a subject line and 312 the reply form2
The earliest document used here	23–24 November 2010. Epstein to Peggy Siegal, proposing him as a guest for Prince Andrew. Read at the page image4
The latest	15 April 2019, a message from a handle carrying his name3
What the correspondence is about	Dinners, private film screenings, walks, and two trips to Paris. Almost all of it is one office booking time with another2
In his own voice	Three messages. One of 21 May 2012, dictated to his assistant and signed Woody; two of 2019, from a handle carrying his name, one of 20 January and one of 15 April83
Response	None located. No statement by him or on his behalf about any of this has been found, and no request for one was made from here9
Not established here	That he knew of Jeffrey Epstein’s conduct or of any allegation against him; that he was told he had been proposed as a guest for Prince Andrew; that any arranged dinner, screening or walk took place, except where a sheet says so; or that he received anything of value10

Woody Allen is a film director, and he appears in the Epstein release in very large volume and almost entirely in the third person. His name reaches at least 7,955 documents. What those documents record is years of two offices arranging things: dinners at Jeffrey Epstein’s New York house, private screenings of films not yet released, walks, and two trips to Paris. His assistants wrote nearly all of it. He wrote almost none of it.²

That is the finding, and it is a different finding from an absence. Several people in this release are names in other people’s papers. He is not one of them: his office corresponded with Epstein’s office continuously for seven years, over a mailbox whose display name is his own, and the two offices were in contact often enough that his assistant could write, in February 2012, Do you talk to anybody else's assistant as much as you talk to me?!¹¹ What the record does not contain is him. Where a message from that mailbox is signed it is signed Kathryn, Gini, Lauren or Sam, except where an assistant is passing on words she says are his; where it is unsigned, it still speaks of him as somebody else, as in Unfortunately Woody is rehearsing for his musical until late so he won't be able to come.¹²

Three times the record does carry his own words, and they are set out below.

November 2010: proposed as a guest for Prince Andrew

The earliest document this page uses is an idea Jeffrey Epstein had about him, and he is not a party to it. Late on 23 November 2010 Epstein wrote to the publicist Peggy Siegal. The message has no subject line and one line of body. Read at the page image at the served file’s native 96 pixels per inch:

woody allen for prince andrew? , who is smart and today⁴

The released text of that sheet reads woody alien. The paper reads woody allen, and the two spaces before the comma are the sheet’s.⁴

Siegal’s reply is quoted on the sheet as sent at 10:00 PM on 23 November. She knew him and said so:

Woody is a great idea. Do you know Woody? I do.¹³

She then weighed how he might be managed, and closed with an inducement:

He may feel better if people he knows are around. On the other hand a royal may intrigue him.

The other thing we could do…is, I have a dvd of “The King’s Speech” and we can show it to him…but we can’t tell anyone.¹³

One sentence of her reply is not reproduced here, in any form, and nothing on this page turns on it.¹³¹

Epstein replied on the morning of 24 November about a third person Siegal had mentioned: lorinda knows me well she worked for me thirtyyears ago. The word thirtyyears is run together on the paper and is not mended here.¹³

Nothing read for this page records that he was asked, that he was told, or that any meeting with Prince Andrew was proposed to him. The exchange is between two other people about him.¹⁰

March 2012: a question about his name

Twice the record shows Jeffrey Epstein taking an interest in him away from the diary. On 18 March 2012 Epstein wrote to Warren Eisenstein, asking him to put a question to a third party about a man whose surname he had noticed:

ask frog if konigsberg. ( woody aliens last name„ was a relation to him

The sheet prints woody aliens, which is the same spelling the paper corrects to allen elsewhere, here in the possessive. The doubled comma is the sheet’s. The nickname frog is the sheet’s own and this page does not expand it. Nothing read for this page records an answer.¹⁴¹⁰

And on his birthday his office circulated a note about him, under the subject Woody Allen-FYI, quoting a search engine for his birth name. That is the only document in this release that gives his birth name, and the date of birth printed beside it is not reproduced here.¹⁴

The two offices

From late 2011 his office and Epstein’s office were in routine contact, and the shape of it is visible in the mail’s own furniture. Epstein’s office headed its messages with his name; his office headed its replies with Epstein’s. Across this population 545 sheets carry the subject line Woody Allen and 312 carry Re: Woody Allen.²

The mailbox his office wrote from carries his name as its display name, which is why this project’s index records 272 documents as sent by him. It is the office. Of those 272, 215 carry an assistant’s signature block. The 57 that do not were read one by one: they are the office as well, and several of them speak of him in the third person.²

His assistants are named on the sheets. Kathryn Sigismund is the sender of 222 documents between 2011 and 2012 and signs Assistant to Woody Allen. Ginevra Tamberi, who signs herself Gini, and Lauren Cheung both sign over a block reading MANHATTAN FILM CENTER and 575 Park Avenue. A Sam answers for the office in 2012, and Epstein’s office names a Melissa as his assistant in September 2011.²⁵⁶⁷

The released text of that one job title is damaged in at least sixteen different ways, among them Assistant to Woody Mon, Assistant to Woody Alton, Assistant to Woody Allan and Assistant to Woody Alien, against 1,927 clean renderings.²

2012: the screenings, and a physicist

The commonest single act in this record is a private screening of a film before its release, run by his office for Jeffrey Epstein.

On 6 March 2012 Kathryn Sigismund wrote to Lesley Groff under the subject Departure Time for Paris, and asked two things in one message. The second was:

Also, regarding Jeffrey’s screening on March 13th, is he planning on bringing any guests? If so, how many?¹⁵

Two years later the arrangement was still running. On 14 May 2014, from the mailbox carrying his name, his assistant wrote to Epstein under the subject Screening:

Hello Jeffrey,

I hope you are well.

I can screen next week either Tuesday or Wednesday and maybe Thursday (depends if Woody has band practice then).

Let me know.

Best, Gini⁵

That message is the whole relationship in miniature: his office, his diary, his band practice, and not a word from him.

The screenings reach other published pages here. Brad Karp attended one in May 2014 and Harry Fisch another in June 2017, and both pages set those out; this page does not repeat them.¹⁰

The one message he dictated

On 21 May 2012 his assistant forwarded Epstein a reply she said was his. Her covering line is Here is Woody's response for Jeffrey:, and under it stands a message in the first person, signed:

Dear Jeffrey,

If you ever have Brian or an equally knowledgeable quantum physicist to dinner we’d love to come and find out once and for all how the universe got started and just how long in the future it’s safe for me to make plans.

Woody⁸

Three days later Epstein’s office was still working on it, asking whether he might be free for lunch on one of three days because Jeffrey would like to have Woody come by next week to meet with a scientist friend. The answer came back that He's looking into Thursday.⁸

This page does not identify the physicist. The sheet gives a forename only, and no document read here supplies more.⁸¹⁰

2012 and 2013: two trips to Paris

Twice, Epstein’s office and his office arranged for the two parties to travel to Paris together.

The first was settled in January 2012. His assistant wrote that a 27 January trip to France would not work, that he would be interested in going in March for a longer period, and that he had named the dates himself: Woody threw out the dates March 17th to April 2nd.¹⁶ By 13 February the offices were fixing the return, and by 6 March his assistant was asking Have we finalized a departure time for Jeffrey and the Allen's trip to Paris?, so that she could tell the drivers in Paris when to expect them. The apostrophe in the Allen's is the sheet’s.¹¹¹⁵

A second Paris trip was arranged in March 2013. A separate arrangement, made in March 2012, concerned his return from Paris on an aircraft belonging to Leon Black, organised through Black’s assistant Melanie Spinella. That arrangement is set out on her page and is not repeated here.¹⁰

This page records that the travel was arranged. It records nothing about who travelled. The documents that would answer that are passenger lists, and every one of them is refused.¹

2014 to 2018: the long middle

For five years the traffic is dinners and small favours, and the acts in it belong to Epstein’s office rather than to him. His office supplied dates; Epstein’s office supplied guests.

In October 2012 Epstein’s office asked his assistant for a telephone number for our directory. No number is reproduced here and none is described.¹⁷

In August 2017 Leon Black’s assistant asked Epstein’s office for his address, writing Hi — can I please have his address — Leon wants to send him a book. Epstein’s office supplied it the same evening. The address is partly covered by the producing party on that sheet and is not reproduced, supplied or described here.¹⁸

The mail runs out in November 2018. The last document in this population with a sender on his office’s side is dated 12 November 2018.²

2019: two messages

The record does not end with the mail. Two message-extraction records carry messages from a handle labelled with his name, in January and April 2019.

On 20 January 2019, the day on which other correspondents were sending Jeffrey Epstein birthday messages, that handle sent one:

I understand it’s your birthday. Tell me exactly how much underwear you need.

Woody³

On 15 April 2019, at a stamp of 17:51:05, it sent:

Saw a big part of interview. Will complete after casting when there is some free time. Very interesting. Then we can talk.

and then, as a separate message twenty-five seconds later at 17:51:30, a single word:

Woody³

The two are not joined here, because the sheet records them as two messages. Both stamps are in the same form on the same sheet, which is why the interval between them is given.³

That handle is not always him. On 14 April 2019 the same handle sent a message about him, from his office, over his own name: I just tried calling you. I have Woody here to speak to you whenever you want.³ So the handle carries both the man and the people who work for him, and this page attributes to him only the messages written in the first person and signed.³

What this page does not establish

• That he knew anything about Jeffrey Epstein’s conduct. No document read for this page records him being told anything, asking anything, or being present at any discussion of it.¹⁰
• That he was told he had been proposed as a guest for Prince Andrew. The exchange is between two other people and no document read here records it reaching him.⁴¹⁰
• That any particular dinner, screening, walk or trip took place. The record is overwhelmingly of arrangement. Where a sheet records an outcome, this page says so; elsewhere it does not.¹⁰
• That he received anything of value from Jeffrey Epstein, or gave anything. No invoice, payment, fee or gift in either direction appears in any document read for this page.¹⁰
• Who travelled on any journey arranged here. The documents that answer it are refused.¹
• Anything about his family. No member of it is named, described, aged or counted on this page, and nothing here should be read as identifying one.¹
• It makes no allegation and records none.

How this page is scoped

Measured against the released files on 5 November 2026. The index’s size on disk was compared against its recorded value and printed before every run, every return code was read un-piped, and no empty result was turned into a zero.²

Controls printed and read in the same invocations as the counts: richard m berman returned 371 documents, matching this project’s standing figure; a token generated for the test returned 0; and an aim control on a name known to be in this material returned 15,489 documents, which is what shows the instrument was pointed at something.²

The phrase woody allen returns 7,013 documents. Adding nine further spellings takes the union to 7,888, and three more forms, found by reading documents rather than by generating variants, take it to 7,955. The union is a floor and is reported as one.²

That the floor is real was demonstrated rather than argued. wbody allen returns 13 documents of which 12 lie outside every other form, and all twelve were read: all twelve are dinner entries naming him. wnvoody allen, where a preceding word has run into his forename, returns 11 of which 3 lie outside, and all three were read. Neither form is reachable from the correct spelling by any substitution, because one is a letter swap and the other is a word join.²

The largest single addition is a recipient field. wood allen returns 135 documents of which 52 lie outside every other form, and all 52 were read: every one concerns him, his office or his films, and most are Epstein’s office writing to the mailbox whose display name the released text renders that way.²

Where two forms returned the same number, set equality was tested rather than assumed. This project’s index discards punctuation, so allen, woody and allen woody are one set, not two, and w allen and w. allen likewise.²

The bare surname is a different population and was sampled, not assumed. allen returns 9,616 documents. 2,581 of them lay outside the nine-form union, and against the final union the residue is 2,514. A sample of forty was drawn from the larger residue on a total ordering of the identifier strings under a fixed seed; the draw was run twice and the two outputs proved byte-identical at 47,244 bytes with no differing identifier, and all forty were read.

Four of the forty concern him, and three of those four are the documents the three additional spellings then captured. That is how those spellings were found: by reading the residue rather than by generating variants. The fourth is refused. The remaining thirty-six are other bearers: Paul Allen in a university signature block (7), Booz Allen Hamilton (5), a town in Texas in a credit-reference address (3), Allen & Company (3), a Swiss news correspondent in a tax report’s footnotes (2), and one each of a bank, an aircraft support manager, a sales director, a shopper, a courier’s signature, a New Mexico candidate, an FBI programme manager, a compliance distribution list, a case citation, an artist, a medical director, a physiatrist, a 1980s company treasurer, a street name, a bare forename in a refused document, and a man whose middle name is Allen and who is not him. A sample measures the sample: four of forty is not a rate, and no population figure is derived from it here.²¹

Classification is this project’s own labelling and is quoted as such, and on this population the labels are wrong. The index types 6,227 of these documents as mail headers at a mean of 1.6 sheets. Read, they are not headers: they carry full message bodies, and a further 168 typed as property lists are complete emails with a metadata block appended. No act fraction is derived from those labels anywhere on this page.²

Six sheets were read at the page image. Four cited documents were absent from all four of this project’s local stores, which is a statement about this project’s disk and not about what exists; each was then fetched read-only, one request at a time, from the site’s own per-document path. Every batch carried a negative control, which returned HTTP 403 at 111 bytes, while every target returned HTTP 200 and a file beginning %PDF-. Each page count matches this project’s row count for that document exactly, and both rendered documents are served at a native 96 pixels per inch; every reading is taken from the native raster and none from an upsampled render.⁴¹³

Two sheets carry a printed stamp at the foot in a numbering series different from the identifier that addresses the document. The two series are not converted into one another and neither is used as an address.⁴¹³

Where this page gives a sheet number it is the served number, counting from one. This project’s index numbers sheets from zero, and that numbering is not used here.

Pins, weekdays and intervals were checked arithmetically. 23 November 2010 was a Tuesday and 24 November a Wednesday. One interval is derived on this page and one only: twenty-five seconds between two message stamps printed in the same form on the same sheet. No other interval is derived, because the sheets print times in forms that are not on one clock: the same November 2010 message appears on two copies with printed send times five hours apart, and no clock time is asserted as the time of any message.⁴¹³³

Related

• Jeffrey Epstein, the other party to every exchange on this page
• Lesley Groff, who wrote most of the messages from Epstein’s side
• Peggy Siegal, to whom the November 2010 proposal was made
• Leon Black, whose aircraft was offered for a return from Paris and who sent a book in 2017
• Melanie Spinella, Black’s assistant, whose page carries the 2012 flight arrangement
• Brad Karp and Harry Fisch, each of whom attended a screening his office arranged
• Joel Klein, who was invited to a birthday dinner for him and declined
• Kathryn Ruemmler and David Blaine, named on dinner schedules alongside him
• 9 East 71st Street, where most of the dinners were to be held

Notes

Footnotes

1. What was refused, and why. A manifest-shape screen of eight arms (passenger, manifest, pax, souls on board, persons on board, seat number, tail number, flight log) was built for this page, proved on eight planted examples with two designed negatives silent, and run over every sheet of all 7,955 documents. It returned hits in 142 documents; the other 7,813 are silent. The whole firing set is refused, and nothing from any of it is quoted, summarised, characterised, counted or identified here. The refusal is stated as a class and a count rather than by identifier because the set is large and naming any part of it beside what it contains would build an index this page has no need to build; no date, route, aircraft or party from it appears anywhere above. Further documents are refused on protection grounds and are not identified. Among them is a 2016 thread in which Epstein’s office recruited guests to appear on a film set, which identifies a young private individual still in education; no attribute of that person appears here: no name, no initial, no age, no measurement, no place and no time, and the act itself is not written up, because the page already establishes the access it would show. Also refused, for the same reason, is a 2016 introduction made by his office at Epstein’s request. In the residue sample, one of the forty documents drawn is a first-person complainant account in which the matching word is a bare forename belonging to someone else entirely. It is refused in full and is not identified, and it is counted in the bearer breakdown only as “a bare forename in a refused document”. One further document is refused on two independent grounds and is not cited. The refusals were decided by measurement and not by impression: every screen was run over the whole population before anything was written, and the firing sets were separated from the silent ones before any document was used. What refusing them costs the page is stated plainly: it costs the question of who travelled with whom, which this page therefore does not answer. ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴ ↩⁵ ↩⁶ ↩⁷

2. Measured against the released files on 5 November 2026. Document counts are distinct identifiers in this project’s full-text index. The index’s size on disk was compared against its recorded value of 10,982,875,136 bytes and printed before every run; the comparison matched on every run, and a second file of the same name elsewhere on this machine is 0 bytes and was not used. Controls printed and read in the same invocations: richard m berman 371 documents, matching this project’s standing figure; zzqxw7 allen and wqzxy allen, tokens confirmed to return nothing before they were used, 0; aim control ghislaine maxwell 15,489 documents. Forms tried and their returns, in documents: woody allen 7,013 · woody alien 898 · allen, woody 99 · allen woody 99 · wood allen 135 · mr allen 112 · woody alen 11 · woody a 65 · w allen 9 · w. allen 9 · wbody allen 13 · wnvoody allen 11 · woodyallen 6 · vvoody allen 5 · woodv allen 3 · wallen 3 · woody allens 2 · woody ailen 1 · vetwoody allen 1 · all en 25 · konigsberg 31 · bare allen 9,616. Returning nothing: allen konigsberg, heywood allen, vyoody allen, woodv alien, woody aiien, vvoody alien, woody allen jr, nvoody allen, woodyallen and, wooay allen. Set equality: allen, woody and allen woody are one set and w allen and w. allen are one set, because the index discards punctuation; the possessive returns 691 documents, all inside the base. The union: the base plus nine damaged renderings gives 7,888; three further forms read and verified at the documents (wood allen, wbody allen, wnvoody allen, plus the single vetwoody allen) give 7,955. Deflation: collapsed on the first 600 normalised characters of each document, 7,955 documents give 7,893 distinct fingerprints, a ratio of 1.01 to 1, largest duplicate cluster 4; 19,865 occurrences of the name across the population sit in 17,608 distinct 140-character contexts, the most-replicated appearing 21 times. Dates: 1,125 distinct days carry a date in this project’s index; 1,112 documents carry none. The sender census: 272 documents carry his name in the sender field; of these 215 carry an assistant’s signature block or forename sign-off and 57 do not, and all 57 were read. A wider set including his named assistants gives 646 documents on 247 distinct days, 17 November 2011 to 12 November 2018, distributed by year 2011:13 · 2012:255 · 2013:111 · 2014:115 · 2015:37 · 2016:88 · 2017:21 · 2018:3 · undated:3. Classification: this project’s index types the population email.header 6,227 · phone.extraction 435 · calendar 371 · untyped 170 · plist 168 · email.footer_only 160 · email.chain 66 · email.body 45 · news_clipping 44 and 36 further labels. Those labels were checked against the sheets and they are wrong here: documents typed as mail headers carry full message bodies, and documents typed as property lists are complete emails with a metadata block appended. No act fraction is taken from them. Job-title renderings: Assistant to Woody Allen 1,927, against at least fifteen damaged forms including Woody Mon 82, Woody Men 55, Woody Alton 49, Woody Allon 30, Woody Allan 24, Woody Anon 23 and Woody Alien 17. Subject lines: Woody Allen 545 sheets, Re: Woody Allen 312. The residue sample: 2,581 documents carry the bare surname outside the base plus nine damaged renderings, and 2,514 outside the final union of 7,955; forty were drawn from the larger of those two residues on a total ordering of the identifier strings under a fixed seed, the draw was run twice and the two outputs were byte-identical at 47,244 bytes with zero differing identifiers, and all forty were read. Register check: every identifier cited on this page was run against this project’s registers in one invocation with a known-barred positive control, which returned its bar; none of the cited identifiers is in any register, which on this corpus is the ordinary answer and is not a clearance. A fraud-class screen of seven arms, every shape proved on its own planted positive, was run over the whole population: bank account 0, routing 0, SWIFT 0, and the four further arms’ matches were read and classed as a survey code, a search-engine parameter, a message-range counter and a case-number fragment; one further match sits on a document this page refuses and does not cite. No value of any kind is reproduced, described or located anywhere on this page, and 0 barred identifiers appear on it against a planted control of the same shape that returns 1. ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴ ↩⁵ ↩⁶ ↩⁷ ↩⁸ ↩⁹ ↩¹⁰ ↩¹¹ ↩¹² ↩¹³ ↩¹⁴ ↩¹⁵ ↩¹⁶ ↩¹⁷ ↩¹⁸ ↩¹⁹ ↩²⁰ ↩²¹

3. Two message-extraction records of 2019. The birthday message is at EFTA01211646 served p. 14, stamped 2019-01-20 22:34:59, sender labelled with his name, signed Woody. The April messages are at EFTA00784441 served p. 9, stamped 2019-04-15 17:51:05 and 2019-04-15 17:51:30, the second consisting of the single word Woody. The message in which the same handle speaks of him in the third person is at EFTA00784423 served p. 7, stamped 2019-04-14 11:55:02. Released text only; none of these sheets was read at the page image. From them this page takes the three quoted messages and the fact that the handle also carries messages written by somebody else about him. The two April messages are not joined: the sheet records them as separate entries twenty-five seconds apart, and the interval is derived only because both stamps are printed in the same form on the same sheet by the same extraction. The handle’s own identifying value is covered on these sheets and is not supplied, described or located here, and no participant value of any kind is reproduced. Nothing else on any of these sheets is quoted, summarised or characterised, and in particular no message to or from any other participant is used. That the handle is his is this page’s reading of the sender label and the first-person sign-off, and it is stated as that rather than as a fact established by any document. ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴ ↩⁵ ↩⁶ ↩⁷ ↩⁸ ↩⁹

4. Jeffrey Epstein to Peggy Siegal, Sent: Wed 11/24/2010 1:32:06 AM, no subject line, one sheet. EFTA01980585 p. 1 of 1. Read at the page image. Fetched read-only from the site’s own per-document path on 5 November 2026: HTTP 200, 47,062 bytes, a file beginning %PDF- of one page against this project’s one row for it, with a negative control fetched in the same call returning HTTP 403 at 111 bytes; pdfimages -list reports the native resolution as 96 pixels per inch and the reading here is taken from that raster, 816 by 1073 pixels, greyscale. From this sheet this page takes the single line of body text, whole, and the fact that the sheet carries no subject line. The released text of this sheet reads woody alien; the paper prints woody allen, and the paper governs. The two spaces before the comma are the sheet’s. The recipient’s electronic address is covered by the producing party on this sheet and is not supplied, described or located here. The sheet carries nothing handwritten, nothing rotated and nothing in its margins; the lower two thirds are blank paper. The foot of the sheet carries a printed stamp in a numbering series different from the identifier that addresses the document; the two are not converted into one another. The Sent: line carries no zone, and a second printing of the same message gives its time in a different form five hours apart; no interval is derived and no clock time is asserted as the time of this message. ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴ ↩⁵ ↩⁶ ↩⁷ ↩⁸ ↩⁹

5. From the mailbox whose display name carries his name, Sent Wed 5/14/2014 3:05:47 PM, subject Screening, one sheet. EFTA01928252 p. 1 of 1. Released text only; this sheet was not read at the page image. From it this page takes the message whole, including the sign-off Gini and the signature block giving Ginevra Tamberi, Assistant to Woody Allen, MANHATTAN FILM CENTER and 575 Park Avenue. The block’s telephone and facsimile lines are not reproduced, described or located. This is a business address and is given because the documents give it; no residential address of any person appears on this page. ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴

6. Lauren Cheung to Jeffrey Epstein, Sent Wednesday, November 2, 2016 1:04:30 PM, two sheets. EFTA01739025 p. 1. Released text only; this sheet was not read at the page image. From this sheet this page takes ONLY the signature block, giving Lauren Cheung, Assistant to Woody Allen, MANHATTAN FILM CENTER and 575 Park Avenue. Nothing else on the sheet is quoted, summarised, characterised or counted: the message itself concerns an introduction made at Epstein’s request on behalf of a young private individual, and that individual is not named, described or alluded to anywhere on this page, nor is the introduction written up. The electronic addresses on the sheet are not reproduced, described or located. ↩ ↩² ↩³

7. Lesley Groff to Jeffrey Epstein, Sent Tue 9/27/2011 7:23:16 PM, subject Re: re Woody Allen's play/oct 20th, one sheet. EFTA02020029 p. 1 of 1. Released text only; this sheet was not read at the page image. From it this page takes only the fact that Epstein’s office named a Melissa as his assistant in September 2011. The message’s own forwarded content comes from a third party’s assistant and nothing from it is reproduced here. The sheet’s covering line attributes the forwarded message to his assistant while the forwarded message itself is signed by a different person at a different firm; this page does not resolve that inconsistency and takes from the sheet only the name and the date. ↩ ↩²

8. Kathryn Sigismund to Lesley Groff, On May 21, 2012, at 3:18 PM, forwarded inside a chain of 24 May 2012, three sheets. EFTA00412214 served p. 3. Released text only; this sheet was not read at the page image, and this page asserts nothing about what any producing party has done to it. From this sheet this page takes her covering line Here is Woody's response for Jeffrey:, the four lines of the message beneath it including the sign-off, whole; and, from the chain above it, Lesley Groff’s request that he come by next week to meet with a scientist friend and the answer He's looking into Thursday. The physicist is given a forename only on this sheet and this page does not supply a surname or identify him. A further printing of the same message is at EFTA00412579; it was not read at the page image, nothing here rests on it, and no comparison between printings was made or is reported. This is one of three messages on this page attributed to him in his own voice, and the attribution rests on his assistant’s own covering sentence and on the first-person sign-off. ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴

9. No response from Woody Allen, or from anyone on his behalf, has been located. No statement, denial or comment by him about any document on this page has been found in the released files or in any source consulted for it. A response is not recorded as absent because he declined to give one. No request was made from here; the finding is only that none has been located. ↩

10. Statements of absence on this page are scoped to the documents read and returned for it, and to a search of the released files run on 5 November 2026 under the forms listed at ². They are not claims about what the release holds and they are not claims about the world. In each case the control that shows the query could have found the thing is named at ²: the firing control returning 371 documents, the aim control returning 15,489, and the invented tokens returning 0. Specifically: no document recording that he was told he had been proposed as a guest for Prince Andrew was located; no invoice, payment, fee or gift in either direction between him and Jeffrey Epstein was located; no document recording that any particular arranged dinner, screening, walk or trip took place was located, except where a sheet quoted above says so; and no document recording him being told of, asking about, or present at any discussion of Jeffrey Epstein’s conduct was located. Unmeasured, and therefore not stated as a negative: what the refused documents contain; whether he appears in these files under a project name, a production name or an institutional handle that never spells his name; and whether damage to the first four letters of his surname hides further documents, a shape that was not tested. ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴ ↩⁵ ↩⁶ ↩⁷ ↩⁸ ↩⁹ ↩¹⁰

11. Kathryn Sigismund to Lesley Groff, Date: February 13, 2012 6:57:34 PM EST, subject Return Date from Paris, forwarded to Epstein the same night, one sheet. EFTA02006697 p. 1 of 1. Released text only; this sheet was not read at the page image. From it this page takes her parenthetical remark, whole, and the fact that the message concerns fixing a return from Paris. The remainder of the message names a private individual and is not reproduced here. Her signature block renders her title as Assistant to Woody AJlon on this sheet, which is extraction damage and is recorded rather than mended. ↩ ↩²

12. A reply of Mon 12/10/2012 3:34:03 PM carrying, in its quoted block, a message of Dec 10, 2012, at 10:31 AM sent from the mailbox carrying his name, under the subject Re: Lunch today with Jeffrey Epstein & Leon Botstein?. EFTA02152863 p. 1. Released text only; this sheet was not read at the page image. From it this page takes the one quoted clause, which is offered as evidence that the mailbox speaks of him in the third person and therefore is not him. The quotation stops where the sheet’s line ends; the sentence continues on the sheet and nothing in its continuation bears on the point made here. The sender’s name is covered on this sheet and is not supplied; this page does not say which assistant wrote it. ↩

13. Jeffrey Epstein to Peggy Siegal, Sent: Wed 11/24/2010 9:52:19 AM, Subject: Re:, two sheets, carrying her reply of Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:00 PM and his original beneath it. EFTA01980690 p. 1. Read at the page image, fetched read-only in the same call as the control described at ⁴: HTTP 200, 105,132 bytes, two pages against this project’s two rows, native 96 pixels per inch. From this sheet this page takes Epstein’s one line of 24 November, whole; three spans of Siegal’s reply, each quoted as a contiguous run; and the fact that the quoted original prints woody allen on the paper here too, which is a second and independently produced sheet carrying the same reading. The run-together thirtyyears is the sheet’s and is not mended. The multiple spaces inside Siegal’s sentences are the sheet’s. The straight double quotation marks around the film title are the sheet’s. The released text of this sheet renders the film title’s first word as ihe; the paper prints The, and the paper governs. That is the second place on these two sheets where the released text and the paper disagree, the first being the subject’s own surname, and in both the paper was followed. One sentence of Siegal’s reply is not reproduced here in any form, and no characterisation of it is given. Siegal’s characterisation of a third party is also not reproduced, being one person’s aside about someone who is not the subject of this page. The electronic addresses on this sheet are covered by the producing party and are not supplied, described or located. The sheet carries nothing handwritten and nothing rotated. The foot carries a printed stamp in a numbering series different from the addressing identifier. The quoted original’s Sent: line reads Tue Nov 23 20:32:06 2010 while the other copy’s own header reads Wed 11/24/2010 1:32:06 AM; the two are different renderings of one message and this page derives no interval from them and asserts neither as the time of sending. ↩ ↩² ↩³ ↩⁴ ↩⁵ ↩⁶ ↩⁷

14. Jeffrey Epstein to Warren Eisenstein, Sent Sun 3/18/2012 10:32:44 PM, no subject line, one sheet. EFTA01838949 p. 1 of 1. Released text only; this sheet was not read at the page image. From it this page takes the one quoted line, whole. The doubled comma and the spelling woody aliens are the sheet’s and are not mended; aliens here is the possessive of the damaged spelling, and no correction is asserted for this sheet because it was not opened at the image. The nickname in the message is the sheet’s own and is not expanded, and the third party it refers to is not identified here. Six further printings of the same message are in the release; none was read at the page image and no comparison between printings was made or is reported. The birthday note is EFTA02414485 p. 1 of 1, subject Woody Allen-FYI, released text only; from it this page takes only the fact that the note was circulated and that it quotes a search engine for his birth name. The date of birth printed on that sheet is not reproduced, partially reproduced or described here, and no year is given. ↩ ↩²

15. Kathryn Sigismund to Lesley Groff, Date: March 6, 2012 3:01:00 PM EST, subject Departure Time for Paris, forwarded to Epstein under the subject Woody Allen, one sheet. EFTA01843818 p. 1 of 1. Released text only; this sheet was not read at the page image. From it this page takes two quoted spans, the question about a departure time and the question about guests at the screening of 13 March. The apostrophe in the Allen's trip is the sheet’s and is not corrected. No name of any traveller is taken from this sheet and none appears above. ↩ ↩²

16. Kathryn Sigismund to Lesley Groff, Date: January 9, 2012 3:27:02 PM EST, forwarded to Epstein by Lesley Groff under the subject Woody Allen, one sheet. EFTA02006755 p. 1 of 1. Released text only; this sheet was not read at the page image. From it this page takes one quoted sentence, Woody threw out the dates March 17th to April 2nd., and, in this page’s own words and not as a quotation, the substance of the sentence before it: that a 27 January trip to France would not work and that he was interested in going in March for a longer period. That sentence is given in summary rather than quoted because it names a private individual, and summarising it rather than stopping the quotation short is what keeps the counter-proposal intact. Her signature block renders her title as Assistant to Woody Allan on this sheet. ↩

17. Epstein’s office to the mailbox carrying his name, Sent Thur 10/11/2012 4:33:52 PM, subject Jeffrey Epstein, one sheet. EFTA02156874 p. 1 of 1. Released text only; this sheet was not read at the page image. From it this page takes only the fact that Epstein’s office asked his office for a telephone number for a directory it kept. No number stands on this sheet and none is reproduced, described or located here. The sender’s name is covered on this sheet and is not supplied. ↩

18. Melanie Spinella to Epstein’s office, Sent: Thur 8/17/2017 8:04:56 PM, subject Wood Allen, and the reply of the same evening, Sent: Thur 8/17/2017 8:31:46 PM, one sheet each. EFTA02220144 p. 1 of 1 and EFTA02220164 p. 1 of 1. Released text only; neither sheet was read at the page image. From them this page takes her one quoted sentence and the fact that Epstein’s office answered the same evening. The address supplied in the reply is partly covered by the producing party on that sheet and is not reproduced, completed, described or located here. Her signature block gives her employer and a business address, which are not reproduced here because nothing on this page turns on them. ↩