Epstein Data Wiki

Peggy Siegal

Properties2
tagsperson, new-york, publicist, public-relations, epstein-finances, gotham-awards
aliasesPeggy Siegal

26 min read

OccupationPublicist. The invoices issued in her name bill for “PR Services”; the books of the company that carried her work run “Event Fee”, “Admin fee” and “Reimb. Expenses” as its income lines12
Three firm names in these documents”Peggy Siegal Inc.”; “waggingtail entertainment limited”, also written “Waggingtail Entertainment Ltd.”; and “The Peggy Siegal Company”123
Address on the firm’s own invoices900 Broadway, Suite 400, New York City 10003, April and June 201114
Address her office gave for an invoice750 Lexington Avenue, 5th Floor, New York, New York 10022, November 20173
Billed to”HRBK Associates … ATTN: Rich Kahn”, April 28 and June 22, 2011, $8,000 and $25,00014
In Epstein’s filesA quarter-by-quarter analysis of “peggy siegal co billings” that Epstein forwarded to her in July 2009; draft financial statements of Peggy Siegal Inc for the nine months to September 30, 2011; Waggingtail Entertainment Ltd.’s profit and loss by class for 2011; and a draft 2016 living trust naming her as grantor and trustee5678
The split the accounts record”PEGGY SIEGAL DUE 60%” of the excess of revenues over expenses; the profit and loss statement writes it “PS 60%” and “BB 40%”67

Peggy Siegal is a New York publicist. Three published pages on this wiki record what she did for Jeffrey Epstein as an event fixer: assembling guest lists, placing his account of a lawsuit with a reporter, and passing a documentary project up the chain to Steve Bannon. A fourth, on Prince Andrew, records not an act of hers but a question put to her: in February 2011 a Daily Beast journalist put it to Siegal that she had helped organise a dinner for the prince, and no answer from her to that appears in what those pages record.9 This page is about the other side of that relationship, which those pages do not carry: the invoices, the accounts and the donation paperwork. Her firm sent numbered invoices to the accountancy firm that handled his affairs; Epstein forwarded her an analysis of her own company’s billings; and his files hold her company’s draft financial statements, its profit-and-loss reports, and a draft of her personal living trust. In 2017 he told a fundraiser to issue the invoice and contribution letter for his own donation to her company rather than to him, in the words “just send to peggy. you her co . its better for her”, and then, five days later, reversed it.1011

Three names for one operation

The documents read here use three firm names, and they are not interchangeable.

The invoices are issued on a single letterhead that carries two of them stacked: “waggingtail enterainment limited”, the misspelling being the letterhead’s, above “Peggy Siegal Inc.”, with the address 900 Broadway, Suite 400, New York City 10003.1 The foot of the same sheet instructs: “PLEASE MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO waggingtail entertainment limited”.1 So the trading name on the paper is hers and the payee is Waggingtail.

The accounts keep the two apart in the same way. Waggingtail Entertainment Ltd.’s “Profit & Loss by Class” for January through March 2011 runs a single class headed “PpS”, whose income block is headed “Peggy Siegal Income” and runs “Event Fee” 441,384.74, “Admin fee” 8,128.50 and “Reimb. Expenses” 30,426.54, totalling 479,939.78, and whose expense block is headed “Peggy Siegal”.2 At its foot the statement divides the quarter’s net income of 256,665.03 as “PS 60% $153,999.02” and “BB 40% $102,666.01”.7 Peggy Siegal Inc’s own statements for the nine months to September 30, 2011, compiled by Scheer & Rubinstein, CPA’s, LLP of White Plains, New York, carry a supplementary schedule headed “ALLOCATION BETWEEN PEGGY SIEGAL AND BRYAN BANTRY”, which puts revenues in excess of expenses at $493,372 and “PEGGY SIEGAL DUE 60%” at $296,023.126 The same schedule lists twenty-nine dated “PAYMENTS TO PEGGY SIEGAL PER WAGGINGTAIL THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2011” totalling $309,531, which is $13,508 more than the 60 per cent share the sheet computes.6

The third name appears in 2017, when an invoice had to be made out. Asked by the Independent Filmmaker Project what to put on a donation letter, Siegal’s office answered: “Company Name: The Peggy Siegal Company / Contact Name: Peggy Siegal / Address: 750 Lexington Avenue 5th Floor New York, New York 10022.”3

An accountant’s signature block in the file ties the operation together from the other end: it reads “Katia Goldin / Accountant / Bryan Bantry, Inc / Waggingtail Entertainment Ltd”.13

Invoices to Epstein’s side of the table

Cannes, March 2010. On March 3, 2010 a message headed “Cannes 2010 Budget and invoice”, with a PDF attached named “10003PSCannes2010.pdf”, was sent from Deanna Romeo, over a signature block reading “Deanna M. Romeo / waggingtail entertainment limited / Peggy Siegal Inc.”14 The body opens “Jeffrey and Rich,”; the message’s To: line is blacked out on the image, and this page does not say who was in it.14 It reads: “At Peggy’s request, following is the estimated budget for her Cannes trip in a few weeks.”14 The itemisation is “Hotel $13,700 / Airfare $6,944 / Transportation (car in Cannes) $12,000 / Food/Misc Expenses $5,000”, and “Total: $37,644”; the four lines add to the total as printed.14 It closes: “This budget is based on today’s Euro rate of exchange. We have already given a credit card and they would like to charge ASAP. We should be okay if we can receive payment soon.”14 The sheet gives no title for the sender and none is supplied here.

PR services, 2011. Two numbered invoices on the Waggingtail/Peggy Siegal Inc. letterhead are addressed to “HRBK Associates … ATTN: Rich Kahn”. Invoice PSI 1102, dated April 28, 2011, bills “EVENT NAME: PR Services / EVENT DATE: 4/27/2011” at $8,000.00, with an “Administrative Fee (5%)” line entered at $0.00.1 Invoice PSI 1103, dated June 22, 2011, gives the same event name and the same event date and bills $25,000.00, again with the administrative fee at $0.00.4 Both carry the terms “PAYABLE UPON RECEIPT” and the warning that “A 2% LATE CHARGE WILL BE ADDED TO ALL INVOICES NOT PAID WITHIN 10 DAYS”.14 The firm named on these invoices is spelled “HRBK”; the firm’s own correspondence in this release spells it HBRK Associates Inc., and HBRK Associates is where Richard Kahn wrote from.15

Epstein holding her company’s numbers

On July 14, 2009 Epstein forwarded to Siegal a message whose body is a quarter-by-quarter analysis of her own company’s billings. The header of his covering message reads “To: Peggy Siegal / From: Jeffrey Epstein”; the forwarded message’s own From field is blacked out on the image, and no sender is named here.5

The analysis is headed “peggy siegal co billings” and its figures are in thousands. It gives half-year totals, “2009 1st and 2nd Q = 351k / 2008 1st and 2nd Q = 446k / 2007 1st and 2nd Q = 650k / 2006 1st and 2nd Q = 410k”, then a quarter-by-quarter comparison with an expense figure in brackets against each quarter, then “yearly totals / 2008 = 1,403 down 221k from 2007 / 2007 = 1,624 up 429 from 2006 / 2006 = 1,195”.5 Read as thousands, the 2008 year is about $1.4 million and 2007 about $1.6 million. The individual 2008 quarters printed above, 235.5, 210.5, 291 and 656, add to 1,393, ten short of the 1,403 the sheet gives as the year; the sheet’s own difference line (“down 221k from 2007”) is computed from 1,403.5 The last line of the analysis reads “bryan bantry begins with peggy 2005 4th Q 246”, which sets the start of the series one year before the earliest year it totals.5

Two years later a fuller set of her books was in the same file, and it was assembled in a single autumn. Waggingtail’s profit-and-loss reports for the 2011 quarters were printed on 10/27/11; its payment register, printed on 10/31/11, lists thirty-four payments to Peggy Siegal Inc. between 01/13/2011 and 10/24/2011, each posted against “Accounts Payable” and split to “WAGGING TAIL ENT. LTD.”, totalling 404,781.56.216 On November 14, 2011 Scheer & Rubinstein wrote to “Ms. Peggy Siegal / Peggy Siegal Inc.” to “confirm and specify the terms of our engagement of the services we are to provide for Peggy Siegal Inc. for the nine months ended September 30, 2011,” listing among the client’s own responsibilities “designing and implementing programs and controls to prevent and detect fraud.”17 The compilation report that followed is dated November 15, 2011 and addressed “To The Stockholder / Peggy Siegal Inc.”; every sheet of that set of financial statements carries a diagonal DRAFT watermark, which the machine text of those pages does not reproduce.1812 The compilation report states in terms what it is not: “We have not audited or reviewed the accompanying financial statements and, accordingly, do not express an opinion or provide any assurance about whether the financial statements are in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America,” and “Management has elected to omit substantially all of the disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, including the statements of cash flows.”18

A fortnight later Siegal moved her tax papers herself. On November 29, 2011 she forwarded a message headed “Fwd: 2009-2010 tax returns”, with four PDFs attached whose file names are those of her personal and corporate returns for 2009 and 2010, to two addresses that are blacked out on the image.13 The message she forwarded, from the accountant named above, reads “Hi Peggy, Your 2009-2010 tax returns are attached”; beneath it sits an earlier message from the same accountant, dated November 21, 2011 and labelled EST, which reads: “I am not sending those returns to Peggy’s assistant / if Peggy needs them we can messenger her all her paperwork we currently have in the office”.13

Nothing read here shows how any of this material reached the Epstein production. No covering message appears within these documents, and this page does not supply one.

The Gotham Awards donation, 2015 to 2017

The Independent Filmmaker Project ran an annual awards ceremony, the IFP Gotham Awards. Its associate director of development, Steven Pfeiffer, dealt with Epstein through Siegal.19

2016. On November 23, 2016 Pfeiffer wrote to Siegal: “It was brought to my attention that we had not yet sent to you this year’s Jeffrey Epstein donation invoice. I have issued the new invoice for 2016, which is attached here.”20 Siegal replied the same day: “I thought Joana and Lesley in Jeffrey’s office already took care of the invoice for $10,000 for the ballroom chairs for the gala.” Her next line, as printed on the image, is “If not,” followed by a blacked-out name, then ”, Jeffrey’s assistant will process it on Monday.” She signed off “xoxo Peggy” and added: “Joane…where am I sitting this year. / You always find a great seat for me.”20 Pfeiffer answered: “I believe the previous invoice that was sent was the outstanding one from 2015. This one is for this year’s ceremony,” and asked the IFP business office to confirm; the reply, signed “Mitch”, came back: “Thanks Steven. Yes that is correct. / The invoice from the 2015 Gotham’s is still outstanding.”20

2017. On November 16, 2017 Pfeiffer wrote to Epstein at 1:36 p.m.: “As per Peggy Siegal’s office, I have included here the invitation to the IFP Gotham Awards ceremony, which will be held on Monday, November 27 at Cipriani Wall Street in New York City.”1921 At 3:26 p.m. Epstein replied: “happy to buy your 10k of chairs and will need me plus 3 seats.”19 At 3:38 p.m. Pfeiffer asked for the billing details: “If you or someone in your office could provide the information below, I can send along an invoice and contribution letter for your $10K donation toward the chairs,” followed by four blank fields for a company name, a contact name and two address lines.10 Two minutes later, at 3:40 p.m., Epstein answered Pfeiffer and Siegal together, in one line: “just send to peggy. you her co . its better for her”.10 At 4:23 p.m. Pfeiffer turned to Siegal: “So, Peggy, if you could just let me know what info to include on the donation letter and invoice, I’ll send that along your way.”3

The answer came from Siegal’s own address on November 20, marked “Importance: High”, signed “Rebecca”, and gave the company name, contact name and address of The Peggy Siegal Company.3

That contradicted what Epstein’s accountant had already told the same fundraiser. On November 17 Richard Kahn had written: “The foundation that will be making this contribution is: Gratitude America Ltd. / 6100 Red Hook Quarter, B3 / St Thomas, USVI 00802 / please send all correspondence including invoice to me via email.”15 On the evening of November 20 Pfeiffer put the conflict to Kahn: “But perhaps you can clarify something for me before I put all this together for the donation. Jeffrey Epstein had asked to submit the letter and invoice to Peggy Siegal instead, and she had supplied different information than below. / Please advice how best to proceed.”22 At 8:29 a.m. Eastern on November 21 Kahn asked Epstein directly, “is gratitude paying for IFP or pegg[y]? / please advise / thank you”, and fifteen minutes later, at 8:44 a.m. Eastern, Epstein’s whole reply was one word: “gratitude”.11

So the instruction to bill the donation to her company was given on November 16, acted on by her office on November 20, questioned by the charity’s fundraiser the same evening, and withdrawn by Epstein on November 21 in favour of Gratitude America Ltd., his own foundation. Whether any invoice or contribution letter was in fact issued to The Peggy Siegal Company in 2017 is not established by the documents read for this page.

A draft trust, 2016

The release also holds a twenty-seven-sheet draft trust agreement whose first sheet carries the top line “Draft 5.9.16” and names the instrument in its body, “This trust shall be known as: THE PEGGY SIEGAL 2016 LIVING TRUST”.8 It is made “between PEGGY SIEGAL … (hereinafter called the ‘Grantor’), and PEGGY SIEGAL … and her successor(s) IN TRUST (hereinafter called the ‘Trustees’)”, and records that “Contemporaneously herewith, Grantor has transferred to the Trustees One Hundred ($100.00) Dollars in cash.”8 It is a draft and it was not executed: the day and month of the agreement are left blank on the first sheet, and on the signature sheet the rule above the typed line “PEGGY SIEGAL, Grantor and Trustee” is empty, and empty rather than redacted.23 The instrument’s beneficiaries are private individuals and are not named here.

What these documents do not show

  • They do not name the author of the 2009 billings analysis. The forwarded message’s sender field is redacted on the image, and this page attributes the analysis to no one.
  • They do not show how Peggy Siegal Inc’s draft financial statements, Waggingtail’s profit-and-loss reports, its check register or the draft living trust came into the Epstein production. No covering message appears within them.
  • They do not show whether the 2011 invoices to HRBK Associates were paid, or what the “PR Services” of April 27, 2011 consisted of.
  • They do not show whether a 2017 invoice or contribution letter was issued to The Peggy Siegal Company, nor whether the 2015 Gotham Awards invoice was ever settled.
  • Nothing on this page is a finding of wrongdoing by any person or company named on it.

How this page was searched

The full-text index was queried by phrase, not by scan: “Peggy Siegal Company” returns 892 page hits, “waggingtail” 98 and “Peggy Siegal Inc” 74. Her name alone returns 8,136 pages, most of them copy lines and letterheads, and this page is built only on documents she writes, signs, is billed for or is the formal subject of.

See also

Notes

Footnotes

  1. Invoice PSI 1102, April 28, 2011, on the letterhead “waggingtail enterainment limited / Peggy Siegal Inc.,” addressed to HRBK Associates for the attention of Rich Kahn. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00611510 p.1. Read from the page image by the writer at 2026-09-09T18:48Z. Account and routing details, a tax identification number, and telephone and facsimile lines belong to the classes this wiki does not reproduce, and none of them is reproduced here. The letterhead’s spelling of “enterainment” is as printed. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6 ↩7 ↩8

  2. “Waggingtail Entertainment Ltd. / Profit & Loss by Class / January through March 2011,” printed 10/27/11. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00601818 p.1. Read from the page image by the writer at 2026-09-09T18:55Z. The single class column is headed “PpS”. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  3. Steven Pfeiffer’s message of November 16, 2017 at 4:23 p.m. and the reply of November 20, 2017 sent from Peggy Siegal’s address, marked “Importance: High” and signed “Rebecca,” giving “Company Name: The Peggy Siegal Company / Contact Name: Peggy Siegal / Address: 750 Lexington Avenue 5th Floor New York, New York 10022.” https://epstein-data.com/HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026228 p.1. Read from the page image by the writer at 2026-09-09T18:44Z; fetched read-only from the site server as above. The sheet says nothing further about the person who signed it, and nothing further is supplied here. The top-of-message “Sent” field on this sheet carries no zone, which is why the November 20 message is dated here and not timed. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5

  4. Invoice PSI 1103, June 22, 2011, same letterhead and same addressee. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00611511 p.1. Read from the page image by the writer at 2026-09-09T19:00Z. The same classes of protected value are present on this sheet as on the April invoice, and none of them is reproduced here. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  5. Jeffrey Epstein to Peggy Siegal, July 14, 2009, forwarding a message of July 8, 2009 whose body is an analysis headed “peggy siegal co billings.” https://epstein-data.com/EFTA01829415 p.1. Read from the page image by the writer at 2026-09-09T18:36Z. Two cautions on this sheet. First, the forwarded message’s From field is blacked out on the image; the subject line’s opening words name an individual as the source of the message, they are not reproduced here, and this page does not attribute the analysis to any person. Second, neither timestamp on the sheet carries a zone: the top-of-message “Sent” field reads “Tue 7/14/2009 10:06:10 PM” and the forwarded “Date” line reads “Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 3:32 PM,” and neither is used as a clock time in the body of this page. The figures are stated in thousands, with a “k” written on some and not on others. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5

  6. “PEGGY SIEGAL INC / SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION … ALLOCATION BETWEEN PEGGY SIEGAL AND BRYAN BANTRY.” https://epstein-data.com/EFTA01077269 p.5. Read from the page image by the writer at 2026-09-09T18:50Z. The sheet states excess of revenues over expenses $493,372, “PEGGY SIEGAL DUE 60% $296,023”, and lists twenty-nine payments dated between 01/13/11 and 09/30/11 under “PAYMENTS TO PEGGY SIEGAL PER WAGGINGTAIL THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2011” with the total “$309,531”; the listed payments add to that total as printed, and $309,531 less $296,023 is $13,508. The sheet carries a DRAFT watermark. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  7. The same report, second sheet, carrying total expense 223,274.75, net income 256,665.03, and the division “PS 60% $153,999.02 / BB 40% $102,666.01 / $256,665.03.” https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00601818 p.2. Read from the page image by the writer at 2026-09-09T18:52Z. ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  8. “Draft 5.9.16,” the top line of the first sheet of a twenty-seven-sheet trust agreement; the trust is named in the body of that sheet, “This trust shall be known as: THE PEGGY SIEGAL 2016 LIVING TRUST.” https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00619462 p.1. Read from the page image by the writer at 2026-09-09T18:58Z. The residence particulars of both named parties are blacked out on the image; the machine text of the page returns fragments of the redaction bars rather than any value. ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  9. The four published pages that name her are Scott Rothstein, David Blaine, Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and Steve Bannon. This page does not restate what they establish. ↩

  10. Steven Pfeiffer’s message of November 16, 2017 at 3:38 p.m. and Jeffrey Epstein’s reply at 3:40 p.m., “just send to peggy. you her co . its better for her.” Two copies were read. On https://epstein-data.com/HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026229 p.1 the reply stands at the head of the sheet with no From line of its own; on https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00955985 p.1 the same reply is quoted under the header “From: ‘jeffrey E.’ … Date: Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 3:40 PM / To: Steven Pfeiffer … Peggy Siegal,” which is where the attribution to Epstein comes from. Both read from the page images by the writer at 2026-09-09T18:43Z and 2026-09-09T18:45Z. ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  11. Richard Kahn to Jeffrey Epstein, November 21, 2017 at 8:29 a.m., and Epstein’s reply, whose entire body is the word “gratitude.” https://epstein-data.com/EFTA02563819 p.1. Read from the page image by the writer at 2026-09-09T19:27Z. Kahn’s question is printed “is gratitude paying for IFP or pegg=?” on that sheet, the ”=” being the same quoted-printable damage; it is given in the body as “pegg[y]” with the restoration marked. The top-of-message “Sent” field on that sheet, “Tuesday, November 21, 2017 1:44 PM,” carries no zone and is not used for the time. The zone comes from a second copy of the same message: https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00950174 p.1 carries the RFC header “Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 13:44:04 +0000”, read from the page image by the writer at 2026-09-09T19:26Z, and 13:44:04 UTC is 8:44:04 a.m. United States Eastern Standard Time on that date. A third copy, https://epstein-data.com/HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031320 p.1, read from the page image at 2026-09-09T19:29Z, gives the same field to the second and again without a zone, “Sent: 11/21/2017 1:44:04 PM”, which is how the three are known to be one message. Kahn’s 8:29 a.m. is a quoted header time and is Eastern on the proof set out in the clock note below, so the reply came fifteen minutes after the question, on the morning of November 21 and not in the afternoon. The machine text of the EFTA00950174 sheet renders the day of the week in that header wrongly and cannot be used for it. ↩ ↩2

  12. “PEGGY SIEGAL INC / STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENSES / FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2011.” https://epstein-data.com/EFTA01077269 p.4. Read from the page image by the writer at 2026-09-09T18:50Z. Total income $1,244,788 (event fees $1,150,854, administrative fees $19,959, reimbursed expenses $73,975); total event expenses $182,002; total administrative expenses $569,414; revenues in excess of expenses $493,372. The sheet carries a DRAFT watermark. The machine text of this page garbles two expense figures that the image gives plainly, which is why the figures here are taken from the image. ↩ ↩2

  13. Peggy Siegal, “Fwd: 2009-2010 tax returns,” November 29, 2011, forwarding a message of November 28, 2011 and, beneath it, one of November 21, 2011 labelled EST. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00423028 p.1. Read from the page image by the writer at 2026-09-09T18:57Z. The header carries an explicit offset, “Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 22:42:44 +0000”. Both recipient addresses on her covering message are blacked out on the image and are not supplied here; the four attachments are named on the sheet by file name only, and no figure from any return appears. The accountant’s signature block reads “Katia Goldin / Accountant / Bryan Bantry, Inc / Waggingtail Entertainment Ltd”; her telephone and facsimile lines on this sheet are not reproduced. ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  14. “Cannes 2010 Budget and invoice,” March 3, 2010, attachment “10003PSCannes2010.pdf,” signed “Deanna M. Romeo / waggingtail entertainment limited / Peggy Siegal Inc.” https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00763332 p.1. Read from the page image by the writer at 2026-09-09T18:35Z. The header carries an explicit offset — “Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 20:19:17 +0000” — so the time on this message is UTC on its own face. The machine text of this page renders “At Peggy’s request” as “At Peggy% request”, so that quotation is taken from the image. The To: line is redacted, as are the sender’s and Siegal’s own addresses and the street lines of the two addresses in the signature block; the sheet gives the sender no job title, and none is supplied here. Email addresses appear on this sheet and are not reproduced. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5

  15. Richard Kahn to Steven Pfeiffer, November 17, 2017 at 11:19 a.m., naming the donating foundation and its address, quoted within the later chain; the same sheet carries Kahn’s signature block, “Richard Kahn / HBRK Associates Inc. / 575 Lexington Avenue, 4th Floor / New York, NY 10022.” https://epstein-data.com/EFTA02563819 p.2. Read from the page image by the writer at 2026-09-09T19:28Z. On that sheet Kahn’s message has lost its own header line, and the 11:38 a.m. printed above it is the timestamp of Pfeiffer’s reply to him, “Thanks so much for providing this information,” and not of Kahn’s message. The 11:19 a.m. is taken from two cleaner copies of the same chain, https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00950174 p.2 and https://epstein-data.com/HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031321 p.1, each of which heads Kahn’s message “On Nov 17, 2017, at 11:19 AM”; both were read from the page image by the writer, at 2026-09-09T19:26Z and 2026-09-09T19:30Z, and the second of them names him on that line. Like the other quoted times in this chain the two are Eastern, on the proof set out in the clock note below. The EFTA02563819 sheet carries pervasive quoted-printable damage in which ”=” stands in for lost characters, and the quotations here are given with those characters restored: the November 17 message reads “corres=ondence” on the sheet, and the signature block reads “=ichard Kahn.” ↩ ↩2

  16. “Waggingtail Entertainment Ltd. / Find Report / January through December 2011,” printed 10/31/11, a single sheet of thirty-four rows, each naming Peggy Siegal Inc., with the column total 404,781.56. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00601824 p.1. Read from the page image by the writer at 2026-09-09T19:01Z. Two rows are typed “ACH” in the number column and the rest carry check numbers, which are not reproduced here. The machine text of this page is badly damaged — it renders the print date as “10’31/1” and the payee name variously as “PoNSY 5,4118 Int” and “Pepe Siegar Inc” — so every figure above is taken from the image. The first twenty-nine rows correspond, date for date, to the payments listed on the accountants’ allocation schedule through September 30, 2011. ↩

  17. Scheer & Rubinstein, CPA’s, LLP to “Ms. Peggy Siegal / Peggy Siegal Inc.,” engagement letter, November 14, 2011. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA01077275 p.1. Read from the page image by the writer at 2026-09-09T19:02Z. The addressee’s street address beneath the company name is blacked out on the image, as are the firm’s own telephone and facsimile lines. The second sheet of this letter, read from the machine text only and not relied on here, sets the firm’s billing rates and terms. ↩

  18. Scheer & Rubinstein, CPA’s, LLP, “Independent Accountants’ Compilation Report,” dated White Plains, New York, November 15, 2011, addressed “To The Stockholder / Peggy Siegal Inc.” https://epstein-data.com/EFTA01077269 p.3. Read from the page image by the writer at 2026-09-09T18:51Z. The sheet carries a diagonal DRAFT watermark that the machine text of the page does not reproduce, and the report is typed over the firm’s name rather than signed by an individual. The firm’s telephone and facsimile lines are redacted on this sheet. ↩ ↩2

  19. Steven Pfeiffer to Jeffrey Epstein, November 16, 2017 at 1:36 p.m., and Epstein’s reply at 3:26 p.m., as quoted within the chain. https://epstein-data.com/HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026229 p.1. Read from the page image by the writer at 2026-09-09T18:43Z; the page image for this production is not served on the /pdf/ route and was fetched read-only from the site server. Pfeiffer’s signature block on this sheet gives his position as “Associate Director, Development” at the “Independent Filmmaker Project”. ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  20. “RE: IFP Donation for Gotham Awards/Jeffrey Epstein,” November 24, 2016, carrying the IFP business office’s reply and, quoted beneath it, Steven Pfeiffer’s messages of November 23, 2016 and Peggy Siegal’s reply of the same day. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00439272 p.1. Read from the page image by the writer at 2026-09-09T18:46Z. The head of this message carries an explicit offset, “Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 04:21:45 +0000”; the times quoted inside it carry no zone, so this page gives dates only for the 2016 exchange and takes the order of the messages from the chain itself. One caution specific to this sheet: in Siegal’s message the image shows a name blacked out between the words “If not,” and ”, Jeffrey’s assistant will process it on Monday,” and the machine text of the page closes that gap so the sentence reads as though no name had been removed. The redacted name is not supplied here. ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  21. Where a clock time is printed on this page, the zone is proved from a second copy of the same message. Steven Pfeiffer’s message of November 16, 2017 appears on https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00955985 p.1 under an RFC header reading “Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 21:23:58 +0000” and is quoted on https://epstein-data.com/HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026228 p.1 as “Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2017 4:23 PM”; 21:23 UTC is 4:23 p.m. United States Eastern Standard Time, so the clock times quoted within this November 2017 chain are Eastern. A forwarded header on https://epstein-data.com/EFTA02563819 p.1 is labelled “EST” in the document itself and agrees. Elsewhere on this page, where a field carries no zone, the date is given and the clock time is not. ↩

  22. Steven Pfeiffer to Richard Kahn, November 20, 2017. The forwarded header giving the time reads “November 20, 2017 at 8:4=:00 PM EST” and is on the FIRST sheet of this run; the body of the message quoted in the text is on the second. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA02563819 pp.1-2. Read from the page images by the writer at 2026-09-09T19:27Z and 2026-09-09T19:28Z. A cleaner copy of the same forwarded header, https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00950174 p.1, read at 2026-09-09T19:26Z, gives it undamaged as “Date: November 20, 2017 at 8:48:00 PM EST”. The second sheet prints “I certainly =ill. But perhaps you can clarify something for me before I put all this to=ether for the donation. Jeffrey Epstein had asked to submit the letter and=invoice to Peggy Siegal instead, and she had supplied different informatio= than below. / Please advice how best to proc=ed.”; the quotation in the body restores the characters lost to that damage and changes nothing else. ↩

  23. Signature sheet of the same agreement, carrying the typed line “PEGGY SIEGAL, Grantor and Trustee” beneath an empty rule. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00619462 p.26. Read from the page image by the writer at 2026-09-09T18:56Z. The rule is blank, not redacted, and the date fields on the first sheet are also blank; on that basis the instrument is unexecuted in this copy. ↩

Backlinks