Epstein Data Wiki

Emad Hanna

Properties2
tagsperson, epstein-office, hbrk-associates, new-york-strategy-group, little-saint-james, construction, requisitions
aliasesHanna, Emad

43 min read

Title as his own signature gives it”Project Controller”, on e-mail signatures from September 2004 to at least January 2011123
Offices on those signaturesNew York Strategy Group, September 20041; HBRK Associates at a New York post-office box, November 2009 to March 201024; HBRK Associates, 301 East 66th St, Suite 10F, New York, NY 10065, December 2010 to January 201153
Title as a third party gives it”The controller was EMAD HANNA (HANNA)”, in Lesley Groff’s FBI proffer of July 23, 20216
What the documents show the job to have beenPreparing wire and cheque requisitions, pricing and chasing vendors, putting invoices to Jeffrey Epstein one at a time for approval, and tracking construction costs789101112
The earliest document read for this page that names himAn exchange with Daphne Wallace of September 20 and 22, 2004 about a numbered project, over a signature reading New York Strategy Group1
Earliest requisition read for this pageA one-sheet “LSJ / WIRE TRANSFER REQUISITION FORM” of Friday, October 14, 2005 for $10,395.00, “Requested By: Emad Hanna”7
What Epstein wrote about his authority”please do as i ask, and do not involve other people, emad,,” (December 16, 2010) and “call me,, emad has not aurthority zero i want him to take pictures and report period” (December 10, 2010)513
Latest document read for this page carrying his nameA LinkedIn invitation notice addressed to Jeffrey Epstein, Friday, September 11, 2015, giving his profile headline as “Controller at Currently Looking for a New Opportunity=/td>“14
Sheets read at the page image for this pageEighteen sheets across eleven identifiers, each at its own native 96 ppi, named in the footnotes

Project controller. It is the title on his own e-mail signature across seven years and two differently named New York offices, it is the word Jeffrey Epstein’s executive assistant used for him when the FBI interviewed her in 2021, and no document read for this page gives him any other. What the documents show the job to have been is the handling of money for Epstein’s building work: requisition forms for wires and cheques, vendor prices negotiated and written down, invoices put to Epstein one at a time, and costs tracked to the square foot.

The page on HBRK Associates covers the New York firm of Epstein’s accountants Richard Kahn and Harry Beller. It does not name him. This page begins four years before that firm existed, because the earliest documents read here put him in the same work under a different office name.

Nothing on this page is a finding of wrongdoing. He is named here because he named himself, in his own e-mail signature, on the face of ordinary commercial paperwork.

What this page covers, and what it does not

This page is about one man’s documented role in paying for construction and procurement. It reports no allegation and records none. No document is cited here for anything it records about a survivor or a complainant.

Two of the documents cited here sit inside longer runs that hold other material. An FBI continuation record of nine sheets is used for one sentence on its second sheet and for nothing else, and nothing from its other sheets is reproduced, characterised or counted here.6 A twelve-sheet procurement packet of October 2005 holds, besides the requisition and the price sheet used here, a consumer purchase order carrying a private individual’s personal fields; no value and no name is taken from that sheet, and the citations below name the sheets used rather than the run.71516

No telephone number, fax number, e-mail address, bank account number or routing number is reproduced on this page, from any document, whether or not the producing party covered it. Several of the sheets cited here are banking paperwork and carry such values; none is given, described, or located.

Where the producing party has covered a name or a value on a sheet cited here, this page writes around it, supplies nothing into it, and draws no inference about whom it belongs to. Covered spans inside a quotation are marked ▮.

2004: Project Controller, New York Strategy Group

The earliest document read for this page that names him is an exchange of September 2004 with Daphne Wallace about a numbered project. He asks whether it is finished and under budget and says that if it is he would like to archive it; she replies, “This project was completed, under budget, on April 8, 2004. You can archive it.”1

The signature beneath his message gives his title as “Project Controller” and his office as “New York Strategy Group”.1 That is the name the Epstein office in New York used before HBRK Associates: the page on Bella Klein sets out New York Strategy Group LLC at 457 Madison Avenue, Fourth Floor, in 2005 and in 2007, and Richard Kahn used the same signature block in 2007.

In October 2004 he is in the copy line of a message from the island manager Miles Alexander to Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell about the sale of a boat.17

2005 to 2007: the requisition forms

The forms are where the job is visible, because they have a field for it. Each prints “Requested By:” over a rule and, further down, an “Authorization:” block with a rule for a name and a rule for a signature.

On Friday, October 14, 2005 a one-sheet form headed “LSJ / WIRE TRANSFER REQUISITION FORM” requests $10,395.00, payee “Arrigo Dodge Chrysler Jeep”, “Requested By: Emad Hanna”, “Purpose/Description: LSJ Proj# 197 / Purchase of GEM Car”. The payee’s address is covered by the producing party, and so are part of the bank fields. Read at the page image, the Authorization block is completed in handwriting in blue ink: the name rule carries “JEFFRey Epstein” followed by a word reading “Authorized”, and the signature rule beneath it carries a cursive signature in the same ink. No name is typed or printed anywhere against that signature and this page does not identify the hand.7

The day before, a screen print from an internal system footed “Copyright (c) 2000-2004, Epstein Interests, Inc. All Rights Reserved” records one message under the heading “Records Listed For: EMAD from 10/13/2005 to 10/13/2005”. Its sender cell reads “JE” over “10:41AM”, and the message reads:

Buy it - re GEM car - including a 10% discount the price is $ 10,395. This includes all the options, freight, and dealer fee.15

The discount checks against the dealer’s own price sheet in the same packet, which totals the vehicle and its options at “Total MSRP Price $ 10,945.00”, adds a state fee and a dealer fee to a “Sub Total $ 11,551.45”, and then prints “SALE PRICE Out The Door $ 10,395.00”. The difference is $1,156.45, which is 10.01 per cent of $11,551.45. The price sheet also carries, hand-written in blue ink at its foot, “LSJ” and ”# 197”, the project code the requisition gives.16

In 2006 the same hand is on cheque requisitions, and the authority is recorded in prose rather than in the block. A form headed “NES / CHECK REQUISITION FORM”, dated Monday, April 24, 2006, requests $76,577.00 for a named mechanical contractor, “Requested By: Emad Hanna”, under “Purpose/Description: Project # 96 / Final installment payment on total project cost of $ 256,231 / Approved by JE on 2/6/06”. The delivery box is ticked against “Regular Mail” and the line beside it reads “Give to: Emad”. Read at the page image, the Authorization block is wholly blank: no name, no signature.8 A second form in the same run, dated Tuesday, March 07, 2006 for $2,380.00 to an electrical contractor on the same Project # 96, carries the line “Project Budget Approved by JE on 2/6/06”.18

In January 2007 his own name appears on the authorization rule. A form of Friday, January 19, 2007 requests $23,000.00 for the “Purchase of a New Holland Tractor” under “LSJ Project # 301”; its entity header has been left as the template’s placeholder, “Type Entity Name Here!!!”. “Requested By:” reads Emad Hanna; the Authorization name rule is typed “Emad Hanna”; read at the page image, the signature rule beneath it carries an ink signature in which the forename “Emad” is legible.9 Four days later, a form headed “LSJ” requests $34,300.00 for the “Purchase of New John Deere Skid Steer” under “Project # 302”, again “Requested By: Emad Hanna” with “Emad Hanna” typed on the Authorization name rule; on that sheet the signature rule is blank.10 On both forms the bank routing and account fields are covered by the producing party.

Vendors wrote to him and expected him to route the decision upward. On Wednesday, January 24, 2007 a boat-fitting firm sent him an estimate of “$42,500” with a “Not To Exceed: $50,000”, closing: “Emad, Please review, and call me with any questions, if you do not have any questions to clarify, please forward to Jeff.”19

2009 to 2011: HBRK Associates, and the approval chain

By late 2009 his signature carries HBRK Associates over a New York post-office box. On Tuesday, November 24, 2009 he asks Epstein, “Would it be possible for me to stay one night and come back the next day so I can meet with Tropical Shipping and another one of our main vendors?” Epstein’s reply the same evening is two words: “Of course”.2

On Monday, March 1, 2010 he prices twelve marine fenders for a vessel and two locations at ”$ 10,800” and asks, “Please provide your approval for payment so that we can get these produced.” Epstein replies, “Aren’t they in the stores”.4

By January 2011 the signature gives HBRK Associates at 301 East 66th St, Suite 10F, New York, NY 10065.3 That is the address Richard Kahn was using for HBRK Associates in August 2010, on a message in which Kahn put a vendor’s invoice to Epstein for approval after it had been sent to the two of them together: “Greetings Emad, Gary is requesting payment for the following invoice, via wire”.20

The chain the documents show has three places in it, and his is the last. A construction manager asks; Epstein approves or does not; he pays. On Friday, February 25, 2011 Gary Kerney wrote to Epstein, copying him:

We are purchasing materials that are known for structures but Emad will not authorize payments til you approve the budget.21

Three days later he set out what was waiting, in a numbered list of seven items opening with ”$ 40,000 deposit payment on a $ 200,000 pool contract” and ”$ 40,400 for 500 tons of Colombian sand”.22

On Monday, March 21, 2011 he wrote to Epstein under the subject “Main House Pool”. The whole message is four lines:

I received a requisition for payment of next $ 20,000 toward a $ 100,000 contract with sub contractor Virgin Island Gunite Pools

So far we have paid $ 20,000 of the contract.

Please advise with approval in order for me to get this payment processed11

The same pattern produced a complaint about him in June 2011. He asked Epstein to confirm a change order “for Glidden electrical work in the amount of $52,074 added to the original contract of $23,750 making it a total of $75,824”, said “We have paid $12,500 from the original contract and I have a request for $19,111.20 to process”, and asked, “Do I have your approval?” Epstein’s reply was “no for what??”12 Kerney, writing to Epstein a few days later, ended his account of the change order with “Emad did not notify me you had an issue til I checked today why the invoice hadn’t been paid” and then, on the next sheet, “Please release Emad to process payment”.2324

December 10, 2010: “emad has not aurthority zero”

A four-sheet printed thread records a single day. At 6:55 AM he sent photographs, described in the quoted attribution line as “Pictures of pops garden where it meets the road from different angles”. At 9:05 AM Epstein replied, “i asked for rocks to be dry stacked along the ribbon, as you can see nothing was done since i left.. and i have been asking for ten days,, get it done”. At 9:09 AM he forwarded that to Kerney over two lines, “Fyi” and “JE wants this done now”.2513

Kerney answered at 1:05 PM with a list of what his crews were doing and one sentence about him: “Emad asserts to my supers that your list has priority.I need your direction on the things on the list that take priority over what I schedule.”13

Epstein’s reply, five minutes later by the clock on the same sheet, is the line the record is best known for:

call me,, emad has not aurthority zero i want him to take pictures and report period13

The sheet prints “aurthority”, and the spacing above is the sheet’s own. Read as a reply to what Kerney had just written, it is an answer to the complaint that he was telling foremen which jobs came first, and not a description of the requisition forms he had been signing four years earlier.

None of the clock times on this sheet states a time zone, and this page computes no interval between them.

December 2010: the tile

A twelve-sheet thread of December 13 to 16, 2010 runs from a contractor’s failure on a kitchen floor to a quotation for laying tile, and it is the clearest record of what Epstein asked him for. Epstein’s messages are three or four words at a time: “did we bid this”, “this comparison is ridiculous. , what vendor did the laundry room , what is the material..”, “Explain 20k I’d it us 6 a foot”, “0 want you to go yo home depot”, “im not sure what this means„ When i went to home depot they quoted me 3 -4 dollars to install .”, “Isn’t it the reverse”.2627282930

On the morning of December 16, after he reported a comparison a colleague had given him, Epstein wrote:

please do as i ask, and do not involve other people, emad,, it cost him 350 a square foor installed.. cost of material. how largea job,, please give me info that i can understand5

The sheet prints “foor” and “largea” and the spacing above is the sheet’s own; the message was read at the page image for this page and nothing in it is repaired here.

That afternoon he answered with the arithmetic Epstein had asked for:

I just looked at the invoice for the laundry and it was $ 6,780 and the total square feet was 677.91 which make it a $ 10 cost per square foot. And we supplied all the material so this was purely labor only.31

$6,780 divided by 677.91 is $10.00 to the cent, so the sheet’s own division checks.

A loan in his name, and a resume

On Thursday, June 23, 2011 a memorandum on Jeffrey Epstein’s own printed letterhead, from Harry Beller to a named officer at JP Morgan and signed in ink, instructs a transfer of “Four Thousand Nine Hundred Sixty Five Dollars & 00/100 ($4,965.00)” from an Epstein account to a New Jersey bank. The account name is given as “Emad Hanna” and the reference line reads “5 Year Loan Revision”. The routing and account fields are covered by the producing party.32

Three months later, on Tuesday, 20 September 2011, he wrote to Epstein’s executive assistant Lesley Groff under the subject “My Resume”, attaching a file whose name carries a date in September 2011:

Attached is my resume anyone that you can forward this to I would really appreciate.33

A loan in his name survives into a later instrument. An undated draft headed “FIRST AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT TO TRUST AGREEMENT for the JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN 2001 TRUST ONE”, whose own recital reads “made and entered into this __ day of __, 2012”, the day and the month left blank on the sheet, carries at paragraph 3 the sentence “I forgive any loans which I made to the following individuals:” over a list lettered a) to p). “EMAD HANNA” is item i). Three of the sixteen entries are covered by the producing party; the thirteen that are not include Darren K. Indyke, Mark Epstein, Jean Luc Brunel, David Lampert, Alberto Pinto and Steven Victor.34 Read at the page image, that copy’s conclusion sheet is wholly unexecuted: every “Date signed:” rule, every signature rule, both witness rules and the day and month of the attestation are blank.35 A separate file index in the release lists, under the heading “Promissory Notes”, an entry reading “Promissory Note Emad Hanna”; the entry states no direction and no sum, and neighbouring entries in the same list are written with the word “to” where a direction is given.36

After 2011: where the record thins, and where it does not stop

The documents that carry his name are overwhelmingly a three-year block, and that block ends in 2011. Of the 3,880 documents that carry the exact phrase “Emad Hanna”, 3,531 carry a date in this project’s index of the released files, and 3,476 of those 3,531, or 98.4 per cent, are dated 2009, 2010 or 2011 (387, 1,620 and 1,469 respectively). Only fourteen carry an index date later than 2011 and only thirty-five carry one earlier than 2009; six carry a year that cannot be a date of a document of this kind.37 These are counts of index entries, not of events, and the index is this project’s own: one document in that later group was opened for this page and turned out to be a 2010 invoice, and two more carry the impossible header year that another page in this wiki has already identified as an export artefact.

He is not in the office chart HBRK used. The undated internal administration sheet that the HBRK Associates page cites lists, under the heading “HBRK” at 575 Lexington Ave. 4th Floor, four roles: Attorney, Project Manager, Estate Manager and Executive Assistant. No controller is listed and he is not named on that one sheet, which was read here end to end. The sheet carries no date, and the address it gives is the later of the two HBRK addresses, not the one his own signature carries.38

He is not in the 1953 Trust. A search of all thirty-two sheets of the trust instrument of August 8, 2019 in this project’s store returns no occurrence of “Emad” and none of “Hanna”, where the same search of the same thirty-two sheets returns six sheets carrying “Kahn”.39

But the record does not end in 2014. On Friday, September 11, 2015 at 4:55 PM a LinkedIn invitation notice reached Jeffrey Epstein under the subject “Jeffrey, please add me to your LinkedIn network”. Its From line gives his name, its body is the service’s standard two lines, and beneath his name it prints the headline from his profile:

Controller at Currently Looking for a New Opportunity=/td>14

The trailing fragment is printed on the face of the sheet and is not repaired here. Three days later a reminder notice to Epstein listed the invitation as still pending, with the same headline.40

What a third party said he was

On July 23, 2021, in a proffer recorded on an FBI continuation form, Lesley Groff described the New York office room by room. Of the people in it, the sheet records:

The controller was EMAD HANNA (HANNA). When GAINEY left, he was replaced by RICH KAHN (KAHN).6

The three individuals named immediately before that sentence are covered by the producing party, and nothing is supplied for them here. The sentence is Lesley Groff’s account, given in an interview ten years after the last of the documents above, and it is reported here as her account and not as a finding.

How the documents on this page were read

Eighteen sheets across eleven identifiers were rendered from this project’s own served copy and read at the page image: every one at its own native resolution of 96 ppi, which is what that route carries. They are EFTA00594995 p. 5; EFTA00298542 pp. 4 and 25; EFTA00600407 pp. 4, 6 and 10; EFTA00616498 p. 8; EFTA00616510 p. 4; EFTA01246216 p. 2; EFTA01581197 p. 1; EFTA01832061 pp. 1, 2, 3 and 4; EFTA01993257 p. 1; EFTA02033042 pp. 1 and 3; and EFTA02356939 p. 1. For each, the number of sheets served was reconciled against the number this project’s index holds and the two agreed.

Every other quotation on this page follows the released text of the sheet cited, and the footnote says so. No statement is made here about what is or is not written in ink on any sheet that was not opened. Where a sheet that was opened carries a producer’s covering, that is stated for that sheet and for no other, and no copy of any document is compared with any other copy.

Quotations follow the sheets exactly, including their spellings, their spacing and their punctuation. Where a quotation crosses a line break in the released text, the break is rendered as a single space and nothing else is changed; where a quotation is cut, the cut is marked.

Limits of this page

This page does not say when he was engaged or when he left, because no document read for it records either. It does not give his qualifications, his pay, his nationality, his age, or anything about his family or his health, and no such detail is reproduced here for him or for anyone else named on this page. It does not say whether the loan referred to in the June 2011 memorandum was repaid, forgiven or written off, because no document read for it says. It does not say who signed the October 2005 authorization. It does not say what he did after 2015.

It reproduces no contact value and no bank identifier of any kind. Several sheets cited here carry such values; this page carries none of them and locates none of them.

Documents in the release that would answer further questions about him were not opened for this page, and their absence here is a limit on this page and not a statement about the record.

HBRK Associates; Richard Kahn; Harry Beller; Darren Indyke; Bella Klein; Lesley Groff; Gary Kerney; Daphne Wallace; Miles Alexander; Little Saint James; NES, LLC.

Footnotes

Footnotes

  1. E-mail exchange, Daphne Wallace to Emad Hanna, “Re: FW: Project # 18”, Wednesday, September 22, 2004 9:28 AM, quoting his own message of Monday, September 20, 2004 11:08 AM. Her reply reads “Greetings Emad, This project was completed, under budget, on April 8, 2004. You can archive it. Daphne”; his message asks “Is this finished and we came in under budget?” and “If it is I would like to archive it.” His signature stands on three separate lines reading “Emad Hanna”, “Project Controller” and “New York Strategy Group”. A figure he gives for the under-budget amount is damaged in the released text and is not reproduced. This sheet is the eighth of an eight-sheet run whose other seven sheets are 2003 and 2004 landscaping proposals, contractor faxes and job-cost reports for Little Saint James; nothing is taken from them. Read in the released text; this page did not open the image of this sheet. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00600311 p. 8. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5

  2. E-mail, Epstein to Emad Hanna, “Re: Palm Beach”, Tuesday, November 24, 2009 9:31 PM, reading “Of course” over “Sent from my iPhone”, quoting his own message of Nov 24, 2009 at 4:03 PM. His message opens “Jeffery,” as printed and asks the question quoted. His signature stands on separate lines giving “Project Controller”, “HBRK Associates” and a New York post-office box, with the telephone and fax labels beneath; no value from them is reproduced. This is the first of a two-sheet run whose second sheet carries nothing but a page number. Read in the released text; this page did not open the image of this sheet. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA01780065 p. 1. ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  3. E-mail, Emad Hanna to Jeffrey Epstein, “LSJ”, Sent “Tue 1/11/2011 8:30:31 PM”, one sheet. The body is three lines and the signature stands on separate lines giving “Emad Hanna”, “Project Controller”, “HBRK Associates”, “301 East 66th St”, “Suite 10F” and “New York, NY 10065”, over five labelled contact lines from which nothing is reproduced. The same document is cited on the page for Richard Kahn, which describes it by role without naming him. Read in the released text; this page did not open the image of this sheet. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA02031977 p. 1. ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  4. E-mail, Epstein to Emad Hanna, “Re: Lady K Marine Fenders”, Monday, March 1, 2010 4:59 PM, reading “Aren’t they in the stores” over “Sent from my iPhone”, quoting his own message of Mar 1, 2010, at 11:57 AM. That message gives “the $ 10,800 purchase cost is the best price we have located” and closes with the sentence quoted. His signature again gives Project Controller, HBRK Associates and the post-office box. This is the first of a two-sheet run whose second sheet carries nothing but a page number. Read in the released text; this page did not open the image of this sheet. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA01780975 p. 1. ↩ ↩2

  5. E-mail, Jeffrey Epstein to Emad Hanna, “Re: Laundry floor”, Sent “Thursday, December 16, 2010 8:35 AM”, the third sheet of a twelve-sheet printed thread. Read at the page image at the sheet’s native 96 ppi; served p. 3 carries the printed Bates stamp EFTA_R1_00543977. The quotation is the whole body and is given exactly as the sheet prints it: the sheet reads “foor” for “foot” and “largea” for “large a”, and the three double spaces are the sheet’s own. The released text of this sheet renders “emad” as “cmad”; the image reads “emad”. Beneath it the sheet quotes “On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 8:33 AM, Emad Hanna ▮ wrote:” over the single line “Carlos used a guy that did tile at his house and it cost him $ 3.50 per square foot”. The signature block’s contact lines are covered by the producing party. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA02033042 p. 3. ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  6. FBI form FD-302a, continuation sheet of the proffer of Lesley Groff, 07/23/2021, served p. 2 of a nine-sheet run, the sheet’s own folio reading “page 2 of 9”. Read at the page image at the sheet’s native 96 ppi; the sheet carries the printed Bates stamp EFTA_00092062 and the legend “SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17”. The quotation is given with the two spaces the sheet prints between its sentences. The sentence immediately preceding it names three individuals whose names and short forms the producing party has covered, and nothing is supplied for them here. The released text of this sheet renders “(BELLER)” as “(SELLER)”; the image reads “(BELLER)”, as the page for Bella Klein also records. Only this sheet of the run was read and only this sentence is used; nothing from the other eight sheets is reproduced, characterised or counted here. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA01246216 p. 2. ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  7. “LSJ / WIRE TRANSFER REQUISITION FORM”, Date of Request “Friday, October 14, 2005”, Amount Requested ”$ 10,395.00”, Payee “Arrigo Dodge Chrysler Jeep”, Bank Name “Wachovia”, Bank Address “Jacksonville, Florida”, “Requested By: Emad Hanna”, “Purpose/Description: LSJ Proj# 197 / Purchase of GEM Car”, the Special Instructions and G/L Account blocks blank. Read at the page image at the sheet’s native 96 ppi. The payee’s address field is covered by the producing party and the bank fields are covered in part; no value from any of them is reproduced. The Authorization block is completed in blue ink: the name rule carries “JEFFRey Epstein” followed by a word reading “Authorized”, and the signature rule carries a cursive signature in the same ink against which no name is typed or printed. The released text of this sheet places “Purchase of GEM Car” under Special Instructions; the image places it under Purpose/Description, and the image is followed here. This sheet is the fourth of a twelve-sheet procurement packet; the packet’s fifth sheet is a consumer purchase order carrying a private individual’s personal fields and nothing is taken from it. The foot of the sheet was measured against its own body and carries no printed Bates stamp, so this is cited by document and served page. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00600407 p. 4. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  8. “NES / CHECK REQUISITION FORM”, Date of Request “Monday, April 24, 2006”, Amount Requested ”$ 76,577.00”, “Requested By: Emad Hanna”, “Purpose/Description: Project # 96 / Final installment payment on total project cost of $ 256,231 / Approved by JE on 2/6/06”, the delivery box ticked “XXXXXXX” against “Regular Mail” and “Give to: Emad” beside it, and, in the two-column G/L Account block, the description Air Conditioning against the number 15004. That block is set in two columns on the sheet and is described here rather than quoted, because no single contiguous string of it is rendered in the released text; the same two values stand again on served p. 9 of this run. Read at the page image at native 96 ppi; the Authorization block carries no name and no signature. A short covering by the producing party precedes the payee’s name and nothing is supplied into it; the payee’s own street address prints on the sheet and is not needed here. This sheet is the fifth of a thirteen-sheet run of 2006 contractor faxes and requisitions. No printed Bates stamp. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00594995 p. 5. ↩ ↩2

  9. “Type Entity Name Here!!! / WIRE TRANSFER REQUISITION FORM”, Date of Request “Friday, January 19, 2007”, Amount Requested ”$ 23,000.00”, Payee “Rose Bros. Inc”, “Requested By: Emad Hanna”, “Purpose/Description: LSJ Project # 301 / Purchase of a New Holland Tractor”, “G/L Account: Tractor - Backhoe - Excavator / 15234”. Read at the page image at native 96 ppi. The entity line is the form template’s unfilled placeholder and is quoted as printed. The routing and account fields are covered by the producing party. The Authorization name rule is typed “Emad Hanna” and the signature rule carries an ink signature in which the forename “Emad” is legible; this page reads the mark and makes no handwriting comparison. This sheet is the eighth of a twelve-sheet run. No printed Bates stamp. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00616498 p. 8. ↩ ↩2

  10. “LSJ / WIRE TRANSFER REQUISITION FORM”, Date of Request “Tuesday, January 23, 2007”, Amount Requested “34,300.00”, Payee “Everglades Farm Equipment Co, Inc”, Bank Name “Bank of Belle Glade”, “Requested By: Emad Hanna”, “Purpose/Description: Project # 302 / Purchase of New John Deere Skid Steer”, “G/L Account: Skid Steer / 15237”. Read at the page image at native 96 ppi; the Authorization name rule is typed “Emad Hanna” and the signature rule bears no mark. The routing and account fields are covered by the producing party. The released text renders the amount “34.300.00” and places the purchase line under Special Instructions; the image reads “34,300.00” and places it under Purpose/Description, and the image is followed. This sheet is the fourth of a seven-sheet run. No printed Bates stamp. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00616510 p. 4. ↩ ↩2

  11. E-mail, Emad Hanna to Jeffrey Epstein, “Main House Pool”, Sent “Mon 3/21/2011 8:13:09 PM”, one sheet. Read at the page image at the sheet’s native 96 ppi; served p. 1 carries the printed Bates stamp EFTA_R1_00486804. The three quoted paragraphs are the whole of the message’s body and are given exactly as the sheet prints them, including the spaces after the dollar signs, the full stop at the end of the second and the absence of one at the end of the first and third. The sheet’s To line and the signature block below “HBRK Associates” are covered by the producing party in part, and nothing is supplied into either. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA01993257 p. 1. ↩ ↩2

  12. E-mail thread about the Flagpole Pool electrical change order, four sheets, whose subject line stands on served p. 1 and is not quoted here. His message of June 2, 2011 runs from served p. 2 onto served p. 3 and the quotation above crosses that page break; the sentences quoted are “Just wanted to confirm that you approved to Gary a change order for Glidden electrical work in the amount of $52,074 added to the original contract of $23,750 making it a total of $75,824.” on p. 2 and “We have paid $12,500 from the original contract and I have a request for $19,111.20 to process.” and “Do I have your approval?” on p. 3. Epstein’s reply, printed above it on p. 2, is dated “June 2, 2011 2:05:18 PM EDT” and reads “no for what??”. The two clock stamps on that sheet are in different conventions and this page does not reconcile them. Read in the released text; this page did not open the image of these sheets. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA01991089 pp. 2-3. ↩ ↩2

  13. E-mail thread, “Re: FW: Pictures”, four sheets, printed as one run. Read at the page image at the sheet’s native 96 ppi, all four sheets; served pp. 1-4 carry the printed Bates stamps EFTA_R1_00209538 to EFTA_R1_00209541. Served p. 1 carries three messages: Epstein to Gary Kerney of “Fri 12/10/2010 6:16:16 PM”; Epstein to Gary Kerney copied to Emad Hanna of “Fri 12/10/2010 1:10 PM”, whose body is the line quoted above and whose spelling “aurthority” and double spaces are the sheet’s; and Emad Hanna to Gary Kerney of “Fri 12/10/2010 9:09 AM” reading “Fyi” and “JE wants this done now”. Gary Kerney’s message of “Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 1:05 PM”, quoted inside Epstein’s, carries the sentence about priorities given above, with its own spacing and spelling. Served pp. 3 and 4 carry his signature block and three repetitions of a confidentiality footer and nothing else. No address value from any sheet of this run is reproduced here. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA01832061 p. 1. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  14. LinkedIn invitation notice addressed to Jeffrey Epstein, From line “Emad Hanna ▮”, Sent “Friday, September 11, 2015 4:55 PM”, Subject “Jeffrey, please add me to your LinkedIn network”, two sheets. Read at the page image at the sheet’s native 96 ppi; served p. 1 carries the printed Bates stamp EFTA_R1_01342193. The body carries the service’s standard lines “Hi Jeffrey,” and “I’d like to connect with you on LinkedIn.”, his name, and then the headline line quoted above; the trailing ”=/td>” is a markup fragment printed on the face of the sheet and is not repaired here. The released text of this sheet renders “LinkedIn” as “Linkedln” throughout; the image reads “LinkedIn”, and the image is followed. This is a notice generated by the service, not a letter he wrote, and it is reported as such. The sender’s address is covered by the producing party and the sheet’s tracking URLs are not reproduced. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA02356939 p. 1. ↩ ↩2

  15. Same packet, served p. 6, a screen print from an internal message system headed “Records Listed For: EMAD from 10/13/2005 to 10/13/2005” and footed “Copyright (c) 2000-2004, Epstein Interests, Inc. All Rights Reserved”. Read at the page image at native 96 ppi. The table’s first column header is clipped at the left edge of the scan; its single row’s cell reads “JE” over “10:41AM”. The message is quoted whole above. The same screen print appears again at served p. 11 of the same packet. No printed Bates stamp. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00600407 p. 6. ↩ ↩2

  16. Same packet, served p. 10, the dealer’s price sheet for a “2005 E4”, read at the page image at native 96 ppi. It prints “Base Price $ 8,995.00” over nine option lines and “Freight (from factory) $ 750.00”, then “Total MSRP Price $ 10,945.00”, “State of FL Tire & Battery Fee $ 6.50”, “ealer Fee(Includes Delivery) $ 599.95” with its first letter clipped on the sheet, “Sub Total $ 11,551.45”, “Total Purchase Price $ 11,551.45”, “SALE PRICE Out The Door $ 10,395.00” and “BALANCE DUE TO ARRIGO $ 10,395.00”, above “Sale Price reflects a 5 Vehicle purchase offer.” The arithmetic stated in the body is this page’s subtraction and division between figures printed on this sheet, and is not a figure the sheet gives. “LSJ” and ”# 197” are written at the foot in blue ink. The released text of this sheet renders the fee line “Rotten,’” and the payee “ARMCO”; the image reads “Battery” and “ARRIGO”, and the image is followed. A black band runs across part of the sheet above the SALE PRICE line; this page does not characterise it. No printed Bates stamp. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00600407 p. 10. ↩ ↩2

  17. Miles Alexander to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, copied to two others of whom he is one, “LSJ Seamore boat”, Tue 10/5/2004 11:06:14 AM, one sheet. Cited here only for the fact that his name stands in the copy line. The sender’s contact lines print on the sheet and are not reproduced. The message’s substance is set out on the page for its author. Read in the released text. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA02332983 p. 1. ↩

  18. Same run, served p. 9, a second “NES / CHECK REQUISITION FORM”, Date of Request “Tuesday, March 07, 2006”, Amount Requested ”$ 2380.00”, “Requested By: Emad Hanna”, “Purpose/Description: Project # 96”, and a Special Instructions field carrying two lines, “Balance on Invoice # 2093” and “Project Budget Approved by JE on 2/6/06”. Its G/L Account block gives the description Air Conditioning against the number 15004; that block is set in two columns and is described here rather than quoted, as on served p. 5. Read in the released text; this page did not open the image of this sheet, and makes no statement about what is or is not written on its Authorization rules. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00594995 p. 9. ↩

  19. Estimate from a named vice-president of a Florida powerboat firm to Emad Hanna, “Enclosure Pricing and ‘85 Service Pricing”, Wednesday, January 24, 2007 5:22 PM, the first sheet of a twelve-sheet run. It itemises an enclosure system to “Total Estimate: $42,500” over “Not To Exceed: $50,000” and closes with the sentence quoted. The sender’s contact lines print on the sheet and are not reproduced. Read in the released text; this page did not open the image of this sheet. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00616579 p. 1. ↩

  20. E-mail, Rich Kahn to Jeffrey Epstein, “FW: Construction wire request - August 6, 2010”, “Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 19:36:26 +0000”, forwarding Daphne Wallace’s message of “Monday, August 09, 2010 1:34 PM” to “Emad Hanna; Rich Kahn”, copied to Gary Kerney. Her message opens “Greetings Emad, Gary is requesting payment for the following invoice, via wire:” and names an architect’s invoice at ”$ 8,948.56”; Kahn’s own message asks Epstein “Is it ok to pay 50% ($8,948.56) deposit as requested by Gary?” over a signature giving “HBRK Associates Inc.”, “301 East 66th Street, Suite 10F”, “New York, NY 10065”. Read in the released text; this page did not open the image of this sheet. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00733667 p. 1. ↩

  21. Gary Kerney to Jeffrey Epstein, copied to Emad Hanna and another, “FW: flagpole”, Sent “Fri 2/25/2011 12:59 PM”, the third sheet of a three-sheet printed thread. The sentence is quoted whole above and the sheet spells “til”. The same sheet carries, beneath it, a further Kerney message of “Thu 2/24/2011 4:10 PM” reading “Sorry here’s the flagpole budget”. Read in the released text; this page did not open the image of this sheet. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA01795532 p. 3. ↩

  22. Same thread, served p. 1, Gary Kerney forwarding to Jeffrey Epstein and Emad Hanna on “Wednesday, March 2, 2011 11:00 AM” a message of Emad Hanna dated “February 28, 2011 4:12:45 PM AST”, which opens “Jeffrey, This is what I have pending payment at this time” over a numbered list of seven items. The two items quoted above are items 1 and 2; the remaining five are not reproduced, and one of them carries a payee name damaged in the released text. His signature continues onto served p. 2, which also carries a Gary Kerney message of “Monday, February 28, 2011 3:01 PM” reading in part “Would you approve this budget in advance of finalizing it from plans so Emad can pay for current activity”. Read in the released text; this page did not open the image of these sheets. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA01795532 pp. 1-2. ↩

  23. Same thread, served p. 1, Gary Kerney to Jeffrey Epstein copied to Emad Hanna, Sent “Tue 6/7/2011 7:41:18 PM”, setting out how the change order grew. The sentence quoted is the last on the sheet. Read in the released text; this page did not open the image of this sheet. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA01991089 p. 1. ↩

  24. Same thread, served p. 2, which opens with the four words “Please release Emad to process payment” above “Gary”. Read in the released text; this page did not open the image of this sheet. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA01991089 p. 2. ↩

  25. Same run, served p. 2, read at the page image at native 96 ppi; printed Bates stamp EFTA_R1_00209539. It carries Epstein to Emad Hanna of “Friday, December 10, 2010 9:05 AM”, whose body is quoted above with the sheet’s own spacing, over the quoted attribution “On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 6:55 AM, Emad Hanna ▮ wrote:” and the single line “Pictures of pops garden where it meets the road from different angles”. The sheet also carries his signature block, whose contact lines are covered by the producing party. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA01832061 p. 2. ↩

  26. Same thread, served p. 8, Jeffrey Epstein to Emad Hanna of “Monday, December 13, 2010 2:59 PM” under the subject “Re: ceaserstone”, and served p. 9, his message of “Monday, December 13, 2010 12:42 PM” reading “did we bid this” over a forwarded message from Gary Kerney of “Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 12:18 PM”. Read in the released text; this page did not open the images of these sheets. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA02033042 pp. 8-9. ↩

  27. Same thread, served p. 7, Jeffrey Epstein to Emad Hanna of “Monday, December 13. 2010 4:19 PM”, whose body as the released text gives it is “0 want you to go yo home depot” over “Sorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone”. The first character is damaged in the released text and this page did not open the image of this sheet. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA02033042 p. 7. ↩

  28. Same thread, served p. 6, Jeffrey Epstein to Emad Hanna of “Monday, December 13, 2010 4:23 PM”, body “Explain 20k I’d it us 6 a foot”. Read in the released text; this page did not open the image of this sheet. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA02033042 p. 6. ↩

  29. Same thread, served p. 5, Jeffrey Epstein of “Thursday, December 16, 201012:10 AM” as the released text runs the date and time together, body “im not sure what this means„ When i went to home depot they quoted me 3 -4 dollars to install .”, over a quoted message from Gary Kerney of “Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 7:14 PM” about tile purchase and tile setters. Read in the released text; this page did not open the image of this sheet. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA02033042 p. 5. ↩

  30. Same thread, served p. 2, Jeffrey Epstein to Emad Hanna of “Thursday, December 16, 2010 11:07 AM”, body “Isn’t it the reverse”, over his own quoted message of “Dec 16, 2010, at 9:41 AM” giving a local contractor’s rough quotation. That contractor is a private individual and is not named here. Read in the released text; this page did not open the image of this sheet. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA02033042 p. 2. ↩

  31. Same thread, served p. 1, Emad Hanna to Jeffrey Epstein, “RE: Laundry floor”, Sent “Thur 12/16/2010 4:29:28 PM”. Read at the page image at native 96 ppi; printed Bates stamp EFTA_R1_00543975. The quoted paragraph is the second of the message’s three. The division stated in the body is this page’s arithmetic on the two figures the sheet prints, and is not a figure the sheet gives. The signature block’s contact lines are covered by the producing party. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA02033042 p. 1. ↩

  32. Memorandum on the printed letterhead “JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN”, “To: Janet, JP Morgan”, “From: Harry Beller”, “Date: June 23, 2011”, “Re: Jeffrey Epstein Account ▮”, one sheet. Read at the page image at the sheet’s native 96 ppi; the sheet carries the printed Bates stamp JPM-SDNY-00060588 and the legend “Confidential Treatment Requested by JPMorgan Chase”. The body reads “Please transfer Four Thousand Nine Hundred Sixty Five Dollars & 00/100 ($4,965.00) from the above account” above “Bank name: Valley National Bank / 1422 Broad Street / Bloomfield, NJ 07003”, “ABA#: ▮”, “Account name: Emad Hanna”, “Account #: ▮” and “Re: 5 Year Loan Revision”. A signature in ink stands beside the typed name “Harry Beller”. The released text of this sheet renders the figure “(54,965.00)” and the street “Broad Sweet”; the image reads ”($4,965.00)” and “Broad Street”, and the image is followed. The sheet’s own furniture gives it as page 5 of a 5-page fax; the document in this project’s store is this one sheet. The fax header and footer carry machine-printed identifiers and a telephone number, and none of them is reproduced. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA01581197 p. 1. ↩

  33. E-mail, Emad Hanna to Lesley Groff, “My Resume”, “Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 19:59:40 +0000”, one sheet, with one attachment whose file name carries a September 2011 date. The body is the sentence quoted above and a second reading “Also take a look at it if you have any suggestions please let me know”. The signature’s closing lines are damaged in the released text and are not reproduced. Read in the released text; this page did not open the image of this sheet. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00427700 p. 1. ↩

  34. “FIRST AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT TO TRUST AGREEMENT for the JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN 2001 TRUST ONE”, twenty-seven sheets, whose opening recital on served p. 1 reads “made and entered into this __ day of __, 2012, by and between JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, as Grantor (“Grantor”) and DARREN K. INDYKE, JES STALEY and ANDREW FARKAS, as Trustees” with the day and the month left blank on the sheet. Paragraph 3 of served p. 4 is quoted above. Served p. 4 read at the page image at the sheet’s native 96 ppi: entries l), m) and n) are covered by the producing party, and “EMAD HANNA” is entry i). Served p. 1 was read in the released text only. The paragraph that follows on the same sheet concerns a beneficiary whose name the producing party has covered; nothing from it is reproduced, characterised or counted here, and no inference is drawn about who that person is. The page for Andrew Farkas sets out the matching instrument for the 2001 Trust Two and the ink date it carries; this page takes no date from that instrument. The sheet carries its own folio “-4-” and no printed Bates stamp. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00298542 p. 4. ↩

  35. Same instrument, served p. 25, the “CONCLUSION” sheet, read at the page image at native 96 ppi. It prints “I have duly executed this Agreement on the date set opposite my signature.” over four “Date signed:” rules against Jeffrey E. Epstein as Grantor and Darren K. Indyke, Jes Staley and Andrew Farkas as Trustees, then the attestation “On this __ day of __, 2012, the foregoing instrument was signed, published and declared to be the First Amendment and Restatement to the Jeffrey E. Epstein 2001 Trust One Trust Agreement by JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, as Grantor”, then two witness rules. Every one of those rules is empty on the sheet. The sheet carries its own folio “-25-” and no printed Bates stamp. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00298542 p. 25. ↩

  36. File index, twenty-six sheets, whose first sheet is headed “FILE CABINET TWO / DRAWER ONE: Financial Trust Company, Inc. Organizational File (FTC)”. Served p. 11 carries a list headed “Promissory Notes” whose entry B reads “Promissory Note Emad Hanna”. Other entries in the same list are written with the word “to” where a direction is given; this entry is not, and this page does not supply one. Read in the released text; this page did not open the image of this sheet. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00299927 p. 11. ↩

  37. Counts taken on 24 October 2026 against this project’s full-text index of the released files, which holds 2,925,025 sheets of 1,425,573 documents. The exact phrase “Emad Hanna” returns 4,775 sheets of 3,880 documents, which is 0.27 per cent of documents. A bare match count ranks nothing and no section here rests on its size: the single word “Epstein”, searched the same day against the same index, returns 578,565 documents, or 40.6 per cent of them. Widening to the union of that phrase with “Emad Hamm”, “Einad Hanna”, “Emad Harma”, “Emad Hannah”, “Ernad Hanna”, “Hanna Emad”, “E Hanna” and “ehanna” gives 4,818 sheets of 3,904 documents, adding only 24 documents; an invented phrase returns 0, which is the control for those queries. The index’s tokeniser splits on commas, so “Hanna, Emad” and “Hanna Emad” are one query and are not counted as two forms. The year figures are a property of this project’s index, not of the documents: of the 3,880, exactly 3,531 carry a date in the index, distributed 1 in 1990, 1 in 2003, 1 in 2004, 2 in 2005, 3 in 2006, 10 in 2007, 17 in 2008, 387 in 2009, 1,620 in 2010, 1,469 in 2011, 2 in 2012, 4 in 2013, 3 in 2014, 4 in 2015, 1 in 2016, 3 in 2023, 1 in 2026 and 2 in the year 4501. The last three groups cannot be dates of documents of this kind; another page in this wiki identifies the 4501 value as an export artefact. One of the documents carrying a 2016 index date was opened for this page and is an invoice of March 2010. ↩

  38. Internal administration sheet, one sheet, read here end to end. It sets out two offices. The second is headed “HBRK / 575 Lexington Ave. 4th Floor / New York, New York 10022” and lists four roles against four names: Attorney, Darren Indyke, Esq.; Project Manager, Richard Kahn; Estate Manager, Mark Tollison; Executive Assistant, Lesley Groff. The labels stand in one column and the names in another, so no label-and-name pair prints as one continuous string; they are described here rather than quoted. Above them a line reading “HBRK is…” is left without a completion. No controller is listed and no occurrence of “Emad” or “Hanna” stands anywhere on the sheet. The sheet carries no date. The office and fax labels print with their values covered by the producing party. The same sheet is cited on the page for HBRK Associates. Read in the released text; this page did not open the image of this sheet. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA01304254 p. 1. ↩

  39. The 1953 Trust, “made as of August 8, 2019”, thirty-two sheets in this project’s store. A full-text search of all thirty-two sheets returns 0 sheets carrying “Emad” and 0 carrying “Hanna”; the same search of the same thirty-two sheets returns 6 sheets carrying “Kahn”, which is the control proving the query can return a non-zero result against this document. No sheet of this instrument was read at the image for this page and nothing else is taken from it. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00099303 ↩

  40. LinkedIn reminder notice addressed to Jeffrey Epstein, Sent “Monday, September 14, 2015 4:12 PM”, two sheets, listing his invitation among those still pending with the same profile headline. The released text of this document is heavily damaged. Read in the released text; this page did not open the image of either sheet. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA02357130 pp. 1-2. ↩

Backlinks