Epstein Data Wiki

Henry Kissinger

Properties2
tagsperson, diplomacy, kissinger-associates, china, world-economic-forum, scheduling, 2008, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2017
aliasesHenry Kissinger, Henry A. Kissinger, Kissinger, Henry, Dr. Kissinger, Dr Kissinger, Mr Kissinger, Henry Kissenger

56 min read

What this page does not contain

None of the 530 documents of this release that carry his name or his surname was written by him, and none of them is addressed to him. Across those 530 documents this project’s index holds no sender value of his at all, against controls on the same column returning 323,424 and 106,180 documents for two other people; and a line-by-line screen of every sheet in that population, built to read a mail header and proved on planted examples, finds no From: line and no To: or Cc: line carrying any form of his name.1 He is written about. He writes to nobody in these files and nobody in them writes to him.

One of the 530 does carry prose of his: a signed opinion column, reprinted inside a press digest somebody else compiled. A column written for publication and clipped into another man’s digest is not an act in this matter, and this page does not count it as one, quote it or treat it as evidence of anything.1

He is not Kissinger Associates and he is not Nancy Kissinger, and this page keeps all three apart. The firm’s name reaches 89 documents, of which 74 do not name him at any point; a private individual who shares the surname reaches 14, of which 12 do not name him. Nothing about her appears here in any form, and the firm’s own business is not this page’s subject.1

There is no flight log, no passenger list and no attendee roster behind any of this. Thirty-two documents in the named-form population carry a travel, flight-log, calendar or spreadsheet classification in this project’s index; every one was opened, and not one is a travel record: they are a diplomat’s office press digests, extracts from books, and a conference programme. A manifest-shape screen over all 71 so-classified documents in the wider population, proved on planted examples, returns 76 hits and every one is a false positive: a memoir’s account of a 1972 hijacking, the phrase “Pax Americana”, and the word “manifests”.1

Nothing any complainant said appears here in any form: not quoted, not summarised, not characterised, not counted. Eight documents in the named-form population carry a Bureau, police or transcript classification and not one was used; their identifiers are not listed, because at least one of them is a first-person account by someone who may be a survivor.2 This page also prints no account of Jeffrey Epstein’s address book. Every sheet read for this page that carries such an account also carries material about complainants, and nothing from any of them is taken, quoted, summarised, characterised or counted.2

Named on the documents asHenry A. Kissinger on a conference participant list, read as type at the page image; Henry Kissinger on a corporate structure note and on a manuscript page; Dr. Kissinger and Mr Kissinger in the correspondence of other people’s offices; and, overwhelmingly, the bare surname in Jeffrey Epstein’s own writing34567
The title the documents give himChairman of Kissinger Associates Inc., printed in the affiliation column of the World Economic Forum’s own participant list for Davos, 23 to 27 January 2013. Read at the page image3
Documents he wroteNone. No sheet read for this page carries his signature, his subscription or his sending address. The only prose of his located in these files is a signed opinion column reprinted inside somebody else’s press digest, which is not an act in this matter8
Documents addressed to himNone located. No To: or Cc: line in the whole population carries his name1
What the record is mostly made ofJeffrey Epstein asking other people to approach him. Between February 2013 and May 2015 Epstein wrote to at least five separate correspondents about reaching him: can you ask kissinger if he would like to have a lunch or dinner; does bill know kissinger well?; Invite Kissinger , he will enjoy it; shoudl you invite kissinger good for everyone; ask kissinger, he suggested he wanted to meet910111213
The one substantive instrumentAn undated, unheaded, unsigned sheet setting out the structure of a proposed company, Kissinger China NewCo, in which Henry Kissinger will serve as Executive Chairman of the firm with final say on all client selection matters, and a declining five-year profit split of 50, 40, 25, 10 and 10 per cent. Read at the page image4
What a named third party told Epstein14 November 2014, Thomas J. Pritzker, of a think-tank board meeting: Over the next two days, Kissinger and I then spent 3 hours. My pants are still wet. He is so fucking brilliant that it's scary.14
Not established hereThat he and Jeffrey Epstein ever met, corresponded, spoke or transacted; that any approach made to him arrived; that he knew of any of it15
Covered elsewhere on this wikiJoshua Cooper Ramo, the Kissinger Associates executive the correspondence is really about · Lapo Elkann, who says he worked as his assistant · Deepak Chopra · Tom Pritzker · Terje Rod-Larsen · Elisa New · Jeffrey Epstein

Henry Kissinger, a former United States Secretary of State and, on a January 2013 participant list read here at the page image, the chairman of Kissinger Associates Inc., stands in 530 documents of this release and wrote not one of them. The documents that carry his name are other people’s: Jeffrey Epstein’s messages asking intermediaries to approach him, Epstein’s office’s reminders about his availability, a diplomat’s office press digests that carry his name, a corporate proposal that assigns him a role, and the papers of people who had met him and told Epstein about it.13

The honest act count on this page is zero. Not a letter, not a reply, not a signature, not a message in which he is a named recipient. That is not a gap in the search: the sender column of this project’s index returns nothing for any spelling of his name while returning 106,180 and 323,424 documents for two other people, and a header screen across all 530 documents, proved on planted examples before it was believed, finds no line of either kind.1

The one exception is not an exception. A press digest in this population, compiled by somebody else, reprints an opinion column under the byline By Henry A. Kissinger and dates it on the sheet 5 March 2014. It is his prose, and a byline screen run over all 530 documents returns no other. It was written for publication, not to anybody here, and a column clipped out of the press and filed in another man’s digest is not an act in this matter. This page does not count it, quote it, or take anything from it.8

What the record does establish is an effort, and its direction. Between February 2013 and May 2015 Epstein wrote to Thomas Pritzker, to Boris Nikolic, to Peter Mandelson, to Bill Gates and twice to Terje Rod-Larsen, in each case about getting to or getting something from the same man, and he wrote in the same clipped register each time.91011161213 No document read for this page records any of those approaches producing a meeting, a reply or an acknowledgement. The page says what the approaches were and stops there.

September 2013: the fortnight the record is clearest about

At 21:13:56 on Monday 9 September 2013, Epstein sent four words. The sheet carries producer’s marks and this page says nothing about what any of them covers. The whole body of the message is:

kissinger free from 23 ev17

What happened next is visible because Epstein’s office turned it into standing furniture. By Tuesday 17 September it is a line on his daily schedule sheet, under the heading Tuesday Sept 17, 2013 LSJ, among that day’s reminders:

Reminder: Kissinger is free starting evening of Sept. 23rd18

The same reminder stands on at least five further schedule sheets and in three automatic calendar alerts, one of them generated on 17 September and one on the morning of 23 September itself.19

On 16 September, in the middle of that fortnight, Epstein wrote to Ehud Barak proposing a breakfast with Ariane de Rothschild on the morning of the 23rd and offering, for the 24th, kissinger china guy, which in Epstein’s usage means Joshua Cooper Ramo, not Kissinger.20 Two days later his assistant asked whether to follow the offer up.21

The sequence raises a question this release does not answer. A man’s availability is reported, it is written into a diary, it propagates through an office for a fortnight, and no document read for this page records what became of it. The reminders stop and nothing read here replaces them.15

Asking other people to ask him

On Monday 18 February 2013 Epstein wrote two messages about him, to two different people. To Thomas Pritzker, at Mon, 18 Feb 2013 11:58:56 +0000, under an empty subject line:

gates will be in on the 1st . are you around.? can you ask kissinger if he would like to have a lunch or dinner9

To Boris Nikolic, the same day, the whole message:

does bill know kissinger well?10

The two sheets carry their times in different forms, one a zoned header and one an unzoned office preamble, so no interval between them is derived here, and the page says only that both were written on 18 February 2013.910

On 25 March 2013 he wrote five words to Peter Mandelson, under an empty subject line:

Invite Kissinger , he will enjoy it11

On 9 November 2013 he wrote one line to Bill Gates:

Kissinger got the same pitch from ray dalio last week,16

On 28 May 2014 he wrote to Terje Rod-Larsen about a Sunday night gathering:

ehud , coming sundday night leon balck, jes, shoudl you invite kissinger good for everyone12

And a year later, on 28 May 2015, to the same correspondent, the sentence that is the closest the release comes to an initiative from the other side:

would you like to come to dinner with woody allen wed. ask kissinger, he suggested he wanted to meet13

That sentence is Epstein’s, and it is the only place in this release where any approach is said to have come from Kissinger. It is Epstein reporting to a third party what he says a fourth party suggested. No document read for this page corroborates it, dates the suggestion, or records a dinner.15 The sheet prints woody allen; the released text of the same sheet reads woody alien.13

What other people told Epstein about him

Two correspondents wrote to Epstein about him in their own words: one about a breakfast he had arranged, one about a conversation that had already happened.

On 9 October 2014, inside a chain about scheduling, William Burns wrote:

Very sorry to be slow — I was trying to rearrange my schedule, but unfortunately will be in Europe Oct 14-15 to meet with Iranians (never much fun). I will be in NY for an awards dinner on Oct 16, and then following morning for breakfast with Kissinger and farewell meeting with Ban Ki Moon, before coming back to DC. Thanks for thinking of me, and we’ll make meetings work eventually.

Warm regards, Bill22

A second message of his in the same chain says that his life and schedule would open up after the end of October and speaks of my exit from government service, and no document read for this page gives his office; none is supplied here.22

On 14 November 2014 Thomas J. Pritzker wrote a longer account, of giving a speech about ISIS to the board the sheet names as CSIS, and being invited from the floor to be challenged:

Moderator then took mic, walked over to Henry and asked him to challenge me. Henry opened up with “I completely disagree with this approach. Let me tell you where I feel we must go”. He then went 180 degrees on me. I was given rebuttal time, but WTF am I going to go up against Henry in a public setting so I asked him a question. I sat down next to Scowcroft who said I was right and Henry was wrong, “but pls don’t tell Henry I said that”.

Over the next two days, Kissinger and I then spent 3 hours. My pants are still wet. He is so fucking brilliant that it’s scary.

tjp14

Epstein’s whole reply was sounds like fun.14 This is a credible first-person account by a named correspondent and it is not corroborated anywhere else in this release. The identification of Henry as Kissinger is made by the passage itself, which uses both forms; nothing is supplied from outside it.

A third class of document shows his name used as a fixed point in other people’s diaries. On 31 May 2013 a correspondent arranging a Monday evening for Epstein reported back:

Mort IS going to the Kissinger birthday party at 7:30pm monday night23

Epstein had asked, in the message that reply quotes, ask if he not going to kissingers birthday, we can meet monday night, at 6 ? for 2 hours. or tues after 5. Three days later an arrangement for that evening was cancelled for the same reason: a correspondent wrote that Epstein needed to cancel altogether because It is Kissinger's birthday party and everyone is going there.2324

On 7 December 2015 the Harvard professor Elisa New sent Epstein a list of the people she had filmed for her poetry course and the people who had agreed to be filmed. Under the heading yeses from politicians not yet scheduled she listed, among six others:

former sec of State, Henry Kissinger25

Epstein’s reply was better list to present woody.25 That he had agreed is her statement, made to Epstein; no document read for this page records a filming.15

On 1 July 2017 Deepak Chopra forwarded Epstein a letter he had written that afternoon, proposing an institute and naming a model for it:

I am reminded that Henry Kissinger quietly became the center of a global network of leaders by running a summer school at Harvard that brought everyone together around him. I’d like to do that with a select group every summer.26

Those are Chopra’s words, not Epstein’s, and the letter is set out more fully at Deepak Chopra.26

The firm, and why it is a different subject

Kissinger Associates Inc. is a legal person and it is not this page’s subject. Its name reaches 89 documents in this release and 74 of them never name him at all. This wiki does not cover the firm and this page does not either.1

Where the firm and the man do meet on one sheet, the sheet is worth having. An undated, unheaded and unsigned page in Epstein’s files is titled Kissinger China NewCo Structure and Operation. It sets out a new corporation to hold the China-focused business operations of Kissinger Associates, and under the heading Roles it gives two:

Henry Kissinger will serve as Executive Chairman of the firm. He will have final say on all client selection matters and on operational decisions about how client matters are pursued, hiring decisions and significant capital expenditures.

Joshua Ramo will serve as Chairman and CEO of the firm. He will be responsible for daily operation of the firm, consistent with the practice of the current China operations of Kissinger Associates.4

Under Structure it sets out the terms: for the first five years, Kissinger will receive profit distributions as follows: 50% in year one, 40% in year two, 25% in year three and 10% in years four and five, and The firm will be owned initially 100% by Ramo.4

The sheet carries no date, no author, no addressee and no signature, and no document read for this page states who wrote it or whether anything came of it. The correspondence it sits beside is set out at Joshua Cooper Ramo, which this page does not repeat.415

The firm also reaches Epstein’s office twice in a way the man does not. On 13 October 2015 Ramo’s assistant cancelled an appointment with Epstein, over the firm’s own signature block:

There’s been an unforeseen change in Mr. Ramo’s calendar and unable to meet with Mr. Epstein tomorrow as scheduled. Mr. Ramo now has an internal meeting with Dr. Kissinger. My apologies for the last minute cancellation.6

Epstein’s own assistant relayed it to him in her own words the same evening, as Josh Ramo must cancel: Unfortunately Josh must attend a meeting with Mr Kissinger tomorrow.7 Of everything read for this page, that is the only writing by somebody inside Kissinger Associates that says what he was doing on a given day, and what it says is that somebody else had to cancel.

And on 20 June 2016 a message reported a delivery for Epstein. The quoted message reads, within one line of the sheet and after a producer’s mark this page says nothing about, there are 6= book in a navy blue bag; it goes on, across the sheet’s own line breaks and in the same damaged encoding, to say that they were for Jeffrey, that they were from Kissinger Associates, and that they had been delivered that day. The = characters and the broken words are on the face of the sheet and nothing is quoted across them.27

Where his name stands in other people’s papers

On the World Economic Forum’s own list of participants for Davos, as of 17 January 2013, one row reads, across its four columns, Henry A. Kissinger | Chairman | Kissinger Associates Inc. | USA. The list runs to 77 sheets in Epstein’s files. Read at the page image.3

A programme synopsis for the St Petersburg International Economic Forum of 18 to 20 June 2015, also in his files, lists under LEADERSHIP SERIES: Henry Kissinger, Chairman, Kissinger Associates, with Thomas Piketty, Rex Tillerson and one other name. It is a programme and not a record of attendance, and no document read for this page records whether he attended.2815

A draft book manuscript in the release carries a page headed with his name and nothing else. Page 359 of a 401-page draft, headed with the draft’s version mark and its word count, carries one underlined heading and no text under it:

Henry Kissinger5

No sheet read for this page names the manuscript’s author. A second copy of the same manuscript in the release puts the heading at a different folio, so no page number is asserted beyond the one printed on the sheet cited.5

The earliest message from Epstein’s own account in this population that names him uses the name as a figure of speech. In a message of 30 October 2008 about the financial crisis, written to a recipient the producing party covers, Epstein set a new way of living against an old one and named him for the old one: the sheet prints vs Kissenger.. constipation, cholesterol,WSJ editorials. The misspelling is Epstein’s own, on the paper. Nothing else is taken from that message.29

The last writing of his own that this page reads is a question. In an iMessage of 25 August 2018 at 16:21:07 UTC, Epstein asked a correspondent the producing party covers:

any thought on who he might at least listen to seriously.? ken starr? kissinger? hannity30

The sheet does not say who he is, and this page does not supply him.30

What this page does not establish

  • That he and Jeffrey Epstein ever met. No document read for this page records a meeting, a telephone call, a letter, a message or a transaction between them in either direction.15
  • That any of the approaches arrived. Five separate requests to intermediaries are on the record. No document read for this page records any of them being passed on, answered or acknowledged.91011121315
  • That he suggested he wanted to meet. That is Epstein’s report to a third party and it stands alone.13
  • That he agreed to be filmed, or was. That is Elisa New’s statement to Epstein.25
  • That the proposed China company was formed, or that he saw the sheet proposing it. The sheet is undated, unsigned and unaddressed.4
  • That he attended the Davos meeting or the St Petersburg forum. One document is a participant list compiled six days before the meeting opened; the other is a programme.328
  • Anything about Kissinger Associates as a business. The firm is a separate subject and this wiki does not yet cover it.1
  • Anything about any other bearer of the surname. A private individual who shares it is named in this release and nothing about her appears here.1
  • It makes no allegation and records none. Where the record holds other people’s words about him, they are printed as those people wrote them, and attributed to them.

How this page is scoped

Measured against the released files on 4 November 2026. The size of the index on disk was asserted against its recorded value before every run, every query’s return code was read, and no empty result was turned into a zero. Controls, printed and read in the same invocations as the counts: the phrase richard m berman returned 371 documents / 885 sheets, matching this project’s standing figure; a standing high-frequency control returned 567,984 documents / 752,295 sheets; and a freshly generated token, verified unused, returned 0.1

The phrase henry kissinger returns 186 documents / 208 sheets. Adding every other live form of his name takes the union to 219 documents, and the union is a floor, not a count: of the forms tried, thirteen return documents, three of those thirteen were not on the list this page began with, and one more, a damaged spelling, turned out to belong to a different person and was removed.1

The bare surname reaches 520 documents, and that is where the record actually is. Of the 311 documents it reaches that the named-form union does not, 71 are the firm’s and 11 are the other bearer’s, leaving 229 explained by neither. A sample of 40 of those 229 was drawn on a total key with a fixed seed, run twice and proved byte-identical, and all 40 were read. Twenty-seven are Jeffrey Epstein’s own office records or his own correspondence naming him by surname alone; six use the surname to identify the firm or an executive of it; three are journalism; two are captures of web search results; two are message logs. A sample measures the sample, and this one is not projected onto the other 189.1

The share of the record that is journalism depends entirely on which population is counted, and the difference is the finding. Classified by this project’s own labels, 87 of the 219 named-form documents are newspaper clippings, research articles or research reports: 39.7 per cent. Over the 530-document population the same classification gives 99 of 530, or 18.7 per cent, and the largest single class becomes mail headers at 229 documents averaging 1.7 sheets each. That 229 is a different set from the bare-surname residue of 229 above and the equal size is a coincidence: the two sets share 128 documents and each holds 101 the other does not. A page scoped on his full name would have been a page about press coverage; the office traffic is reachable only through the surname.1

Those classifications are this project’s labels and not a reading of the documents, and on this set they are wrong often enough to matter. Twenty documents in the named-form population are labelled travel itineraries; thirteen of them are a diplomat’s office press digests running to between fourteen and forty-three sheets, one is a 77-sheet conference participant list, and the rest are extracts from books and reports. Three are labelled flight logs and all three are pages of memoirs. One is labelled a calendar and is a newspaper page. Eight are labelled spreadsheets and seven are press digests. Every one was opened before this was written.1

Every message header line this page transcribes was run as a search key against the released files before it was printed. A header line is the part of a message reproduced identically in every copy of it, so a transcribed one addresses a whole family of copies at once. The twenty-four lines that carry a time are narrow. Each returns the message it belongs to and its further printings, at most eight documents, and not one of the twenty-four returns a single document outside the population his own name already reaches, measured against a deliberately loose control key which does reach outside it and so shows that the test can say so.

The lines that carry only a date are not narrow, and this page says so rather than leaving a reader to discover it. A bare date matches any message quoted anywhere on that day. Three of the transcribed lines are of that kind, and between them they reach documents outside the 530: at the widest, one hundred and fifty-four documents of which one hundred and forty-one lie outside it. None of those documents was read for this page, none is named here, and nothing whatever is said about them. A date is not a path to anything: it is a string anybody can type, it identifies no document by itself, and two of the three are already printed in words in the body above. And this page makes no claim anywhere that any copy of anything carries more or less than any other: every footnote that names a further printing says in terms that it was not opened and that no comparison was made.1

Twenty-one sheets were read at the page image. Twenty of them belong to documents fetched read-only, one request at a time, from the site’s own per-document path, each batch carrying a negative control that returned HTTP 403 at 111 bytes while every target returned HTTP 200 and a file beginning %PDF-; all twenty are served at a native 96 pixels per inch. The twenty-first was read from this project’s local copy of a served image at 300 pixels per inch. Every reading is taken from the native raster and none from an upsampled render.1

The paper corrected the released text in at least seven places, and this page follows the paper in every one. In the released text, a sheet that prints woody allen is transcribed woody alien; one that prints leon balck is transcribed leon balcic; one that prints bag is transcribed baa; one that prints going to go up against Henry loses the word go; one that prints Sept. 23rd loses the full stop; one that prints the heading Tuesday Sept 17, 2013 LSJ turns the comma into a full stop; and a participant list whose four columns the released text scrambles aligns cleanly on the paper. All seven sit inside material this page prints, which is why each is named in the footnote that carries it. Seven is a floor: no claim is made that the released text of these sheets is accurate anywhere else.1

Foot bands were measured pixel by pixel against a within-sheet body control before any statement about a printed stamp. The two states separate cleanly with no overlap: stamped bands return 364 to 366 dark pixels at minimum grey 0, blank bands return exactly 0 at minimum grey 255, and the body control fires on every sheet. No claim about ink on paper is made for any sheet that was not rendered.1

  • Joshua Cooper Ramo, whose page carries the Kissinger Associates correspondence, the compensation exchanges and the fuller treatment of the China proposal
  • Lapo Elkann, who has said publicly that he worked as his assistant and that he crossed paths with Epstein at a gathering in New York while doing so
  • Jeffrey Epstein, who wrote every one of the approaches recorded here
  • Tom Pritzker, asked to make an approach in 2013 and the author of the 2014 account
  • Terje Rod-Larsen, asked twice, and whose office’s press digests account for most of the journalism in this population
  • Boris Nikolic, Peter Mandelson and Bill Gates, the other correspondents of the 2013 approaches
  • Elisa New and Deepak Chopra, whose own letters to Epstein name him
  • Lesley Groff, who kept the schedule sheets and relayed the 2015 cancellation

Notes

Footnotes

  1. Measured against the released files on 4 November 2026. Counts are of documents in the full-text index, taken with an explicit suffix-strip document key and with sheets counted as index rows; the two are one key on this corpus and are not reported as independent routes. Controls printed and read in the same invocations: richard m berman 371 documents / 885 sheets; the standing high-frequency control 567,984 documents / 752,295 sheets under the explicit strip; a freshly generated token, confirmed to return nothing before it was used, 0. Forms tried and their returns, in documents: henry kissinger 186 · kissinger, henry 2, which the index reads identically to kissinger henry · henry a kissinger 15, which the index reads identically to henry a. kissinger · dr kissinger 15, identical to dr. kissinger · mr kissinger 3 · secretary of state kissinger 2 · kissenger 7 · kissingcr 1 · henry kissing 2, which reaches two sheets where an export artefact has broken the surname · kissing r 4 · kissinger bare 520 · kissinger associates 86, with two further damaged renderings taking that to 89 · nancy kissinger 13, with one damaged rendering taking it to 14. Returning nothing: henry alfred kissinger, heinz kissinger, heinz alfred kissinger, hank kissinger, harry kissinger, secretary kissinger, sec kissinger, sec. kissinger, prof kissinger, professor kissinger, ambassador kissinger, chancellor kissinger, kissinger, h, kissinger h., h kissinger, h a kissinger, h. a. kissinger, henry kissinger jr, kissinger iii, kissinger esq, kissinger mcclarty, kissinger mclarty, kissinger-mcclarty, henrykissinger, hkissinger, kissingerh, henri kissinger, henery kissinger, and seventeen further damage shapes of the surname and forename tested for the substitutions this corpus is known to make. The named-form union is 219 documents. It adds three documents over a thirteen-form list this page began with: one reached only by mr kissinger and two only by henry kissing. And it removes one, a hundred-sheet newspaper compilation reached only by kissnger, whose single occurrence of any form of the surname is the other bearer’s name and not his. 219 is a floor and is reported as one. The bare surname residue: 520 minus the 209 floor documents the surname also reaches leaves 311, of which 71 are the firm’s and 11 the other bearer’s, leaving 229. The sample of the 229 was drawn with a fixed seed over the population sorted by the identifier string, which is a total order because identifiers are unique and no tie can be broken by iteration order; the script was run twice and its output proved byte-identical. All 40 were read and classified: 27 Epstein’s own office records or correspondence, 6 the firm or its executives, 3 journalism, 2 web-search captures, 2 message logs. The combined population is 530 documents. The sender census: this project’s index holds 0 documents whose sender column matches kissinger, kissenger, kissingcr, kissnger or the fragment kissin, against the same column returning 106,180 and 323,424 for two other people and 0 for a freshly generated token. The header screen was built to require a real header label followed by a colon; a first version omitting the colon produced 64 hits, every one of them an ordinary sentence beginning with a capital A, and it was rebuilt. The rebuilt arm fires on four planted header lines and is silent on five planted non-headers, and over all 530 documents it returns 0 From: or sender lines and 0 To:, Cc: or Bcc: lines carrying any form of the name. The manifest screen tests for passenger, manifest, pax, souls-on-board and tail-number shapes; five of seven planted examples fire and two designed negatives stay silent; over all 71 travel, flight-log, calendar and spreadsheet-labelled documents in the 530 it returns 76 hits, every one read and every one a false positive. The byline screen: three arms tested for a byline, an author credit line and an op-ed credit shape over all 530 documents, each proved on a planted positive and silent on a planted negative; two fired. They return one document carrying a signed column of his, which is set out at 8. Classification figures are this project’s own labels and are quoted as such; the documents behind them were opened. The fetches: each batch began with a negative control which returned HTTP 403 at 111 bytes while every target returned HTTP 200 and a file beginning %PDF-; pdfimages -list reports every one at a native 96 pixels per inch; rasters were extracted at native resolution and not upsampled. Register check: every identifier cited on this page was run against this project’s registers with a known-barred positive control returning its bar in the same invocation; none of the cited identifiers is in any register, which on this corpus is the ordinary answer and is not a clearance. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6 ↩7 ↩8 ↩9 ↩10 ↩11 ↩12 ↩13 ↩14 ↩15 ↩16 ↩17 ↩18 ↩19

  2. Documents refused, and why. Eight documents in the 219-document named-form population carry a Bureau, police or transcript classification in this project’s index. None was used, and their identifiers are not listed here, because at least one is a first-person account by someone who may be a survivor, and listing the identifiers beside the fact that they name him would point a reader at it. The classification was the starting point and not the finding: each was opened only so far as its header, enough to establish what it is, and nothing below the header of any of them is read, quoted, summarised, characterised or counted on this page. A classification-based refusal can leak, because the same paper is produced more than once under different identifiers and the labels disagree between printings; the admitted set was therefore checked for same-length printings of anything refused, and the one pair at a distinctive length was examined and is not a printing of a refused document. A further class was refused on reading rather than on classification. Several newspaper pages, book extracts and court exhibits in this population carry an account of Jeffrey Epstein’s address book on the same sheet as his name; every one of them also carries, on that sheet, a complainant’s own account or a description of complainants. Nothing from any of them appears on this page, which is why this page prints no account of the address book at all. One further document was examined and set aside: a call-detail record, cited for nothing and with no value taken from it. ↩ ↩2

  3. World Economic Forum Annual Meeting, List of Participants, As of 17 January 2013, Davos-Klosters, Switzerland, 23 to 27 January 2013, seventy-seven sheets. EFTA02707384 served sheet 37. Read at the page image at the served file’s native 96 pixels per inch, fetched read-only with a negative control returning HTTP 403 at 111 bytes in the same call. From this sheet this page takes one row, across all four of its columns, and the running heading World Economic Forum Annual Meeting printed at the foot. The released text of this sheet separates the name column from the affiliation column, so that the two cannot be paired from it; the columns align on the paper and the pairing printed on this page is taken from the image and from nothing else. No other participant on the sheet is named here. The foot of this sheet carries a printed Bates stamp in a numbering series different from the identifier that addresses the document. This document is typed in this project’s index as a travel itinerary, which it is not. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5

  4. Single sheet, undated, unheaded and unsigned, titled Kissinger China NewCo Structure and Operation. EFTA00584255 p. 1 of 1. Read at the page image. Fetched read-only from the site’s own per-document path on 4 November 2026: HTTP 200, 62,549 bytes, a file beginning %PDF- of one page, against a negative control fetched in the same call returning HTTP 403 and 111 bytes; pdfimages -list reports the native resolution as 96 pixels per inch and the readings below are taken from that raster. From this sheet this page takes the title, the opening sentence, the two paragraphs under Roles in full, the profit-split sentence and the ownership sentence under Structure, and the fact that the sheet carries no date, no author, no addressee and no signature. The sheet also carries paragraphs headed General Guidelines and Operational Principles and Questions; nothing is taken from them here. One quotation on this page crosses a line break on this sheet: the sheet wraps China-focused across two lines with a hyphen. Measured against the sheet’s established line width that break falls at 0.956, inside the band in which every other soft wrap on the sheet falls (0.921 to 1.000) and far from the 0.060 to 0.542 at which its paragraphs end, so it is an ordinary word wrap and the quotation crosses it. The foot band was measured against a within-sheet body control: 0 dark pixels at minimum grey 255, against 4,248 dark pixels in the body band. This sheet carries no printed Bates stamp and none is named. No producer’s mark falls on this sheet. The same document is cited and quoted at Joshua Cooper Ramo, which treats the correspondence around it; no document read for this page ties this sheet to any particular message, and none is asserted. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6

  5. One sheet of a draft book manuscript, carrying at its head the draft’s version mark 4.2.12 and WC: 191694, a single underlined heading, and the folio 359 centred at the foot. HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017446 p. 1 of 1. Read at the page image from this project’s local copy of the served file, a JPEG at 300 pixels per inch. From this sheet this page takes the heading, the version mark, the word count and the folio, and the fact that the rest of the sheet carries no text at all. The foot of the sheet carries a printed production stamp. The manuscript’s own table of contents, carried on other sheets of the same production, gives its total word count as 191,694 over 401 pages and sets out a preface and chapters; no sheet read for this page names its author, and none is supplied here. The adjacent sheets of the same production carry further headings of the same kind, each on its own otherwise blank page. A copy of the whole manuscript stands at EFTA01090973, where the same heading falls at a different folio; that document is 406 sheets, it was not opened beyond the sheet carrying the heading, nothing here rests on it, and no comparison between printings was made or is reported. ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  6. Thread of four messages of Tuesday 13 October 2015 under the subject Re: Meeting Request, five sheets. EFTA02070162 served sheet 2. Read at the page image at the served file’s native 96 pixels per inch, fetched read-only with a negative control returning HTTP 403 at 111 bytes in the same call. From this sheet this page takes the message quoted at On Oct 13, 2015, at 5:18 PM, Ybel Collado, taken whole except for its closing salutation, and the signature block beneath it, which reads Ybel Collado / EA to Co-Chief Executive Officer and Vice Chairman, Joshua Cooper Ramo / Kissinger Associates, Inc. / 350 Park Avenue, 26th FL. Producer’s marks fall on this sheet. Nothing under any of them is read, supplied or described, and this page does not say what any of them covers. The foot of this sheet carries a printed Bates stamp in a numbering series different from the identifier that addresses the document; the two are not converted into one another. Measured against a within-sheet body control the foot band returns 366 dark pixels at minimum grey 0, where a blank band on a sibling sheet returns 0 at minimum grey 255. No telephone, fax or mail value from the signature block is reproduced, described or located. Six further printings of the same message are in the release, among them EFTA02070068, EFTA02070531 and EFTA02070744; none was opened and no comparison between printings was made or is reported. See Joshua Cooper Ramo. ↩ ↩2

  7. Lesley Groff to Jeffrey Epstein, Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2015 9:46 PM, subject Josh Ramo must cancel, one sheet. EFTA02485200 p. 1. Read at the page image at the served file’s native 96 pixels per inch, fetched read-only with a negative control returning HTTP 403 at 111 bytes in the same call. From this sheet this page takes the subject line, the date and the first eleven words of the body. The body continues and mus= cancel his appt with you at 4pm.; the = is an export artefact on the face of the sheet and the quotation on this page stops before it rather than crossing it. The sheet prints the recipient’s forename with three fs and it is not mended. Producer’s marks fall on this sheet. Nothing under any of them is read, supplied or described, and this page does not say what any of them covers. The foot of this sheet carries a printed Bates stamp in a different numbering series; measured against a within-sheet body control the foot band returns 365 dark pixels at minimum grey 0, against a blank band’s 0 at minimum grey 255. The machine-generated trailer below the message is not reproduced. See Lesley Groff. ↩ ↩2

  8. A press digest of thirty-five sheets compiled by a third party. EFTA01133119 p. 30. Released text only; this sheet was not read at the page image, and nothing is asserted here about what its paper carries. From it this page takes only the fact that the digest reprints a signed column under the byline By Henry A. Kissinger, and the date printed beside that byline, which the released text renders with a full stop where a comma belongs. Not one word of the column is reproduced, summarised or characterised here, and no publication is named for it anywhere on this sheet. It was located by a byline screen run over all 530 documents, described at 1, and it is the only document the screen returns. A column written for publication is not an act in this matter and is not counted as one anywhere on this page. ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  9. Jeffrey Epstein to Tom Pritzker, Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 11:58:56 +0000, subject line printed with no value, one sheet. EFTA00954419 p. 1. Read at the page image at the served file’s native 96 pixels per inch, fetched read-only with a negative control returning HTTP 403 at 111 bytes in the same call. The line quoted is the whole body of the message. The sheet’s spacing inside that line is irregular, two spaces before the first full stop and three before can you ask, and markdown will not render it; it is recorded here. Producer’s marks fall on this sheet. Nothing under any of them is read, supplied or described, and this page does not say what any of them covers. The foot band was measured against a within-sheet body control and carries no printed Bates stamp. A second printing at EFTA01901941 renders the send time as an unzoned office preamble two seconds adrift; it was not opened, nothing here rests on it, and no comparison between printings was made or is reported. See Tom Pritzker. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5

  10. Jeffrey Epstein to Boris Nikolic, Sent: Mon 2/18/2013 12:38:15 PM, one sheet. EFTA01902241 p. 1. Read at the page image at the served file’s native 96 pixels per inch, fetched read-only with a negative control returning HTTP 403 at 111 bytes in the same call. The five words quoted are the whole body of the message. Producer’s marks fall on this sheet. Nothing under any of them is read, supplied or described, and this page does not say what any of them covers. The foot of this sheet carries a printed Bates stamp in a numbering series different from the identifier that addresses the document; the two are not converted into one another and the stamp is not used as an address. Measured against a within-sheet body control the foot band returns 364 dark pixels at minimum grey 0, where a blank band on a sibling sheet returns 0 at minimum grey 255. The send time on this sheet is an unzoned office preamble and the send time on the message at the preceding note is a zoned header. Two timestamps in different forms are two different clocks, and no interval between them is derived anywhere on this page; both messages are dated 18 February 2013 and nothing further about their order is asserted. A second printing is at EFTA00954428; it was not opened and no comparison between printings was made or is reported. See Boris Nikolic. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5

  11. Jeffrey Epstein to Peter Mandelson, Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 15:33:27 +0000, subject line printed with no value, one sheet. EFTA00957272 p. 1. Read at the page image at the served file’s native 96 pixels per inch, fetched read-only with a negative control returning HTTP 403 at 111 bytes in the same call. The six words quoted are the whole body of the message, and the space before the comma is the sheet’s. Producer’s marks fall on this sheet. Nothing under any of them is read, supplied or described, and this page does not say what any of them covers. The foot band was measured against a within-sheet body control and carries no printed Bates stamp. See Peter Mandelson. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  12. Jeffrey Epstein to Terje Rod-Larsen, Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 19:20:42 +0000, subject line printed with no value, one sheet. EFTA00990738 p. 1. Read at the page image at the served file’s native 96 pixels per inch, fetched read-only with a negative control returning HTTP 403 at 111 bytes in the same call. The line quoted is the whole body of the message, and the misspellings sundday and shoudl are the sheet’s. The sheet prints leon balck; the released text of the same sheet reads leon balcic. The paper governs and the released text’s form is not quoted on this page. Producer’s marks fall on this sheet. Nothing under any of them is read, supplied or described, and this page does not say what any of them covers. The foot band was measured against a within-sheet body control and carries no printed Bates stamp. A second printing is at EFTA01920989; it was not opened and no comparison between printings was made or is reported. See Terje Rod-Larsen. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  13. Jeffrey Epstein to Terje Rod-Larsen, Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 13:45:45 +0000, subject line printed with no value, one sheet. EFTA00855950 p. 1. Read at the page image at the served file’s native 96 pixels per inch, fetched read-only with a negative control returning HTTP 403 at 111 bytes in the same call. The line quoted is the whole body of the message, and the three spaces before ask kissinger are the sheet’s. The sheet prints woody allen; the released text of the same sheet reads woody alien. The paper governs and the released text’s form is not quoted on this page. Producer’s marks fall on this sheet. Nothing under any of them is read, supplied or described, and this page does not say what any of them covers. The foot band was measured against a within-sheet body control and carries no printed Bates stamp. A second printing is at EFTA02499161; it was not opened and no comparison between printings was made or is reported. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6

  14. Thomas J. Pritzker to Jeffrey Epstein, quoted at On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 1:58 PM, with Epstein’s reply at Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 19:01:22 +0000, one sheet. EFTA01001283 p. 1. Read at the page image at the served file’s native 96 pixels per inch, fetched read-only with a negative control returning HTTP 403 at 111 bytes in the same call. From this sheet this page takes the two passages quoted, the sign-off tjp, and Epstein’s whole reply, which is two words. The double spaces inside the quotations are the sheet’s, and WTF am I going to go up against Henry is the sheet’s wording and is not mended. The released text of this sheet drops the word go from that clause; the paper governs and the released text’s form is not quoted on this page. The three blocks are printed here as three blocks because the sheet breaks between them structurally: measured against the sheet’s established line width, the line before Over the next two days ends at 0.179 of that width and the sign-off line at 0.040, where every soft wrap in the same block ends between 0.957 and 1.000. Nothing is joined across either break. The quotation begins partway into the message, at a sentence boundary, and the sentences before it are described in the body rather than reproduced. The body’s description of the occasion is taken from the message’s own opening words, which read Gave a speech to Board of CSIS about ISIS.; no city, date or other particular of that occasion is supplied from outside the sheet, and the sheet gives none. The remainder of the message describes the audience and names three further people; it is not reproduced here. The sender’s own send time is an unzoned quoting preamble and the reply’s is a zoned header. Two timestamps in different forms are two different clocks, and no interval between them is derived. Producer’s marks fall on this sheet. Nothing under any of them is read, supplied or described, and this page does not say what any of them covers. The identification of Henry in this passage rests on the passage itself, which writes the surname three lines later; nothing is supplied from outside the sheet. See Tom Pritzker. ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  15. Statements of absence on this page are scoped to the documents read and returned for it, and to a search of the released files run on 4 November 2026 under the name forms listed at 1. They are not claims about what the release holds, and they are not claims about the world. Specifically, and in each case naming the control that shows the query could have found the thing: no document written by him was located, against a sender census on this project’s own index that returns 106,180 and 323,424 documents for two other people and 0 for a freshly generated token; no document addressed to him was located, against a header screen proved on four planted header lines and silent on five planted non-headers; no record of a meeting, call, letter or transaction between him and Jeffrey Epstein was located; no document recording that any of the five approaches was passed on, answered or acknowledged was located; no document corroborating that he suggested a meeting, or dating any such suggestion, was located; no record of a filming was located; no document stating who wrote the China proposal, or what became of it, was located; and no document recording his attendance at either the Davos meeting or the St Petersburg forum was located. Each of those is a statement about the material read for this page and about the forms listed in the scope note. Unmeasured, and therefore not stated as a negative: whether he appears in these files under a title, a role phrase or an institutional handle that never spells the name; whether the 189 documents of the bare-surname residue that were not read contain anything the 40 read do not; and what the eight documents refused by classification contain. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6 ↩7 ↩8

  16. Jeffrey Epstein to Bill Gates, Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2013 23:23:34 +0000, subject line printed with no value, one sheet. EFTA00975553 p. 1. Read at the page image at the served file’s native 96 pixels per inch, fetched read-only with a negative control returning HTTP 403 at 111 bytes in the same call. The line quoted is the whole body of the message, trailing comma included. No document read for this page says what the pitch was. Producer’s marks fall on this sheet. Nothing under any of them is read, supplied or described, and this page does not say what any of them covers. The sheet also carries a four-character fragment below the export boilerplate; it is not reproduced and nothing is taken from it. The foot band was measured against a within-sheet body control and carries no printed Bates stamp. See Bill Gates. ↩ ↩2

  17. Jeffrey Epstein, Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2013 21:13:56 +0000, subject line printed with no value, one sheet. EFTA00969545 p. 1. Read at the page image at the served file’s native 96 pixels per inch, fetched read-only with a negative control returning HTTP 403 at 111 bytes in the same call. The four words quoted are the whole body of the message. Producer’s marks fall on this sheet. Nothing under any of them is read, supplied or described, and this page does not say what any of them covers. The foot band was measured against a within-sheet body control and carries no printed Bates stamp. A second printing of the same message is at EFTA01957075, which renders the send time as an unzoned office preamble; it was not opened, nothing here rests on it, and no comparison between printings was made or is reported. ↩

  18. Jeffrey Epstein’s daily schedule sheets, thirteen sheets as this project’s index holds them. EFTA00284799 served sheet 7. Read at the page image at the served file’s native 96 pixels per inch, fetched read-only with a negative control returning HTTP 403 at 111 bytes in the same call. From this sheet this page takes the heading Tuesday Sept 17, 2013 LSJ and the single reminder line quoted, and nothing else. The sheet prints Sept. 23rd, with a full stop after Sept and rd as a superscript; the full stop and the superscript were both settled under magnification of the native raster. The released text of this sheet drops the full stop and prints Sept 23rd, and the paper governs. The heading is settled the same way: the sheet prints Tuesday Sept 17, 2013 LSJ, underlined, with a comma and a double space before LSJ, where the released text prints Tuesday Sept 17.2013 LSJ. Markdown will not render the superscript and it is recorded here rather than shown. Producer’s marks fall on this sheet. Nothing under any of them is read, supplied or described, and this page does not say what any of them covers. The sheet also carries that day’s other reminders, named third parties, and flight legs. None of it is reproduced, summarised, characterised or counted, and no passenger of any flight named on it is identified, described or counted. Five further printings of the same reminder stand at EFTA00383074, EFTA00383548, EFTA00872613, HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_000929 and HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_000935; none was opened and no comparison between printings was made or is reported. ↩

  19. Three automatic calendar alerts carrying the same reminder text, each one sheet. EFTA02128292 p. 1, generated 17 September 2013 and naming a calendar service as its sender; EFTA02126659 p. 1, timed on the sheet at mid-morning on Monday 23 September 2013; and EFTA02125809 p. 1. Released text only; none of these three sheets was read at the page image, and nothing is asserted here about what their paper carries. This page takes from them only the fact that the reminder was carried into automatic alerts, and the two dates quoted above. The times printed on these sheets are in two different forms and no interval between any of them is derived anywhere on this page. ↩

  20. Jeffrey Epstein to Ehud Barak, Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 18:55:54 +0000, subject line printed with no value, one sheet. EFTA00970427 p. 1. Released text only; this sheet was not read at the page image. The whole body reads can you do breakfast with ariane rothscild on morinig of 23. and if you wnat kissinger china guy at brakfast 24. The misspellings are the sheet’s as the released text carries them and are not mended. kissinger china guy is Epstein’s description of a third person and not of the subject of this page; the same usage, in the same month, is set out and sourced at Joshua Cooper Ramo. Two further printings are at EFTA00383615 and EFTA01955207; neither was opened and no comparison between printings was made or is reported. ↩

  21. Lesley Groff to Jeffrey Epstein, timed on the sheet at midday on Wednesday 18 September 2013, subject Ehud-Kissinger China guy?, one sheet. EFTA02574993 p. 1. Released text only; this sheet was not read at the page image. This page takes from it the subject line, the date, and the fact that the message asked whether to follow the offer up; the body also names a third party and that name is not reproduced here. The = in the body of this sheet is an export artefact of the kind this release carries throughout and no quotation is taken across it. ↩

  22. Chain of messages between Jeffrey Epstein and William Burns running from Tue, Oct 7, 2014 to Wed, 15 Oct 2014 23:31:04 +0000, two sheets. EFTA00628966 p. 1. Read at the page image at the served file’s native 96 pixels per inch, fetched read-only with a negative control returning HTTP 403 at 111 bytes in the same call. The passage quoted is the message the chain attributes to On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 10:10 AM, William Burns, taken whole; the double spaces inside it are the sheet’s. This page takes from the rest of the chain only a second message of his, quoted at On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 5:45 PM, which reads in part My life (and schedule) will open up a little more after the end of October, and my exit from government service. The sign-off stands on its own line on the sheet and is printed here as its own line: measured against the sheet’s established line width, the body’s last line ends at 0.206 of that width where every soft wrap in the same block ends between 0.986 and 1.000, so the break before the sign-off is structural and the two are not joined. No document read for this page gives his office and none is supplied here. Producer’s marks fall on several lines of this chain. Nothing under any of them is read, supplied or described, and this page does not say what any of them covers. The times on this chain stand in two forms, a zoned header and unzoned quoting preambles, and no interval is derived anywhere on this page. Two further printings are at EFTA00998834 and EFTA00999171; neither was opened and no comparison between printings was made or is reported. ↩ ↩2

  23. Thread of three messages of Friday 31 May 2013 under the subject Re: Mort Zuckerman, the last timed Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 13:13:52 +0000, one sheet. EFTA00961958 p. 1. Read at the page image at the served file’s native 96 pixels per inch, fetched read-only with a negative control returning HTTP 403 at 111 bytes in the same call. From this sheet this page takes the opening clause of the final message and Epstein’s quoted message of On May 31, 2013, at 8:19 AM, whole; the double spaces inside the latter are the sheet’s. The quotation stops at monday night because the mark that follows it cannot be settled at this sheet’s native resolution: the released text renders it as three full stops and a space, the paper appears to carry a single character and no space, and this page asserts neither. The clause continues it is black tie., which is given in this page’s own words rather than quoted. The remainder of the thread concerns arranging a different meeting and is not reproduced. Producer’s marks fall on this sheet. Nothing under any of them is read, supplied or described, and this page does not say what any of them covers. The times on this sheet stand in two forms and no interval is derived. Three further printings are at EFTA00389766, EFTA00961960 and EFTA01971458; none was opened and no comparison between printings was made or is reported. ↩ ↩2

  24. Message of Monday, June 03, 2013 2:39 PM quoted inside a thread about arranging a dinner, three sheets. EFTA02138014 p. 1. Released text only; this sheet was not read at the page image. This page takes from it the single clause quoted and the date, and nothing else. The sender of the quoted message is not named here, because the line carrying the name is damaged on this sheet. ↩

  25. Elisa New to Jeffrey Epstein, On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 3:23 PM, inside a chain whose outer message is Epstein’s own at Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2015 19:35:13 +0000, subject Re: and....another bit of advice ...? on WA, three sheets. EFTA00839330 p. 1. Read at the page image at the served file’s native 96 pixels per inch, fetched read-only with a negative control returning HTTP 403 at 111 bytes in the same call. From this sheet this page takes the heading yeses from politicians not yet scheduled, the one line quoted, the fact that six other names stand under the same heading, and Epstein’s whole reply, which is five words. Her title is taken from her own signature block, which stands on the second sheet of the same document and reads Elisa New / Powell M. Cabot Professor of American Literature / Harvard University; that sheet was read in the released text only, and no address from it is reproduced. The other names under that heading, and the longer list above and below it, are not reproduced here. Producer’s marks fall on several lines of this sheet. Nothing under any of them is read, supplied or described, and this page does not say what any of them covers. The times on this sheet stand in two forms and no interval is derived. A further printing is at EFTA00839333 and a third at EFTA01788356; neither was opened and no comparison between printings was made or is reported. See Elisa New. ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  26. Deepak Chopra’s letter of July 1, 2017 at 4:02:19 PM EDT, forwarded to Jeffrey Epstein the same afternoon, three sheets. EFTA01041991 p. 2. Released text only; this sheet was not read at the page image. The two sentences quoted are taken whole from the first numbered proposal of that letter and nothing else is taken from it here. The letter is signed Deepak, and the sentence naming him is the letter-writer’s and not Jeffrey Epstein’s, although this project’s index records Epstein as the sender of the forwarding message. The letter is set out at greater length, and attributed the same way, at Deepak Chopra. A further printing is at EFTA01041994 and a third at EFTA02352355; neither was opened and no comparison between printings was made or is reported. ↩ ↩2

  27. Message of On Monday, June 20, 2016, quoted inside a chain whose index date is 21 June 2016, one sheet. EFTA02295332 p. 1. Read at the page image at the served file’s native 96 pixels per inch, fetched read-only with a negative control returning HTTP 403 at 111 bytes in the same call. The clause quoted stands wholly within one line of the sheet and nothing is quoted across a line break; the = characters and the broken word are on the face of the sheet. The sheet also prints its ellipses as the literal characters =E2=80=A6, and this page neither reproduces nor decodes them: the words after the quoted clause are given in this page’s own words instead. The sheet prints bag; the released text of the same sheet reads baa, and the paper governs. Producer’s marks fall on this sheet, including inside the message the page quotes from. Nothing under any of them is read, supplied or described, and this page does not say what any of them covers. The clause this page quotes stops short of every one of them. The foot of this sheet carries a printed Bates stamp in a different numbering series. This document records a delivery from the firm and not an act of the subject of this page. ↩

  28. Programme Synopsis and Architecture, SPIEF 2015 (June, 18-20 2015), one sheet, landscape. EFTA01191263 p. 1. Read at the page image at the served file’s native 96 pixels per inch, fetched read-only with a negative control returning HTTP 403 at 111 bytes in the same call. From this sheet this page takes the title, the dates, the heading LEADERSHIP SERIES and the four names printed under it. No claim about a printed Bates stamp is made for this sheet: it is landscape and its foot band was not measured. It is a programme and not an attendance record, and no document read for this page records whether the event took place as programmed or who attended it. A second printing is at EFTA02710590; it was not opened and no comparison between printings was made or is reported. ↩ ↩2

  29. Jeffrey Epstein, Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 01:00:02 +0000, subject line printed with no value, one sheet. EFTA00694623 p. 1. Read at the page image at the served file’s native 96 pixels per inch, fetched read-only with a negative control returning HTTP 403 at 111 bytes in the same call. From this sheet this page takes the four words quoted and the date, and nothing else. The misspelling Kissenger is on the paper and is Epstein’s own, not an artefact of the released text. The rest of the message concerns banking and the financial crisis and is not reproduced, summarised or characterised here. Producer’s marks fall on this sheet. Nothing under any of them is read, supplied or described, and this page does not say what any of them covers. The foot band was measured against a within-sheet body control and carries no printed Bates stamp. Four further printings of the same message are at EFTA00748417, EFTA01300065, EFTA01780865 and EFTA01826147; none was opened and no comparison between printings was made or is reported. A copy is not an event, and these five sheets are one message. ↩

  30. A record of messages recovered from a telephone, seventeen sheets. EFTA00786091 served sheet 14. Read at the page image at the served file’s native 96 pixels per inch, fetched read-only with a negative control returning HTTP 403 at 111 bytes in the same call. From this sheet this page takes one message, its stamp iMessage [1] 2018-08-25 16:21:07 (UTC), and the fact that its sender field reads Self over an address this page does not reproduce. The spacing inside the quotation is the sheet’s. Producer’s marks fall on this sheet. Nothing under any of them is read, supplied or described, and this page does not say what any of them covers. No contact value of any kind is taken from this sheet. The other messages on this sheet are not reproduced, summarised, characterised or counted, and this page makes no statement about whom the message refers to. ↩ ↩2

Backlinks