⚠ what this page is about, and what it is not

An investor who corresponded with Jeffrey Epstein from 2009 to 2017, including from the Gulf. No allegation against him was found anywhere in the release, and none is made here. ⚠⚠ One quoted exchange contains a woman’s name that the producing party withheld. She is not identified here, nothing about her is inferred, and the page says plainly that her identity and her circumstances are unknown to it.

WhoTom Barrack, investor; the release gives his name in a private e-mail alias and one formal signature, Thomas J. Barrack, Jr1
In the release546 documents under the full name, 558 pages, 1.02 pages per document2
His own messages118 sender rows across 100 documents, 14 September 2009 to 20 July 20172
⭐ The actOn 5 October 2010, writing from Dubai, he answered Epstein’s question about whether he would see a person Epstein called “sultan”: “I did. He is in exile—quite sad!!!!”3

Tom Barrack appears in the released files as a correspondent of Jeffrey Epstein’s across eight years. The traffic is short, fast and personal: BlackBerry messages about where each man is and who he is seeing.

October 2010: Dubai, Paris, and a withheld name

The exchange runs over a few hours on 4 and 5 October 2010 and is on one sheet, read at the image.3

  • Barrack, 04:24: “U and I need to talk about ▮!!! I am just being smart and considerate of her! Where r u tomorrow! I am in Dubai”
  • Epstein: “paris.. will you see sultan?”
  • Barrack, 04:51: “I did. He is in exile—quite sad!!!!”
  • Epstein, 04:54: “i flew her to paris form new york.. if you are free call now ▮”
  • Epstein: “I will be available again after 1 paris time.. come visit on your way back , I still have my apartment. you are welcome to stay”

⚠⚠ THE NAME IN BARRACK’S FIRST MESSAGE IS COVERED ON THE SHEET BY THE PRODUCING PARTY, AND THIS PAGE DOES NOT SUPPLY IT, RECONSTRUCT IT, OR LOOK FOR IT IN ANOTHER COPY. The woman Epstein refers to as “her” is, on the face of the thread, the person whose name Barrack’s message carries. Nothing read for this page identifies her, states her age, says why she travelled, or says whether the two men are referring to the same person at all.The page reports the messages and stops, and a reader should not take the juxtaposition for a finding.

“sultan” is lower-case on the sheet and is not identified here. The release contains a separate high-volume name fragment of that form which the desk has not resolved, and guessing across that gap is exactly the homograph error this desk has recorded. Barrack’s answer, “He is in exile”, is the only thing said about the person.

What is plainly documented is the geography: Barrack writing from Dubai, Epstein in Paris offering his apartment, and the two arranging a call within the hour.3

What the 546 documents are

A count this size has been an artefact three times on this wiki, so it was measured first.2

  • 558 pages across 546 documents, 1.02 pages per document. Not a running head. 473 are typed as e-mail headers.
  • Most of his messages arrive under a private alias, Tom Barrack Private, which accounts for 77 of his 118 sender rows; Thomas J. Barrack, Jr accounts for 9.
  • His subject lines are almost all bare Re:, which is the signature of a running exchange and not of a circular.
  • 13 documents in the population are typed phone.extraction and were not opened for this draft; they are a different kind of record and are flagged rather than counted into anything.

What this page does not say

No allegation against him was found anywhere in the release.4

Nothing here says he did business with Epstein, took money from him, or introduced anyone to him.Nothing here connects him to any later matter in his own public life, which is outside this corpus and outside this page.

⚠⚠ And nothing here should be read as a statement about the woman in the October 2010 thread. Her name was withheld by the producing party; this desk withholds it too, and additionally declines to characterise a person about whom it knows nothing.

Footnotes

Footnotes

  1. Identification.No document read for this page states his firm, his title or a biography. The release carries him as the e-mail display name Tom Barrack Private and, on nine rows, as Thomas J. Barrack, Jr. The page states that and no more, because a sister page was corrected today for taking a descriptor from a colleague’s signature block.

  2. The measurement. "Tom Barrack" returns 546 documents across 558 pages, 1.02 pages per document; "Thomas Barrack" returns 23. ⚠ The hinge is page scope: pages_fts indexes pages and a document counts when any one page carries the phrase. Corpus documents.doc_type splits the population as email.header 473 · phone.extraction 13 · email.footer_only 13 · email.chain 8 · news_clipping 7. In the e-mail metadata store, senders matching the surname give 118 rows across 100 documents, 14 September 2009 to 20 July 2017, by year 2009 1 · 2010 36 · 2011 17 · 2012 23 · 2013 5 · 2014 4 · 2016 10 · 2017 21, with no rows in 2015. Sender strings: Tom Barrack Private 77 · Tom Barrack 17 · Thomas J. Barrack, Jr 9. ⚠ No deduplicated message total is stated, and the surname population was not decomposed for other Barracks. 2 3

  3. The exchange of 4 and 5 October 2010. EFTA00732511 p.1, read at the image at 700 dpi, which carries the whole chain; the outermost message is Epstein’s, headed Tue, 05 Oct 2010 03:20:48 +0000. ⚠ The header times and the quoted On … at … times are in different zones and are printed here as the sheet prints them, which is why Barrack’s 04:24 appears below a message sent at 19:49 the previous evening. Spellings form for “from” and the doubled full stops are as printed. ⚠⚠ Two values are covered on this sheet: a NAME in Barrack’s first message, and a telephone number after “call now”. Neither is supplied, neither is reconstructed, and no other copy was consulted for either.No e-mail address from this sheet is reproduced here. The sheet’s foot carries a confidentiality legend that is Epstein’s own, naming him as its owner. Two later messages in the same sequence, EFTA00732536 p.1 and EFTA00732539 p.1, carry only “Let me know when is good”, “now”, “One hour ok” and “look forward to it.” and were read from the text layer. 2 3

  4. Absences, each scoped. No allegation against him was found anywhere in the release. No deposition of him, no interview report and no filing naming him as a party or a subject was found. ⚠ Each of these says what was not found, not what does not exist. ⚠⚠ The six derived stores were NOT searched for this draft, and the 13 phone.extraction documents in the population were not opened. Both are real gaps and are stated rather than implied.