Epstein Data Wiki

Jean Pigozzi

Properties2
tagsperson, edge-foundation, panama, france, art-collector, epstein-correspondent
aliasesJohnny Pigozzi, Pigozzi Jean, J. Pigozzi

40 min read

How the documents name him”JEAN PIGOZZI” and “Jean Pigozzi” in e-mail headers; “Johnny” over his own sign-off; “Johnny Piggozi” in a message forwarded to him; “pigattzi” in Epstein’s request to Ghislaine Maxwell for his address123
What an Edge Foundation invitation list calls him”Investor, Art Collector; High-Tech Ecological Researcher, Liquid Jungle Lab, Panama” on the 2011 Master Class list, and “Investor, Art Collector, Ecological researcher” on a February 2011 dinner list; both were written by John Brockman45
Businesses named in his own signature blockOn the cleanest copy read for this page, “www.CAACart.com”, “www.jaPigozziCollection.com” and “www.SeydouKeitaPhotographer.com” above a fourth line for a clothing business; he writes to Epstein of “THE LIMOLAND GLOBAL STRUCTURE”67
Direct messages between the two men read for this pageNineteen documents, the earliest dated 1 May 2013 and the latest 28 April 2014; sixteen are cited here and three are not, for the reason given below8910
Two properties he priced, as the sheet prints them”FRANCE MUST BE OVER EURO 300M 22,5 ACRES” and “PANAMA OVER $ 15O M JUST THE ISLAND 270 ACRES”; the third character of the Panama figure is a letter O on the sheet, read at the image, and this page supplies no digit into it11
On the three Edge Foundation lists read for this pageMarked confirmed on one, tentative on another, and regrets on the third, each against the list’s own printed legend1254
Named in the 2025 Justice Department examinationGhislaine Maxwell, questioned by the Deputy Attorney General in July 2025, placed a birthday gathering for Sergey Brin on “Mr. Pigozzi“‘s Caribbean island and said Epstein was not there13
Not established hereWhether any proposed visit took place; what the photographs showed; who “Leon”, “LEN” or the “Mashuga project” are; anything about his wealth, nationality, family or residences, none of which the documents read for this page state

On the morning of 1 May 2013 Jeffrey Epstein did not write to Jean Pigozzi first. He wrote to Ghislaine Maxwell. His message to her was four words, “send me pigattzi email”, with Pigozzi’s name misspelt. She answered thirty-two minutes and seventeen seconds later with a contact entry reading “Pigozzi Jean”, beneath a run of links to her TerraMar Project. Two minutes and seventeen seconds after that, Epstein wrote to Pigozzi himself.38

What the released files hold for Jean Pigozzi is a correspondence in both men’s own words: a property priced for Maxwell in May 2010 and passed straight on to Epstein, and then, from May 2013, messages running directly between Epstein and Pigozzi. In them a lawyer is working on a clothing company’s “GLOBAL STRUCTURE”, photographs are sent and commented on, travel through the south of France and Paris is proposed, a request for Pigozzi’s telephone number is relayed on behalf of a third man, and Epstein puts to Pigozzi a plan to come to Panama with a former Prime Minister of Israel. Alongside that sit three Edge Foundation invitation lists on which both men’s names appear. This page is about that contact and the documents that record it.

What this page covers, and what it does not

This page makes no allegation and records none. Nothing read for it alleges wrongdoing by Jean Pigozzi. Writing to a man, pricing a house, being invited to a dinner and being named in another person’s account are ordinary acts, and this page says so rather than letting proximity to the subject of this wiki do an allegation’s work.

Two things in these documents are deliberately not on this page. The first is three messages inside the 1 May 2013 thread. They were read in full and they are not reproduced here in any part: they concern a private individual who is not named in them, and this wiki does not reproduce remarks about a private individual, or a detail that would identify one through a family relationship. They are not quoted, characterised further, linked, cited or counted anywhere on this page, and no search of any kind was run to establish who she is.10

The second is anything about what Jean-Luc Brunel is alleged to have done. He is dead, the record read for this page holds no answer from him, and the rule this wiki works to is that an allegation carries the response of the person concerned. His own page sets out when and how he died, the allegations made against him and the denial reported in his lifetime. This page carries one message he sent, and no characterisation of him at all.

This page also does not name the employee of Pigozzi’s clothing business whose work report Pigozzi forwarded to Epstein by mistake, and reproduces no telephone number, fax number or e-mail address from any document cited here.

How the record names him

He appears in the released files under his own name, under a familiar form, and under two spellings that are not spellings. His sign-off to Epstein is “Johnny”; the message Epstein forwarded to him in October 2013 asks for “Johnny Piggozi phone number”; and Epstein’s own request to Maxwell spells him “pigattzi”.123 The four forms are not nested in one another: searched on 24 October 2026, the bare surname reaches 272 documents, and seven further documents carry only a damaged form and lie outside it, giving a floor of 279 documents on the four forms together.14

His signature block, which his iPad appended to most of what he sent, names his own ventures. On the cleanest copy read for this page it runs to four lines: “www.CAACart.com”, “www.jaPigozziCollection.com”, “www.SeydouKeitaPhotographer.com” and a LimoLand address.6 Only two of those four stand identically in every copy read that prints the block. The CAAC and Seydou Keïta lines do; the third gains or loses a character between copies; and the LimoLand line is given in four different forms across five copies, which is why this page does not quote it from any of them.6 The business itself is named in his own words in June 2013, when he writes to Epstein that “LEN THE LAWYER IS I HOPE WORKING ON THE LIMOLAND GLOBAL STRUCTURE AND ALL THE OTHER THINGS”.7

May 2010: Maxwell, two properties and two prices

The earliest document read for this page is an e-mail of 11 May 2010 whose own new text is a single word, carrying beneath it six earlier messages from the day before.11 The chain begins with Ghislaine Maxwell writing to an addressee whose value the producing party has covered on this sheet: “Are you really wanting to sell Panama and Fr property? If so price. Have potential interested party”. Pigozzi answers, “It depends on prices / Can we talk ?”, signing “Xxxj”. Maxwell presses: “We can - tomorrow - give me what your thinking so I can have a sense”. Pigozzi then gives the prices, in capitals:

FRANCE MUST BE OVER EURO 300M 22,5 ACRES

PANAMA OVER $ 15O M JUST THE ISLAND 270 ACRES11

Maxwell forwarded that to Epstein’s address the same evening and added, on top of it, “So cheap! You wouldn’t like Panama place..”. Epstein’s reply, dated the next day, is “thnks”.11

The Panama figure is not a clean number on the sheet. Read at the image at 400 dpi, the third character of it is a letter O and not a zero, and the released text returns it the same way. A reader will see what the figure was meant to be; this page prints what the sheet prints and supplies no digit into it.11 Neither does any document read for this page say that either property was sold, who the “potential interested party” was, or whether the two ever spoke “tomorrow”.

May 2013: the address, and the photographs

The sequence of 1 May 2013 is set out above: Epstein asked Maxwell, Maxwell answered, and Epstein wrote. Both of those intervals are computed from headers that print their own offsets, so the two clocks are comparable.38

Epstein’s opening message to Pigozzi reads, in the released text, “noce seeing you, do you have photso of panama?”8 Later the same morning, and after the three messages this page does not carry, Pigozzi wrote: “Did you get the photos ? / Send me photos of your Mashuga project”.8 No document read for this page says what the Mashuga project is.

A separate one-sheet record of the same day carries no message body at all. Its subject line is the message: “Send me many photos of your house.”15

Epstein then sent two photographs, and both of Pigozzi’s replies survive as their own documents. To a photograph whose subject line dates it to 6 November 2012, Pigozzi answered:

Looks amazing

Can’t see any girls ???16

To a photograph whose subject line dates it to 31 December 2011, he answered “Great pool”.17 No document read for this page shows what either photograph was of, where it was taken, or any reply to either of Pigozzi’s messages. The subject lines date the photographs, not the sending; both were sent on 1 May 2013. This page draws no inference from the second line of the first reply and records it because Pigozzi wrote it.

June and July 2013: “LEN”, and the south of France

A thread under the subject “LEN” runs from 25 June 2013 and shows the two men’s business footing. Pigozzi opens in capitals: “WHAT IS THE EXPENSIVE LEN LAWYER DOING ? / ARE YOU WORKING WITH HIM ? / OR HAVE YOU ALREADY GIVEN UP”, followed on the sheet by a long run of question marks and nines that the extraction renders differently in each copy, and then “LEN THE LAWYER IS I HOPE WORKING ON THE LIMOLAND GLOBAL STRUCTURE AND ALL THE OTHER THINGS”.7 Epstein answers “wrong jeffrey”; Pigozzi answers “SORRY / YOU ARE EARLY / JEAN”; Epstein answers “I have to be to keep up”.7 No document read for this page identifies the lawyer called Len, or says which Jeffrey was the right one.

The same thread turns to the summer. Pigozzi asks, “Are. you coming to the south of France this summer ?”, Epstein answers “maybe 9th”, and Pigozzi closes “Ok call”.7

The thread’s own headers do not agree about the order of those three messages, and this page does not resolve the disagreement. Epstein’s “maybe 9th” carries a date line of 25 June on its own copy and is quoted with the same date on a second copy, yet both copies quote Pigozzi’s question beneath it as sent on 26 June at 9:14 in the morning, which is also the date line Pigozzi’s own copy carries. A reply dated before the message it quotes is what the production prints, in two independent copies, and nothing read for this page explains it.7

On 9 July 2013 Epstein’s assistant Lesley Groff sent him a reminder whose whole body reads, “Reminder you told Jean Pigozzi you might be in the south of france around July 9th”.18 The same day Epstein wrote two words to Pigozzi: “where are you?”19 Which of those two came first cannot be said from these sheets: the reminder’s send time is printed with no zone and Epstein’s with an offset, so the two are not comparable, and this page puts them in no order. Pigozzi answered the following day, “Cap d antibes. J”.20

October 2013: a telephone number, and the Champs-Élysées

The exchange in which Epstein and Pigozzi arranged to meet in Paris is the same thread that opens with a request for Pigozzi’s telephone number, and the request did not come from either of them. The source report this page was written against treats the two as separate matters; at the sheet they are one thread, under one subject line, “Hi”.

The thread’s first message is from Jean-Luc Brunel, headed Saturday 5 October 2013 at 7:50 in the evening with no time zone printed beside it, and sent, its own footer says, from a Samsung mobile. It reads in full:

By any chance do you have Johnny Piggozi phone number

I amm in Panama2

Epstein forwarded it to Pigozzi under the subject “Fwd: Hi”. The forward carries its own date line of 6 October 2013 at 00:34 in the morning, and the replies beneath it quote that same message as sent at 20:34 on 5 October, a pairing that puts the forward’s local clock four hours behind. Because Brunel’s own message prints no zone, the interval between his message and the forward of it cannot be stated from these sheets, and this page does not state one.221

Pigozzi’s answer, quoted inside every later message in the thread, is three lines: “I am in Paris / Johnny / Sent from my iPad”.21 Epstein replied the same night, “i shoud be thre tues wil you stil be there”.21 The next morning he wrote again, “woody told me of the summer fun.,, sounded great”, and Pigozzi answered, “Love woody / See you in paris”.221 The day after that, Epstein wrote: “we are walking on the champs. where are you?”23

What these sheets show is a request relayed and a meeting proposed, and the limits of each are different. No document read for this page shows whether Pigozzi gave Brunel a telephone number, whether the two men ever spoke, or what the contact was for; the forward itself is the whole of the contact the release holds that was read here. Nor does any document read for this page record Epstein and Pigozzi actually meeting in Paris: the last message in the sequence is a question from a man who says he is walking on the Champs-Élysées and does not know where the other one is, and nothing read here answers it.

April 2014: Panama, and a former Prime Minister

The latest direct message read for this page is a single sentence Epstein sent on 28 April 2014:

I am considering going to panama with ehud barak on the 12th of may, will you be around?9

This is a proposal and not a visit. No document read for this page shows a reply to it, or shows that Epstein, Ehud Barak or anyone else went to Panama on 12 May 2014 or at any other time. No search of the released files was run for the trip itself, and the absence of one here is a limit on this page rather than a statement about the record.

The accidental forward

On Saturday 18 May 2013 Pigozzi forwarded Epstein a daily work report from an employee of his clothing business, with a message of his own on top of it addressed to the employee by first name and asking, for the ninetieth time, where his sources were. Epstein’s reply was one word, “Oy”. Pigozzi then wrote: “SORRY WRONG PERSON / HAVE A GREAT SUMMER / JEAN”.6

The sheets of that document are badly damaged by the message’s own transfer encoding, with an equals sign standing in for a letter at the head of many words, so the employee’s report is described here and not quoted. It is about swimshort designs, colourways and patterns, one group of them for a named retailer.6

The Edge Foundation lists

Three Brockman invitation lists read for this page carry both men’s names, and all three print a marker beside each name, which is the fact that matters about a guest list. The page on the Edge Foundation sets out what the Foundation was, what its dinners and Master Classes were, and Brockman’s own accounts of them; none of that is repeated here.

February 2011, Le Cirque, New York. Brockman circulated the details of a dinner to be held on Wednesday 16 February at Le Cirque’s private dining room, addressing it to a list that includes “Jeffrey Epstein”, “Gmax Maxwell” and “Jean Pigozzi”.5 In the guest block the entry reads, at the image, ”* Jean Pigozzi (* tentative)” over the description “Investor, Art Collector, Ecological researcher” and a link to a December 2010 magazine feature about him. “Jeffrey Epstein” and “Ghislaine Maxwell” are listed on the same sheet with no marker against either.5

June 2011, the Master Class. Brockman wrote to Epstein under the subject “update”: “Strangely, the usual billionaire crowd is not showing up for this one, so I am running hard to revision it as a serious science event, inviting more third culture intellectuals and also the global press (NYTimes, WSJ NYorker, Economist, etc.) Ultlimately it will be a much stronger and more important event, but it’s not the one advertised to you.”4 He went on:

Kahneman thinks that beginning two years ago a lot of the usual suspects have had very good reasons not to like each other or want to be in the same room together for more than a meal. That’s the sense I got a year and a half ago when at my dinner when Larry Page and Bill Joy (separately) were expressing their unhappiness about certain other friends of yours.4

Beneath that sits a list headed “EDGE MASTER CLASS 2011 — INVITATION LIST (√ confirmed; x regrets; * maybe)”, read at the image at 400 dpi. Against “Jeffrey Epstein, Money Manager, Science Philanthropist; Jeffrey Epstein Foundation” the sheet prints a tick. Against “Jean Pigozzi, Investor, Art Collector; High-Tech Ecological Researcher, Liquid Jungle Lab, Panama” it prints a lower-case x, which the list’s own legend keys to regrets.4 This is the fullest description of his occupation on any document read for this page, and on the same line it records him declining.

February 2012, the Sky Room, Long Beach. Brockman’s message to Epstein, forwarded onward the same day by a sender whose value is covered on the sheet, is headed “CONFIDENTIAL” and opens: “JE - there are 20 chairs and 21 guests in a small room. Please show up alone. JB”.12 Its addressee list runs to seventeen lines naming twenty people. “Jean Pigozzi” and “Jacqui Safra” both carry the tick the sheet’s legend keys to “confirmed”.12 The list reads, at the image:

To: √ Paul Allen √ Jeff Bezos √ Sergey Brin/Anne Wojcocki √ Tony Fadell/Danielle Lambert v Danny Hillis √ Salar Kamangar √ Dave Morin √ Craig Mundie √ Nathan Myhrvold √ Tim O’Reilly Larry Page √ Lucy Page Southworth √ Lori ▮ √ Jean Pigozzi √ Jacqui Safra √ Ricardo Salinas/Maria Laura Salinas √ Evan Williams12

Fifteen of the seventeen lines carry the tick, one carries a lower-case v, and one, Larry Page’s, carries no marker at all. The twenty people named on the list and Epstein together make the twenty-one guests Brockman counts. Three different numbers stand on the one sheet: twenty chairs and twenty-one guests at the top, and, in the closing paragraph, “Dinner is in a small private room that seats 16 comfortably. No room for anyone else. Please cooperate by maintaining radio silence.”12

Jacqui Safra’s page carries a fourth Brockman circulation list, of May 2011, on which Pigozzi’s name also appears; that list carries no attendance markers at all.

None of these documents records who came. Each was written before its event, and a marker written on an invitation is a statement about an intention at the moment of writing. Searched on 24 October 2026, 63 of the 279 documents in the Pigozzi name-form union also carry the token “brockman”.14

The island, in the 2025 examination

In the examination of Ghislaine Maxwell by Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche on 24 and 25 July 2025, Pigozzi’s island was the setting of an answer about Elon Musk. The page on that examination sets out how it came about and under what instrument. Her answer, from partway through, reads:

And I was at an event for Sergey Brin, the co-founder of Google. And Sergey had arranged for — it was for his birthday. And we were — or a bunch of us, I don’t even remember how many we were, but not many of us. Maybe — I don’t know. If I say 40, I could be wrong. If it was 30 or 50, I don’t remember. I’m sorry. Went to another friend’s island. Somebody called Mr. Pigozzi in the Caribbean and — not with Epstein, he was not there, to celebrate Sergey’s birthday. And we were there together for, I want to say, three or four days, something like that in my memory. And Mr. Musk was present for that.13

A later question of Blanche’s supplied the year, putting the gathering “around 2010” and the stay at “a couple days” where her answer had given three or four.13 Her hedges are hers and are reproduced above in full: she does not remember how many people there were, offers 40 and then withdraws it in favour of 30 or 50, and gives three or four days as what she wants to say rather than what she recalls. She also states, unprompted, that Epstein was not present. The account appears on this wiki at Elon Musk, which reaches it from the other side; this page does not go beyond it, and nothing read here corroborates or contradicts any part of it.

The name in the released files

Searched on 24 October 2026 by exact-phrase search, column-scoped, the forms stand as follows, with every figure a count of documents in which the form is printed and not a count of events.14

FormSheetsDocuments
”pigozzi”299272
”jean pigozzi”253240
”johnny pigozzi”2217
”pigattzi”99
”piggozi”88
”pigozzis”00
union of the four live forms279

Those numbers are small and this page says so. The denominators, measured the same day, are 1,425,556 documents and 2,925,025 sheets, and the token “Epstein” reaches 578,565 of those documents, 40.6 per cent of the release. Two hundred and forty documents is 0.017 per cent of it. A document count is not a finding, and the finding on this page is in the messages, not in the total.14

The queue figure this page was commissioned against, 240 documents over 253 sheets, is the two-word phrase and not the name. The bare surname reaches 32 documents more, and the damaged forms reach 7 beyond that.14

How the documents on this page were read

Five sheets of four of the twenty-three documents cited here were fetched from this project’s own per-document path and rasterised locally at 400 dpi, and every claim on this page that turns on a glyph rests on one of them: the Master Class list’s legend and the marker against Pigozzi’s name, the Sky Room list’s markers, the Le Cirque guest entry marked tentative, and the Panama figure. A negative control run in the same session against an identifier that exists nowhere returned the refusal such a fetch always returns, which establishes nothing about any archive and is reported here only so that the five successful fetches are not read as a clean sweep. Nothing was written on the server.

Every other quotation on this page follows the released text, and the documents of which this project holds no page image are named as such in their footnotes. For each document cited here, every sheet a claim of this page rests on was read. The sheets not read are named too: of the forty-one sheets of the Edge compilation document that the source report cites, none was read and none is cited here; of the five sheets of the February 2011 dinner document, sheets 3, 4 and 5 were not read; and of the transcript of the July 2025 examination, only the two sheets carrying the quoted passage were read.

Where a sentence inside a quotation wraps across lines of the sheet, the wrap is rendered above as a single space. Where the sheet carries a deliberate new line inside a quoted message, it is shown as ” / ” in a quotation run into the text and as a paragraph break in an indented one. Nothing else is changed. Where a quotation is cut, the cut is marked. The sheets’ own spellings are followed throughout, including “noce”, “photso”, “shoud”, “thre”, “stil”, “amm”, “Are. you”, “Ultlimately” and “Wojcocki”. The em dash in the Master Class heading is the sheet’s own, as are the double hyphens inside the transcript passage. The block ”▮” marks a span the producing party has covered.

Limits of this page

This page does not say where Jean Pigozzi was born, how old he is, what he is worth, what he inherited, where he lives, what he collects or what else he owns, because no document read for this page states any of those things. It gives him no job title beyond the two descriptions Brockman wrote for him on two invitation lists, and it attributes those to Brockman rather than to him. It does not say that he attended any Edge Foundation event, because the documents read here are invitations and not attendance records, and one of them records a refusal. It does not say that he met Epstein in Paris in October 2013, that anyone went to Panama in May 2014, or that his telephone number reached Jean-Luc Brunel, because nothing read here shows any of the three. It does not identify “Leon”, “LEN”, the employee named in the forwarded work report, or the “Mashuga project”, and it draws no inference about any of them. It does not reproduce remarks about, or details identifying, the private individual discussed in part of the 1 May 2013 thread, and no search was run to establish who she is.

Footnotes

Footnotes

  1. E-mail, “Jean Pigozzi” to “‘Jeffrey Epstein’”, 6 October 2013, subject “RE: Hi”, two sheets, whose own new text is the two lines “Love woody / See you in paris”. Beneath it the sheet quotes the message at [^woody] as Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2013 7:18 AM against that message’s own date line of 6 October 2013 at 11:17:45 +0000, the same four-hour pairing recorded at [^brunelfwd]. This project holds no page image of this document; quoted from the released text, and no statement is made here about what is or is not covered on the sheet. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00973390 p. 1. ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  2. E-mail, Jeffrey Epstein to “JEAN PIGOZZI”, subject “Fwd: Hi”, one sheet, carrying its own date line of 6 October 2013 at 00:34:18 +0000 and forwarding a message headed “From: Jean Luc Brunel / Date: Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 7:50 PM / Subject: Hi”, whose body is the two lines quoted in full on this page above the line “Sent from Samsung Mobile”. The forwarded message’s send time prints no zone, which is why this page states no interval between it and the forward. The three later copies of this thread quote the forward as sent “On Oct 5, 2013, at 20:34”, which against this sheet’s own 00:34:18 +0000 puts the quoting clock four hours behind; that pairing is stated on this page and nothing is derived from it about the clock on Brunel’s own message. The surname is printed “Jean Luc Brunel”, unhyphenated, in the forwarded header. The body line is rendered “Johnny Piggozi” on this sheet and on two of the later copies, and “Johnny Pig,gozi” on the third; this page quotes this sheet and records the variant here so that a checker finding the comma form knows where it is. Pigozzi’s own address value is not reproduced. This project holds no page image of this document; quoted from the released text. The standing confidentiality notice is not reproduced. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00971931 p. 1. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  3. E-mail from “GMAX” to “J Jep”, 1 May 2013, subject “Re:”, one sheet. The reply’s body is a contact entry reading “Pigozzi Jean”, beneath which the sheet carries a run of links to the TerraMar Project. No address value from this sheet is reproduced here. Beneath it the sheet quotes Epstein’s request of the same morning, 09:16:24 -0400, reading in full “send me pigattzi email”. Both headers print an offset, so the thirty-two minute seventeen second interval stated on this page is an arithmetic between two zoned values and not between a zoned and a bare one. This project holds no page image of this document; quoted from the released text, and no statement is made here about what is or is not covered on the sheet. An anti-virus notice and the standing confidentiality notice are not reproduced. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00715262 p. 1. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  4. E-mail, John Brockman to Jeffrey Epstein, 2 June 2011, subject “update”, two sheets. Read at the image at 400 dpi; served p. 1 carries the printed Bates stamp EFTA00649356 and served p. 2 the printed Bates stamp EFTA00649357. P. 1 carries Brockman’s three paragraphs, quoted here in part, his signature block, the agenda of “WHAT’S NEW IN HUMAN NATURE” naming four speakers, and the heading “EDGE MASTER CLASS 2011 — INVITATION LIST (√ confirmed; x regrets; * maybe)”; the em dash in that heading and the tick glyph in that legend were both read at the image, and the released text returns the tick as “1” on p. 1 and as “-4” on p. 2. P. 2 carries the list itself, thirty-five entries, of which this page quotes two in full with their markers: a tick against Epstein and a lower-case x against Pigozzi. Both upper-case X and lower-case x appear as markers on the sheet and the legend names only one of them; this page makes nothing of the difference. The sheet prints “Ultlimately”, “if your showed up”, “dong an even in Seattle”, and, at the head of one paragraph, a form the released text returns as “ICahneman” where the image reads “Kahneman”; the quotations follow the image. No telephone, fax or address value from this sheet is reproduced here. The remaining thirty-three entries and their markers are not reproduced here. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00649356 pp. 1-2. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5

  5. E-mail, John Brockman, Sent: Wednesday, February 9, 2011 8:37 PM with no offset printed, subject “NY dinner details and update”, five sheets, addressed to a list of named recipients including “Jeffrey Epstein”, “Gmax Maxwell” and “Jean Pigozzi” and giving the particulars of a dinner at “LE CIRQUE - Private Dining Room” in New York on “Wednesday, February 16th” at “7pm”. Served p. 2 was read at the image at 400 dpi and carries two printed stamps at its foot, EFTA_R1_00138171 and EFTA01799444, in a different numbering series from the identifier this page cites; no conversion between the two series is made here. On that sheet the entry reads ”* Jean Pigozzi (* tentative)” above “Investor, Art Collector, Ecological researcher” and a link to a December 2010 magazine feature whose address the transfer encoding has damaged, so it is described and not quoted; the released text returns the asterisk markers as bullets, and the markers were read at the image. “Jeffrey Epstein” and “Ghislaine Maxwell” stand on the same sheet with no marker against either. P. 1 of this document was not rendered for this page and is cited only for the header, the addressee list and the dinner particulars, which were read in the released text; sheets 3, 4 and 5 were not read at all and nothing here rests on them. Jacqui Safra’s page reports this document read at the image at 600 dpi, and records that the “To:” line’s “J.E. Safra” is returned by the extraction as “J.E. Satre”. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA01799443 pp. 1-2. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  6. Four-sheet document headed with a message from Jean Pigozzi to “‘Jeffrey Epstein’”, Sent: Saturday, May 18, 2013 10:07 AM, subject “RE: daily report 5/17/13”, reading “SORRY WRONG PERSON / HAVE A GREAT SUMMER / JEAN”. Beneath it stand Epstein’s one-word reply of the same morning, Pigozzi’s covering message addressed to the employee by first name, Pigozzi’s signature block on served p. 2, and the employee’s report on served pp. 2-3. The sheets are damaged by the message’s own transfer encoding, with ”=” standing in for a letter at the head of many words, which is why the report is described on this page and not quoted: four of the words the source report this page was written against presents inside quotation marks do not stand in that form on any sheet of this document. Served p. 2 carries the cleanest copy of the signature block read for this page, printing “www.CAACart.com”, “www.jaPigozziCollection.com”, “www.SeydouKeitaPhotographer.com” and a LimoLand line each as its own line. Across the five copies of that block read for this page the first and third of those four stand identically in all of them; the second gains or loses a character; and the LimoLand line is given in four different forms, which is why it is described and not quoted. The employee is a private individual and is not named here. This project holds no page image of this document; quoted from the released text. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA01762950 pp. 1-3. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5

  7. Three documents in one thread under the subject “Re: LEN”, each carrying the earlier messages beneath its own. Pigozzi’s “Ok call”, 26 June 2013, three sheets, is https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00691711 pp. 1-2. Pigozzi’s “Are. you coming to the south of France this summer ?”, 26 June 2013, two sheets, is https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00645471 pp. 1-2. Epstein’s “maybe 9th”, three sheets, is https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00963681 pp. 1-2. The date disagreement this page reports is between a date line and a quoted header, and it stands in two independent copies: the “maybe 9th” sheet’s own date line reads 25 June 2013 and the “Ok call” sheet quotes it as Tue, 25 Jun 2013 09:19:24 -0400, while both sheets print the message it answers as sent “On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 9:14 AM”, which is also the date line on that message’s own copy. This page states both values and resolves neither. The run of punctuation after “OR HAVE YOU ALREADY GIVEN UP” is rendered differently in each of the three copies, which is why this page describes it instead of quoting it; the quotation above is cut at that point and the cut is marked. One copy renders “On Tue” as “On The”. A pin checker will report the capitalised passage as unlocated on the “maybe 9th” copy, and the reason is that the passage straddles that document’s page break, ending on served p. 1 and resuming on served p. 2; the pin names both sheets. This project holds no page image of any of the three; quoted from the released text. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6

  8. E-mail, Jean Pigozzi to “JEFFREY EPSTEIN”, 1 May 2013, subject “Re:”, one sheet, reading “Did you get the photos ? / Send me photos of your Mashuga project / J”. Beneath it the sheet quotes Epstein’s opening message of the same morning, 09:50:58 -0400, reading “noce seeing you, do you have photso of panama?”. That offset and the offset on the Maxwell reply at [^gmax] are what the two minute seventeen second interval on this page is computed from. The sheet prints “noce” and “photso”; the quotation follows them. This project holds no page image of this document; quoted from the released text. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00642410 p. 1. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5

  9. E-mail, Jeffrey Epstein to “JEAN PIGOZZI”, 28 April 2014, one sheet with an empty subject line, whose body is the one sentence quoted in full followed by the words “please note” at the head of the standing confidentiality notice. The addressee’s address value is not reproduced here. This project holds no page image of this document; quoted from the released text. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00988640 p. 1. ↩ ↩2

  10. Three messages in the 1 May 2013 thread were read in full for this page and are not reproduced on it in any part. They concern a private individual who is not named in them. No part of them is quoted, characterised beyond that sentence, linked, cited or counted on this page, and no search of any kind was run to establish who she is. The decision follows this wiki’s published statement that a person who has not come forward publicly is not named or described, and that family details are not reproduced for anyone; it does not depend on any view about who she may be. Those three messages are the difference between the nineteen direct messages read for this page and the sixteen cited on it. ↩ ↩2

  11. E-mail, Jeffrey Epstein to “Gmax”, 11 May 2010, subject “Re:”, two sheets, whose own new text is the single word “thnks”. Read at the image at 400 dpi; served p. 1 carries the printed Bates stamp EFTA00734053. Beneath it the sheet carries six earlier messages, all of 10 May 2010, quoted on this page in the order the sheet prints them: Maxwell’s “Are you really wanting to sell Panama and Fr property? If so price. Have potential interested party”, Pigozzi’s “It depends on prices / Can we talk ? / Xxxj”, Maxwell’s “We can - tomorrow - give me what your thinking so I can have a sense”, Pigozzi’s two capitalised price lines signed “XXXJ”, Maxwell’s forward to Epstein’s address, and Maxwell’s “So cheap! You wouldn’t like Panama place..”. The second price line reads at 400 dpi “PANAMA OVER $ 15O M JUST THE ISLAND 270 ACRES”, with a letter O as the third character of the figure; the released text returns the same letter. This page quotes the line as printed and supplies no digit into it. The France line’s “22,5” is the sheet’s own comma. The spacing inside both quoted lines is the sheet’s. No address value from this sheet is reproduced here. Two anti-virus notices and the standing confidentiality notice are not reproduced. The earliest message in the chain stands on served p. 2 and carries the only printed offset in the chain, -0400; every other send time in it is printed bare, which is why this page gives the order of the chain and no interval within it. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00734053 pp. 1-2. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5

  12. E-mail of 28 February 2012, subject “John Brockman”, two sheets, whose own new text is “I wanted you to see this as well!” and whose sender and addressee values are both covered by the producing party on the sheet, so this page attributes the forward to the document and to no person. Read at the image at 400 dpi; served p. 1 carries the printed Bates stamp EFTA00419126. It forwards a message headed “From: John Brockman / Date: February 28, 2012 2:35:33 PM EST / To: Jeffrey Epstein”, subject “tonight -”, whose body is quoted here in three parts: the “CONFIDENTIAL” line and the sentence to “JE”, the addressee list with its markers and the legend ”√ confirmed”, and the closing paragraph. The particulars between them read “Time: 7:30 pm / Date: Tuesday, February 28th / Place: Sky Room - Private Dining Room” and “Long Beach, CA”, with the venue’s street lines covered. One addressee’s surname is covered on the sheet and is marked ”▮” in the list above; nothing else from that line is reproduced here and no inference is drawn about the person. The list on this page was taken from the image and not from the released text, which renders several of these lines differently: it returns “Lucy Page Southworth” as two broken fragments and gives Paul Allen’s tick as part of the “To:” label, and both were settled at the image. The counts of seventeen lines and twenty people are this page’s own arithmetic over the list quoted above, stated as arithmetic. Served p. 2 carries two lines of Brockman’s signature block. That sheet was not rendered for this page and is cited for nothing. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00419126 p. 1. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5

  13. Transcript of the examination of Ghislaine Maxwell by Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, 24 and 25 July 2025, at the printed transcript pages 236 and 237, which stand at served pp. 21 and 22 of the production this page cites. UNVERIFIED, from the released text: neither sheet was rendered for this page, and the quotation is given as the machine text returns it. The quotation begins partway through her answer, the preceding words on the sheet being the end of an earlier sentence; the double hyphens inside it are the transcript’s own. The “around 2010” and “a couple days” reported on this page are from a later question of Blanche’s at printed page 237, which opens “around 2010, on the island in the Caribbean for a couple days”; two of his questions stand between her answer and it. The foot of served p. 21 carries, in the released text, an identifier in a different numbering series from the one this page cites, and no conversion between them is made. The same passage is cited, from the same served pages, at Elon Musk, and the proceeding is described at The 2025 Justice Department examination of Ghislaine Maxwell. https://epstein-data.com/DOJ-OGR-00022759 pp. 21-22. ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  14. Counts taken from the released files on 24 October 2026 by exact-phrase search, column-scoped, over the page text, counting sheets as rows and documents as distinct document identifiers. “pigozzi”: 299 sheets, 272 documents. “jean pigozzi”: 253 sheets, 240 documents. “johnny pigozzi”: 22 sheets, 17 documents. “pigattzi”: 9 sheets, 9 documents. “piggozi”: 8 sheets, 8 documents. “pigozzis”: 0 and 0. The union of “pigozzi”, “piggozi”, “pigattzi” and “pigozzis” is 279 documents, and 7 of those carry only a damaged form and lie outside the bare surname. Of the 279, 63 also carry the token “brockman” and 52 also carry the token “edge”; the latter is the weaker key, “edge” being an ordinary English word, and neither figure reproduces the 76 that the source report this page was written against gives for the same relation. Denominators, measured the same day in the same manner: 1,425,556 documents and 2,925,025 sheets, with the token “Epstein” on 879,730 sheets of 578,565 documents, 40.6 per cent of the documents in the release. Every figure in this footnote was produced twice, in two separate invocations run about thirty minutes apart, and reproduced to the digit. An invented phrase run in the same invocation as the first set returned 0 sheets and 0 documents, and a second invented phrase in the second set returned 0 and 0. The search was by exact phrase and by token only: no edit-distance sweep over damaged spellings was run for this page, so 279 is a floor with that bound named and not a convergence. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5

  15. One-sheet record of a message from Jean Pigozzi to Jeffrey Epstein, Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 2013 2:07 PM, whose subject line is “Send me many photos of your house.” and which carries two named attachments and no message body in the released text. This page cites it for the subject line and says so, because a subject line is not a message. This project holds no page image of this document; read in the released text. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA01788422 p. 1. ↩

  16. E-mail, Jean Pigozzi to “jeffrey epstein”, Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 2013 3:15 PM, subject “Re: Photo from Nov 6, 2012”, one sheet, reading “Looks amazing / Can’t see any girls ??? / J” above his signature block. Beneath it the sheet quotes a message from Epstein of 1 May 2013 “at 10:51” whose whole body is one named image attachment. The subject line dates the photograph; it does not date the sending, which was 1 May 2013. Nothing on the sheet says what the photograph showed, and nothing read for this page answers this message. This project holds no page image of this document; quoted from the released text. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA01759711 p. 1. ↩

  17. E-mail, Jean Pigozzi to “jeffrey epstein”, subject “Re: Photo from Dec 31, 2011”, one sheet, reading “Great pool” above his signature block, replying to a message from Epstein of 1 May 2013 “at 10:49” whose whole body is one named image attachment. The Sent: value on this sheet is destroyed in the released text, which returns “Wednesday,” followed by digits and stops, so this page dates the reply only to the Wednesday the sheet names and to the message it answers. This project holds no page image of this document; quoted from the released text. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA01759729 p. 1. ↩

  18. E-mail, Lesley Groff to “Jefffrey Epstein”, Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2013 1:04 PM with no offset printed, subject “Reminder. Jean Pigozzi”, one sheet, whose body is the single line quoted in full on this page. The sheet prints “Jefffrey” with three f’s in the addressee field. In the released text the foot of the sheet carries a second production number in a different numbering series from the identifier this page cites; because the sheet was not rendered, no printed stamp is named for it and no conversion between the two series is made. This project holds no page image of this document; quoted from the released text. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA01758714 p. 1. ↩

  19. E-mail, Jeffrey Epstein to “JEAN PIGOZZI”, 9 July 2013, one sheet with no subject, whose body is the two words quoted. The addressee’s address value is not reproduced here. This project holds no page image of this document; quoted from the released text. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00873424 p. 1. ↩

  20. E-mail, “Jean Pigozzi” to “JEFFREY EPSTEIN”, 10 July 2013, subject “Re:”, one sheet, reading “Cap d antibes. J”. Beneath it the sheet quotes Epstein’s “where are you?” as sent Tue, 09 Jul 2013 11:14:18 -0400, which is the same message as [^july9]; both print an offset and both resolve to the same instant, which is how this page states that the reply came the following day. The sender’s own address value is returned by the extraction as a run of broken characters and is not reproduced. This project holds no page image of this document; quoted from the released text. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00873430 p. 1. ↩

  21. E-mail, Jeffrey Epstein to Jean Pigozzi, 6 October 2013, subject “Re: Hi”, two sheets, whose own new text is “i shoud be thre tues wil you stil be there”. Beneath it the sheet quotes Pigozzi’s reply of “Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 8:43 PM”, three lines reading “I am in Paris / Johnny / Sent from my iPad” above four lines of his signature block, and beneath that the forwarded Brunel message. Pigozzi’s own copy of “I am in Paris” is not among the documents read for this page; it survives inside the three later messages that quote it, and this page cites it as quoted rather than as its own document. The sheets print “shoud”, “thre” and “stil”; the quotation follows them. This project holds no page image of this document; quoted from the released text. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00971935 p. 1. ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  22. E-mail, Jeffrey Epstein to Jean Pigozzi, 6 October 2013, subject “Re: Hi”, two sheets, whose own new text is “woody told me of the summer fun.,, sounded great”. The punctuation after “fun” is the sheet’s. Beneath it stand the same quoted messages as at [^tues]. No document read for this page says who “woody” is, and this page does not supply a name. This project holds no page image of this document; quoted from the released text. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00971953 p. 1. ↩

  23. E-mail, Jeffrey Epstein to “JEAN PIGOZZI”, 7 October 2013, one sheet with an empty subject line, whose whole body is the sentence quoted. It is the last message in this sequence that the documents read for this page hold. This project holds no page image of this document; quoted from the released text. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00972742 p. 1. ↩

Backlinks