Epstein Data Wiki

H. Loy Anderson, Jr.

Properties2
tagsperson, banking, palm-beach, due-diligence, nes-llc, deceased
aliasesHarry Loy Anderson Jr., Harryloy Anderson, ANDERSON H LOY JR, Loy Anderson

24 min read

Name as it appears in the recordH. Loy Anderson, Jr. in the signature and FROM: lines of bank instruments; H LOY ANDERSON, set in capitals, in the bank’s mainframe customer profile; Harryloy Anderson, run together, on a plaintiff’s witness list; ANDERSON H LOY JR, surname first, in Palm Beach County property data; Harry Loy Anderson Jr. in his obituary12345
Role in the Epstein recordNamed OFFICER on the Palm Beach National Bank & Trust Company relationship approval ticket for Jeffrey E. Epstein, and PRIM OFFICER on the bank’s customer profile for him62
The act this page is aboutA memorandum of August 7, 2001 in which he waived the requirement for financial statements on an application for three corporate credit cards for an Epstein company1
Other bank staff named on the same instrumentsNancy Bruno, recorded as referring officer on the approval ticket and as the addressee of the waiver memorandum; Dorothy Wilson, recorded as the secondary officer on the customer profile612
Career, per his obituarySon of a president of First Federal Savings & Loan; assumed the presidency of Worth Avenue National Bank in 1970 at 26; attended Washington & Lee University, took a degree from Florida Atlantic University and attended the Harvard school of business; served in the U.S. Army Reserves57
DiedDecember 8, 2013, aged 70. His obituary was mailed to Epstein’s own jeevacation address two days later5
Documents reaching himA measured floor of 18. See The search, and what it reaches8

H. Loy Anderson, Jr. was the banker on Jeffrey Epstein’s Palm Beach account. On one sheet in the release he is recorded doing something specific: on August 7, 2001 he wrote an internal memorandum waiving a due-diligence requirement on a credit application made in the name of an Epstein company and guaranteed by Epstein personally.1

That sheet, and the account records that place him on the relationship, are the whole of what the release establishes about him. He is not charged in any document cited here and nothing on this page is a finding of wrongdoing. The question a reader should hold is narrower and answerable: what did a named bank officer decide about this customer, on whose authority, and what did the bank’s own paperwork say about it.

Account and card numbers appearing on sheets this page cites are not reproduced here.

The waiver of August 7, 2001

The memorandum is four lines of body text on a single sheet. Read at the image at 400 dpi, it prints:

MEMORANDUM

TO: Nancy Bruno FROM: H. Loy Anderson, Jr. DATE: August 7, 2001 REF: Jeffrey Epstein

Nancy,

I am waiving the requirement for financial statements on the application for three corporate credit cards totaling $25,000 for Jeffrey’s company NES, LLC issued in the names of Shannon Pascuzzi, Emmy Tayler and Jonitha Mackenzie which are being guaranteed by Mr. Epstein.

An ink mark follows the printed name in the FROM: line: a rising stroke, then a tall narrow loop and two rounded ones. The approval block of the relationship ticket discussed below carries two ink marks, not one. The same compact mark stands at the right-hand end of the upper rule, clear of the printed name; a second and much longer cursive signature is written across the printed name itself and over both rules. This page does not attribute the longer mark.16

Four things the sheet says, and one it does not.

What was waived. Not the application, and not the guarantee. What Anderson set aside was the requirement that the applicant produce financial statements. The cards were to be issued unsecured against a personal guarantee, and the document that would have shown whether the guarantor could stand behind it was the document he dispensed with. The bank’s own approval ticket for the same customer sets out two such credit-card lines, both unsecured and both personally guaranteed by Epstein; one of the two is in the name of NES and the other is not.6 The bank recorded the exception more widely on its own underwriting worksheet than the memorandum states it: there it is written as no financial statements and no personal or business tax returns.9

For which account. Three corporate credit cards totalling $25,000, on an application in the name of NES, LLC. NES, LLC is the company that paid Epstein’s household and flight staff; his chief pilot gave it under oath as his sole employer and sole source of income, and said of it, “I don’t really know. I mean, it’s the company that my check comes from.”10 The card file records the three opening cardholder limits as $10,000, $10,000 and $5,000; two of the three were changed by facsimile in March 2002.1112

On whose authority. The memorandum states the decision in the first person and attributes it to nobody else: “I am waiving”. It is addressed downward, to the officer recorded elsewhere on the same file as referring officer, and it carries no counter-signature, no committee reference and no approval line. The relationship ticket for the same customer carries an approval block dated 6/21/02 over his printed name.6

To whom the cards went. The three named cardholders are Epstein employees. Emmy Tayler is identified in sworn testimony in the release as one of Ghislaine Maxwell’s assistants, and appears on a subpoena schedule listing Epstein household employees.1314 Shannon Pascuzzi appears repeatedly in 2002 and 2003 as the addressee of shipments to Zorro Ranch.15 The application gives no address for any of the three: it is a company application, naming NES, LLC and a New York billing address for the company, and its cardholder section carries none. The file records a request in June 2002 to terminate one of the three cards, and an earlier request in January 2002 to cancel another of them.111612

And what the memorandum does not say: why. It gives no reason. It states the waiver, names the instrument, names the holders and names the guarantor, and stops.

The bank’s own form asked for one. The same bank file carries a CREDIT CARD UNDERWRITING WORKSHEET for this application, and that form prints two fields one above the other: Exceptions to policy: and, on the line directly beneath it, Justification:. Read at the image at 400 dpi, the exceptions field is completed by hand, in capitals and lower case as the writer formed them, as NO financial Statements/Personal or business TAX returns. The Justification: field is a printed rule with nothing written on it.9

The rest of the worksheet is empty in the same manner. Every INCOME field is blank: Gross Monthly, Other and Total Income(A). So is every DEBT field: Mortgage/Rent, Equity Line/Loan, Auto Loan, Installment Pymts, Revolving Pymts, Alimony/Child Support, Proposed Payment and Total Expenses(B). The BANKING line is marked neither Yes nor No; Checking and Savings are blank; under EMPLOYMENT both Verified on: and Verified with: are blank. The line that works out the debt-service ratio, (B) $ divided by (A) $ to a percentage, is empty in all three of its positions. Both Date: fields are blank and so is the second of the two Approved By: rules. What is entered is the applicant, a Beacon Score of 698, a mark against Visa, the word BUSINESS, a Credit Limit of $25,000.00, and an ink mark on the first Approved By: rule: the same compact mark that follows the printed name in the memorandum’s FROM: line.9

Two statements stand together here and this page makes both. No document located for this page supplies a reason for the waiver, and this page does not assert that one exists. And the bank’s own underwriting form printed a field for that reason, and it was left blank. The first is an absence in the record; the second is something the record positively shows. The searches run to test the first are set out below.

The copies, and what they show about the redaction

The same memorandum survives in five copies across four documents in the release, and they are not redacted alike. The copy cited above prints the sentence complete. Copies produced under the SDNY protective order and copies filed in the Palm Beach County federal docket carry a producer’s bar across the cardholder names, and one copy bars the TO: and FROM: lines as well, so that Anderson’s own name does not appear on it at all.117

That last point has a consequence for counting. A search for any form of his name cannot return the copy on which his name is barred. His documented footprint is bounded by the producing parties’ redaction choices and not only by how his name is spelled, and the floor below is stated with that bound named.

Primary officer on the Epstein relationship

Two internal bank instruments place Anderson on the relationship itself rather than on the single transaction.

The relationship approval ticket is a Palm Beach National Bank & Trust Company form, on the bank’s Palm Beach branch code, for the borrower Jeffrey E. Epstein at a New York mailing address. Read at the image at 400 dpi, it records the officer as H. Loy Anderson, Jr., gives his officer number as 1, records Nancy Bruno as referring officer, and grades the loan 3. The phone and tax-identification fields are under a single solid bar. The body of the ticket sets out two Visa business credit-card lines, each unsecured and each personally guaranteed by Epstein, both at 14.5% fixed; the annual-fee entry on the second line is struck through on the sheet. They stand against a last approval of $25,000, with $12,468 owing, and $60,000 desired in total. The approval block at the foot is dated 6/21/02 and carries his name in printed type, with the long ink signature written across it and the compact mark described above standing clear of it at the right.6

A note in ink lower on the same sheet names David Rodgers, Larry Visoski and Larry Morrison beside a corporate account line. Rodgers and Visoski were successive chief pilots on Epstein’s aircraft.610

The customer profile is a printout from the bank’s mainframe of 06/05/02, for customer JEFFREY E EPSTEIN. Read at the image at 400 dpi, it gives the status as open and the date opened as 03-08-1991, the branch as the Palm Beach office, the primary officer as Anderson and the secondary officer as Dorothy Wilson. The tax-identification and telephone fields and the whole account-number column are under producer’s bars on this copy. Seven balances are printed beside its eight account lines, running from $979 to $1,794,477.2

Two things follow that the memorandum alone would not give.

First, the relationship long predates the waiver. The profile dates the account to March 1991; the waiver is August 2001; the profile itself is June 2002. Anderson is the primary officer across that span, which makes the August 2001 memorandum an act inside an eleven-year banking relationship rather than a one-off accommodation to a new customer.

Second, there were at least three named bank staff on it. Anderson as primary officer, Dorothy Wilson as secondary officer, and Nancy Bruno as referring officer and as the person the waiver was addressed to. Correspondence in the card file from Epstein’s office is addressed to Bruno and to a further bank officer, Ann Lufft, and is signed by Epstein office staff including Bella Klein and Eric Gany.1612 None of Bruno, Wilson or Lufft has a page here.

The bank, and a gap worth naming

The obituary makes Anderson the president of Worth Avenue National Bank from 1970. The Epstein account records name a different institution: Palm Beach National Bank & Trust Company, branch PB.627

The corpus bears the asymmetry out. "Palm Beach National Bank" returns 85 documents; "Worth Avenue National Bank" returns 2, both of them the obituary.

The record does not state what office Anderson held at Palm Beach National Bank. Its instruments call him OFFICER and PRIM OFFICER and give him officer number 1; they give him no title. This page supplies none. The gap is worth naming rather than filling: the institution a reader would reach for from the obituary is not the institution that held the account, and no document located here joins them.

A plaintiff’s witness list

A witness list filed in Doe v. Epstein, Case No. 08-CV-80893-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON, runs to numbered entries in a ruled table. Read at the image at 400 dpi, entry 107 reads Kent Anderson and entry 108 reads Harryloy Anderson, the forename and second name run together as one word. Neither entry carries the producer’s bar that covers contact details elsewhere on the sheet: of its twenty-two numbered entries, eleven carry such a bar and eleven do not. The entries around them are a mixture of police officers, professional acquaintances and public figures, and this page does not enumerate them.3

The sheet gives no generational suffix and no description for either Anderson entry. The identification rests on two things outside the sheet: the obituary names Anderson’s sons as H. Loy III and Kent, and Harryloy is the run-together form of the name the obituary uses in its headline. Read against those, entry 108 is most naturally the subject of this page and entry 107 his son, but the list itself does not say so, and the subject shares his name with a son. This page prints what the sheet prints and does not resolve it.73

One reading that the image refutes should be recorded, because the text layer invites it. A separate numbered entry six places above opens All people on inmate visitor log and then names three individuals. On the extraction that heading and the later names run together as one block. At the image they are different numbered entries. Anderson’s entry is an entry in its own right and is not inside the visitor-log entry.3

A contact card

A forensic extraction report in the release lists recovered contact records from a Macintosh Mail store. Read at the image at 400 dpi, one record’s First field reads “Loy Anderson — The Paradise Fund”. Its e-mail value is under a producer’s bar, and the record is recovered from a deleted mail envelope index.18

That is a company field in somebody’s address book, and it is all the record supports. It does not establish what the Paradise Fund was, what Anderson’s connection to it was, or when the card was made.

The release does hold a description of the fund, on a document that is not his. A curriculum vitae, present in six copies, belongs to Story A. Cowles, who gives THE PARADISE FUND, Palm Beach, FL as an employer from January 2007 to April 2009, describes it as a Feeder Fund to International Charities, and gives the position held as President. The same CV gives a later post as paralegal at a West Palm Beach criminal defence firm, with responsibilities including “dealing with firm’s highest net worth client.”19

That CV is a different person’s and no inference from it is carried onto this page. It is recorded here because the fund appears in both places and a reader tracing the name should know the fund’s own description comes from somebody else’s document.

What the release does not establish

Set out so a later reader can re-run the tests rather than trust them.

  • No document located for this page states a reason for the waiver. The first tests were keyed on the words of the memorandum: phrase searches for "waiving the requirement", "waive the requirement", "financial statements" conjoined with "Epstein", and "NES" conjoined with "financial statement"; and reading every page returned by "Loy Anderson" and its adjacent forms. Those forms could not have returned a document that gives a reason without using any of them, so a second set was written, before it was run, out of the words a banker recording a reason would use: "policy exception" returns 3 documents, "exception to policy" 4, "compensating factor" and "compensating factors" 0 each, "longstanding customer" 1, and "long-standing customer" 2. All seven documents returned by the first two forms were read. They are a trust-law treatise, a different bank’s exception log, a Virgin Islands indemnification brief, two of that other bank’s identification-exception forms, and two House Oversight documents about leak prosecutions. None concerns this bank, this customer or this waiver. The memorandum’s own text carries no reason clause; the sheet that follows it in the same run is a different instrument; and the bank’s own printed Justification: field, set out above, is blank.
  • No document located for this page gives Anderson a title at Palm Beach National Bank. The tests run were "Loy Anderson" conjoined with president, with chairman, and with vice president; and reading all 33 index pages carrying the name in any form. The instruments give OFFICER, PRIM OFFICER and officer number 1.
  • No document located for this page records correspondence written by Anderson other than the August 2001 memorandum. He is a sender on no message in the index: act_rate.py returns a sender-field rate of 0 of 9 on the phrase population and 0 of 15 on the measured name-reachable floor. That is a fact about e-mail. His record here is paper, and his documented acts are all paper: a memorandum he wrote and marked in ink, the approval block of the relationship ticket, and the first Approved By: rule of the underwriting worksheet, which carries the same compact mark.
  • This page does not assert that Anderson knew the purpose of the cards, the identity of the cardholders beyond the names on the application, or anything about Epstein’s conduct. Nothing located here speaks to any of those.

The search, and what it reaches

Every count below was measured on the pages_fts index and is a count of documents, not pages. Zeros are reported with the forms that produced them, because a form that fails is evidence about the form.

form querieddocuments
"Loy Anderson"9
"Loy Anderson Jr"8
"H. Loy Anderson"7
"Harry Loy Anderson"2
"Anderson H Loy"6
"ANDERSON H LOY JR"5
"loy jr"5
"h loy"13
harryloy (bare token)1
"Harryloy Anderson"1
loy (bare token)335
"Harry Anderson"0
"Anderson Loy"0
"Anderson Harry"0
"Loy Anderson Sr"0
"Loy A. Anderson"0
loyanderson (run together)0
"loy andersen", "loy anderscn", "loy andersori", "1oy anderson"0 each

The floor is 18 documents, and here is what it is made of and where it stops.

Nine documents carry a forename-first form of the name. Six more carry only the surname-first form ANDERSON H LOY JR, and every one of the six is Palm Beach County property data in the House Oversight production. Those six lie outside every forename-first form; the field-order effect alone raises the population by two thirds. Two more carry the run-together form Harryloy Anderson on the witness list, and both lie outside all the name forms above: one of them because its extraction renders the word lo instead. One more carries the waiver memorandum with Anderson’s name under a producer’s bar, and is therefore unreachable by any name form at all.

Bounds on that floor, stated rather than implied:

  • It is a floor over name forms and the memorandum text. It is not a claim about the corpus.
  • The bare token loy returns 335 documents. The residue outside the floor was sampled at 40 and read: every one is a homograph or extraction damage, most of it 10y (ten-year) misread as lOy in bond-trading correspondence, loy-alty broken across a hyphen, and citations to the Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review. The sample found no further Anderson document, but it was a sample of 40 of 326 and it caps nothing.
  • NEAR(loy ander*, 3) returns the same 15 documents as NEAR(loy anderson, 3), so no damaged spelling of the surname adjacent to the forename adds anything within that window.
  • NEAR(lo* anderson, 3) returns 106 documents. The 91 outside the floor were classified at their rows: location, local, Lorenzo, Louie, lotte (a hyphen break in Charlotte), Lou, looking, looks. None is him.
  • A whole-index enumeration was attempted and did not complete. A Damerau-Levenshtein pass over fts5vocab prefix ranges was killed at a ten-minute budget with no output. An empty result from a killed run is not a null, and none is claimed. The targeted NEAR probes above stand in its place and their window is three tokens.
  • The institutional-key route yields nothing here. The approval ticket gives Anderson’s officer number as 1. A single digit is not a usable search key, and no other internal code for him appears on any sheet read for this page. The bank’s own cost centre, 0000200, returns 15 documents, more than the name does, so it identifies the branch rather than the man.

Notes on the sources

Two of the sheets quoted here carry export damage on their face, and it is reproduced rather than repaired. The obituary was received as a quoted-printable message and prints y=ungest for youngest and led=the for led the in its own headline; that damage is on the sheet and is not this page’s doing. Where a damaged string is quoted below it is quoted as printed.5

The witness list is the clearer case of why the image is required. Its extraction renders Harryloy Anderson as lo Anderson, merges the numbered entries into a continuous run, and drops the table rules that separate them. Every statement this page makes about that sheet was read at the image at 400 dpi.3

Footnotes

  1. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00186431 p. 9 (Bates EFTA00186439), read at the image at 400 dpi. The sheet is reproduced sideways on the page image. It prints the memorandum complete, with no producer’s bar anywhere on it. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6

  2. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00186331 p. 9 (Bates EFTA00186339), read at the image at 400 dpi. On this copy the customer number, the tax-identification and telephone fields and the entire account-number column stand under producer’s bars. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5

  3. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00725731 p. 6 (Bates EFTA00725736), read at the image at 400 dpi. Headed PLAINTIFF DOE, WITNESS LIST CONTINUATION over Doe vs. Epstein - CASE NO. 08-CV-80893-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON. A second copy of the same table, https://epstein-data.com/EFTA01099834 p. 41, carries a different caption on its own face and its extraction is more heavily damaged; the statements above are taken from the first. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5

  4. Six CONTAINER ROWS, each a native spreadsheet and not a page, in the Palm Beach County property-owner data produced to the House Oversight Committee: https://epstein-data.com/HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016698, https://epstein-data.com/HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016694, https://epstein-data.com/HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016695, https://epstein-data.com/HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016696, https://epstein-data.com/HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016552 and https://epstein-data.com/HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016600. The largest of these rows runs to 2,357,962 characters, so no page is pinned, none was read at the image, and nothing here rests on a page reading of any of them. They are used for one fact only: they carry the surname-first form of the name, the owner column being written surname first, and they carry no forename-first form of it. ↩

  5. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA02357177 p. 1 (Bates EFTA_R1_01342670), read at the image at 400 dpi. A message of December 10, 2013, timed shortly after midnight on the sheet’s own unzoned Sent: line, to [email protected]; the sender value is under a producer’s bar. It carries a Palm Beach Daily News obituary by Shannon Donnelly and David Rogers. The sheet prints the headline as Harry Loy Anderson Jr., y=ungest bank president, dies at 70 and the standfirst as 'Happy Harry Loy' led=the Worth Avenue National Bank at 26.; the = characters are on the sheet. A second copy of the same message is at https://epstein-data.com/EFTA01752722 p. 1. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4

  6. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA01337869 p. 3 (Bates EFTA01337871; also stamped EFTA_00258227 and SDNY_GM_02771419), read at the image at 400 dpi. Card and account numbers written in ink on this sheet are not reproduced here. ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6 ↩7 ↩8

  7. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA02357177 p. 2 (Bates EFTA_R1_01342671), read at the image at 400 dpi. The continuation of the obituary. It gives his father as a president of First Federal Savings & Loan, states that In 1970, at age 26, he assumed the presidency of W=rth Avenue National Bank and became the youngest bank president in the nat=on, and names his surviving children including sons H. Loy III and Kent. The death date and the age at death are on p. 1, not on this sheet. ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  8. See The search, and what it reaches for the forms measured, the zeros, and the named bounds on the figure. ↩

  9. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA01337869 p. 21 (Bates EFTA01337889, also stamped EFTA_00258245), read at the image at 400 dpi. A printed CREDIT CARD UNDERWRITING WORKSHEET form completed in hand. The entries on it are handwriting and the extraction of this sheet does not carry handwriting: its printed field labels are in the index and the written values are not, so the sheet is reached by its heading and its Bates stamps rather than by anything entered on it. A manuscript mark is dropped by the extraction altogether, so the state of the Approved By: rule is a reading only the image can give. The page image of this sheet carries no producer’s bar anywhere on it. ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  10. Deposition of Larry Visoski, October 15, 2009: https://epstein-data.com/EFTA01110326 p. 3, read at the image at 400 dpi. The sheet is a condensed transcript printing four transcript pages to one page image; the testimony quoted here is transcript page 8, lines 10 to 22, read there. The extraction of this sheet breaks the quoted sentence across the condensed column, so a phrase search for it does not return this document and a pin checker reports the quotation as unresolved against it; the reading here is the image, not the index. His employment by NES, LLC is set out in full on his page, which cites the same sheet for the same answers. ↩ ↩2

  11. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00186431 p. 2 (Bates EFTA00186432), read at the image at 400 dpi. A VISA BUSINESS CREDIT CARD APPLICATION on which the creditor is given as Palm Beach National Bank & Trust Co. and the company applicant as NES, LLC. Its cardholder section is headed LIST THE NAMES OF ALL EMPLOYEES TO WHOM CARDS ARE TO BE ISSUED FOR BUSINESS PURPOSES: and gives the three names with credit limits of $10,000, $10,000 and $5,000. It has no column for a cardholder address. ↩ ↩2

  12. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00186431 pp. 62, 63 and 67, read from the full-text index and not at the image. Further facsimiles from NES, LLC to bank officers there, dated November 14, 2001, January 24, 2002 and March 14, 2002. The January facsimile asks that one cardholder’s card be cancelled; the March facsimile changes individual cardholder limits, reducing two and raising one. ↩ ↩2 ↩3

  13. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00068582 p. 111, read from the full-text index and not at the image. Asked “Do you recall someone named Emmy Tayler?” the witness answers “Yes”; asked “She was one of Ghislaine’s assistants, wasn’t she?” he answers “Yes, she was.” ↩

  14. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00193068 p. 58, read from the full-text index and not at the image. A document schedule calling for wage and tax statements for a list of named individuals, Emmy Tayler among them. ↩

  15. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00217909 p. 3, https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00217824 p. 4 and https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00218443 p. 5, read from the full-text index and not at the image. Courier invoice detail lines giving the recipient as Shannon Pascuzzi at Zorro Ranch, Stanley, New Mexico, on shipments sent from Epstein’s New York office in 2002 and 2003. ↩

  16. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00186431 p. 56, read from the full-text index and not at the image. A facsimile from NES, LLC of June 13, 2002 addressed to Nancy Bruno and Ann Lufft at the bank, asking that one named cardholder’s card be terminated, signed over Epstein’s name by an office staff member. ↩ ↩2

  17. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA01337869 p. 28 (Bates EFTA01337896; also stamped EFTA_00258252 and SDNY_GM_02771444), read at the image at 400 dpi. The extraction of this sheet breaks the last of those three stamps with an inserted space, so the form printed here returns nothing in the index and the damaged form is the only string that finds the sheet again. The sentence is printed to issued in the names of, at which point a producer’s bar begins and continues onto the following line, resuming at which are being guaranteed by Mr. Epstein. The sheet carries a protective-order stamp in red. ↩

  18. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00511355 p. 10 (Bates EFTA00511364), read at the image at 400 dpi. A forensic extraction report listing recovered Contact records from a Macintosh Mail store, each with a source device, a path, a source type and an identifier. The e-mail value on every record on this sheet is under a producer’s bar. ↩

  19. https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00586666 p. 1, read from the full-text index and not at the image. Five further copies of the same curriculum vitae are at https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00586667, https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00586770, https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00730302, https://epstein-data.com/EFTA01256137 and https://epstein-data.com/EFTA01300550. ↩

Backlinks