Case 1:19-cv-10476-PGG-DCF Document 11 Filed 01/14/20 Page 1 of 2 The Clerk of Court of the Southern District of New York is directed to docket the within ORDER in each of the following actions: VE v. Nine East 71st Street et al., No. 1:19-cv-07625 (AJN) (DF) Katlyn Doe v. Indyke et at, No. 1:19-cv-07771 (PKC) (DF) Priscilla Doe v. Indyke et al., No. 1:19-cv-07772 (ALC) (DF) Lisa Doe v. Indyke et al., No. 1:19-cv-07773 (ER) (DF) Jane Doe v. Indyke et al., No. I :19-cv-08673 (KPF) (DF) v. Indyke et al, No. 1:19-cv-10475 (LGS) (DF) v. Indyke et al, No. 1:19-cv-10476 (PGG) (DF) v. Indyke et al, No. 1:19-cv-10479 (ALC) (DF) Jane Doe 1000 v. Indyke et al., No. 1:19-cv-10577 (LGS) (DF) Jane Doe 15 v. Indyke et al., No. I :19-cv-10653 (PAE) (DF) Mary Doe v. Indyke et al, No. 1:19-cv-I 0758 (PAE) (DF) v. Indyke et al, No. 1:19-cv-10788 (GHW) (DF) Anastasia Doe v. Indyke et al, No. 1:19-cv-11869 (MN) (DF) DEBRA FREEMAN, United States Magistrate Judge: The above-referenced cases — all brought by plaintiffs claiming that they were sexually abused by Jeffrey Epstein and seeking damages from his estate — have been neither consolidated for any purpose, nor designated as "related" by the Court. Nonetheless, these cases (together with certain other, similar cases, not listed above) have been referred to the undersigned for general pretrial supervision, so that discovery — and potentially settlement — may be coordinated as reasonable. While, at the parties' request, discovery in the other Jeffrey Epstein cases referred to this Court has been stayed pending a further report on the parties' settlement efforts, the parties to each of the above-referenced cases have requested, by submissions dated January 10, 2020, that this Court set a discovery schedule. This Court's having reviewed the parties' submissions, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. In each of the above-referenced cases in which the parties have not yet submitted a jointly proposed discovery plan pursuant to Rule 26(f) of the