Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1018 Filed 01/13/20 Page 1 of 11 USDC SONY DOCUMENT ELEMONICALLY FIED I DOC DATE FEED:: f- (3-kr I UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Plaintiff, 15 Civ. 7433 (LAP) -againstOPINION & ORDER GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. LORETTA A. PRESKA, Senior United States District Judge: In its December 16, 2019 Order, the Court concluded that "only motions actually decided by Judge Sweet--along with documents relevant to Judge Sweet's decisions on those motions-are properly considered judicial documents to which a presumption of public access attaches." (See dkt. no. 1016.) The Court now writes to explain the basis for that Order. At this point, Plaintiff "), Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell ("Ms. Maxwell"), Intervenor Miami Herald Media Company ("the Herald"), and Interested Party John Doe ("Doe," and, collectively with . Maxwell, and the Herald, "the Parties") are more than well-versed in the facts and procedural history of this case. Accordingly, the Court sees no reason for an in-depth rehashing of that factual background in this opinion. Of essential note, the Court ordered the Parties on October 28, 2019 to "inform the Court by letter . . . of the motions 1 EFTA02781462