Case 1:17-mc-00025-RWS Document 33 Filed 03/13/17 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK J. REPLY IN J. SUPPORT OF MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER Plaintiff, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL No. 1:17-mc-00025-RWS Defendant. Subpoena respondent J. a non-party and attorney for the Plaintiff in the v. Maxwell action, hereby files this supplemental reply in support of his motion to quash.' BACKGROUND As the Court recalls, Defendant served subpoenas for documents on two of lawyers: Paul G. Cassell, Esq., and J. Esq. The subpoenas were overlapping in most respects and largely substantively indistinguishable. This Court has previously ruled on a motion to quash the Cassell subpoena, quashing most of the demands made there. With regard to the overlapping subpoena, defense counsel has agreed that "the majority of this has been disposed of by [the Court's] earlier opinion" on the Cassell subpoena. Hearing Tr. Mar. 9, 2017, at 57:16-17. The motion RFPs #19 and #20 (and all other RFPs) should be denied for reasons explained earlier in Mr. Motion to Quash and Reply in Support of His Motion to Quash, which documents are incorporated by reference into this reply as if set forth verbatim. EFTA02759147