home

epstein-data
Research ▼
🔍 SearchFull-text document search 🤖 Ask AIAI research assistant 🔎 Evidence MapFBI serial resolution 📷 Reverse Image SearchCLIP + face across 614K images 🧑 Find Face BETASearch 29K faces by photo 💻 Run Your OwnDownload & search locally
Explore ▼
📚 Full Text Corpus1.39M docs, 2.77M pages 🌎 Global Heatmap145 countries mentioned 📈 Coverage MapWhat's here 🌌 AtlasSemantic map · 1.29M docs ⚖ Cases53 federal & state cases · per-case briefings 🎤 DepositionsTranscribed audio & video 💬 Hear from the SurvivorsSurvivors in their own words 📖 Cover to Cover-Up24-hour public reading, synced to the video ✉ Wolff–Epstein Emails2,009 messages · 2009–2019
📷 Images92K analyzed photographs 🔍 Multi-DB SearchSearch all databases individually 🗃 All Databases14 searchable databases
Entities Reports
News ▼
📰 NewsCoverage & reporting ⚖ Justice MonitorArrests, charges, lawsuits, firings
Source ▼
🏛 DOJ ProductionOfficial EFTA disclosures 📜 EFTA Law TextPublic Law 119-38 📁 Source Data (GitHub)Open source databases
🌐 Community ResourcesCurated external projects ✉ ContactGeneral · privacy · DMCA · press
❤️ Donate 🎧 Podcast

Research

🔍 Search Documents 🤖 Ask AI 🔎 Evidence Map 📷 Reverse Image Search 🧑 Find Face BETA 💻 Run Your Own Investigator

Explore

📚 Full Text Corpus 🌎 Global Heatmap 📈 Coverage Map 🌌 Atlas ⚖ Cases 🎤 Depositions 💬 Hear from the Survivors 📖 Cover to Cover-Up ✉ Wolff–Epstein Emails 📷 Images 🔍 Multi-DB Search 🗃 All Databases

Entities

👥 Entity Directory

Reports

Browse All Reports 📰 News ⚖ Justice Monitor

Source

🏛 DOJ Production 📜 EFTA Law 📁 Source Data (GitHub) 🌐 Community Resources ✉ Contact
🎧 Podcast & Newsletter ❤️ Donate Privacy Policy

EFTA02759147

← Prev Next →
Loading document…

Case 1:17-mc-00025-RWS Document 33 Filed 03/13/17 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK J. REPLY IN J. SUPPORT OF MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER Plaintiff, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL No. 1:17-mc-00025-RWS Defendant. Subpoena respondent J. a non-party and attorney for the Plaintiff in the v. Maxwell action, hereby files this supplemental reply in support of his motion to quash.' BACKGROUND As the Court recalls, Defendant served subpoenas for documents on two of lawyers: Paul G. Cassell, Esq., and J. Esq. The subpoenas were overlapping in most respects and largely substantively indistinguishable. This Court has previously ruled on a motion to quash the Cassell subpoena, quashing most of the demands made there. With regard to the overlapping subpoena, defense counsel has agreed that "the majority of this has been disposed of by [the Court's] earlier opinion" on the Cassell subpoena. Hearing Tr. Mar. 9, 2017, at 57:16-17. The motion RFPs #19 and #20 (and all other RFPs) should be denied for reasons explained earlier in Mr. Motion to Quash and Reply in Support of His Motion to Quash, which documents are incorporated by reference into this reply as if set forth verbatim. EFTA02759147

Suggest a category
Misclassified? Pick a better fit.
Community Notes
▸ People Mentioned
▸ Interest Level
Routine Notable Significant
▸ Dates Mentioned
▸ Related Topics
▸ Places & Organizations
▸ Transcription Correction
▸ Research Notes 0
No notes yet.
Related documents
Source Data Investigation Reports DOJ EFTA CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 Contact
Independent research project. Not affiliated with the U.S. Department of Justice, FBI, any government agency, or Anthropic. All analytical text on this site is AI-generated (Claude, Anthropic) and iteratively fact-checked against source documents, but may contain errors. Verify all claims against linked EFTA sources before citing.
Powered by Datasette  ·  ❤️ Buy me a coffee

You are leaving epstein-data.com

You are being redirected to an external website not operated by this project. We are not responsible for the content or privacy practices of external sites.

Powered by Datasette