Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 277 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/14/2014 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S RESPONSE TO PETITIONERS' REASSERTION OF OBJECTIONS TO GOVERNMENT'S ASSERTIONS OF PRIVILEGES Respondent, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Response to Petitioners' Reassertion of Objections to Government's Assertions of Privileges (D.E. 265), and states: I. THE GOVERNMENT'S PRIVILEGE LOGS ADEQUATELY INFORM PETITIONERS AND THE COURT OF THE PRIVILEGE BEING ASSERTED, AS WELL AS THE NATURE OF THE DOCUMENT The government has provided adequate privilege logs which inform petitioners and the Court of the privilege being asserted, as well as the nature of the documents, in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(b)(5)(A)(ii). Petitioners argue that the privilege log is inadequate, and that "[a]s a result of the Government's failures, it is impossible to even begin to determine which of the Government's assertions of privilege are valid." D.E. 265 at 2. Petitioners' complaints about the privilege log are baseless "[b]ecause the adequacy of privilege log entries depends on whether the other parties will be able to assess the validity of the privilege claim, the entries should be evaluated not in a vacuum, but in light of information that the parties can be presumed to possess." In re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether Products Liability Litigation, 898 F.Supp.2d 584, 590 (S.D.N.Y. 2012)(footnote omitted). Petitioners object to EFTA02755125