Case 9:09-cv-80469-KAM Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2009 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE II )CASE NO.: 09-80469-CIV-MARRA Plaintiff, VS. JEFFREY EPSTEIN. and Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO SERVE REPLY TO DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S, MOTION TO DISMISS Plaintiff, JANE DOE II, respectfully requests an enlargement of time to serve her Reply to Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S, Motion to Dismiss, and would show in support: 1. The Reply to Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S, Motion to Dismiss is due May 15, 2009. Due to the press of other business, Plaintiff's counsel has been unable to finish the reply to said motion which raises many complex issues that are typically not addressed on a motion to dismiss. 2. Counsel certifies that he has today consulted with Robert Critton, Esq., Counsel for Jeffrey Epstein, and he does not oppose an enlargement of time until Friday May 22, 2009, for Plaintiff to serve her Reply to Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S, Motion to Dismiss. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court grant an extension to serve the Reply to Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S, Motion to Dismiss up to and including May 22, 2009. EFTA02750409