Case 9:08-cv-80804-KAM Document 19 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/04/2008 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-80804-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE, a/k/a JANE DOE NO. 1, Plaintiff, VS. JEFFREY EPSTa and Defendants. MOTION TO DISMISS Defendant Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Rule 7.1(A) of the Local Rules for the Southern District of Florida, moves to dismiss Counts I, II and IV of plaintiffs amended complaint' against Defendant Jeffrey Epstein, and states as follows: ' The time to answer the remaining allegations of the amended complaint is tolled pending the Court's ruling on the present motion. See Beaulieu v. Bd. of Trustees of Univ. of W. Fla., No. 3:07cv30/RV/EMT, 2007 WL 2020161, * 2 (N.D. Fla. July 9, 2007) (holding that defendant's partial motion to dismiss "automatically extends its time to answer . . . until after the court has ruled on [its] motion to dismiss"); Finnegan v. Univ. of Rochester Med. Or., 180 F.R.D. 247, 249 (W.D.N.Y. 1998) (concluding "that the filing of a motion that only addresses part of a to the entire complaint, not just to the claims that are the complaint suspends the time v. Berry College, Inc., No. Civ.A. 4:96CV338-HLM, 1997 WL subject of the motion"); 579166, *1 (N.D. Ga. July 3, 1997) (noting that there is significant case law to support the position that "when a defendant files a Rule 12(b) motion to dismiss, addressing only some of EFTA02750255