Case 9:10-cv-80309-KAM Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/25/2010 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 10-80309-CIV-Marra JANE DOE No. 103, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFERY EPSTEIN, Defendant. DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITATION ON MOTION TO DISMISS, & FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT & STRIKE DIRECTED TO PLAINTIFF JANE DOE NO. 103'S COMPLAINT Idated 2/23/20101 Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, by and through his undersigned counsel, moves to exceed the page limitation of 20 pages imposed by Loc. Gen. Rule 7.1. C. 2. (S.D. Fla.), in his response to Plaintiff JANE DOE NO. 103's Complaint, dated February 23, 2010. In support of his motion, Defendant states: 1. Local Gen. Rule 7.1 C. 2. provides in part that absent prior permission of the court, no party shall file any legal memorandum exceeding twenty pages in length. Defendant is in the process of preparing his response to Plaintiff's Complaint, (presently due on March 26, 2010, but Plaintiff has agreed to an extension until April 5, 2010), and the response will exceed the 20 page limitation. It is clear, based on the issues raised in Plaintiff's Complaint that in excess of 20 pages is required to fully and adequately respond to and discuss the issues raised. Defendant anticipates needing to exceed the page limitation for his legal memorandum by 6 to 8 pages. 1 EFTA02739161