From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2018 1:23 PM To: Lawrence Krauss Subject: Re: Draft appeal the question that can be raised in the regs is =he " and" does that mean you n=ed both ? or did they mean or , just h=d a similar issue > wrote: Thanks.. I will look at this as I go over the document. =br> You are wrong about grounds for dismissal of tenure, btw.. =C240but anyway will look at this. I twitter.com https://urldef=nse.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http- 3A twitter.com_lkrauss1&d=DQMFAg=amp;c=AGbYxf.IbXK67KfXyGqyv2Ejiz41FqQuZFk4A- 1IxfAU&r=DB9LvLOIQiaqWc=OihHC0LZCntZCR8Xtq5BHKNVR5To&m=ciP97mEbO4349G8_Nf9I5Up33Th7MWHYf6uw7=U BP2c&s=mspp0SBZaPjp58OPRbD2xXlzHCi4LgzTZ8KNgjNBBKg&e=> I w <https://urldef=nse.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http- 3A_krauss.faculty.asu.edu_&d=DCIM=Ag&c=AGbYxO13XK67KfXyGgyv2Ejiz41FqQuZFk4A- llxfAU&r=DB9LvLOIQia=WcFOihHC0LZCntZCR8Xtq5BHKNVR5To&m=ciP97mEbO4349G8_Nf9I5Up33Th7MWHYf6=w7yU ESPZc&s=f7W9C_XvplQaElpZ3o8vIh0dM_e0hTXbMIVPaUviEt8&e=> ww.lawrencemkrauss.com <http://ww.la=rencemkrauss.com> </=> <=cliv> On Aug 21, 2018, at 7:48 PM, jeffre= E. <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]» wrote: sorry, I do not. AT=ALL. . !. This cant be justins writing. ! .=C24> it doesnt deal with the main issue. Th=y have the right to fire you if your behavior makes it impossible for you =o teach. . if you were to be convicted of beating nancy . etc.=C24> you admit much too much, you tell them what =hey can and cant do you attack your accusers. in t=days environment. without giving them respect.. your ev=dence re not poking the woman in the chest is great. , =C24), lucy story , you have witness after witness , case alrea=y an issue. . saying you wouldnt be that stupid , re aus=ralia is not a basis for appeal. I didnt intentinally do=it. and there is no eveidence that i had intent. p=riod. . dumb criminal. ridiculous argument. - . th=y are not saying jumper romper is the issue it was the stud