From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2018 7:24 PM To: Starr, Ken Subject: Re: Jed Rubenfeld i read turley,s piece on same subject / federa=ist papers etc. too much in the weeds. avera=e joe. not sure what he concluded =div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 3:17 PM, Starr, Ken «mailto > wrote: Wise counsel. Thx! Sent from my iPhone On Aug 22, 2018, at 1:49 PM, jeffrey E. <[email protected] <mailto:jeevacation@g=ail.com» wrote: I think scholarly but not too much so. no one above =he law.. we began leaving a kingdom. . unlikely t= give king like powers to a president. on one above the law.=C2* I would like lunch pail joe to come away and think ,4)=A0 this guy is smart . I understood . lets see what he writes about the clintons. someone suggested that trump could shoot someone on fifth avenu= and not lose a vote. that is true , but would make little sen=e for him not to suffer an immediate consequence. the al=owed civil depo setting precedent for criminal process, is a lawyers outline I might think of dumbing it down , again , and sugge=ting that you can sue your neighbor , even if you neighbor is the presiden=. makes little sense that the you can be indicted for as=aulting him but he cannot if he assaults you. Q=A0 low bar for civil higher bar for criminal. . =at some point on your book tour I might point out how disappointed you wer= that the clinton and betty curries' trashcan story , was reopen=d . . On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 2:08 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@=mail.com <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: i vote yes as it makes you relevant to today rather =han merely re- reciting an old tale. :) or tail? <mailto On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 12:07 PM, Starr, Ken > wrote: Can you talk? lmpt. EFTA_R1_01799331 EFTA02607446