From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, December 7, 2017 4:31 PM To: Noam Chomsky Subject: Re: ok, but harry was told by max that he , max needed d=tailed financial inforrmation first , and harry repeated he wanted t= sit with you face to face first . so you have your work cut out for=you On =hu, Dec 7, 2017 at 11:29 AM, Noam Chomsky < ><=span> wrote: On vision,=l know of some evidence that social interaction (mother-neonate) facilitat=s depth perception, but it's years ago. Maybe there is more now.=C240 But the experimental work has been with isolated individuals (kitten=, mainly, I think), and seems to yield normal vision with early patterned =timulation. Let's talk about it some day. l&#=9;ve thought about your suggestion. I think it's better to do it=step by step, not bringing up issues of legal implications unless it's=necessary. I'll write them renewing the request to replace Max b= Richard Kahn, along the lines that we discussed by phone: that I simply c=n't trust Max and want someone trustworthy. I'd also like to=give the gist of the memo, in particular that the marital trust is designe= for those who established it, the IRA as backup. On Thu= Dec 7, 2017 at 4:03 AM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: like th= military, can be good for an individual . b=t needs a group. I think "understanding=quot; might be similar as a group function as the visual syste= is for the individual. . it needs collective input and =hen with a recursive interations focuses on a concept4=A0 you should have the call with your children asap. =C240 feel free to send them debras memo so they see what you =ee. her privlege argument makes no sense. 4>=A0 you WANT the other side to see your justifications for your posit=on. she is just trying to stay out of the mix. j>=A0 as she has done virtually nothing to get you what you clearly are=entitiled to. shameful On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 1:52 AM, Noam Chomsky &l=;nchomsky3@gmail.=om <mailto