From: Kathy Ruemmler Sent: Friday, October 17, 2014 7:40 PM To: jeffrey E. Subject: Fwd: Forwarded message From:= <mailto Date: Oct 17, 2014 3:39 PM Subject: To: < Cc: My draft response belo=. I tweaked the points slightly. </=pan> Thanks, Carol, for let=ing me know what the second phase of your story will emphasize. I wa=ted to share the below points with you on background which I hope wi=l help provide you with the proper factual context for your story. If you have specific questions after reviewing this =aterial, would you please send them to me by email? </a The Comprehensivene=s of the Review: </a On the morning of Apri= 20, 2012, the USSS informed the White House that an individual asso=iated with the White House advance team, Jonathan Dach, may have also had =n overnight guest at his hotel room. The USSS characterized this information as a "rumor" that USSS=personnel who were in Cartagena had learned during the course of the inves=igation into improper conduct of USSS personnel. </_> In response, the White=House Counsel requested that USSS provide her with any information that the USSS uncovered suggesting that White House =taff or volunteers may have engaged in inappropriate conduct on the trip.=C24* </a (1) T=e White House Counsel immediately initiated an internal review of the enti=e White House advance team (both staff and volunteers) that had traveled t= Colombia, including Jonathan Dach. < / = > (2)Th= White House included Dach in the internal review even though he was a vol=nteer, NOT an employee of the White House, who EFTA_R1_01652604 EFTA02517357