would then be asking for a TOTAL declination. ( if he talks about appeal., waivers, 1 think that is a non. starter but does he want to send you a proposed set of facts, to which we would have to stipulate. I.1 realize that emotions are running high on both of our sides. But if You take a step back, which I again strongly urge you to do. 1 think you'll agree that our current proposal , while not what we, would ultimately want , nor what you would have preferred- is currently the best overall solution, for both of us. I think it is fair and just. Id like you to think about it, and I suggest we postpone setting up any firm meeting date until tomorrow, after you have had ample time to review the current situation and circumstances and reconsider, the possibility of getting this, complex matter firmly and totally. behind us. Alex, I wanted to have a one on one conversation re yesterdays call. I wanted to give you time to confirm for yourself what Lily had represented regarding the New York Times. . I'm sure you now realize that contrary to the characterization of David weinstein's actions as merely third party hearsay, I wanted you to know that we have proof positive of what transpired. Proof positive of a breach of the U.S. attorneys manual, proof positive of a breach of the local rules of conduct„ I can't represent to you we have proof beyond a reasonable doubt of a 6 e violation, but clearly enough facts that would support a charge. . Alex, David discussed details of our plea negotiations, ( personal security and house arrest), after repeatedly voicing the offices concern with the Palm beach post editorial. He discussed the theory of the case , and talked about the multiple charging statues, even including the 1591 statute , of sex trafficking -.that is patently unfair to Mr. Epstein. . Frankly, as you heard yesterday, Ken , to put it mildly, is outraged . He is a man of great faith- both in his religion and his unwavering belief in the system of ju