10/20/2010 17:01 THE FLORIDA BAR PAGE 81/02 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Grievance Committee) TO. Bradley James Edwards Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, et al 425 N. Andrews Ave, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301-3268 IN RE: Complaints by Jeffrey Epstein and The Florida Bar Against Bradley James Edwards, Attorney No. 542075 Case No. 2010-50,746(09B) OF NO PROBABLE CAU A LETTER OF ADVICE TO ACCUSED The grievance committee has found no probable cause in the above- you and the complaint was dismissed. In November 2009, The Florida Bar began an investigation into the Rosenfeldt Adler (RRA). According to a complaint filed by Herbert S in Case No. 09-34791-BKC-RBR, dated December 29, 2009, "[a]s p. defraud investors, [Scott Walter] Rothstein utilized the RRA offices, R his position as an attorney and as an owner and officer of RRA, in with existing clients of RRA and RRA's financial institution accounts, fraudulent sale of fictitious structured settlements." Thereafter, co alleged that you conspired with Mr. Rothstein to encourage plaintiffs to against Mr. Epstein to further Mr. Rothstein's Ponzi scheme. During the investigation of RRA, the bar discovered that Mr. R Rosenfeldt were the only equity shareholders in RRA. Despite partners, you held yourself out as a "partner" when you held no equity based upon the trust account improprieties at RRA, inquiry was made 4-1.5 and Chapter 5 of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar and believed during your tenure at the firm that RRA complied with all ap to its trust accounts. The bar also became aware of allegations that I engaged in actions that constituted violations of campaign finance lawyers at RRA were instructed to make political campaign cont reimbursed to the lawyer from funds at RRA. You responded to the inquiry and indicated generally that you were g reflect your legal experience and seniority within RRA. You never he partner and were unaware that anyone ever misunderstood