From: "A. de Rothschild" < To: "jeffrey E." <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 11:09:08 +0000 Agreed i II call her end of afternoon Ariane de Rothschild Le 30 mars 2015 a 12:16, jeffrey E. leevacation®gmail.com> a emit : yes , and if it were a paper case, where he could read and sign we might be ok, might however a real case. NO WAY. I would suggest playing the war game out with Kathy, have her tell you what it might lead to? you have many decisions to make and actions to take. as i have always said the first second and third prioirty is protection!!. protection for you , the girls the bank, the family . On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 6:10 AM, A. de Rothschild <I > wrote: He knows the case well as i have been briefing him systematically on all aspects + he has better knowledge than me on historical agreements between Edmond,David and Eric... They are themselves in uncomfortable position: managing partners who were led to believe they owned the brand, french taxes, misuse of Lafite for bking ( even using Lafite photographs for their advertising) etc Ariane de Rothschild Le 30 mars 2015 a 11:55, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> a ecrit : not bad, howver , he can not handle a hostile depostion. where all questions about the bank , and his knowledge will be on the table.. since the case is about unfair practice. etc. GO SLOW On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 5:37 AM, A. de Rothschild <I > wrote: Here s a great one for you: B s answer to his absences from boards : it was a chosen strategy to give me "space" and to "force" boardmembers to respect me.... Why not... Ariane de Rothschild Le 30 mars 2015 a 03:48, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> a acrit : i understand . speak tomorw On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 9:09 PM, A. de Rothschild < > wrote: Yes . We have to think about how we articulate Kathy and team and how we want to go about it Ariane de Rothschild On 29 mars 2015, at 19:39, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: EFTA007