Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 321 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/03/2015 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 9:08-cv-80736-ICAM JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2. Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. VICTIMS' SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY IN SUPPORT OF RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR LI\IITED INTERVENTION BY ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ COME NOW petitioners Jane Doe No. I and Jane Doe 2, as well as movants Jane Doe No. 3 and Jane Doe No. 4 ("the victims"), to provide supplemental authority in support of their Response to Motion Limited Intervention by Alan M. Dershowitz (DE 291). In their response, the victims argued that a "sinister pattern" existed of persons refusing to provide information about Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking. DE 291 at 15. One of the persons identified as improperly refusing to provide information was Jean Luc Brunel. Id. at 16. Within the last several weeks, victims' counsel have learned that Brunel has filed a complaint in the Circuit Court for Dade County against Epstein. See Brunel v. Epstein, No. 14- 21348-CA-01 (11th Jud. Cir. Jan. 26, 2015) (Ex. I) (available at 2015 WL 129782). In the complaint, Brunel admits that he evaded deposition requests by undersigned counsel on behalf of several of Epstein's victims. Brunel further alleges that this evasion was due to Epstein's instructions. Brunel's complaint alleges that he was told by "Epstein to leave the Palm Beach EFTA00607078