Percival Clouden From: Paul Hemming Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 10.00 AM To: Stacey Plaskett; Magarita A. Benjamin; Priti Mehta; Percival Clouden Cc: Tanya Hill, Jerry Garcia Subject: RE FOIA Request CONFIDENTIAL Attorney-Client Pnvilege Stacey, Thursday is public hearing and Board meeting. It appears as if we will be going all day. How about Friday Morning? I will woke with Maggie to response to the residency requirement. We may want to provide a blank PDF version of the cost benefits to show our instrument we used to measure the inputs and outputs before a decision is made. lust a thought. Paul From: Stacey Plaskett Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 9:48 AM To: Magarita A. Benjamin; Priti Mehta; Percival Clouden; Paul Flemming Cc: Tanya Hill; Jerry Garcia Subject: FOIA Request CONFIDENTIAL Attorney-Client Privilege Good Morning, below please find the email that was sent this past Friday from Wayne Barrett, reporter. I would like to send a written response back by the end of the week and am asking for your assistance in crafting a letter. Please see the following thoughts. I would like to provide short foundation piece explaining the benefits go to a company and the EDC qualifies a beneficiary to take benefits, not all individuals take our vetting, cost benefit analysis and compliance component. what sourcing and residency laws mean. Further explain regulated by BIR and IRS. Also explaining purpose of program as a development piece for the territory not that this is a tax haven. Do we have anything already written that you all can recall? Please lets put these responses together by Thursday afternoon and I will put something together for group review then to be submitted to Mr. Clouden for his review. Thanks Stacey Hello Ms. Plaskett, Please find the following questions and concerns we had in reference to the requested documents received from your office: 1) In looking at the new documents sent to us I'd like to further amend my prev