From: (USAFLS)" To: la, (USAFLS)" Subject: RE: One additional discovery request in Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 vs. U.S., No. 08-80736 Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 23:54:34 +0000 Importance: Normal Do you want me to just get a copy of DE123 from the court? From: MI, s (WARS) Sent: Monday, June 24 2013 7:25 PM To: Paul Cassell M I. (USAFLS) Cc: =., (USAFLS); Brad Edwards Subject: RE: One additional discovery request in Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 vs. U.S., No. 08-80736 Paul, You have addressed your additional discovery request to the correct person. In the Court's order denying the government's motion to dismiss, the Court referenced "[t]he stay of discovery pending ruling on the government's motion to dismiss entered November 8, 2011 [DE #123) is LIFTED." I checked back into my CM/ECF notifications on Outlook, and did not find any for D.E. 123. I checked the docket sheet, which indicates a sealed order being entered on November 9, 2011, which is D.E. # 123. I was under the impression the Court had not ruled on the government's motion to stay. On December 6, 2012, the petitioners filed their Motion for Prompt Ruling Denying Government's Motion to Stay (D.E. 179), in which the petitioners noted that, "(t)he government's motion was filed more than one year ago, yet (presumably because of a flurry of other motions) the Court has yet to rule on this particular motion." From this, it appears petitioners also believed the Court had not ruled on the government's motion for stay. In any event, your e-mail states that "you look forward to receiving the discovery materials that the Court has ordered you to produce on the schedule that the Court has ordered them produced." What is your view as to the schedule that the Court has ordered the documents produced? Is that contained in D.E. 123? Thanks. From: Paul Cassell [mailto Sent: Monday June 24 2013 4:07 PM To: M (USAFLS); I (USAFLS); M, (USAFLS) Cc: (USAFLS); Brad Edwards Subject: RE: One additi