From: (USAFLS)" <O=USAJOU=FLS/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=DLEE> To: ' (USAFLS)" Subject: FW: facts to response to Reinhart Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 19:54:38 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: response-motion-to-intervene-todexter.doc At 4:00 p.m. today, I am going to be speaking with Paul and Brad about their desire to get information to respond to Bruce Reinhart's motion to intervene and motion for sanctions. They just sent me this draft response that they want to file in response to Reinhart's motion. It references comments you made during the December 10, 2010 meeting with CW, and calls you made to Brad during the weekend of March 19-20, before they filed their motions. I will see what they want, and contact you later. From: Paul Cassell [mailto Sent TUesda May 10, 2011 3:34 PM To: (USAFLS) Cc: Brad Edwards Subject: RE: facts to response to Reinhart Dear Thanks so much for the copy of my(!) letter — secretarial issue here!! One of the things Brad and I would like to discuss with you is how we should respond to Reinhart's attack on us. Attached is draft statement of facts, that explains some of the reasons why we included the facts about him in our summary judgment motion. We want to discuss with you whether you Office would have any concern about us filing this? Or whether it should be filed under seal? Or whether we should not file it all, relying on other information? We also want to discuss with you what sorts of information Dal is willing and able to give us to respond. We hope you can look through this before the call. We look forward to chatting soon. Paul Paul G. Cassell Ronald N. Boyce Presidential Professor of Criminal Law Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah hftp://www.law.utah.eduiprofilesidefault.asp?PersonID=57&name=Cassell Paul CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message - along with any/all attachments - is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, t