From: (NY) (FBI)" an' To: :Mr ea (NY) (FBI)" (NY) (FBI)" Cc: ' intM (NY) (FBI)" `AMINIME >, (NY) (FBI)" Subject: Re: URGENT - Deconfliction request Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2023 16:20:15 +0000 Importance: Normal We dont mind From: (NY) (FBI) < EM> Sent: Tuesday, April 4, 2023 12:13 PM To: . (NY) (FBI) cl. M.>; (NY) (FBI) < >; (NY) (FBI) < > Cc: (NY) (FBI) <I MMI:>; (NY) (FBI) < > Subject: Re: URGENT - Deconfliction request Per the SDNY AUSAs nothing it to be released. If SDNY has agreed to something with opposing counsel in the civil suit they have not notified me. SDNY has been going direct so I can forward the details of the request to the team if you don't mind. From: (NY) (FBI) < > Sent: Tuesday, April 4, 2023 11:25:48 AM To: (NY) (FBI) < >; (NY) (FBI) < Cc: (NY) (FBI) < >; (NY) (FBI) <M >-; (NY) (FBI) •t > Subject: Re: URGENT - Deconfliction request ADC is working with USAO regarding the civil requests so I am cc'ing her for awareness. As ADC advised below, we are not disclosing any information regarding the Maxwell/Epstein matters at this time. Thanks! From: (NY) (FBI) < > Sent: Tuesday, April 4, 2023 10:59:40 AM To: (NY) (FBI) 4: >; (NY) (FBI) < > Cc: (NY) (FBI) < >; (NY) (FBI) Subject: RE: URGENT - Deconfliction request Hi — to the extent any of those names relate to the Maxwell case/appeal, then yes, you should be consistent with SDNY and let FINCEN know that the FBI does object to the release of the info. From: (NY) (FBI) Sent: Tuesday, April 4, 2023 10:40 AM To: . (NY) (FBI) 4: >; Cc: (NY) (FBI) < >; Subject: Fwd: URGENT - Deconfliction request (NY) (FBI) < > (NY) (FBI) < > EFTA00162435