From: "/O=EXCHANGELABS/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP S/CN=72708F8BC5354F44958B87907FFOBCDB To: Cc: Subject: Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 00:22:11 +0000 Importance: Normal Attachments: Interview of _ pdf AUL" Ok sorry for the delay. For there is only the attachment; no notes were taken for the 302 authored Yes, the 302 regardin= just the short notes along with the invoice. There were no notes fora I apologize for the confusion in labeling that attached. Ok I figured out thMconfusion. The terview is attached because he was present for the interview lected in the 302. sent. l-nay, may ]. , ZULU SU/ Pm listed at the top Subject: RE: 302s / interview notes This is really helpful, and I think we're down to the last few. A couple follow-up questions / clarifications — Fo ), I don't think we received notes from 7/6/19 — the attachments included a copy of her ID but not any writing. It's possible there weren't other written notes — the 302, attached, is very short — but just let us know either way? Similarly, just want to confirm that the notes for are just the short contact info notes, with his attorney info and a property invoice — both the notes and the 302 are a ached for reference. I think that's right but just want to confirm. I also didn't see notes foe though let us know if it's in a longer write-up in one of the files or if we otherwise missed it, that's also totally possible. And lust a clarification, it looks like the other attached document is listed as' which I assume is It also has the nam (?) at the top, which maybe where that confusion comes from — I know you were looking into that. I think both those names just show up on that one doc. Also totally happy to chat via phone if that's easiest to run through these. Thanks again! EFTA00153838