From: ' To: M" INIISANYeallr)" (USANYS)" Cc:" < Subject: RE: United States v. Jeffrey Epstein, 19-CRIM-00490 (S.D.N.Y.) Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 19:50:16 +0000 That sounds fine, thanks, we'll do that. And we planned to request return / destruction of prior discovery immediately upon the entry of the nolle. From: (USANYS) Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2019 15:49 To: I sc M>; Cc: ) Subject: RE: United States v. Jeffrey Epstein, 19-CRIM-00490 (S.D.N.Y.) (USANYS) c= > It sounds like has already reached out to you and will be handling from Civ Div. To the extent you feel a need to respond at all, I= proposes something along the lines of the following: Your August 20, 2019, requests for disclosure made to the Department of Justice's Touhy regulations will be handled by AUSA of our Civil Division, copied here. Please note that in light of the death of the defendant and in anticipation of the entry of the proposed order of nolle prosequi, no further productions will occur in the context of the criminal case of United States v. Epstein, 19 Cr. 490. Also, asked if we planned to claw back the discovery already produced? My recollection is that under the terms of our protective order, we're entitled to, and, if so, it's probably a good idea... From: Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2019 11:47 AM To: (USANYS) (USANYS) Cc: Subject: FW: United States v. Jeffrey Epstein, 19-CRIM-00490 (S.D.N.Y.) C and M, rz > We received the attached document requests from Epstein's lawyers. Based on our previous conversations about this, it sounds like these should be routed to the civil division, but I wasn't sure who in particular to contact, or whether you would prefer to make the referral. Thanks, From: Miller, Michael Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2019 11:42 AM To: Cc: Weingarten, Reid >; 'Martin G. Weinberg'Scavelli, Michael EFTA00078493