From: ' To:" )11 (USANYS)" Cc: ' (USANYS)" < Subject: RE: Epstein Victim Impact Statements Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 17:37:40 +0000 SANYS and I were doing parallel work and she beat me to it, but in case it's helpful, in addition to the individuals who spoke or were present for their letters being read (10 identified by name and 7 Jane Does), Brad Edwards stated that he had 15 clients present (eight of whom spoke) and "at least 20 more who didn't make this hearing today for a multitude of reasons." (Tr. at 29). And I similarly don't recall anyone who expressed directly to us that they wanted to attend but couldn't, with the exception of jjj, as jj, mentioned. Also to the extent it's helpful, the Tuesday, August 27 hearing was ordered on Wednesday, August 21, and that day we posted the following general notification to the case page on our Office's website: August 21, 2019 update: On August 21, 2019, a hearing was ordered by the Court in the case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 (RMB). The hearing is in connection with the nolle prosequi order proposed to the Court on August 19, 2019, by the United States Attorney, following the death of defendant Jeffrey Epstein. At the hearing, counsel for the victims and the victims will be heard, if they wish to be. The hearing is scheduled for Tuesday, August 27, 2019, at 10:30 a.m. before the Honorable Richard M. Berman, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York, in Courtroom 17B. https://wwwjustice.gov/usao-sdnyYprograms/victim-witness-services/united-states-v-jeffrey-epstein-19-cr-490- nnb And I believe the notification from went out that afternoon as well. From: (USANYS) Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 201913:24 To: ) (USANYS) ‹ > Cc: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Epstein Victim Impact Statements Thanks very much. I agree on the third question. If we could come up with a number