From: (USANYS)" To: ' (USANYS)" Cc: ' i.TANYS)" <1 Subject: Re: Question from HQ Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2019 18:39:58 +0000 (USANYS)" Sounds like it. Sent from my iPhone On Aug 17, 2019, at 11:55 AM, (USANYS) > wrote: We got some clarification below. Are you comfortable with us just responding no? From: (OIG) Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2019 11:43 AM To: (USANYS) Cc: (USANYS) Subject: RE: Question from HQ As you may know IG was a prosecutor in the SDNY and I believe he wants to know if the BOP disregarded requests, directives or court orders from the prosecutors or Judge in the SONY on the underlying case as it related to phone use. I believe HQ wants to know if the SDNY prosecutors office or Judge had any additional requirements, requests, directives or court orders that the BOP needed to comply with that are above standard BOP policy for his phone use. Such as specific recording of phone calls made, reporting to the SDNY of when phone calls were made, to whom, discussion topics, observing or monitoring phone calls, writing memorandums of what they BOP staff may of heard. U.S. Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General New York Field Office From: (USANYS) Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2019 11:28 AM To: • (OIG) Cc: (USANYS) •rz > Subject: Re: Question from HQ Does "memorialize Epstein's phone calls" mean was SDNY required to keep its own log of Epstein's calls at MCC? On Aug 17, 2019, at 10:01 AM, . (OIG) wrote: EFTA00031007