From: " To: "Tomback, Andrew" "Weinstein, Marc A." Cm > Cc: Subject: RE: follow-up question Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 18:36:29 +0000 Inline-Images: iinage001.png Thanks and understood re: both. From: Tomback, Andrew Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2020 08:28 To: Cc: >; Weinstein, Marc A. Subject: RE: follow-up question Marc and/or I will respond to your email below soon — ideally later today. Regarding my open issue, the Estate won't list any property before June 15. Stay safe. Andy Andrew E. Tomback I Partner White 8. Case LLP I 1221 Avenue of the Americas I New York. NY 10020-1095 WHITE S.CASE From Sent: Monday, May 18, 2020 4:17 PM To: Tomback, Andrew >; Weinstein, Marc A. Cc: Subject: RE: follow-up question Mark, Andy, Tomback, Andrew One question I had meant to ask in our call but forgot, on a separate subject — we had briefly discussed in late February our request for photographs and videos in the possession of the estate, and my recollection is that with respect to videos, the estate and trustees were not aware of being in possession of any historical surveillance-type videos (and in particular that any such surveillance video is regularly over-written, and so would not currently exist for any time before, for example, Epstein's suicide), and that separately the estate and trustees were not aware of being in possession of other physical video recordings. My recollection is that with respect to photographs, that there were some photographs in the properties that had not been the subject of physical search warrants, i.e., the Florida and New Mexico residences. I think we had discussed that EFTA00026530