From: (USANYS)" ci To: Cc: Subject: RE: motions under seal? Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2019 15:49:38 +0000 As you know, the protective order distinguishes between all discovery and that marked "sensitive," and it is the sensitive discovery that cannot be publicly filed. El statements to law enforcement do not fall into the sensitive category, so they should be publicly filed. We'd ask that, consistent with the protective order, any sensitive discovery and references to cooperators be redacted in your public filings. Along the same lines, we noticed that you publicly filed four documents that were marked sensitive (Exhibits A through D to your cell site motion) in violation of the protective order. We will be asking the Court to remove them from the docket and you will need to refile. Assistant United States Attorney From: Sent: Friday, August 2, 2019 11:33 AM To: (USANYS) Cc: Bachrach ([email protected]) <[email protected]>; [email protected] Subject: RE: motions under seal? .cl >; Michael I don't think that will satisfy our concern about revealing the statements and certainly not something we can do today or easily. Nor do I want the extra work. Garden City, NY 11530 This transmittal may be a confidential attorney client communication or may otherwise be privileged or confidential. If it is not clear that you are the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this transmittal in error; any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this transmittal is strictly prohibited. If you suspect that you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone or email and immediately delete this message and all its attachments From: (USANYS) Sent: Friday. August 02 2019 11:26 AM To: Cc: Subject: RE: motions under seal? ; Michael Bachrach (michaelembachlaw.com); bkoffskyesnet.net EFTA00021532