Page 101 1 carefully -- the -- each -- each victim was tied to a 2 particular set of criminal activity. In other words, these 3 victims were not lumped in an aggregate sort of formless 4 petri dish. 5 A Yes. 6 Q They were individuals. had met -- was 7 meeting with them, *indeed was finding new victims along with 8 the FBI, and they were conducting individualized assessments 9 of the viability of each victim witness, and indeed 10 submitted a follow on pros memo, a pros memo addendum in 11 July, and another one in September, and tailored -- continued 12 to tailor her indictment -- proposed indictment to these 13 individualized acts. 14 The question -- when I -- when I hear the victims 15 referred to in the aggregate, I wonder what effort there was 16 to sit down and address each individual victim, because there 17 were so many, and a credibility issue that could be very 18 troubling with one victim, if -- or, two victims, or four 19 victims -- 20 A Fair. 21 Q -- could well be overcome by other victims who had, 22 not those credibility issues, perhaps others, and if I may 23 finish, that in the aggregate, when presented individually in 24 total, a kind of a persuasive case could be made that would 25 be impossible with one or two or three? Does that -- is that EFTA00009329