i The Court renee the attached letters via USDC SDN¥ Case 1:20-cH-00330-PAE Document 451 Filed 11/12/4JemaiPageDisefcbno longer permits public DOCUMENT access by telephone for in-court criminal ELECTRONICALLY FILED proceedings, including trials. The DOC #: a memorandum can be found here - https:// 11/12/21 1/12/71 I it P nysd.uscourts. gov/covid-19-coronavirus. The sideldertadorsms nn CT 1 re S Court’s public access orders for all proceedings in the case can be found here - October 29, 2021 https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/usa-vs- ghislame-maxwell-20-cr-330-ajn-case- : fe tion. The Court h 1 ted By E-mail to [email protected] _| procedure for docketing fitngs'with vee proposed redactions and 1s ruling on the i i istri proposals as expeditiously as possible. See Hon. Alison J. Nathan, United States District Judge ee OL co ORDERED: Southern District of New York, 40 Foley Square, New York, NY 1000 Mh | i Re: US v. Maxwell, 20-cr-330 (AJN), timely opposition to blanket requests to seal ' ' ; i. ; ng ! 11/12/21 portions of motions in limine, trial exhibits, public access Dear Judge Nathan: On behalf of Inner City Press and in my personal capacity, I have been covering the above-captioned case. This concerns in the first instance the flurry of motions in limine filed earlier this evening, replete with redactions justified by the a conclusory reference to Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). The Government's Justifications for redaction (Docket No. 399, docketed at 10:06 pm on Friday Oct 29) cites Lugosch then says "The Government also seeks sealing of trial exhibits, where are not public.” Inner City Press immediately opposes this. As one example within this motions of limine, the Government has redacted the entirely of its Argument X, even the title and the page number. And as to trial exhibits, see for example Judge Jed S. Rakoff's order in US v. Weigand, 20-cr-188 (JSR) https://www.documentcloud.org/documents