criminal case

United States v. Tova Noel and Michael Thomas

Docket 19-cr-00830
Court S.D.N.Y.
Filed 2019
Status Closed
Category criminal
Federal criminal prosecution of the two Metropolitan Correctional Center correctional officers on duty in 9 South the night Jeffrey Epstein died, charged in November 2019 with conspiring to defraud the United States and falsifying SHU count and round records. Both defendants entered deferred-prosecution agreements in May 2021 and the indictment was dismissed by nolle prosequi on January 3, 2022.
345EFTA pages linked
635linked emails
10must-read docs
30sampled for briefing

Background

United States v. Tova Noel and Michael Thomas, 19 Cr. 830 (AT), was a federal criminal prosecution in the Southern District of New York assigned to Judge Analisa Torres. The grand jury returned a four-count indictment on November 19, 2019 (Dkt. 1) charging both correctional officers with one count of conspiracy to defraud the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 and three counts of making false records in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001. The indictment alleged that during their overnight shifts in the Metropolitan Correctional Center's Special Housing Unit on August 9–10, 2019, Noel and Thomas failed to perform mandated 30-minute rounds and the institutional counts at 12:00 a.m., 3:00 a.m., and 5:00 a.m., instead remaining at the officers' desk, browsing the internet, and moving around the SHU common area, while signing count slips and round forms attesting that the checks had been performed. As a result, no officer conducted any round of the 9 South tier from approximately 10:30 p.m. on August 9 until approximately 6:30 a.m. on August 10, when the defendants discovered Epstein unresponsive in his cell.

The defendants self-surrendered on November 19, 2019 and were arraigned the same day. Defendant Noel was represented by Jason Foy of Foy & Seplowitz LLC and defendant Thomas by Montell Figgins. The prosecution was led by AUSAs Rebekah Donaleski and Nicolas Roos. Initial conferences were held before Judge Torres on November 25, 2019 (Dkt. 17, transcript) and the parties litigated discovery issues throughout 2020, including a motion to compel by Thomas seeking the DOJ Office of the Inspector General report and related BOP investigative materials (Dkt. 33), which Judge Torres denied on June 9, 2020 (Dkt. 36) on the ground that Rule 16 and Brady do not generally reach materials in the possession of non-prosecuting agencies. Trial was originally scheduled for June 22, 2020, adjourned to January 4, 2021 due to the COVID-19 pandemic (Dkt. 34), and ultimately pushed into the fourth quarter of 2021 (Dkt. 51).

On or about May 20, 2021, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York entered into deferred-prosecution agreements with both defendants. The agreements required Noel and Thomas to admit the conduct charged in the indictment, to cooperate with the ongoing OIG investigation by providing truthful information, and to complete 100 hours of community service preferably related to the criminal-justice system, in exchange for a six-month deferral of prosecution. The deferral period expired on November 20, 2021 with both defendants in compliance, and the government filed a nolle prosequi dated December 13, 2021 (Dkt. 65, filed January 3, 2022) dismissing the indictment as to both defendants. The case is closed. The OIG continued its independent administrative investigation, which culminated in the June 2023 OIG report on the BOP's custody, care, and supervision of Epstein at MCC New York (separately briefed as OIG-23-085).

What the corpus shows

The corpus contains 345 EFTA-stamped pages and 635 emails linked to this docket, drawn primarily from the SDNY production. The sample reviewed includes the original four-count indictment (Dkt. 1, EFTA DOJ-OGR-00021908), the November 25, 2019 initial-conference transcript before Judge Torres (Dkt. 17, DOJ-OGR-00021977), Thomas's 38-page motion to compel discovery and production of the OIG and BOP investigative files (Dkt. 33, DOJ-OGR-00022024), Judge Torres's June 9, 2020 order denying that motion (Dkt. 36, EFTA00022186), the April 22, 2020 order adjourning trial to January 4, 2021 because of the COVID-19 jury-trial suspension (Dkt. 34, EFTA02845890), the April 19, 2021 order resetting trial for the fourth calendar quarter of 2021 (Dkt. 51, DOJ-OGR-00022120), and the December 13, 2021 nolle prosequi dismissing the indictment (Dkt. 65, DOJ-OGR-00022147). Also present is a January 29, 2020 letter from Foy & Seplowitz to the SDNY enumerating Rule 16 demands focused on the MCC video-surveillance system, including the documented "system failure" on or about July 29 and August 8, 2019 and the replacement of the surveillance system on or about August 12, 2019 (EFTA00075609).

The corpus also captures the parallel administrative track. Multiple DOJ OIG digitally recorded sworn statements taken on June 14 and July 12, 2021 in OIG Case 2019-010614 (EFTA00058522, EFTA00062649, EFTA00110989, EFTA00114184) and an OIG Memorandum of Investigation summarizing the September 12, 2019 voluntary interview of an MCC SHU Senior Officer Specialist (EFTA00135547) document the investigative record that the AUSA team and the OIG were building in parallel. A January 10, 2022 OIG memorandum to the BOP Office of Internal Affairs transmits the post-prosecution Memoranda of Investigation for both Thomas and Noel (each dated October 8, 2021) for administrative use now that the criminal case had been dismissed (EFTA00141680). The June 2023 OIG report itself is included as EFTA00039025.

Internal SDNY communications in the sample show how the disposition was managed: a May 20, 2021 "Urgent Memo Report" up-the-chain to Main Justice describing the planned DPAs, the admission-of-guilt requirement, and the 100-hour community-service term (EFTA00029185), and a June 29, 2021 SDNY notice of a planned July 2, 2021 release of approximately 2,700 pages of BOP records to The New York Times in connection with the Times's parallel FOIA suit, NYT v. BOP, 20-cv-00833 (PAE), now that the DPAs had removed the FOIA Exemption 7(A) basis for withholding (EFTA00068566; the Times's cross-motion for summary judgment in that suit is at EFTA00088701). The corpus does not include the deferred-prosecution agreements themselves, the underlying surveillance video, or the sealed grand-jury record.

Must-read documents

DOJ-OGR-00021908 page 1
DOJ-OGR-00021908
Indictment, United States v. Noel & Thomas, 19 Cr. 830 (AT) (Dkt. 1, filed 11/19/2019)
The four-count charging document. Lays out the August 9–10, 2019 timeline, the SHU 30-minute round and institutional count requirements, and the specific false count slips and round forms charged under 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 and 1001.
DOJ-OGR-00021977 page 1
DOJ-OGR-00021977
Transcript: Initial Conference before Judge Analisa Torres, 11/25/2019 (Dkt. 17)
First on-the-record proceeding after the defendants self-surrendered on November 19. Establishes appearances (AUSAs Donaleski and Roos for the government; Foy for Noel; Figgins for Thomas), the discovery posture, and the protective-order framework.
DOJ-OGR-00022024 page 1
DOJ-OGR-00022024
Defendant Thomas's Motion to Compel Discovery (Dkt. 33, filed 04/09/2020)
The defense's principal pretrial discovery motion, demanding the OIG report and other agency investigative materials about Epstein's death. Frames the central pretrial fight over what evidence about the broader BOP failures the defense could put before a jury.
EFTA00022186 page 1
EFTA00022186
Order denying Thomas's motion to compel (Dkt. 36, filed 06/09/2020)
Judge Torres's reasoned order denying the motion. Details what the government had already produced (surveillance video back to July 5, 2019; count slips, 30-minute round forms, and staffing rosters for the three weeks around the death; internal MCC phone records; employee files for Noel and Thomas; written BOP policies; and witness statements) and explains why Rule 16 and Brady did not reach the additional OIG/BOP materials sought.
EFTA00075609 page 1
EFTA00075609
Foy & Seplowitz letter to SDNY re: MCC surveillance system, 01/29/2020
Defense Rule 16 demand letter focused on the MCC video-surveillance system, including the documented 'system failure' on or about July 29, 2019 and August 8, 2019 and the replacement of the surveillance system on or about August 12, 2019. The most concrete view in the corpus of the surveillance-evidence dispute that shaped the case.
EFTA00029185 page 1
EFTA00029185
SDNY Urgent Memo Report to Main Justice on planned DPAs for Noel and Thomas (05/20/2021)
Internal AUSA notification up the chain describing the deferred-prosecution agreements then about to be offered: cooperation with the OIG investigation, an admission of guilt as to the conduct in the indictment, and 100 hours of community service. The clearest single statement in the corpus of the disposition and its terms.
DOJ-OGR-00022147 page 1
DOJ-OGR-00022147
Nolle Prosequi (Dkt. 65, dated 12/13/2021, filed 01/03/2022)
The dismissal that closed the case. Recites the procedural history, confirms that the deferral period expired on November 20, 2021, and that Pretrial Services reported full compliance, and asks the court to dismiss the indictment.
EFTA00135547 page 1
EFTA00135547
DOJ OIG Memorandum of Investigation — voluntary interview of MCC SHU Senior Officer Specialist, 09/12/2019
Contemporaneous OIG agent's interview record describing the actual practice of 30-minute SHU rounds on 9 South — including the officer's own statements that staffing was 'abysmal' and that on shower days the rounds 'would not be possible' as scheduled. Investigative groundwork that informed both the indictment of Noel and Thomas and the later OIG report.
EFTA00141680 page 1
EFTA00141680
OIG memorandum transmitting post-prosecution Memoranda of Investigation for Thomas and Noel to BOP Office of Internal Affairs (01/10/2022)
Confirms that the OIG separately interviewed both correctional officers and produced October 8, 2021 MOIs, and that those investigative materials were transmitted to the BOP for administrative purposes after the criminal case was dismissed. Bridges the criminal track to the BOP discipline track and to the eventual June 2023 OIG report (EFTA00039025).
EFTA00068566 page 1
EFTA00068566
SDNY Urgent Memo Report on planned July 2, 2021 release of ≈2,700 BOP pages to The New York Times in NYT v. BOP, 20-cv-00833 (PAE) (06/29/2021)
Documents the link between the criminal disposition and the parallel FOIA litigation. Once the DPAs removed the FOIA Exemption 7(A) basis, the SDNY notified Main Justice that it would release internal BOP memoranda about Epstein's incarceration and suicide, his MCC psychological records, the OCME autopsy report, and BOP/SDNY emails from the day of the death — the public-records pathway for much of the BOP material now in this corpus.

Full evidence inventory

145 additional documents grouped by type. Click a section to expand. Each EFTA opens in the document viewer.
Court filings (motions, orders, indictments, briefs)126 docs
EFTATypePagesConfidencePage-1 preview
DOJ-OGR-00021928 court.order 1 high
DOJ-OGR-00021929 court.filing 1 high
DOJ-OGR-00021930 court.filing 1 high
DOJ-OGR-00021931 court.filing 1 high
DOJ-OGR-00021932 court.filing 10 high
DOJ-OGR-00021942 court.filing 8 high
DOJ-OGR-00021950 court.order 1 high
DOJ-OGR-00021951 court.order 1 high
DOJ-OGR-00021954 court.filing 5 high
DOJ-OGR-00021971 court.filing_state 1 high
DOJ-OGR-00021972 court.filing 5 high
DOJ-OGR-00021992 court.filing_state 1 high
DOJ-OGR-00021994 court.filing 2 high
DOJ-OGR-00021996 court.filing 2 high
DOJ-OGR-00021998 court.filing 3 high
DOJ-OGR-00022001 court.order 1 high
DOJ-OGR-00022002 court.filing 1 high
DOJ-OGR-00022003 court.filing 1 high
DOJ-OGR-00022019 court.filing 1 high
DOJ-OGR-00022020 court.filing 1 high
DOJ-OGR-00022021 court.filing 1 high
DOJ-OGR-00022022 court.order 1 high
DOJ-OGR-00022023 court.order 1 high
DOJ-OGR-00022062 court.filing 1 high
DOJ-OGR-00022063 court.filing 34 high
DOJ-OGR-00022097 court.filing 9 high
DOJ-OGR-00022107 court.order 1 high
DOJ-OGR-00022108 court.filing 1 high
DOJ-OGR-00022109 court.filing 1 high
DOJ-OGR-00022110 court.filing 1 high
DOJ-OGR-00022111 court.filing 1 high
DOJ-OGR-00022113 court.filing 1 high
DOJ-OGR-00022114 court.filing 1 high
DOJ-OGR-00022115 court.filing 1 high
DOJ-OGR-00022116 court.filing 1 high
DOJ-OGR-00022117 court.filing 1 high
DOJ-OGR-00022120 court.filing 1 high
DOJ-OGR-00022121 court.order 1 high
DOJ-OGR-00022122 court.filing 2 high
DOJ-OGR-00022124 court.filing 1 high
DOJ-OGR-00022125 court.filing 3 high
DOJ-OGR-00022128 court.filing 5 high
DOJ-OGR-00022133 court.filing 1 high
DOJ-OGR-00022134 court.filing 1 high
DOJ-OGR-00022135 court.filing 5 high
DOJ-OGR-00022142 court.filing 1 high
DOJ-OGR-00022143 court.order 1 high
DOJ-OGR-00022144 court.filing 3 high
DOJ-OGR-00022150 court.filing 1 high
DOJ-OGR-00022151 court.order 1 high
DOJ-OGR-00022152 court.order 1 high
EFTA00009747 court.filing 20 high
EFTA00009781 court.filing 5 high
EFTA00009786 court.filing 5 high
EFTA00009791 court.filing 3 high
EFTA00023087 court.filing 5 high
EFTA00023092 court.filing 5 high
EFTA00027307 court.filing 34 high
EFTA00088032 court.filing 9 high
EFTA00089891 court.filing 9 high
EFTA00090237 court.filing 5 high
EFTA00090242 court.filing 5 high
EFTA00091584 court.filing 9 high
EFTA02845736 court.filing 20 high
EFTA02845756 court.order 1 high
EFTA02845757 court.filing 1 high
EFTA02845758 court.filing 1 high
EFTA02845759 court.filing 1 high
EFTA02845760 court.filing 10 high
EFTA02845770 court.filing 8 high
EFTA02845778 court.order 1 high
EFTA02845779 court.order 1 high
EFTA02845780 court.filing 1 high
EFTA02845781 court.filing 5 high
EFTA02845786 court.filing 1 high
EFTA02845787 court.filing 12 high
EFTA02845799 court.filing 1 high
EFTA02845800 court.filing 5 high
EFTA02845805 court.filing 15 high
EFTA02845820 court.filing 1 high
EFTA02845821 court.filing 1 high
EFTA02845822 court.filing 2 high
EFTA02845824 court.filing 2 high
EFTA02845826 court.filing 3 high
EFTA02845829 court.order 1 high
EFTA02845830 court.order 1 high
EFTA02845831 court.filing 1 high
EFTA02845847 court.filing 1 high
EFTA02845848 court.filing 1 high
EFTA02845849 court.filing 1 high
EFTA02845850 court.order 1 high
EFTA02845851 court.order 1 high
EFTA02845852 court.filing 38 high
EFTA02845890 court.filing 1 high
EFTA02845891 court.filing 34 high
EFTA02845925 court.filing 9 high
EFTA02845934 court.filing 1 high
EFTA02845935 court.order 1 high
EFTA02845936 court.filing 1 high
EFTA02845937 court.filing 1 high
EFTA02845938 court.filing 1 high
EFTA02845939 court.filing 1 high
EFTA02845940 court.filing 1 high
EFTA02845941 court.order 1 high
EFTA02845942 court.order 1 high
EFTA02845943 court.order 1 high
EFTA02845944 court.order 1 high
EFTA02845945 court.filing 1 high
EFTA02845946 court.filing 1 high
EFTA02845947 court.filing 1 high
EFTA02845948 court.filing 1 high
EFTA02845949 court.order 1 high
EFTA02845950 court.filing 2 high
EFTA02845952 court.filing 1 high
EFTA02845953 court.filing 3 high
EFTA02845956 court.filing 5 high
EFTA02845961 court.filing 1 high
EFTA02845962 court.filing 1 high
EFTA02845968 court.filing 1 high
EFTA02845970 court.filing 1 high
EFTA02845971 court.order 1 high
EFTA02845972 court.filing 3 high
EFTA02845975 court.filing 3 high
EFTA02845978 court.order 1 high
EFTA02845979 court.filing 1 high
EFTA02845980 court.order 1 high
Transcripts & depositions3 docs
EFTATypePagesConfidencePage-1 preview
DOJ-OGR-00021959 transcript.hearing 12 high
DOJ-OGR-00022004 transcript.hearing 15 high
EFTA02845832 transcript.hearing 15 high
Memoranda, letters & correspondence11 docs
EFTATypePagesConfidencePage-1 preview
DOJ-OGR-00021953 letter 1 high
DOJ-OGR-00022106 memo 1 high
DOJ-OGR-00022112 memo 1 high
DOJ-OGR-00022118 memo 1 high
DOJ-OGR-00022119 letter 1 high
DOJ-OGR-00022140 letter 1 high
DOJ-OGR-00022141 memo 1 high
EFTA00017811 letter 1 high
EFTA00032687 memo 4 high
EFTA00079565 letter 1 high
EFTA02845969 memo 1 high
Emails5 docs
EFTATypePagesConfidencePage-1 preview
DOJ-OGR-00021952 email.header 1 high
DOJ-OGR-00021993 email.header 1 high
EFTA00028840 email.header 2 high
EFTA00162929 email.header 2 high
EFTA00162931 email.header 2 high
Briefing AI-generated on a stratified sample of 30 documents and iteratively fact-checked against source EFTAs. Each linked document opens in epstein-data.com. Verify all claims against the linked sources before citing.