civil case

In re Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (USVI Probate)

Docket ST-2019-PB-00080
Court Super. Ct. V.I. (St. Thomas / St. John Division)
Filed 2019
Status open
Category civil
USVI Superior Court probate proceeding administering the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein after his August 10, 2019 death, with Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn serving as Co-Executors under letters testamentary issued September 6, 2019. The matter has run in parallel with several adversarial actions filed against the Estate, including the U.S. Virgin Islands' CICO action (ST-20-CV-14), Maxwell's indemnification action (ST-20-CV-155), and a court-supervised Voluntary Claims Resolution Program for survivors.
19EFTA pages linked
0linked emails
8must-read docs
0sampled for briefing

Background

Probate of the Epstein Estate was opened on August 15, 2019 in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands, Division of St. Thomas and St. John, five days after Epstein was found dead while in federal custody at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York. Magistrate Judge Carolyn P. Hermon-Percell issued letters testamentary to Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn on September 6, 2019, naming them Co-Executors of the Estate (EFTA02821591). Indyke had served as Epstein's longtime personal attorney and Kahn as his accountant; both are also named in their executor capacities as defendants in the parallel civil actions against the Estate.

Early in the probate, the Co-Executors filed an Expedited Motion for Establishment of a Voluntary Claims Resolution Program (the "Epstein Fund"), a court-supervised non-adversarial program for resolving sexual-abuse claims against the Estate (EFTA02821591). The Government of the U.S. Virgin Islands filed a separate civil action against the Estate, Indyke, Kahn, the 1953 Trust, and a chain of Epstein-controlled V.I. entities under the Virgin Islands Criminally Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (CICO) on January 15, 2020 (ST-20-CV-14). On January 23, 2020, the Government moved to intervene in the probate as a claimant, and on February 4, 2021 it filed an Emergency Motion to Freeze All Estate Assets and Cash on Hand (EFTA02821591). On February 26, 2021, Magistrate Judge Hermon-Percell entered orders denying the Motion to Intervene and striking the Emergency Motion to Freeze.

The Government petitioned the Superior Court for review of those orders on March 17, 2021, contending it had not been served until March 12, 2021 (EFTA02821562). The Co-Executors opposed, arguing the appeal was untimely, that the Government had lost its motion to intervene more than thirteen months earlier, and that the factual basis for the asset-freeze motion was moot (EFTA02821574). On February 4, 2022, the Superior Court issued a memorandum opinion affirming both magistrate orders, holding that the Government's CICO suit gave it adequate alternative remedies and that intervention in the probate was not warranted (EFTA02821591). The Co-Executors then moved for $112,216.90 in attorneys' fees under 5 V.I.C. § 541 as the prevailing party (EFTA02821599); the Government opposed, arguing the underlying orders were not judgments and that fee-shifting against the Territory acting as a law-enforcement agency was contrary to public policy (EFTA02821851). The fee motion was withdrawn on December 20, 2022 in conjunction with the parties' settlement of the related ST-20-CV-14 CICO action (EFTA02821963).

The probate has also been coordinated with two related cases for case-management purposes. On December 7, 2021, the Superior Court entered an order addressing whether the probate (ST-2019-PB-00080), the Government's CICO action (ST-20-CV-14), and Maxwell's indemnification action against the Estate (ST-20-CV-155) should be designated as complex and assigned to a single judge (EFTA02822335). The probate itself remains pending as the Co-Executors continue to administer the Estate, satisfy approved survivor claims through the Voluntary Claims Resolution Program, and litigate residual third-party claims.

What the corpus shows

The corpus contains a focused slice of the probate docket centered on the 2021–2022 jurisdictional dispute over the Government of the Virgin Islands' attempted intervention. Filings include the Government's March 17, 2021 Notice of Appeal and Petition for Review of the Magistrate Judge's February 26, 2021 orders (EFTA02821562); the Co-Executors' March 29, 2021 response opposing the appeal as untimely and moot (EFTA02821574); a Clerk transmittal of April 7, 2021 (EFTA02821589); and the Superior Court's February 4, 2022 published memorandum opinion (Cite as 2022 VI Super 15U) affirming the Magistrate's orders denying intervention and striking the asset-freeze motion (EFTA02821591). The corpus then captures the post-appeal fee skirmish: the Co-Executors' March 4, 2022 motion seeking $112,216.90 in attorneys' fees against the Government under 5 V.I.C. § 541 (EFTA02821599), the Government's March 17, 2022 opposition (EFTA02821851), and the Co-Executors' December 20, 2022 motion to withdraw the fee request after the parties reached a global resolution in the related CICO matter (EFTA02821963).

Several filings document the procedural integration of the probate with the related civil dockets. A December 7, 2021 Superior Court order and accompanying Notice of Entry caption all three cases together — the probate (ST-2019-PB-00080), the Government's CICO action (ST-20-CV-14), and Maxwell's indemnification action (ST-20-CV-155) — to address whether they should be designated as complex and consolidated before a single judge (EFTA02822333; EFTA02822335). The samples confirm Indyke and Kahn as the only Co-Executors throughout the relevant period, identify Kellerhals Ferguson Kroblin PLLC (Christopher A. Kroblin and Marjorie Whalen) as Estate counsel of record in the V.I., and show the Government appearing through the Virgin Islands Attorney General's Office. The remaining samples (EFTA02732301, EFTA02737450, EFTA02737881, EFTA02751342, EFTA02751863, EFTA02752108, EFTA02778176, EFTA02819459, EFTA02846437) consist of June 3, 2020 Troutman Sanders correspondence and exhibits filed in S.D.N.Y. survivor actions captioned "Doe v. Indyke and Kahn," reflecting the parallel federal litigation track in which Indyke and Kahn were sued in their executor capacities.

Must-read documents

EFTA02821562 page 1
EFTA02821562
USVI Government's Notice of Appeal & Petition for Review (Mar 17, 2021)
The Territory's challenge to the Magistrate Judge's denial of intervention and striking of its emergency asset-freeze motion — the procedural inflection point that would have given the Government a direct claimant role in the probate.
EFTA02821574 page 1
EFTA02821574
Co-Executors' Response to Government's Petition for Review (Mar 29, 2021)
Indyke and Kahn's response, framing the Territory's appeal as untimely and moot and arguing the Government had failed to disclose that its motion to intervene had already been denied thirteen months earlier.
EFTA02821589 page 1
EFTA02821589
Clerk transmittal in ST-2021-RV-00005 review proceeding (Apr 7, 2021)
Documents the case-administration mechanics of the probate review proceeding, identifying the originating probate number and the parallel review docket.
EFTA02821591 page 1
EFTA02821591
Superior Court Memorandum Opinion affirming Magistrate's orders (Feb 4, 2022)
The reasoned ruling that kept the Government of the Virgin Islands out of the probate as an intervenor, leaving the CICO action as its sole vehicle and recapping the procedural history including establishment of the Voluntary Claims Resolution Program (the Epstein Fund).
EFTA02821599 page 1
EFTA02821599
Co-Executors' Motion for Attorneys' Fees — $112,216.90 (Mar 4, 2022)
Indyke and Kahn's bid to recover fees from the Territory under 5 V.I.C. § 541 after defeating the intervention and asset-freeze motions — a window into the Estate's V.I. litigation costs.
EFTA02821851 page 1
EFTA02821851
Government's Opposition to Co-Executors' Motion for Fees (Mar 17, 2022)
The Territory's argument that fee-shifting against a sovereign acting in a law-enforcement capacity is contrary to the policy underlying section 541, with line-by-line attacks on the Estate's fee request.
EFTA02821963 page 1
EFTA02821963
Co-Executors' Motion to Withdraw Fee Motion (Dec 20, 2022)
Confirms that the fee dispute was resolved as part of the global settlement of the parallel ST-20-CV-14 CICO action, linking the probate's litigation posture to the broader USVI resolution.
EFTA02822335 page 1
EFTA02822335
Order on complex / related-case designation — probate, CICO, and Maxwell indemnification (Dec 7, 2021)
Joint case-management order captioning the probate together with ST-20-CV-14 (USVI v. Estate) and ST-20-CV-155 (Maxwell v. Estate), showing how the Superior Court coordinated the three Estate-centered matters.

Full evidence inventory

11 additional documents grouped by type. Click a section to expand. Each EFTA opens in the document viewer.
Court filings (motions, orders, indictments, briefs)8 docs
EFTATypePagesConfidencePage-1 preview
EFTA02737450 court.order 3 medium
Case 1:19-cv-10788-GHW-DCF Document 45-1 Filed 06/03/20 Page 1 of 3 EXHIBIT EFTA02737450
EFTA02751342 court.order 3 medium
Case 1:19-cv-08673-KPF-DCF Document 69-1 Filed 06/03/20 Page 1 of 3 EXHIBIT EFTA02751342
EFTA02751863 court.order 3 medium
Case 1:19-cv-11869-MKV-DCF Document 31-1 Filed 06/03/20 Page 1 of 3 EXHIBIT EFTA02751863
EFTA02752108 court.order 3 medium
Case 1:20-cv-00484-JGK-DCF Document 44-1 Filed 06/03/20 Page 1 of 3 EXHIBIT EFTA02752108
EFTA02778176 court.order 3 medium
Case 1:19-cv-10475-LGS-DCF Document 82-1 Filed 06/03/20 Page 1 of 3 EXHIBIT EFTA02778176
EFTA02821965 court.filing_state 1 medium
IN THE SITEIUOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISIANT6 FILED Oectiober 20, 2022 02:21 PH 51-2021-RV-00005 TAMARA CHARLES CLERK OF THE COURT IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISIO
EFTA02822333 court.filing_state 2 medium
IS UHF SI 'TRH /R Ol RI of IIIE I RCP. NI ANDS FILED Decerrber 07, 2021 35:23 Pm 57-2020 -CV-00155 TAMARA CHARLES CLERK OF THE COURT IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS Dis
EFTA02846437 court.order 3 medium
Case 1:19-cv-07625-AJN-DCF Document 64-1 Filed 06/03/20 Page 1 of 3 EXHIBIT EFTA02846437
Memoranda, letters & correspondence3 docs
EFTATypePagesConfidencePage-1 preview
EFTA02732301 memo 4 medium
Case 1:19-cv-10479-ALC-DCF Document 42 Filed 06/03/20 Page 1 of 1 Troutman Sanders LLP 875 Third Avenue New York, New York 10022 troutman.com troutmaril sanders Bennet J. Moskowitz
EFTA02737881 memo 4 medium
Case 1:19-cv-10577-LJL-DCF Troutman Sanders LLP 875 Third Avenue New York, New York 10022 troutman.com Document 59 Filed 06/03/20 Page 1 of 1 troutmar? sanders Bennet J. Moskowitz
EFTA02819459 memo 4 medium
Case 1:19-cv-10476-PGG-DCF Document 50 Filed 06/03/20 Page 1 of 1 Troutman Sanders LLP 875 Third Avenue New York, New York 10022 troutman.com troutmari" sanders Bennet J. Moskowitz
Briefing AI-generated on a stratified sample of 0 documents and iteratively fact-checked against source EFTAs. Each linked document opens in epstein-data.com. Verify all claims against the linked sources before citing.