{"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_count": 99, "url": "https://epstein-data.com/EFTA01718407", "pdf_url": "https://epstein-data.com/pdf/EFTA01718407.pdf", "pages": [{"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 0, "text_content": "EFTA01718407\n", "char_count": 13}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 1, "text_content": "(USAFLS) \nFrom: \n(USAFLS) \nSent: \n. \n2007 12:47 PM \nTo: \nSubject: \nHi \n— I still am having trouble with my voice and am headed home now. Here is the latest: \ntomorrow morning. \nhat is probably coming late tonight or ear \nThe hearing is off for tomorrow, as is the grand jury time. \ny \nWhen you have a chance, can ou sto b and :et from \na co. of the draft indictment, co ies of the \nand \ntranscripts, and a \no you can start on that while I am laid up. Thank you. \nAssistant U.S. Attorney \nest am eac \nPhone \nFax \nEFTA01718408\n", "char_count": 525}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 2, "text_content": "SEP-12-2008 08:18 \nRIID-WINCEESTER \nP.001 \n• \n' ' \n• \nFD; 448 \nRevised \n10-274004 \nFEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION \nFACSIMILE COVER SHEET \nPRECEDENCE \n(\n7\n!\n \nI\nm\nM\ne\nM\ne\ne\n \nC Priority \n2 Routine \nCLASSIFICATION \n(7 Top Secret \nC Secret \nSK Confidential \nr. senaive \nC \nUnclassified \nSubject: \nSICtrk—\nI d \nNumber of Pages; (including cover) \nSpecla Handling Instructions: \n! \nBrief DeSCriptioniof Commuinication Faxed: \nCop( 4 !e>c #FC)//1 rtect)unt \nv : \nI ' \nI \nI \nI \nWARNING \n: \n• \nInformation attached) to the cover sheet is U.S. Government Property. If you are not the Intended recipient Of this Information disclosure, \nreproduction, distribution, är use of this information is prohibited (16.1.1SC, § 641). Please notify the originator or local FBI Office \nImmediately to arrange forproper disposition. \n! \n; \n; \nI .\n; I \nM \n!\nFD-448 (RevISS 10-27;;2004) \nI \nPage 1 of \nDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGAUON \nEFTA01718409\n", "char_count": 922}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 3, "text_content": "WY. \n• •• an/ \n••••• \n%OW • • Yr \nn \nUV \nire • • nea.ne • ••••• \n• \nJ \n; ! \nJuly 28,42008\nVia fearx; \n• \nLEWIS TEINPL \nATTORNEYS AT LAW \nRecord/information Dissemination Section \nFOIA Request Coordinator \nFederal Bureau of Investi eon, Miami Field Office \nort t \niami eac t, \n9 \nRe: \nFreedoth of Information Act/Privacy Act Request \n..Seeking:Documents from a USA° / FBI Investigation \nin the Southern District of Florida. \n! \n• \nTo Whom it Miy Concern: \nWe write on behalf of our client,ltfaSt, \nto request certain records under the Freedom of \nInformation Act and Privacy Act. \nMr. Epstein has been the focus of a joint investigation by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the \nSouthern District of Florida (\"USAO\") and Federal Bureau of Investigation (\"FBI\"). \nThe USAO and/or FBI may have in its possession original (or copies of original) documents in \npaper anctlectronic form seized from Mr. Epstein pursuant to a searchi warrant executed on his \nPalm Aback Florida home on October 20, 2005. We request copies of these paper and electronic \ndocuments • \nFurther; the USAO and/or FBI ma y have interviewed \n(DOB \n(iii) \na/k/a \n(DOB's), \n(v) \nanc/ \n(DOB \n(vii) \n(DOB \nlx) Sida \nDOB \nhave taken place between 2006 and the present. Under FOIA/PA, we request copies of all interview \nnotes and RBI 302s concerning these interviews. \nWe are enclosing Mr. Epstein's fully executed Certification of Identity (Fokt DOJ -361). \n. ! \n• \nCopies it'llany records,responsive to this FOIA/PA request should be sent to my attention at the \naddress:listed below. Thank you for your courtesy. \n•\n \n• \nVery truly yours, \n(DOB \n(ii \n(DOB \n(iv) \n• ME), (vi \n(DOB \nWe believe \nt cse interviews would \nUn\nl\nTCLCOHON; \n• FACSIMILE \nCOCONUT GROVE, r_OR IDA 33133 \n• WWW.LEWISTE1N .00 M \nEFTA01718410\n", "char_count": 1777}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 4, "text_content": "Old \n14\n- 4VVV \nVO . 14 \nWi n 1/4 4.11;c0 I LS% \nOa \n• \nI \nI \nUS. Department of Justice \nI\n• \n- \n• \n• \n• • \nCertification of Identity \n• \ni \nPrey Act Stalentent. In accordance with 28 CFR Section 16.41(d) personal data sufficient to identify the individuals submitting requests \nby mail underithe Orivacy Act of 1074,5 U.S.C. Section 552a, is required. The purpose of this solicitation is to ensure that the records of \nind vidnann who arc the subject of US. Department of Justice systems of records me not wrongfully diet/O;Od by the Department. Failure to \nfurnish this informittlon will result-in no attics being taken on the requaa. False infornuttroo on this form may subject the requester to crim-\ninal realties Under IS LES.C. Section 1001 and/or 5 U.S.C. Section 552a6X3). \n, \nPaine reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 0.50 hours per response, including the time for review-\n!\ninn instructions. sdarciii rig existing data sources. gathering and mainthioing the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collo:lion \nof 'nforrnation. StiggestiOns for reducing this burden may be submitted to Director. Facilities and Administrative Services Staff, Justice \nMt nags rent pivjsion: V.S. Department ofJusiice. Washington. DC 20530 and the Office of Information and Regulatory Allairs. Office \nof Management and Sfudget. Public Use Reports Project (1103.0016), Washington, DC 20503. \ni . \nF1 1 Name bf requester I\n•\nI • \nCitizenshipiStatus 2  \ntbliAta \n3 :412.• \nf \n Social Security Number' \nCunent A4mit \nCocoa,, 74- 6h,e_ FC33 (13 \nI\nDate of Bitfh  \nis„\n20) 1453 \n Place of Binh  \nM \nt.) kfr-k \n• \n: \nf declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United Slates of America that the foregoing hs true and COTTOCI. and that I am the \npe \nn named ahoive, ind I understand that any falsification of this statement is punishable under the Provisions of 18 U.S.C. Section 1001 \nby fine of net more than S10.000 or by imprisonment of not more than l\n... [truncated, 3582 chars — for the full page use /api/corpus/document/EFTA01718407/4 or ?id=EFTA01718407&page=4]", "char_count": 3582}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 5, "text_content": "idea \nL \n- toVVO \n110 • SU \nAMP IN nvlit30 \nIJA \ntrh \nP 4- I \nU.S. Departnitnt of Justice \ni II I ; \nCertification of Identity \nPrivacy Act Stateinent In accordance with 28 aelt Section 16.41(d) personal data sufficient to identify the individuals submitting requests \nby Imail undei the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. Section 552a, 'et required. The purpose of Ibis solicitation is to ensure that the records of \nindividuals wbo arc thd snbject of U.S. Department of Justice systems of records are not wrongfully disclosed by the Department. Failure to \nfamish this informittion will result in no action being taken on the request. False information on this form may subject the requester to crim-\ninal penalties undei• 18 U.S.0 Sidon 1001 and/or 5 U.S.C. Section 552a(iX3). \nI \n• \n1 \n: \n• \nI \nPublic reporting Mader for this collection of information is estimated to average 0.50 hews per response, including the time for review. \ninj insuuctioists, starching existing data sources. gathering and maintaining the data needed• and completing and reviewing the collection \nof information. SuggeStiOns for reducing this burden may be submitted to Dictator. Facilities and Administrative Services Staff. Justice \nMtpagement Piv.ision. U.S. Department of Justice. Washington. DC 20530 and the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs. Office \nof Management \n \nal Budget. Public Use Reports Project (1103.0016). Washington. DC 20503. \n \n: \nI \nFull Name of gagriester t  \nerFF-rt Cy \nI \ni \ni \nt \nenrerr\n1/4.) \n• \ni. \n. \n'I \n.„_\n' \na zenstup1Status 2 LS/..64O.PC's STATES \nI  \n' ...,/ \nSocial Security Number 3\nit \n; \n, \n1\nCurrent Address  CQ Le Li.):3 Teri \n1 \ni\nI \nDate of Biri .\nl \nT. o......t.... \n'2./N \nl'9_17...3 \n Place of Birth \nA./_e_w qock \n \ni \nI \ni \ni .I \n7\nI • \ni \n; \n1 ( clan under penury of perjury under the laws of the United States of Ameriel that the foregoinglis true and correct, and that I am the \npoison named abire. and I understand that any falsification of this statement is p\n... [truncated, 3758 chars — for the full page use /api/corpus/document/EFTA01718407/5 or ?id=EFTA01718407&page=5]", "char_count": 3758}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 6, "text_content": "Embassy of the United States of America \nOffice of the Legal Attaché \nUS Consulate \nFile No. \nActingCoordinator \nAmericas, Europe, Middle East & Africa Desk \nAustralian Federal Police \nCanberra, ACT Australia \n03 December 2008 \nRe: Jeffrey Epstein \nDear Mr. \nThe United States Attorney's Office, West Palm Beach, Florida re uests the assistance of the \nAustralian Federal Police (AFP) in delivering the enclosed letter to Ms. \nDOB \nof Canberra, Australia; telephone numbers \nan \ne letter \nreferences the outcome of a Non-Prosecution Agreement entered into by the U.S. Government and Mr. Jeffrey \nEpstein. The letter provides Ms. \nwith the terms of the Agreement and contact information should she \nhave any questions. \nOn 24/07/06, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Palm Beach Resident Agency (PBRA) opened \nan investigation involving the illegal sexual activity between multimillionaire Jeffrey Epstein and minor aged \nchildren. At the conclusion of the sexual activity, the minors were aid sums of money ranging from $200 -\n$1,000. Testimony from multi le witnesses indicate that \na minor at the time, was one of \nJeffrey Epstein's victims. Ms. \n. Epstein is currently incarcerated at \nthe Palm Beach County Stocks e serving an \nmont t prison sentence, followed by a year of house arrest. Mr. \nEpstein will also be a life time registered sex offender. \nWitt, at telephone \nIf you have any uestions regarding this request, please contact Assistant Legal Attaché Matthew C. \nSincerely yours, \nUIitta \nBy: \nWstantlell\niAttache \nEnc. I \nThis document contains neither recommendations nor conclusions of the FBI. It is the property of the FBI and is loaned \nto your agency; it and its contents are not to be distributed outside your agency. \nEFTA01718413\n", "char_count": 1760}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 7, "text_content": "File No. \nU.S. Department of Justice \nFederal Bureau of Investigation \n25 August 2008 \nMr. \nFederal Agent \nAustralian Federal Police \nAmericas, Europe and Middle East. Desk \nCanberra, ACT, Australina \nDear Federal Agent M\n., \nThe Miami Division of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) requests the \nassistance of the Australian Federal Police (AFP) in delivering a Victim Notification Letter and \nbrochure to \ndate of birth \nwho has been contacted in the past at \nand/or \nOn 24 July 2006, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Palm Beach Resident \nAgency(PBCRA)opened an investigation involving the illegal sexual activity between multi-\nmillionnaire Jeffrey Epstein and minor aged children. At the conclusion of the sexual activity, \nthe minors were paid sums of mono ranging from $200.00-$1,000.00. Testimony from multiple \nwitnesses indicate hat \na minor at the time, was one ofJeffrey Epstein's victims. \nMr. Epstein is believed to have had contact with \nduring the years of 1998/99 -\n2003/04. \nUnder United States Code \nTitle 18 Section 771,4 victim o a crime in the United States has a number of rights which are \ndeiailed in the enclosed letter and brochures. It is requested that the Australian Federal Police \nlocate \nand deliver the enclosed letter and brochure. If you have any questions \nregarding this request, please contact Assistant Legal Attache Matthew C. Witt at \nSincerely, \nAssistant Leg Attache , \nEFTA01718414\n", "char_count": 1443}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 8, "text_content": "12/07/07 \nFRI 15:31 FAX 1 Mel \nR I RRLAND&ELLI S \nLLP \n91002 \nKen oth W. Styr \nTo \n*Writrr \nI \nctly: \nKIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP \nVIA FACS1 \nE \nHonorable R. Alexander costa \nUnited States Attorney \nUnited States Attorney's Office \nSouth \nistrict of Florida \n2 \nRc: \nJeffrey Epstein \nDear Alex: \nAHD Nnunre> IARMILINP1 \nLffill~ere, \npofnia \nvrawie.rkland.cam \nDecember 7, 2007 \nFeciarn,EIT. \nAs we discussed b \nhon earlier tody we \n• \n• • \nu \nissions with res et to \nan \n11 \nWe propose to have both submissions to you by no la \n-0 \non Monde \nDecember 10. In the rn \ne wi \nO OW up with you y \np one regar ng our su missions e ore ecoseobusiness on Monday. \nAs \n, discussed \n• \n4.1 \nZ712a...t1 \nKenneth W. Starr \ncc: \nHonorable Alice Fisher, Assistant Attorney General \n, First Assistant U.S. Attorney \nChicago \nHong Kong \nLondon \nMandl \nNvei 'fork \nSan Francisco \nWashIng:on, D.C. \nEFTA01718415\n", "char_count": 887}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 9, "text_content": "Dec-B7-117 \nfinrfBna \nFron-Fowler-White Burnett \nT-966 \nP.003/004 BiTe \nAffirmation \nI, Jeffrey E. Epstein do hereby re-affamt the Non-Prosecution Agreement and Addendum w \nsame dared October 30, 2007. \nAq-\nEFTA01718416\n", "char_count": 220}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 10, "text_content": "12/07/07 FRI 15:31 FAX 1 \nXIRRLAND&ELL I \nLLP \n001 \nKIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP \n, Fax Transmittal \nPlease notify us Immediately If any pages aro not received. \nTHE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS COMMUNICATION IS CONFIDENTIAL, MAY \nBE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED, MAY CONSTITUTE INSIDE INFORMATION, AND \nIS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE ADDRESSEE. UNAUTHORIZED USE, \nDISCLOSURE OR COPYING IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. AND MAY BE UNLAWFUL. \nIF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, \nPLEASE NO \nDIATELY AT: \nTo: \nCompany: \nFax #: \nDirect VI: \nHon. R.. Alexander Acosta \nUnited States Attorney's Office \nSouthern District of Florida \nFrom: \nDate: \nP \ntover\nages \nFax #: \nDirect #: \nKenneth W. Starr \nDecember 7, 2007 \n34 \nMessage: \nO \nEFTA01718417\n", "char_count": 743}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 11, "text_content": "12/07/07 FRI 15:31 FAX 1 \nKIRRLAND&ELLIS LLP \n2i003 \nALSTON&BIRD LLP \nPROCEDURAL HISTORY \nPrivileged and Confidential \nAttorney-Client Work Product \nAtlanta • Charlatt• Dallas! NawYork • Resenchlthingle•Maablageon,D.0 \nwwmeslarttom \nEFTA01718418\n", "char_count": 246}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 12, "text_content": "VICTIMS \nge: 14 \nSexual Contact with Epstein: \n(Epstein) \nwatched as Epstein \npstem Introduced unidentifi \nem e w o \nw e \nEpstein had \nwith the um en \nm e \n-Epstein \nMa \nAge: 17 \nSexual Contact with E stein: \n- pstem tout \nAge: 17 \nSexual Contact with Epstein: \nEpstein \n( \"rlfriendfassistant \n-E stein introduced \nto \nwhere they engaged in the \nRIMPAge: \n16 \nSexual Contact with E stein: \nAge: 17 \nEFTA01718419\n", "char_count": 412}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 13, "text_content": "Rete: \n14 \nMIM\nI \nAge: 17 \nSexual Contact with Epstein: \ntein \nby Epstein \nwatched as Epstein engaged in \n(girlfriend/assistant) \n-Epstein paid($200.00 for 5 minutes). \nIlla\nAge: 16 \nSexual Contact with Epstein: \nstein \n'PIM \nAge: 16 \nSexual Contact with Epstein: \nMa \nAge: 16 \nSexual Contact with Epstein: \nstein \npstein \nNOM \nAge: 15 \nSexual Contact with Epstein: \n(Epstein) \nwith \nEFTA01718420\n", "char_count": 397}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 14, "text_content": "RPM. \nAge: 17 \nSexual Contact with Epstein: \nE \nINN \nAge: 16 \nSex\nContact with Epstein: \nstein \n- patent \nME\nM  Age: 15 \nSexual Contact with E stein: \nwith \nwhen she was 17 years of age \nWan \nAge: 17 \nSexual Contact with Epstein:\n(Epstein) \nanAge: \n17 \nSexual Contact with Epstein: \nEpstein \nRIMI\nM Age: 16 \nSexual Contact with Epstein: \n(Epstein) \nDOB: \nAge: 15 \nSexual Contact with Epstein:\n(Epstein \n-Epstein instructed \nEFTA01718421\n", "char_count": 437}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 15, "text_content": "MEL \nAge: 16 \nSexual Contact with Epstein: \n-Masturbation \n***AGE is the age the Victim first encountered Epstein \nEFTA01718422\n", "char_count": 128}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 16, "text_content": "12/11/2007 11:37 FAX \n002/099 \nKIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP \nKenya W. Shan \nI o Call Wrier \nAS\n\":\nI lonorabic R. Alexander Acosta \nUnited Stales Attorney \nUnited States Attorney's Orrice \nSouthern District of Florida \n, 33132 \nRe! \nJeffrey F.pstein \nIkar Alce: \nL,,,Ngwub. ONJp,nPa007 \nww....atioracom \nDecember I I. 2007 \nForiChunile: \nAs we discussed during nur telephone eunversatiuns 011 both Friday and Monday \n(yesterday). we are ibminine two sc vale ctic that address nur broad areas of deep concern \nthis flintier \nc arc grateful or your courtesy in agreeing to receive atld consider these submissions, and then \nto ineet to diszuss ihent. \nAs you undertake your study and reflection. kindly allow me to make this pivotal point: \nChicago \nHong Kong \nLondon \nMunkh \nNova York \nSan Francom \nwahnngion. O C \nEFTA01718423\n", "char_count": 818}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 17, "text_content": "JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nTimeline-Summary \n2/20/2007--Meeting (US: \nand \n'I'll' DEF: Lilly Sanchez and Gerald Lefcourt). \n6/26/2007--Meeting (US: \n, DEF: Alan \nDershowitz, Roy Black, Gerald Lefcourt and Lilly Sanchez). \n7/26/2007--Meeting (US: \n(conference call), \nand \n). \n7/31/2007--Meeting (US: \nand \nDEF: Roy Black, Gerald Lefcourt and Lilly Sanchez \n8/31/2007--Meeting (US: \nand \n9/7/2007--Meeting (US: Alexander Acosta, \nDEF: Kenneth Starr, Jay \nLefkowitz, Lilly Sanchez). \nEFTA01718424\n", "char_count": 485}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 18, "text_content": "9/12/2007--Meeting (US: \nand \n, DEF: Jay Lefkowitz, Gerald Lefcourt and Jack \nGoldberger, STATE OF FLORIDA: Barry Krisher and Lanna \nBelohlavek). \n9/18/2007--Rescheduled date for computer hearing.(Hearing \ninitially set for 9/13/2007). \n9/24/2007--Non-Prosecution Agreement signed. \n9/25/2007--Scheduled date for Federal Indictment. \nEFTA01718425\n", "char_count": 347}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 19, "text_content": "JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nTimeline-Summary \n2/20/2007--Meeting (US: \nand \nDEF: Lilly Sanchez and Gerald Lefcourt). \n6/26/2007--Meeting (US: \nDEF: Alan \nDershowitz, Roy Black, Gerald Lefcourt and Lilly Sanchez). \n7/26/2007--Meeting (US: \n(conference call), \nand\n7/31/2007--Meeting (US: \nand \nDEF: Roy Black, Gerald Lefcourt and Lilly Sanchez \n8/31/2007--Meeting (US: \nand \n9/7/2007--Meeting (US: Alexander Acosta, \nDEF: Kenneth Starr, Jay \nLefkowitz, Lilly Sanchez). \nEFTA01718426\n", "char_count": 471}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 20, "text_content": "9/12/2007--Meeting (US: \nand \nDEF: Jay Lefkowitz, Gerald Lefcourt and Jack \nGoldberger, STATE OF FLORIDA: Barry Krisher and Lanna \nBelohlavek). \n9/18/2007--Rescheduled date for computer hearing.(Hearing \ninitially set for 9/13/2007). \n9/24/2007--Non-Prosecution Agreement signed. \n9/25/2007--Scheduled d'ate for Federal Indictment. \nEFTA01718427\n", "char_count": 346}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 21, "text_content": "Timeline-Summary \n2/20/2007--Meeting (US: a \nand \nDEF: Lilly Sanchez \nand Gerald Lefcourt). \n6/26/2007--Meeting (US: a \nMEIM. \nDEF: Alan Dershowitz, Roy Black, Gerald Lefcourt and Lilly Sanchez). \n7/26/2007--Meeting (US: \n(conference \ncall), \nand \n). \n7/31/2007--Meetin \nS: \n, \n, \n, En \nSid \nDEF: Roy Black, erlitcWand Lilly Sanchez). \n8/31/2007--Meeting (US: =\n, \nand \nO• \n9/7/2007--Meeting (US: Alexander Acosta, \nDEF: Kenneth Starr, Jay Le \nAcosta,\n9/12/2007—Meeting (US: \nand \nDEF: Jay \nLefkowitz, Gerald Lefcourtgll\niAoldberger, STATE OF FLORIDA: Barry Krisher and \nLanna Belohlavek). \n9/18/2007—Scheduled date for computer hearing. \n9/24/2007—Non-Prosecution Agreement signed. \n9/25/2007-Scheduled date for Federal Indictment. \nEFTA01718428\n", "char_count": 747}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 22, "text_content": "U.S. Department of Justice \nUnited States Attorney \nSouthern District of Florida \nunm \n2-2111 \n(lam e: \nNovember 13, 2007 \nDELIVERY BY FACSIMILE \nJay P. Lefkowitz, Esq. \nKirkland & Ellis LLP \nNew York, New York 10022-4675 \nRe: \nJeffrey Epstein \nDear Jay: \nI write in response to your letter of November 8, 2007. \nMost importantly, I want to re-iterate \nOffice can be present. \nmom\nPlease advise me of the new date and time so that someone from our \nYour letter asserts that \nEFTA01718429\n", "char_count": 488}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 23, "text_content": "JAY P. LEFKOWITZ, ESQ. \nNOVEMBER 13,2007 \nPAGE 2 OF 3 \nFinall as to the matters related to \nEFTA01718430\n", "char_count": 105}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 24, "text_content": "JAY P. LEFKOWITZ, ESQ. \nNOVEMBER 13, 2007 \nPAGE 3 OF 3 \nLastly, the statement at the end of your letter that you \nPlease clarify your position on this point. \nSincerely, \nR. Alexander Acosta \nUnited States Attorney \nBy: \nFirst Assistant United States Attorney \ncc: \nIt Alexander Acosta U.S. Attorney \nAUSA \nEFTA01718431\n", "char_count": 320}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 25, "text_content": "%to \nKIRKLAND 8. ELLIS LLP \nAND AMA= \nPAAMUSIOPS \nJay P. Letkowitz, P.C. \nTo \nIlly: \nVIA E-MAIL \n• \nIL \nta\ng \n.t nrney's \nOffice \nSouthern District of Florida \nMM3132-2111 \nDear. \nI write in res onse to ,our recent letter dated November 5 2007. I want to make clear at \nthe outset that \no, iowever, \nwant to a ress eac o \ne points you raise in your e er. \nNew or \n-4611 \nwww.ilitkland.com \nNovember 8, 2007 \nFacsimile: \nRe: Jetty Epstein \nChicago \nHong Kong \nLondon \nLos Angeles \nMunich \nSan Francisco \nWashington, D.C. \nEFTA01718432\n", "char_count": 534}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 26, "text_content": "KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP \noven •007 \nPage 2 \nEFTA01718433\n", "char_count": 54}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 27, "text_content": "KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP \nNovember 8, 2007 \nPage 3 \nI look forward to continuing to work with your Office to resolve any outstanding issues, \nand I sincerely anticipate a conclusion of this matter in the very near future. \nSincerely, \nEFTA01718434\n", "char_count": 244}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 28, "text_content": "U.S. Department of Justice \nUnited States Attorney \nSouthern District of Florida \nDELIVERY BY FACSIMILE \nJay P. Lefkowitz, Esq. \nKirkland & Ellis LLP \nNew York, New York 10022-4675 \nRe: \nJeffrey Epstein \nDear Jay: \nMiami, Fl 33132-2111 \nNovember 5, 2007 \nEFTA01718435\n", "char_count": 268}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 29, "text_content": "L \nJAY P. LEFKOWITZ, ESQ. \nNOVEMBER 5, 2007 \nPAGE 2 OF 2 \nSincerely, \nR. Alexander Acosta \nUnited States Attorney \nBy: \nirst Assistant United States Attorney \ncc: \nR. Alexander Acos \nU.S. Attorney \nAUSA \nEFTA01718436\n", "char_count": 217}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 30, "text_content": "FW: Epstein settlement agreement \nPage 1 of 2 \n- \nFW: Epstein settlement agreement \n(USAFLS) \n@usdoj.gov] \nSent: \nFriday, November 02, 2007 9:56 AM \nTo: \nImportance: High \nDRAFT \nFYI. \nAssistant U.S. Attorney \nest a m cac \nPhone \nFax \nIt went out this morning. \nFrom: \nSen \nTo: \nCc: \nSub] \nDear Lanna: \nUSAFLS) \n007 9:51 AM \nSAFLS) \nps ein se ement agreement \nI was just informed that. a case d \n2008. \nsition conference has been set in the Epstein case on Janu \nI also would appreciate it if you could send me a copy of the plea agreement, the Information that you \nplan to file (if it hasn't been filed already), and any factual proffer or other documents related to the \nplea. Please also let me know the date and time of the plea and sentencing so that someone from our \noffice can attend and insure Mr. Epstein's compliance with the terms of his federal non-prosecution \nagreement. \nIf you need any information regarding the federal investigation, or if you have any questions about the \nterms of the federal non-prosecution agreement, please do not hesitate to contact me at the number \nbelow or Marie in the West Palm Beach office. \nThank you, \nirst \nis an\nntted States Attorney \nlarm, 10111132 \n... 11/9/2007 \nEFTA01718437\n", "char_count": 1231}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 31, "text_content": "FW: Epstein settlement agreement \n4 \n•-te' \n4 \n1/4\nPage 2 of 2 \nPhone \nsststant U.S. Attome \n\" est • 173:=1;$ \n4I \nPhone \nFax \nFrom \nSen \nTo: \nSub \nr 29, \nUSAFLS) \nps n settlement agreement \nK.1:• Li':. id 4. .1 P. \nGood evening. I am the ASA with the \nstein case in Palm Beach Coun . The ne otiated settlement \nis a definite o. \nere ore, t e case \nwas set or e rst wee o anuaty, ut e pea an sentence\ndefinitely occur efore the January \n4th date that was agreed on by all for the sentencing. \nIf you have any questions, please contact me at \nor \nLanna Belohlavek \n... 11/9/2007 \nEFTA01718438\n", "char_count": 592}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 32, "text_content": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA \nCase No: \n18 U.S.C. § 371 \n18 U.S.C. § 2423(e) \n18 U.S.C. § 2423(d) \n18 U.S.C. § 1591(a)(2) \n18 U.S.C. § 2422(b) \n18 U.S.C. § 2423(b) \n18 U.S.C. § 1591(a)(1) \nUNITED STATES OF AMERICA \nvs. \nJEFFREY EPSTEIN, \na/k/a \nand \nDefendants. \nINDICTMENT \nThe Grand Jury charges that: \nBACKGROUND \nAt all times relevant to this Indictment: \n1. \nDefendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN employed defendants \n= \na/k/a ' \nand \nto perform, among other things, \nservices as personal assistants. \n2. \nDefendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN owned a property located at \nPalm \nBeach, Florida, in the Southern District of Florida. \nEFTA01718439\n", "char_count": 657}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 33, "text_content": "3. \nDefendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN was the principal owner ofJEGE, INC., a Delaware \ncorporation. JEGE, INC.'s sole business activities related to the operation and ownership of a \nBoeing 727-31 aircraft bearing tail number N908JE. \n4. \nDefendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN served as president, sole director, and sole \nshareholder of JEGE, INC., and had the power to direct all of its operations. \n5. \nDefendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN was a principal owner of Hyperion Air, Inc., a \nDelaware corporation. Hyperion Air, Inc.'s sole business activities related to the operation and \nownership of a Gulfstream G-1159B aircraft bearing tail number N909JE. \n6. \nDefendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN served as president, sole director, and sole \nshareholder of Hyperion Air, Inc., and had the power to direct all of its operations. \n7. \nPursuant to Florida Statutes Section 794.05, a \"person 24 years of age or older \nwho engages in sexual activity with a person 16 or 17 years of age commits a felony of the \nsecond degree.\" For purposes of \"this section, `sexual activity' means oral, anal, or vaginal \npenetration by, or union with, the sexual organ of another; however, sexual activity does not \ninclude an act done for a bona fide medical purpose.\" Florida Statutes Section 794.021 states \nthat \"ignorance of the age [of the victim] is no defense,\" and that neither \"misrepresentation \nof age by [the victim] nor a bona fide belief that such person is over the specified age [shall] \nbe a defense.\" \n8. \nPursuant to Florida Statutes Sections 800.04(5)(a) and 800.04(5)(c)(2), an adult \n\"who intentionally touches in a lewd or lascivious manner the breasts, genitals, genital area, \nor buttocks, or the clothinE covering them, of a person less than 16 years of age, or forces or \n2 \nEFTA01718440\n", "char_count": 1761}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 34, "text_content": "entices a person under 16 years of age to so touch the perpetrator, commits lewd or lascivious \nmolestation,\" which is a felony of the second degree if the victim is 12 years of age or older \nbut less than 16 years of age. \n9. \nPursuant to Florida Statutes Sections 800.04(6)(a) and 800.04(6)(b), an adult \"who \n[i]ntentionally touches a person under 16 years of age in a lewd or lascivious manner or [s]olicits a \nperson under 16 years of age to commit a lewd or lascivious act commits lewd or lascivious \nconduct,\" which is a felony of the second degree. \n10. \nPursuant to Florida Statutes Sections 800.04(7)(a) and 800.04(7)(c), an adult \"who: \n(1) [i]ntentionally masturbates; (2) [i]ntentionally exposes the genitals in a lewd or lascivious \nmanner; or (3) [i]ntentionally commits any other sexual act that does not involve actual physical or \nsexual contact with the victim, including, but not limited to . . . the simulation of any act involving \nsexual activity in the presence of a victim who is less than 16 years of age, commits lewd or \nlascivious exhibition,\" which is a felony of the second degree. \n11. \nPursuant to Florida Statutes Section 800.04(2), \"[n]either the victim's lack of chastity \nnor the victim's consent is a defense to the crimes proscribed by [Section 800.04].\" \n12. \nPursuant to Florida Statutes Section 800.04(3), \"[t]he perpetrator's ignorance of the \nvictim's age, the victim's misrepresentation of his or her age, or the perpetrator's bona fide belief of \nthe victim's age cannot be raised as a defense in a prosecution under [Section 800.04].\" \n13. \nPursuant to Florida Statutes Section 800.02, a \"person who commits any unnatural \nand lascivious act with another person commits a misdemeanor of the second degree.\" \n14. \nDefendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN was over the age of 24 and did not have any medical \nlicensure. \n3 \nEFTA01718441\n", "char_count": 1867}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 35, "text_content": "15. \nDuring the period of their involvement with the Defendants, Jane Does # 3 and 10 \nattended \nin Palm Beach County. \n16. \nDuring the periods of their involvement with the Defendants, Jane Does # 5, 6, 8, 12, \n13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, and 19 attended \nin Palm Beach County. \n17. \nDuring the period of her involvement with the Defendants, Jane Doe #7 attended \nin Palm Beach County. \n18. \nDuring the period of her involvement with the Defendants, Jane Doe #9 attendec \nin Palm Beach County. \n19. \nDuring the period of her involvement with the Defendants, Jane Doe #11 attended \nin Palm Beach County. \nCOUNT 1 \n(Conspiracy: 18 U.S.C. § 371) \n20. \nParagraphs 1 through 19 of this Indictment are re-alleged and incorporated by \nreference as though fully set forth herein. \n21. \nFrom at least as early as 2001, the exact date being unknown to the Grand Jury, \nthrough in or around October 2005, in Palm Beach County, in the Southern District of Florida, and \nelsewhere, the defendants, \nf \nJEFFREaiaY:IEPSTEIN, \nI\n.a \ndid knowingly and willfully combine, conspire, confederate and agree with each other and \nwith others known and unknown to commit an offense against the United States, that is, to \n4 \nEFTA01718442\n", "char_count": 1211}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 36, "text_content": "use a facility or means of interstate or foreign commerce to knowingly persuade, induce, and \nentice individuals who had not attained the age of 18 years to engage in prostitution, in \nviolation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 2422(b). \nPurpose and Object of the Conspiracy \n22. \nIt was the purpose and object of the conspiracy to procure females under the age of 18 \nto travel to \n, Palm Beach, Florida so that JEFFREY EPSTEIN could, in exchange \nfor money, engage in lewd conduct with those minor females in order to satisfy JEFFREY \nEPSTEIN's prurient interests. \nManner and Means \n23. \nThe manner and means by which the defendants and other participants sought to \naccomplish the purpose and object of the conspiracy included the following: \n(a) \nIt was part of the conspiracy that Defendants \na/k/a \nand \nwould contact minor females via \nthe use of cellular and other telephones to arrange appointments for minor females to travel to \nto allow Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN to engage in lewd conduct with them. \n(b) \nIt was further a part of the conspiracy that Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN, \nand \nailde \nwould make payments to, or \ncause payments to be made to, minor females in exchange for engaging in lewd conduct. \n(c) \nIt was further a part of the conspiracy that Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN, \nand \na/k/a \nwould ask females to recruit \nother minor females to engage in lewd conduct with Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN. \n5 \nEFTA01718443\n", "char_count": 1444}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 37, "text_content": "(d) \nIt was further a part of the conspiracy that Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN, \nand \na/c/a `\nwould make payments to, or \ncause payments to be made to, the recruiters for bringing additional minor females to \nEh \nengage in lewd conduct with Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN. \n(e) \nIt was further a part of the conspiracy that Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nwould pay minor females to engage in lewd conduct with Defendant \nto \nsatisfy Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN's prurient interests. \nOvert Acts \n24. \nIn furtherance of this conspiracy and to effect the objects thereof, there was \ncommitted by at least one of the co-conspirators herein, at least one of the following overt acts, \namong others, in the Southern District of Florida: \n(1) \nIn 2001, Defendant \nled Jane Doe #2 from the kitchen of \nupstairs to Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN's bedroom at \n(2) \nIn the beginning of 2001, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN engaged in sexual \nintercourse with Jane Doe #1, who was then a seventeen-year-old girl, in the presence of Jane \nDoe #2, who was then a fourteen-year-old girl. \n(3) \nIn or around 2001, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN masturbated in the \npresence of Jane Doe #2, who was then a fourteen-year-old girl. \n(4) \nIn or around 2001, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN made a payment of $300 \nto Jane Doe #2. \n6 \nEFTA01718444\n", "char_count": 1295}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 38, "text_content": "(5) \nIn or around 2001, Defendant \nplaced a telephone call to a \ntelephone used by Jane Doe #2 to make an appointment for Jane Doe #2 to travel to \n(6) \nIn or around 2002, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN paid $400 to Jane \nDoe #2, who was then fifteen years' old, to \n(7) \nIn or around 2002, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN asked.Jane Doe #2 if \nshe had any younger friends who would be interested in engaging in similar activities \nwith him. \n(8) \nIn or around 2003, Defendant \ntook nude photographs of \nJane Doe #2, who was then a sixteen-year-old girl. \n(9) \nIn or around 2003, Defendant\nnade a payment of $500 to \nJane Doe #2 in exchange for posing for nude photographs. \n(10) \nIn or around 2003, Defendant \ntold Jane Doe #2 that \nDefendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN had asked \nto take nude photographs of Jane Doe \n#2. \n(11) \nIn or around 2003, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN masturbated in the \npresence of Jane Doe #2, who was then a sixteen-year-old girl. \n(12) \nIn or around 2003, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN made a payment of $300 \nto Jane Doe #2, who was then a sixteen-year-old girl. \n7 \nEFTA01718445\n", "char_count": 1084}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 39, "text_content": "(13) \nIn or around 2003, Defendant \nlaced a telephone call to a \ntelephone used by Jane Doe #2 to make an appointment for Jane Doe #2 to travel to \n(14) \nIn or around 2003, JEFFREY EPSTEIN engaged in sexual intercourse \nwith an unidentified female in the presence of Jane Doe #2, who was then a sixteen-\nyear-old girl. \n(15) \nIn or around 2003, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN paid $300 to Jane Doe #2, \nwho was then a sixteen-year-old girl, for allowing an unidentified female to perform oral sex \non Jane Doe #2 in EPSTEIN's presence. \n(16) \nIn or around the spring of 2003, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN masturbated \nin the presence of Jane Doe #4, who was then a fifteen-year-old girl. \n(17) \nIn or around the spring of 2003, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN made a \npayment of $200 to Jane Doe #4. \n(18) \nIn or around 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN directed Jane Doe #4, who \nwas then a sixteen- or seventeen-year-old girl, to \n(19) \nIn or around 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nof an adult female in the presence of Jane Doe #4, who was then a sixteen- or \nseventeen-year-old girl. \n(20) \nIn or around 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN made a payment of $200 \nto Jane Doe #4. \n8 \nEFTA01718446\n", "char_count": 1182}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 40, "text_content": "(21) \nIn or around 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN instructed Jane Doe #4 to \n(22) \nIn or around 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN\n=Eliot \nJane Doe #4, who was then a sixteen- or seventeen-year-old girl. \n(23) \nIn or around the first half of 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN \noffered to pay Jane Doe #6 to bring additional girls to \n(24) \nIn or around the first half of 2004, Defendant \nmade a \npayment of $200 to Jane Doe #6 for recruiting a minor female to travel to \n(25) \nIn or around the first half of 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nane Doe #8, who was then a seventeen-year-old girl. \n(26) \nOn or about March 11, 2004, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN, a \nand \ntraveled from \nto Palm \nBeach County, Florida aboard the Gulfstream aircraft owned by Hyperion Air, Inc. \n(27) \nIn or around March 2004, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN and \nla\ncaused Jane Doe #5, who was then a seventeen-year-old girl, to travel to \nPalm Beach, Florida. \n(28) \nIn or around March 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN masturbated in the \npresence of Jane Doe #5, who was then a seventeen-year-old girl. \n(29) \nIn or around March 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN made a \npayment of $200 to Jane Doe #5. \n9 \nEFTA01718447\n", "char_count": 1185}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 41, "text_content": "(30) \nOn or about May 1, 2004, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN, I= \nand \ntraveled from New York, New York to Palm \nBeach County, Florida aboard the Boeing 727 aircraft owned by JEGE, INC. \n(31) \nOn or about May 14, 2004, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN, \nand \ntraveled from Canada to Palm Beach \nCounty, Florida aboard the Boeing 727 aircraft owned by JEGE, INC. \n(32) \nOn or about May 14, 2004, Defendant \nplaced a \ntelephone call to a telephone used by Jane Doe #6. \n(33) \nIn or around May 2004, Defendant \nled Jane Doe #6 from \nthe kitchen at \nupstairs to Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN's bedroom at \n358 El Brillo Way. \n(34) \nIn or around May 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN masturbated in the \npresence of Jane Doe #6, who was then a sixteen-year-old girl. \n(35) \nIn or around May 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN made a payment of \n$200 to Jane Doe #6. \n(36) \nOn or about June 11, 2004, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN and \ntraveled from Chicago, Illinois to Palm Beach County, Florida \naboard the Gulfstream aircraft owned by Hyperion Air, Inc. \n(37) \nOn or about June 11, 2004, Defendant \nmade one or \nmore telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #6. \n10 \nEFTA01718448\n", "char_count": 1164}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 42, "text_content": "(38) \nOn or about June 20, 2004, Defendant \nmade one or \nmore telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #6. \n(39) \nOn or about June 20, 2004, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN an'\ntraveled from the U.S. Virgin Islands to Palm Beach County, Florida \naboard the Boeing 727 aircraft owned by JEGE, INC. \n(40) \nOn or about July 4, 2004, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN, \nand \ntraveled from Aspen, Colorado to Palm \nBeach County, Florida aboard the Gulfstream aircraft owned by Hyperion Air, Inc. \n(41) \nOn or about July 4, 2004, Defendant \nmade one or \nmore telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #7. \n(42) \nIn or around July 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN led Jane Doe #3, who \nwas then a fifteen-year-old girl, and Jane Doe #7, who was then a sixteen-years-old girl, from \nthe kitchen of \nupstairs to Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN's bedroom at \n(43) \nIn or around July 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN masturbated in the \npresence of Jane Doe #7, who was then a sixteen-year-old girl. \n(44) \nIn or around July 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN instructed Jane Doe \n#7, who was then a sixteen-year-old girl, to \n(45) \nIn or around July 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nJane Doe #7, who was then a sixteen-year-old girl. \n11 \nEFTA01718449\n", "char_count": 1232}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 43, "text_content": "(46) \nIn or around July 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN made a payment of \n$200 to Jane Doe #7. \n(47) \nIn or around July 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN told Jane Doe #7 that \nif she reported to anyone what had occurred at Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN's home, bad \nthings could happen to her. \n(48) \nIn or around July 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nJane Doe #8, who was then a seventeen-year-old girl. \n(49) \nIn or around July 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN masturbated in the \npresence of Jane Doe #8, who was then a seventeen-year-old girl. \n(50) \nIn or around July 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN made a payment of \n$200 to Jane Doe #8. \n(51) \nOn or about July 15, 2004, Defendant \nplaced one or \nmore telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #7. \n(52) \nOn or about July 15, 2004, Defendant \nplaced one or \nmore telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #8. \n(53) \nOn or about July 16, 2004, Defendant \nplaced one or \nmore telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #7. \n(54) \nOn or about July 16, 2004, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN, \nfl\n and \ntraveled from \nto \nPalm Beach County, Florida aboard the Gulfstream aircraft owned by Hyperion Air, \nInc. \n12 \nEFTA01718450\n", "char_count": 1187}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 44, "text_content": "(55) \nOn or about July 16, 2004, Defendant \ncaused Jane \nDoe #8 to make one or more telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #9. \n(56) \nOn or about July 17, 2004, Defendant M\n.laced one or \nmore telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #8. \n(57) \nOn or about July 18, 2004, Defendant \nplaced one or \nmore telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #6. \n(58) \nOn or about July 18, 2004, Defendant\nplaced one or \nmore telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #8. \n(59) \nOn or about July 22, 2004, Defendant \nplaced one or \nmore telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #6. \n(60) \nOn or about July 22, 2004, Defendant \nplaced a \ntelephone call to a telephone used by Jane Doe #8. \n(61) \nOn or about July 22, 2004, Defendant \nplaced one or \nmore telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #9. \n(62) \nOn or about July 22, 2004, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN, \nand \ntraveled from the U.S. Virgin Islands to \nPalm Beach County, Florida aboard the Boeing 727 aircraft owned by JEGE, INC. \n(63) \nIn or around the last half of 2004, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN and \nengaged in oral sex and sexual intercourse in the presence \nof Jane Doe #8, who was then a seventeen-year-old girl. \n13 \nEFTA01718451\n", "char_count": 1224}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 45, "text_content": "(64) \nIn or around the last half of 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nJane Doe #8, who was then a seventeen-year-old girl. \n(65) \nIn or around the last half of 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN made a \npayment of $300 or more to Jane Doe #8. \n(66) • In or around the last half of 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nJane Doe #9, who was then a seventeen-\nyear-old girl. \n(67) \nIn or around the last half of 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN made \na payment of $200 to Jane Doe #9. \n(68) \nIn or around the last half of 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nmasturbated in the presence of Jane Doe #10, who was then a seventeen-year-old girl. \n(69) \nIn or around the last half of 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN \n.1ane Doe #10, who was then a seventeen-year-old girl. \n(70) \nIn or around the last half of 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN attempted \nto \nJane Doe #10, who was then a seventeen-year-\nold girl. \n(71) \nIn or around the last half of 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN made a \npayment of $200 to Jane Doe #10. \n(72) \nIn or around the last half of 2004, Defendant \nled \nJane Doe #13 from the kitchen of \nupstairs to Defendant JEFFREY \nEPSTEIN's bedroom at \n14 \nEFTA01718452\n", "char_count": 1165}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 46, "text_content": "(73) \nIn or around the last half of 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN asked Jane \nDoe #13 to provide her telephone number. \n(74) \nIn or around the last half of 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN instructed \nJane Doe #13, who was then a seventeen-year-old girl, to \n(75) \nIn or around the last half of 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nmasturbated in the presence of Jane Doe #13, who was then a seventeen-year old girl. \n(76) \nIn or around the last half of 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN made a \npayment of $300 to Jane Doe #13. \n(77) \nOn or about August 19, 2004, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN and \ntraveled from \nto Palm Beach County, \nFlorida aboard the Boeing 727 aircraft owned by JEGE, INC. \n(78) \nOn or about August 21, 2004, Defendant \ntplaced one \nor more calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #11. \n(79) \nOn or about August 25, 2004, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN, \nand \ntraveled from \nto Palm \nBeach County, Florida aboard the Boeing 727 aircraft owned by JEGE, INC. \n(80) \nIn or around the last quarter of 2004, Defendant \ncaused Jane Doe #5 to place a telephone call to Jane Doe #12. \n(81) \nIn or around the last quarter of 2004, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN and \ncaused Jane Doe #5 to travel with Jane Doe #12 to \n15 \nEFTA01718453\n", "char_count": 1232}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 47, "text_content": "(82) \nIn or around the last quarter of 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nmasturbated in the presence of Jane Doe #12, who was then a sixteen-year-old girl. \n(83) \nIn or around the last quarter of 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEN \nJane Doe #12, who was then a sixteen-year-old girl. \n(84) \nIn or around the last quarter of 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN made a \npayment of $200 to Jane Doe #12. \n(85) \nIn or around the last quarter of 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN \ncaused a payment to be made to Jane Doe #5 for recruiting Jane Doe #12 to travel to \n(86) \nOn or about October 2, 2004, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN, \nand \ntraveled from the U.S. Virgin Islands to \nPalm Beach County, Florida aboard the Boeing 727 aircraft owned by JEGE, INC. \n(87) \nOn or about October 29, 2004, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN, \nand \ntraveled from \nto Palm Beach County, Florida aboard the Gulfstream aircraft owned by \nHyperion Air, INC. \n(88) \nIn or around the end of 2004, Defendant \nled Jane \nDoe #19, who was then a sixteen-year-old girl, from the kitchen ofilE\n, \nupstairs to Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN's bedroom at \n(89) \nIn or around the end of 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN masturbated in \nthe presence of Jane Doe #19, who was then a sixteen-year-old girl. \n16 \nEFTA01718454\n", "char_count": 1262}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 48, "text_content": "(90) \nIn or around the end of 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN made a payment \nof $200 to Jane Doe #19. \n(91) \nIn or around the end of 2004, Defendant \nplaced a \ntelephone call to a telephone used by Jane Doe #5 to arrange for Jane Doe #19 to travel to \n(92) \nOn or about November 10, 2004, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN and \ntraveled from \nto Palm Beach County, Florida \naboard the Gulfstream aircraft owned by Hyperion Air, Inc. \n(93) \nOn or about November 18, 2004, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN, \na/k/a ' \nand \ntraveled from \nto Palm Beach County, Florida \naboard the Gulfstream aircraft owned by Hyperion Air, Inc. \n(94) \nIn or around December 2004, Defendant \ncaused Jane \nDoe #12 to place a telephone call to Jane Doe #15. \n(95) \nIn or around December 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN made a \npayment of $100 to Jane Doe #12 for bringing Jane Doe #I5 to \n(96) \nIn or around December 2004, Defendant led \nJane Doe #15 \nfrom the kitchen \nupstairs to Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN's bedroom \nat \n(97) \nIn or around December 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN masturbated in \nthe presence of Jane Doe #15, who was then a sixteen-year-old girl. \n17 \nEFTA01718455\n", "char_count": 1150}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 49, "text_content": "(98) \nIn or around December 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nJane Doe #15, who was then a sixteen-year-old girl. \n(99) \nIn or around December 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nJane Doe #15, who was then a sixteen-year-old girl. \n(100) In or around December 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN made a \npayment of $200 to Jane Doe #15, who was then a sixteen-year-old girl. \n(101) On or about December 3, 2004, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN, \nand \na/k/a \ntraveled from. \nNew York, New York to Palm Beach County, Florida aboard the Boeing 727 aircraft \nowned by JEGE, INC. \n(102) On or about December 4, 2004, Defendant \nprovided a \nwritten message to Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN regarding Jane Does # 8 and 9, stating: \n\"[Jane Doe #9] would like to work @ 4:00 pm if possible. [[Jane Doe #8] is scheduled for \n5:00 today.] the movie is ® 7:30\". \n(103) On or about December 6, 2004, Defendant \nplaced \none or more calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #14. \n(104) On or about December 13, 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN \ntraveled from the U.S. Virgin Islands to Palm Beach County, Florida, aboard the \nGulfstream aircraft owned by Hyperion Air, Inc. \n18 \nEFTA01718456\n", "char_count": 1156}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 50, "text_content": "(105) On or about December 17, 2004, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN and \ntraveled from \nto Palm Beach \nCounty, Florida aboard the Gulfstream aircraft owned by Hyperion Air, Inc. \n(106) On or about December 18, 2004, Defendant \ncaused \nJane Doe #12 to place one or more telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe \n#15. \n(107) In or around the last half of 2004 or January 2005, Defendant \nJane Doe #9, who was \nthen a seventeen-year-old girl, in the presence of Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN. \n(108) In or around the last half of 2004 or January 2005, Defendant \nand Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN performed sexual acts in the \npresence of Jane Doe #9, who was then a seventeen-year-old girl. \n(109) In or around the end of 2004 and the beginning of 2005, Defendant \nJEFFREY EPSTEIN \nJane Doe #13, who was then a seventeen-\nyear-old girl. \n(110) On or about December 23, 2004, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN \ncaused a Western Union wire transfer order to be sent to Jane Doe #13. \n(111) On or about December 29, 2004, Defendant \nplaced a \ntelephone call to a telephone used by Jane Doe #8. \n19 \nEFTA01718457\n", "char_count": 1094}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 51, "text_content": "(112) On or about December 30, 2004, Defendant \nused a credit \ncard to purchase Broadway tickets as an eighteenth birthday gift for Jane Doe #8. \n(113) On or about January 1, 2005, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN, \nand \ntraveled from \nto Palm Beach County, Florida aboard the Gulfstream aircraft owned by Hyperion \nAir, Inc. \n(114) In or around the first quarter of 2005, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nJane Doe #13, who was then a seventeen-\nyear-old girl. \n(115) In or around the first quarter of 2005, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nengaged in sexual intercourse with Jane Doe #13, who was then a seventeen-year-old girl. \n(116) In or around the first quarter of 2005, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nperformed oral sex on Jane Doe #13, who was then a seventeen-year-old girl. \n(117) In or around the first quarter of 2005, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN made a \npayment of $600 to Jane Doe #13. \n(118) In or around the first quarter of 2005, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nand \ncaused Jane Doe #17 to place a telephone call to Jane Doe #18 \nto ask her to travel to \n(119) In or around the first quarter of 2005, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN made a \npayment to Jane Doe #17 for recruiting Jane Doe #18 to travel to \n20 \nEFTA01718458\n", "char_count": 1207}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 52, "text_content": "(120) In or around the first quarter of 2005, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nmasturbated in the presence of Jane Doe #18, who was then a sixteen-year-old girl. \n(121) In or around the first quarter of 2005, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN \ninstructed Jane Doe #18, who was then a sixteen-year-old girl, to remove all of her clothing. \n(122) In or around the first quarter of 2005, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN-\nJane Doe #18, who was then a sixteen-year-old girl. \n(123) In or around the first quarter of 2005, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN made a \npayment of $200 to Jane Doe #18, who was then a sixteen-year-old girl. \n(124) In or around the first half of 2005, Defendant \nade a \npayment of $200 to Jane Doe #6 for recruiting another minor female to travel to. \n(125) In or around the first half of 2005, Defendant \nled \nJane Doe #14 from the kitchen of.\n= \nupstairs to Defendant JEFFREY \nEPSTEIN's bedroom at \n(126) In or around the first half of 2005, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN instructed \nJane Doe #14, who was then a seventeen-year-old girl, to \n(127) In or around the first half of 2005, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nJane Doe #14. \n(128) In or around the first half of 2005, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN made a \npayment of $200 to Jane Doe #14. \n21 \nEFTA01718459\n", "char_count": 1247}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 53, "text_content": "(129) In or around the first nine months of 2005, Defendant JEFFREY \nEPSTEIN masturbated in the presence of Jane Doe #17, who was then a seventeen-\nyear-old girl. \n(130) In or around the first nine months of 2005, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nJane Doe #17, who was then a seventeen-year-\nold girl. \n(131) In or around the first nine months of 2005, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nasked Jane Doe 417, who was then a seventeen-year-old girl, how old she was. \n(132) In or around the first nine months of 2005, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nengaged in sexual activity with Defendant \nin the presence of Jane \nDoe #17, who was then a seventeen-year-old girl. \n(133) In or around the first nine months of 2005, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nasked Jane Doe 417, who was then a seventeen-year-old girl, \nDefendant \n(134) On or about January 6, 2005, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN traveled \nfrom \nto Palm Beach County, Florida, aboard the Gulfstream \naircraft owned by Hyperion Air, Inc. \n(135) On or about January 7, 2005, Defendant \na/lc/a \nplaced one or more calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe \n#14. \n22 \nEFTA01718460\n", "char_count": 1100}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 54, "text_content": "(136) On or about January 8, 2005, Defendant \nplaced one or \nmore telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #13. \n(137) On or about January 9, 2005, Defendant \na/k/a \na\nplaced one or more telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #13. \n(138) On or about January 14, 2005, Defendant \nplaced a \ntelephone call to a telephone used by Jane Doe #4. \n(139) On or about January 14, 2005, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN, \na/k/a \nand \ntraveled from the U.S. Virgin Islands to Palm Beach County, \nFlorida, aboard the Boeing 727 aircraft owned by JEGE, INC. \n(140) On or about January 14, 2005, Defendant \nplaced one or \nmore telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #9. \n(141) On or about January 19, 2005, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN, \nanda\nand \ntraveled from New York, New York to Palm Beach County, Florida aboard the Boeing 727 \naircraft owned by JEGE, \n(142) On or about January 27, 2005, Defendant \nailda \na\n* placed one or more telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #9. \n(143) On or about January 28, 2005, Defendant \nplaced one or \nmore telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #9. \n23 \nEFTA01718461\n", "char_count": 1129}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 55, "text_content": "(144) In or around the February 2005, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN caused \na payment of $200 to be made to Jane Doe #8 for recruiting Jane Doe #14 to travel to \n(145) In or around February 2005, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN and \ncaused Jane Doe #10 to recruit Jane Doe #11 to travel to \n(146) In or around February 2005, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN masturbated in \nthe presence of Jane Doe #11, who was then a seventeen-year-old girl. \n(147) In or around February 2005, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nJane Doe #11, who was then a seventeen-year-old girl. \n(148) In or around February 2005, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN made a payment \nof $200 to Jane Doe #11. \n(149) On or about February 1, 2005, Defendant \nplaced one or \nmore telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #13. \n(150) On or about February 1, 2005, Defendant \nplaced \none or more telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #9. \n(151) On or about February 3, 2005, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN, \nand \ntraveled from \nto \nPalm Beach County, Florida, aboard the Boeing 727 aircraft owned by JEGE, INC. \n(152) On or about February 4, 2005, Defendant \nplaced one or \nmore telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #14. \n24 \nEFTA01718462\n", "char_count": 1195}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 56, "text_content": "(153) On or about February 6, 2005, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN and \ncaused Jane Doe #5 to make one or more telephone calls to Jane Doe #16. \n(154) On or about February 6, 2005, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN ands \ncaused Jane Doe #5 to transport Jane Doe #16 to \n, Palm Beach, \nFlorida. \n(155) On or about February 6, 2005, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN masturbated in \nthe presence of Jane Doe #16, who was then a fourteen-year-old girl. \n(156) On or about February 6, 2005, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN \n-Jane \nDoe #16, who was then a fourteen-year-old girl. \n(157) On or about February 6, 2005, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nJane Doe #16, who was then a fourteen-year-old girl. \n(158) On or about February 6, 2005, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN made a \npayment of $300 to Jane Doe #16. \n(159) On or about February 6, 2005, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN made a \npayment of $200 to Jane Doe #5. \n(160) On or about February 10, 2005, Defendant \nplaced one or \nmore telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #13. \n(161) On or about February 10, 2005, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN, \na/k/a \nand \ntraveled from New York, New York to Palm Beach County, Florida, aboard the Boeing 727 \naircraft owned by JEGE, INC. \n25 \nEFTA01718463\n", "char_count": 1209}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 57, "text_content": "(162) On or about February 10, 2005, Defendant \nplaced one or \nmore telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #14. \n(163) On or about February 21, 2005, Defendant \nplaced one or \nmore telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #14. \n(164) On or about February 21, 2005, Defendants EPSTEIN, \nand \ntraveled from the U.S. Virgin Islands to Palm Beach County, Florida, \naboard the Boeing 727 aircraft owned by JEGE, INC. \n(165) On or about February 23, 2005, Defendant \nplaced a \ntelephone call to a telephone used by Jane Doe #4. \n(166) On or about February 24, 2005, Defendant \nplaced one or \nmore telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #14. \n(167) On or about February 24, 2005, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN, la \nand \ntraveled from \nto Palm Beach \nCounty, Florida, aboard the Gulfstream aircraft owned by Hyperion Air, Inc. \n(168) In or around March 2005, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nJane Doe #11, who was then a seventeen-year-old girl. \n(169) On or about March 1, 2005, Defendant \na/k/a \nplaced one or more telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #13. \n(170) On or about March 4, 2005, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN, \na/Ida \nand \nraveled from New York, \nNew York to Palm Beach County, Florida aboard the Boeing 727 aircraft owned by JEGE, \nINC. \n26 \nEFTA01718464\n", "char_count": 1286}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 58, "text_content": "(171) On or about March 16, 2005, Defendant \nplaced one \nor more telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #13. \n(172) On or about March 17, 2005, Defendant \nplaced one or \nmore telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #14. \n(173) On or about March 18, 2005, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN traveled from \nNew York, New York to Palm Beach County, Florida aboard the Boeing 727 aircraft owned \nby JEGE, \n(174) On or about March 18, 2005, Defendant \nleft a telephone \nmessage for Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN regarding Jane Doe #6, stating: \"Is it ok if [Jane \nDoe #6] will come at 5?\" \n(175) On or about March 21, 2005, DefendantalM \na/lc./a \nplaced one or more telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #13. \n(176) On or about March 29, 2005, Defendant \nplaced one or \nmore telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #6. \n(177) On or about March 29, 2005, Defendant \nplaced one or \nmore telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #5. \n(178) On or about March 29, 2005, Defendant \nplaced one or \nmore telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #13. \n(179) On or about March 30, 2005, Defendant \nplaced one or \nmore calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #5. \n(180) On or about March 30, 2005, Defendant \nplaced one or \nmore telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #14. \n27 \nEFTA01718465\n", "char_count": 1318}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 59, "text_content": "(181) On or about March 31, 2005, Defendant \nplaced one or \nmore telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #14. \n(182) On or about March 31, 2005, Defendant \nplaced one or \nmore calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #5. \n(183) On or about March 31, 2005, Defendant \nplaced one \nor more telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #8. \n(184) On or about March 31, 2005, Defendant \nafida \nplaced one or more telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #14. \n(185) On or about March 31, 2005, Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN traveled from \nNew York, New York to Palm Beach County, Florida, aboard the Boeing 727 aircraft owned \nby JEGE, INC. \n(186) On or about March 31, 2005, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN and \ncaused Jane Doe #5 to make a call to a telephone used by Jane Doe #16. \n(187) On or about April 1, 2005, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN and \ncaused Jane Doe #5 to make one or more calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe \n#16. \n(188) On or about April 1, 2005, Defendant\nplaced one or more \ntelephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #8. \n(189) On or about April 2, 2005, Defendant \na/Ida \nplaced one or more telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #17. \n(190) On or about April 2, 2005, Defendant \na/k/a \nplaced one or more telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #14. \n28 \nEFTA01718466\n", "char_count": 1316}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 60, "text_content": "(191) On or about May 19, 2005, Defendant \nplaced one or \nmore telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #14. \n(192) On or about May 19, 2005, Defendant \nt)laced one or more \ntelephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #17. \n(193) On or about May 19, 2005, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN, \nand \na/k/a \ntraveled from \n=to \nPalm Beach County, Florida, aboard the Gulfstream aircraft owned by Hyperion \nAir, Inc. \n(194) On or about June 30, 2005, Defendant \ncaused one or more \ntelephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #17. \n(195) On or about June 30, 2005, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN and I= \ntraveled from \nto Palm Beach County, Florida aboard the \nGulfstream aircraft owned by Hyperion Air, Inc. \n(196) In or around July 2005, Defendant \nled Jane Doe #18 \nfrom the kitchen of \nupstairs to Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN's \nbedroom at \n(197) On or about July 2, 2005, Defendant \nplaced one or more \ntelephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #17. \n(198) On or about July 22, 2005, Defendant\nplaced one or more \ntelephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #17. \n29 \nEFTA01718467\n", "char_count": 1093}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 61, "text_content": "(199) On or about July 22, 2005, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN and \ntraveled from \nto Palm Beach County, Florida aboard the \nGulfstream aircraft owned by Hyperion Air, Inc. \n(200) On or about August 18, 2005, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN, \na/k/a \nand \ntraveled from \nto Palm Beach County, Florida aboard the Gulfstream aircraft owned by \n• \nHyperion Air, Inc. \n(201) On or about August 18, 2005, Defendant \nmore telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #17. \n(202) On or about August 19, 2005, Defendant \nplaced one or \na/k/a `= \nplaced one or more telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #17. \n(203) On or about August 21, 2005, Defendant \n)laced one \nor more telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #17. \n(204) On or about September 3, 2005, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN and \na/c/a `\ntraveled from the U.S. Virgin Islands to Palm \nBeach County, Florida aboard the Gulfstream aircraft owned by Hyperion Air, Inc. \n(205) On or about September 3, 2005, Defendant \na/k/a \nplaced one or more telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #17. \n(206) On or about September 18, 2005, Defendant placed \none or \nmore telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #17. \n(207) On or about September 18, 2005, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN, \nand \n30 \ntraveled from \nEFTA01718468\n", "char_count": 1286}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 62, "text_content": "to Palm Beach County, Florida aboard the Gulfstream \naircraft owned by Hyperion Air, Inc. ' \n(208) On or about September 18, 2005, Defendant \nsent a text \nmessage to a telephone used by Jane Doe #17. \n(209) On or about September 29, 2005, Defendant \nplaced \none or more telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #17. \n(210) On or about September 29, 2005, Defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN, \na/k/a \nand \ntraveled \nfrom \nto Palm Beach County, Florida aboard the Gulfstream \naircraft owned by Hyperion Air, Inc. \n(211) On or about September 30, 2005, Defendant la \na/k/a \nplaced one or more telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe \n#17. \n(212) On or about October 1, 2005, Defendant \nleft a \ntelephone message for Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN stating: \"[Jane Doe #14] \nconfirmed at 11 AM and [Jane Doe #17] — 4PM\". \n(213) On or about October 2, 2005, Defendant \nplaced one \nor more telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #17. \n(214) On or about October 3, 2005, Defendant \ncaused one \nor more telephone calls to a telephone used by Jane Doe #17. \n31 \nEFTA01718469\n", "char_count": 1075}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 63, "text_content": "(215) On or about October 3, 2005, Defendant \neft a telephone \nmessage for Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN stating: \"(Jane Doe #17] will be 1/2 hour late. \n(216) In or around the first week of October of 2005, Defendant JEFFREY \nEPSTEIN engaged in sexual intercourse with Jane Doe #17, who was then a \nseventeen-year-old girl. \n(217) In or around the first week of October of 2005, Defendant JEFFREY \nEPSTEIN made a payment of $350.00 to Jane Doe #17, who was then a seventeen-year-old \ngirl. \nAll in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 371 and 2. \n32 \nEFTA01718470\n", "char_count": 576}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 64, "text_content": "COUNT 2 \n(Conspiracy to Travel: 18 U.S.C. § 2423(e)) \n25. \nParagraphs 1 through 19 of this indictment are re-alleged and incorporated by \nreference as fully set for the herein. \n26. \nFrom at least as early as 2001 through in or around October 2005, the exact dates \nbeing unknown to the Grand Jury, the defendants, \nann\n.\nJEFFREY EPSTE11‘1, \nand \ndid knowingly and willfully conspire with each other and with others known and unknown to travel \nin interstate commerce for the purpose of engaging in illicit sexual conduct, as defined in 18 U.S.C. § \n2423(f), with another person, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 2423(b); all in \nviolation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 2423(e). \nCOUNT 3 \n(Facilitation of Unlawful Travel of Another: 18 U.S.C. § 2423(d)) \n27. \nParagraphs 1 through 19 of this Indictment are re-alleged and incorporated by \nreference as though fully set forth herein. \n28. \nFrom at least as early as in or about 2001 through in or around October 2005, the \nexact dates being unknown to the Grand Jury, in Pahn Beach County, in the Southern District of \nFlorida, and elsewhere, the defendant, \ndid, for the purpose of commercial advantage or private financial gain, arrange and facilitate the \ntravel of a person, that is Defendant Jeffrey Epstein, knowing that such person was traveling in \n33 \nEFTA01718471\n", "char_count": 1356}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 65, "text_content": "interstate commerce for the purpose of engaging in illicit sexual conduct, as defined in 18 U.S.C. § \n2423(O; in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 2423(d). \nCOUNT 4 \n(Sex Trafficking: 18 U.S.C. § 1591(a)(2)) \n29. \nParagraphs 1 through 19 of this Indictment are re-alleged and incorporated by \nreference as though fully set forth herein. \n30. \nFrom at least as early as in or about 2001 through in or about October 2005, the exact \ndates being unknown to the Grand Jury, in Palm Beach County, in the Southern District of Florida, \nand elsewhere, the defendants, \na\nand \ndid knowingly benefit, financially or by receiving anything of value, from participation in a venture, \nas defined in 18 U.S.C. § 1591(c)(3), which had engaged in an act described in violation of 18 \nU.S.C. $ 1591(a)(1), that is, the recruiting, enticing, providing, and obtaining by any means a person, \nin or affecting interstate commerce, knowing that the person or persons had not attained the age of 18 \nyears and would be caused to engage in a commercial sex act as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 1591(c)(1); \nin violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1591(a)(2), 1591(b)(2), and 2. \nCOUNT 5 \n(Enticement of a Minor: 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b)) \n31. \nParagraphs 1 through 19 of this Indictment are re-alleged and incorporated by \nreference as though fully set forth herein. \n34 \nEFTA01718472\n", "char_count": 1382}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 66, "text_content": "32. \nFrom in or around the spring of 2003 through on or about October 2, 2005, the exact \ndates being unknown to the Grand Jury, in Palm Beach County, in the Southern District of Florida, \nand elsewhere, the defendants, \nJEFFREY EPSTEIN \nand \ndid use a facility or means of interstate commerce, that is, the telephone, to knowingly persuade, \ninduce and entice Jane Doe #4, who was a person who had not attained the age of 18 years, to engage \nin prostitution and in a sexual activity for which a person can be charged with a criminal offense, that \nis violations of Florida Statutes Sections 800.04(5Xa), 800.04(6)(a), and 800.04(7)(a); in violation of \nTitle 18, United States Code, Sections 2422(b) and 2. \nCOUNT 6 \n(Enticement of a Minor: 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b)) \n33. \nParagraphs 1 through 19 of this Indictment are re-alleged and incorporated by \nreference as though fully set forth herein. \n34. \nIn or around March 2004, the exact dates being unknown to the Grand Jury, in Palm \nBeach County, in the Southern District of Florida, and elsewhere, the defendants, \nJEFFREY EPSTEIN \nand \ndid use a facility or means of interstate commerce, that is, the telephone, to knowingly persuade, \ninduce and entice Jane Doe #5, who was a person who had not attained the age of 18 years, to engage \nin prostitution; in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 2422(b) and 2. \nCOUNT 7 \n35 \nEFTA01718473\n", "char_count": 1402}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 67, "text_content": "(Enticement of a Minor: 18 U.S.C. § 2422(3)) \n35. \nParagraphs 1 through 19 of this Indictment are re-alleged and incorporated by \nreference as though fully set forth herein. \n36. \nFrom in or around April 2004 through on or around June 29, 2005, the exact dates \nbeing unknown to the Grand Jury, in Palm Beach County, in the Southern District of Florida, and \nelsewhere, the defendants, \nJEFFREY EPSTEIN, \nand \na \ndid use a facility or means of interstate commerce, that is, the telephone, to knowingly persuade, \ninduce and entice Jane Doe #6, who was a person who had not attained the age of 18 years, to engage \nin prostitution; in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 2422(b) and 2. \nCOUNT 8 \n(Enticement of a Minor: 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b)) \n37. \nParagraphs 1 through 19 of this Indictment are re-alleged and incorporated by \nreference as though fully set forth herein. \n38. \nIn or around July 2004, the exact dates being unknown to the Grand Jury, in Palm \nBeach County, in the Southern District of Florida, and elsewhere, the defendants, \nJEFFREY EPSTEIN \nand \ndid use a facility or means of interstate commerce, that is, the telephone, to knowingly persuade, \ninduce and entice Jane Doe #7, who was a person who had not attained the age of 18 years, to engage \nin prostitution; in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 2422(b) and 2. \n36 \nEFTA01718474\n", "char_count": 1384}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 68, "text_content": "COUNT 9 \n(Enticement of a Minor: 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b)) \n39. \nParagraphs 1 through 19 of this Indictment are re-alleged and incorporated by \nreference as though fully set forth herein. \n40. \nFrom in or around July 2004 through on or around December 29, 2004, the exact \ndates being unknown to the Grand Jury, in Palm Beach County, in the Southern District of Florida, \nand elsewhere, the defendants, \nJEFFREY EPSTEIN \nand \ndid use a facility or means of interstate commerce, that is, the telephone, to knowingly persuade, \ninduce and entice Jane Doe #8, who was a person who had not attained the age of 18 years, to engage \nin prostitution and in a sexual activity for which a person can be charged with a criminal offense, that \nis a violation of Florida Statutes Section 794.05; in violation of Title 18, United States Code, \nSections 2422(b) and 2. \nCOUNT 10 \n(Enticement of a Minor: 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b)) \n41. \nParagraphs 1 through 19 of this Indictment are re-alleged and incorporated by \nreference as though fully set forth herein. \n42. \nFrom in or around July 2004 through on or about January 31, 2005, the exact dates \nbeing unknown to the Grand Jury, in Palm Beach County, in the Southern District of Florida, and \nelsewhere, the defendants, \nJEFFREY EPSTEIN, \n37 \nEFTA01718475\n", "char_count": 1284}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 69, "text_content": "did use a facility or means of interstate commerce, that is, the telephone, to knowingly persuade, \ninduce and entice Jane Doe #9, who was a person who had not attained the age of 18 years, to engage \nin prostitution; in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 2422(b) and 2. \nCOUNT 11 \n(Enticement of a Minor: 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b)) \n43. \nParagraphs 1 through 19 of this Indictment are re-alleged and incorporated by \nreference as though fully set forth herein. \n44. \nFrom in or around the middle of 2004 through on or about April 22, 2005, the exact \ndates being unknown to the Grand Jury, in Palm Beach County, in the Southern District of Florida, \nand elsewhere, the defendants, \nJEFFREY EPSTEIN \nand \ndid use a facility or means of interstate commerce, that is, the telephone, to knowingly persuade, \ninduce and entice Jane Doe #10, who was a person who had not attained the age of 18 years, to \nengage in prostitution; in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 2422(b) and 2. \nCOUNT 12 \n(Enticement of a Minor: 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b)) \n38 \nEFTA01718476\n", "char_count": 1079}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 70, "text_content": "45. \nParagraphs 1 through 19 of this Indictment are re-alleged and incorporated by \nreference as though fully set forth herein. \n46. \nFrom in or around August 2004 through on or about May 27, 2005, the exact dates \nbeing unknown to the Grand Jury, in Palm Beach County, in the Southern District of Florida, and \nelsewhere, the defendants, \nJEFFREY EPSTEIN, \nand \na \ndid use a facility or means of interstate commerce, tat is, t to telephone, to knowingly persuade, \ninduce and entice Jane Doe #11, who was a person who had not attained the age of 18 years, to \nengage in prostitution; in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 2422(b) and 2. \nCOUNT 13 \n(Enticement of a Minor: 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b)) \n47. \nParagraphs 1 through 19 of this Indictment are re-alleged and incorporated by \nreference as though fully set forth herein. \n48. \nFrom in or around November 2004 through in or around March 2005, the exact dates \nbeing unknown to the Grand Jury, in Palm Beach County, in the Southern District of Florida, and \nelsewhere, the defendants, \nJEFFREY EPSTEIN, \nand \na/k/a \ndid use a facility or means of interstate commerce, that is, the telephone, to knowingly persuade, \ninduce and entice Jane Doe #13, who was a person who had not attained the age of 18 years, to \nengage in prostitution and in a sexual activity for which a person can be charged with a criminal \n39 \nEFTA01718477\n", "char_count": 1394}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 71, "text_content": "offense, that is a violation of Florida Statutes Section 794.05; in violation of Title 18, United \nStates Code, Sections 2422(b) and 2. \nCOUNT 14 \n(Enticement of a Minor: 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b)) \n49. \nParagraphs 1 through 19 of this Indictment are re-alleged and incorporated by \nreference as though fully set forth herein. \n50. \nFrom in or around December 2004 through on or about June 5, 2005, the exact dates \nbeing unknown to the Grand Jury, in Palm Beach County, in the Southern District of Florida, and \nelsewhere, the defendants, \nJEFFREY EPSTEIN, \nand \na \ndid use a facility or means of interstate commerce, that is, the telephone, to knowingly persuade, \ninduce and entice Jane Doe #14, who was a person who had not attained the age of 18 years, to \nengage in prostitution; in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 2422(b) and 2. \nCOUNT 15 \n(Enticement of a Minor: 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b)) \n51. \nParagraphs 1 through 19 of this Indictment are re-alleged and incorporated by \nreference as though fully set forth herein. \n52. \nIn or around December 2004, the exact dates being unknown to the Grand Jury, in \nPalm Beach County, in the Southern District of Florida, and elsewhere, the defendants, \nJEFFREY EPSTEIN \nand \n40 \nEFTA01718478\n", "char_count": 1249}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 72, "text_content": "did use a facility or means of interstate commerce, that is, the telephone, to knowingly persuade, \ninduce and entice Jane Doe #15, who was a person who had not attained the age of 18 years, to \nengage in prostitution; in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 2422(b) and 2. \nCOUNT 16 \n(Enticement of a Minor: 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b)) \n53. \nParagraphs 1 through 19 of this Indictment are re-alleged and incorporated by \nreference as though fully set forth herein. \n54. \nIn or around February 2005, the exact dates being unknown to the Grand Jury, in \nPalm Beach County, in the Southern District of Florida, and elsewhere, the defendants, \nJEFFREY EPSTEIN \nand \ndid use a facility or means of interstate commerce, that is, the telephone, to knowingly persuade, \ninduce and entice Jane Doe #16, who was a person who had not attained the age of 18 years, to \nengage in prostitution and in a sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a \ncriminal offense, that is violations of Florida Statutes Sections 800.04(5)(a), 800.04(6)(a), \nand 800.04(7)(a); in violation of Title 18, Urited States Code, Sections 2422(b) and 2. \nCOUNT 17 \n(Enticement of a Minor: 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b)) \n55. \nParagraphs 1 through 19 of this Indictment are re-alleged and incorporated by \nreference as though fully set forth herein. \n56. \nFrom in or around February 2005 through in or around the first week of October \n2005, the exact dates being unknown to the Grand Jury, in Palm Beach County, in the Southern \nDistrict of Florida, and elsewhere, the defendants, \n41 \nEFTA01718479\n", "char_count": 1576}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 73, "text_content": "JEFFREY EPSTEIN, \nand far \ndid use a facility or means of interstate commerce, that is, the telephone, to knowingly persuade, \ninduce or entice Jane Doe #17, who was a person who had not attained the age of 18 years, to engage \nin prostitution and in a sexual activity for which a person can be charged with a criminal offense, that \nis a violation of Florida Statutes Section 794.05; in violation of Title 18, United States Code, \nSections 2422(b) and 2. \nCOUNT 18 \n(Enticement of a Minor: 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b)) \n57. \nParagraphs 1 through 19 of this Indictment are re-alleged and incorporated by \nreference as though fully set forth herein. \n58. \nFrom in or around February 2005 through in or around April 2005, the exact dates \nbeing unknown to the Grand Jury, in Palm Beach County, in the Southern District of Florida, and \nelsewhere, the defendants, \nJEFFREY EPSTEIN, \nand \na/k/a \ndid use a facility or means of interstate commerce, that is, the telephone, to knowingly persuade, \ninduce and entice Jane Doe #18, who was a person who had not attained the age of 18 years, to \nengage in prostitution; in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 2422(b) and 2. \nCOUNTS 19 THROUGH 22 \n(Travel to Engage in Illicit Sexual Conduct: 18 U.S.C. § 2423(b)) \n42 \nEFTA01718480\n", "char_count": 1280}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 74, "text_content": "59. \nParagraphs 1 through 19 of this Indictment are re-alleged and incorporated by \nreference as though fully set forth herein. \n60. \nOn or about the dates enumerated as to each count listed below, from a place outside \nthe Southern District of Florida to a place inside the Southern District of Florida, the Defendant(s) \nlisted below traveled in interstate commerce for the purpose of engaging in illicit sexual conduct as \ndefined in 18 U.S.C. § 2423(f), with a person under 18 years of age, that is, the person(s) listed in \neach count below: \nCOUNT \nDATE(S) \nMINOR(S) INVOLVED \nDEFENDANT(S) \n19 \n7/16/2004 \nJane Doe #7 \nJane Doe #8 \nJane Doe #9 \nJEFFREY EPSTEIN \n20 \n3/31/2005 \nJane Doe #6 \nJane Doe #13 \nJane Doe #14 \nJane Doe #16 \nJane Doe #17 \nJEFFREY EPSTEIN \n21 \n9/18/2005 \nJane Doe #17 \nJEFFREY EPSTEIN \na/k/n \n22 \n9/29/05 \nJane Doe #17 \nJEFFREY EPSTEIN \nI \na/k/ ' \nAll in violation of Tit e 18, United States Code, Sections 2423(3) and 2. \nCOUNTS 23 THROUGH 32 \n(Sex Trafficking: 18 U.S.C. § 1591(a)(1)) \n43 \nEFTA01718481\n", "char_count": 1034}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 75, "text_content": "61. \nParagraphs 1 through 19 of this Indictment are re-alleged and incorporated by \nreference as though fully set forth herein. \n62. \nOn or about the dates enumerated as to each count listed below, the exact dates \nbeing unknown to the Grand Jury, in Palm Beach County, in the Southern District of Florida, \nand elsewhere, the Defendants listed below did knowingly, in and affecting interstate and \nforeign commerce, recruit, entice, provide, and obtain by any means a person, that is, the \nperson in each count listed below, knowing that the person had not attained the age of 18 \nyears and would be caused to engage in a commercial sex act as defined in 18 U.S.C. § \n1591(c)(1): \nCOUNT \nDATE(S) \nMINOR(S) \nINVOLVED \nDEFENDANT(S) \n23 \n2001 - 2004 \nJane Doe #2 \nJEFFREY EPSTEIN \n24 \nApril 2004 \nthrough \nJune 29, 2005 \nJane Doe #6 \nJEFFREY EPSTEIN \na/l a \n25 \nJuly 2004 \nJane Doe #7 \nJEFFREY EPSTEIN \n26 \nJuly 2004 \nthrough \nDecember 29, 2004 \nJane Doe #8 \nJEFFREY EPSTEIN \na \n27 \nJuly 2004 \nthrough \nJanuary 31, 2005 \nJane Doe #9 \nJEFFREY EPSTEIN \na \n44 \nEFTA01718482\n", "char_count": 1069}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 76, "text_content": "COUNT \nDATE(S) \nMINOR(S) \nINVOLVED \nDEFENDANT(S) \n28 \nMid-2004 \nthrough \nApril 22, 2005 \nJane Doe #10 \nJEFFREY EPSTEIN \n29 \nAugust 2004 \nthrough \nMay 27, 2005 \nJane Doe #11 \nJEFFREY EPSTEIN \na \nJEFFREY EPSTEIN \na/lca \n30 \n31 \nNovember 2004 \nthrough \nMarch 2005 \nJane Doe #13 \nDecember 2004 \nthrough \nJune 5, 2005 \nJane Doe #14 \nJEFFREY EPSTEIN \na\n' \na \n32 \nFebruary 2005 \nthrough \nfirst week of \nOctober 2005 \nJane Doe #17 \nJEFFREY EPSTEIN \na \nAll in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1591(a)(1) and 2. \nFORFEITURE 1 \nUpon conviction of the violation alleged in Count 1 of this indictment, the defendants, \nJEFFREY EPSTEIN, \na/Ida \nand \n=IM\n, shall forfeit to the United States any property, real or personal, \nwhich constitutes or is derived from proceeds traceable to the violation. \nPursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461; Title 18, United States Code, \nSection 981(a)(1)(C); and Title 21, United States Code, Section 853. \n45 \nEFTA01718483\n", "char_count": 978}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 77, "text_content": "If the property described above as being subject to forfeiture, as a result of any act or \nomission of the defendants, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, \nailda c=1M \nand\n(1) \ncannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence; \n. (2) \nhas been transferred or sold to, or deposited with a third person; \n(3) \nhas been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the Court; \n(4) \nhas been substantially diminished in value; or \n(5) \nhas been commingled with other property which cannot be subdivided without \ndifficulty; \nit is the intent of the United States, pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p), \nto seek forfeiture of any other property of the defendants up to the value of the above \nforfeitable property. \nAll pursuant to Title 28 United States Code, Section 2461; Title 18, United States \nCode, Section 981(a)(1)(C); and Title 21 United States Code, Section 853. \nFORFEITURE 2 \nUpon conviction of any of the violations alleged in Counts 2, 3, 5-50, 59, 60, of this \nindictment, the defendants, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, \na/k/a \nand \nshall forfeit to the United States \nany property, real or personal, constituting or traceable to gross profits or other proceeds \nobtained from such offense; and any property, real or personal, used or intended to be used to \n46 \nEFTA01718484\n", "char_count": 1267}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 78, "text_content": "commit or to promote the commission of such offense, including but not limited to the \nfollowing: \na. \nA parcel of land located at \n, Palm Beach, Florida \n33480, including all buildings, improvements, fixtures, attachments, and easements found \ntherein or thereon, and more particularly described as: \nBeing all of \n, a \nas \nrecorded in \nin the records of Palm Beach County, Florida \nand \nBEING that uortion I \nasrecoroea m \nRecords of Palm Beach County, Florida, being bounded on the West by the \nWest side of an existing concrete seawall and the northerly extension thereof \nas shown on the Adair & Brady, Inc., drawing \nand bounded on the East by the shoreline ass own on e p \nand bounded on the North and South \nthe Westerly extensions of the \nNorth and South lines respectively of\ncontaining 0.07 acres, more or \nless. \nPursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 2253. \nIf any of the forfeitable property described in the forfeiture section of this indictment, \nas a result of any act or omission of the defendants JEFFREY EPSTEIN, \na/k/a \nand\n(a) \ncannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence; \n(b) \nhas been transferred or sold to, or deposited with, a third person; \n(c) \nhas been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the Court; \n(d) \nhas been substantially diminished in value; or \n47 \nEFTA01718485\n", "char_count": 1320}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 79, "text_content": "(e) \nhas been commingled with other property which cannot be divided without \ndifficulty; \nit is the intent of the United States, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 2253(o), \nto seek forfeiture of any other property of said defendant up to the value of the above \nforfeitable property. \nPursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 2253. \nFORFEITURE 3 \nUpon conviction of any of the violations alleged in Counts 4, 51-58, of this \nindictment, the defendants, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, \na/k/a \nand\nshall forfeit to the United States \nany property, real or personal, that was used or intended to be used to commit or to facilitate \nthe commission of such violation; and any property, real or personal, constituting or derived \nfrom any proceeds that such person obtained, directly or indirectly, as a result of such \nviolation, including but not limited to the following: \na. \nA parcel of land located at \n, Palm Beach, Florida \n33480, including all buildings, improvements, fixtures, attachments, and easements found \ntherein or thereon, and more particularly described as: \nBeing all of \nrecorded in \nand \nas \n, in the records of Palm Beach County, Florida \nBEING that ortion I in West of \n48 \nEFTA01718486\n", "char_count": 1218}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 80, "text_content": "Records of Palm Beach County, Florida, being bounded on the West by the \nWest side of an existing concrete seawall and the northerly extension thereof \nas shown on the Adair & Brady, Inc., drawing \nand bounded on the East by the shoreline as s own on t e p \nand bounded on the North and SotaS the Westerly extensions of the \nNorth and South lines respectively ofM \ncontaining 0.07 acres, more or \nless. \nPursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1594(b). \nA TRUE BILL. \nFOREPERSON \nR. ALEXANDER ACOSTA \nUNITED STATES ATTORNEY \nASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY \n49 \nEFTA01718487\n", "char_count": 586}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 81, "text_content": "06/16/20'61 11:16 FAX \n05/113%06 OTRI 11:08 FAX \nUNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE \noovoo o \nO001 \nCriminal Division \nChild Exploitation and Obscenity Section \nas \nas \ngton, DC 205a -0T01 \nTO: \nOFFICE NUMBER: \nFAX NUMBER: \nFROM: \nDATE/TIME: \nCEOS: NB \nFAX: \n'R. Alexander Acosta, Esq. \nJay lefkowits, Esq. \nMay 16, 2008 \nOFFICE NUMBER: \n• \nNUMBER OF PAGES, EXCLUDING THIS SHEET: 5\nSPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: \nEFTA01718488\n", "char_count": 419}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 82, "text_content": "II \nEFTA01718489\n", "char_count": 17}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 83, "text_content": "05/16/008 11:16 FAX \n05/16/08 ...FRI 11:08 FAX \nIZ 002/006 \nO002 \nU.S. Department of Justice \nCriminal Division \nAndrew G. Oosterbaan, Chief \nChild Exploitation and Moronity Sea ion \nJay Lefkowitz, Esq. \nKirkland & Ellis LLF \nCitigroup Center \n153 E. 531'3 St. \nNew York, NY 10022-4611 \nRe: \nInvestigation ofieety Epstein \nDear Mr. Lefkowitz: \n1400 Nov York A Penile, NW \nSul la 'WO \nInishinglon, DC 20530 \nIIMMO\nrilAiSEM \nMay I5, 2008 \nPursuant to your request and the request of U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta, we have \nindependently evaluated certain issues raised in the investigation ofJeffrey Epstein to determine \nwhether a decision to prosecute Mr. Epstein for federal criminal violations would contradict \ncriminal enforcement policy interests. As part of our evaluation, we have reviewed letters \nwritten on behalf of Mr. Epstein on February 1, 2007, June 25, 2007, July 6, 2007, March 28, \n2008, April 8, 2008, April 28, 2008, and May 14, 2008, with their attachments. We have also \nreviewed memos prepared by the U.S. Attorney's Office. As you will recall, we met with you \nand other representatives of Mr. Epstein to further discuss your views on the propriety of a \nfederal prosecution. We have discussed the factual and legal issues you raise with the Criminal \nDivision's Appellate Section, and we consulted with the Office of Enforcement Operations \nconcerning the petite policy. \nWe are examining the narrow question as to whether there is a legitimate basis for the \nU.S. Attorney's Office to proceed with a federal prosecution of Mr. Epstein. Ultimately, the \nprosecutorial decision making authority within a U.S. Attorney's Office lies with the U.S. \nAttorney. Therefore, to borrow a phrase from the case law, the question we sought to answer \nwas whether U.S. Attorney Acosta would abuse his discretion if he authorized prosecution in this \ncase. \nAs you know, our review of this case is limited, both factually and Iegally. We have not \nlooked at the entire universe of fact\n... [truncated, 2303 chars — for the full page use /api/corpus/document/EFTA01718407/83 or ?id=EFTA01718407&page=83]", "char_count": 2303}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 84, "text_content": "05/16/2008 411:16 FAX \nP \n05/16/08 FRI 11:08 FAX \n0003/006 \nO003 \nAs was made clear at the outset, we did not review the facts, circumstances, or terms \nincluded in the plea offer, nor any allegations that individuals involved in the investigation \nengaged in misconduct. Despite that agreement, we note that your letters of April 8, April 28, \nand May 14 focus in large part on accusations of investigative or prosecutorial misconduct. Not \nonly do allegations of prosecutorial misconduct fall outside the boundary of our arced review, \nthey also fall outside the authority of the Criminal Division in the first instance. Simply, the \nCriminal Division does not investigate or resolve allegations of professional misconduct by \nfederal prosecutors. For these reasons, we do not respond to the portion of those letters that \ndiscuss alleged misconduct. \nBased on our review of all of these materials, and after careful consideration of the issues, \nwe conclude that U.S. Attorney Acosta could properly use his discretion to authorize prosecution \nin this case. We will briefly address each of the issues that you have raised. \nKnowledge of age. Federal child exploitation statutes differ as to whether there must be \nproof that the defendant was aware that the children were under the age of 18. However, even \nfor those statutes where knowledge of age is an element of the offense, it is possible to satisfy \nthat element with proof that the defendant was deliberately ignorant of facts which would suggest \nthat the person was a minor. For that reason, the fact that some of the individuals allegedly lied \nto Mr. Epstein about their age is not dispositive of the issue. While there may be an open factual \nissue as to Mr. Epstein's knowledge, we cannot say that it would be impossible to prove \nknowledge of age for any such charges which require it. Therefore, Mr. Acosta could rightfully \nconclude that this factual issue is best resolved by a jury. \nTravel for the purpose. In the materials you\n... [truncated, 3659 chars — for the full page use /api/corpus/document/EFTA01718407/84 or ?id=EFTA01718407&page=84]", "char_count": 3659}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 85, "text_content": "05/16/2008 11:16 FAX \n05/18/08 FRI 11:09 FAX \n@004/006 \n1004 \nso novel as to implicate the so-called \"clear statement rule,\" the Ex Post Facto clause, or the Due \nProcess clause. As with the other legal issues, Mr. Acosta may elect to proceed with the case. \nAbsence of coercion. With respect to 18 U.S.C. § 1591, the alleged absence of the use of \nforce, fraud, or coercion is of no moment. The statute does not require the use of force, fraud, \nand coercion against minors. Because of their age, a degree of coercion is presumed. In your \nmaterials, you note that the statute requires that the minors must be \"caused\" to engage in a \ncommercial sex act, further arguing that the word \"cause\" suggests that a certain amount of \nundue influence was used. We reject that interpretation, as it would read back into the offense an \nelement--coercion—that Congress has expressly excluded. We have successfully prosecuted \ndefendants for the commercial sexual exploitation of minors, even when the minors testified that \nnot only did they voluntarily engage in the commercial sex acts, it was their idea to do so. As \nsuch, Mr. Acosta could properly decide to pursue charges under Section 1591 even if there is no \nevidence of coercion. \nMore broadly, a defendant's criminal liability does not hinge on his victim identifying as \nhaving suffered at his hands. Therefore, a prosecution could proceed, should Mr. Acosta decide \nto do so, even though some of the young women allegedly have said that they do not view \nthemselves as victims. \nWitness  credibility. As all prosecutors know, there are no perfect witnesses. Particularly \nin cases involving exploited children, as one member of your defense team, Ms. Thacker, surely \nknows from her work at CEOS, it is not uncommon for victim-witnesses to give conflicting \nstatements. The prosecutors are in the best position to assess the witness's credibility. Often, the \nprosecutor may decide that the best approach is to present the witness, let defense c\n... [truncated, 3435 chars — for the full page use /api/corpus/document/EFTA01718407/85 or ?id=EFTA01718407&page=85]", "char_count": 3435}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 86, "text_content": "05/16/2008 11:17 FAX \nf \n1. \n05/10/08, FRI 11:09 PAX \nCa 005/006 \n00 005 \n• \nthe case on the merits after jeopardy has attached.\" USAM 9-2.031(C). Our understanding is \nthat the state case is still pending. As such, the procedural posture of the state case does not \nimplicate the petite policy. \nWe recognize that the petite policy could be triggered if the state case concluded after a \nfederal indictment was issued but prior to the commencement of any federal trial. Id. However, \nthe policy \"does not apply ... where the [state) prosecution involved only a minor part of the \ncontemplated federal charges.\" USAM 9-2.031(B). Based on our understanding of the possible \nfederal charges and existing state charges, we do not think the petite policy would be an issue \nshould federal proceedings take place. \nFederalism and Prosecutorial Discretion. All of the above issues essentially ask whether \na federal prosecution can proceed. We understand, however, that you also ask whether a federal \nprosecution should proceed, even in the event that all of the elements of a federal offense could \nbe proven. On this issue, you raised two arguments: that the conduct at issue here is traditionally \na state concern because the activity is entirely local, and that the typical prosecution under federal \nchild exploitation statutes have different facts than the ones implicated here. You have \nessentially asked us to look into whether a prosecution would so violate federal prosecutorial \npolicy that a United States Attorney's Office should not pursue a prosecution. We do not think \nthat is the case here for the following reasons. \nSimply, the commercial sexual exploitation of children is a federal concern, even when \nthe conduct is local, and regardless of whether the defendant provided the child (the \"pimp\") or \npaid for the child (the \"john\"). In your materials, you refer to a letter sent by the Department of \nJustice to Congress in which the Department expresses concern over the expansion \n... [truncated, 3494 chars — for the full page use /api/corpus/document/EFTA01718407/86 or ?id=EFTA01718407&page=86]", "char_count": 3494}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 87, "text_content": "05/16/2008 11:17 FAX \n05/16/08 FRI 11:10 FAX \n@flit:16/006 \nGD006 \nfacts, we conclude that federal prosecution in this case would not be improper or inappropriate. \nWhile you raise many compelling arguments, we do not see anything that says to us categorically \nthat a federal case should not be brought. Mr. Acosta would not be abusing his prosecutorial \ndiscretion should he authorize federal prosecution of Mr. gpstei . \n,\nSincerely \ncc: \nAAG Alice S. Fisher \nDAAG Sigal P. Mandelkcr \nU.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta \n5 \nOostcrbaan \nEFTA01718494\n", "char_count": 551}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 88, "text_content": "UVOZ/08 JUUN 14:58 FAA \nEIECUE1VE OFFICE \n001 \nU.S. Department of Justice \nUnited States Attorney \nSouthern District of Florida \nUNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA \n99 NE 47\" STREET \nMIAMI, FLORIDA 33132-2111 \nFirst Assistant U.S. Attorney \ntatf Assistant \nFACSIMILE TRANSMISSION \nCOVER SHEET \nDATE: \nJune 2, 2008 \nTO: \nFAX NUMBER: \nSUBJECT: \nEpstein \nNUMBER OF PAGES, INCLUDING THIS PAGE: 9 \nMessage/Comments: \nThis facsimile contains PRIVILEGED AND GO'NFIDEN1lAt. INFORMATION intended only for the use of the \nAddressee(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient ofthis facsimile, or the employee or agent responsible \nfor delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination or coping of this facsimile is \nstrictly prohibited. If you have received this facsimile in error, please immediately notify us by telephone and return the \noriginal facsimile to us at the above address via the U.S. Postal Service. Thank you. \nEFTA01718495\n", "char_count": 1008}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 89, "text_content": ".. \nEFTA01718496\n", "char_count": 17}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 90, "text_content": "vusudbøuw \n~Ph. A.0.4 . \nar,r...inuat:i. 12 ls '\nU \nCaW.U.1 let Ur SVC \n00.1/0(me \nretuuc \n?I 003 /013 \nqr)no:.uoa\nKenneth W. Starr \nIGrklantl \nI\nVIA FkCSIMILI.: \nI lontirable Ntirs \n>i flee Pal the \ny \nthirite• General \ni9lileil \n)_(me \nI \n1.V aSili \nLW.. \n\":./5 \nmay 39. 2008 \nJo: \nmono \nliir.11.LP \n; 1. \nCOAT I DKVT1A I \n[)ear I wipe \nI httat.1 briefly supplements our prior submission to vet' dated May \n2008. In Illo! \ntatillintinicaiitin. we urgently requested that your Office conduct an independent rev i e,• of the\npn.iposed federal pro:Ls:tit:on of our diem. ieffiey Hustein. The dual reastuis for oar request that \nyou review this maller arc I ip th.: hedrock need fus integrity in the curt weeturnt \nfede: al \ncriminal taws. and \nthe predltand questions raised S. the unpreentletitcql tr.:it:limn!: of federal \n;:lie by the t \nkatte s Attorney's Orliee in Miatiii (die ••118AO- 1 iv \npzerament publie \nwho le.,s eloce tins it.. farmer President Clinton. \nAllor11O. Alux .. coma t hat 1.ve vanild he seekim: your Mite's review. Mr. \nI,:itet, \niiii\nthe nee \n. r • • .. • • is lino; :ell the nion: exigent. On Muntluy. May I9. 2008. Vital \nAssistant ivItn.::. \nthe t ;SAO respulded Ulan ennat! front hi; la:Ronit/. infortnito.: I ...••; \nwhich inlp netl a deadline of June 2. 20LIS to admit!), Willi all the terms of tae ,suncitt Non-\ni~ \npr,,seention ..»:reemetit (the - Agntement\")„ pies new unilateral intldifiej1IllInS, till pain ai being \nllecmcd in brateit of ;hat Agreement. appears to have been deliberateiy designed Kt deprive us te.\nan adequate uppOrtimily bisect. your Office's review in this matter. \nThe USAn's desire to foreclose a 4:nitwit:le reviet. is understand,ible. given that the \nChild i,tc:tinitation ;Ind cnsectinv Section (\"Cli0S--) has already tleierntined that our 7:tilothinet..t: \narson:ems regualing why a federal proseeuti In t . !Vs. Itpsotin is not oar:anted wen: \n\"compc•Ilin;.- I Inwever. in contr.:diction to Mr \nassertion that CEOS had proviths,1 an \nin\n... [truncated, 2778 chars — for the full page use /api/corpus/document/EFTA01718407/90 or ?id=EFTA01718407&page=90]", "char_count": 2778}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 91, "text_content": "vu, us, U. \ntr). A, :514 \nr\nCIII.*:'::20eS \n1? i t PAW \n• \nGAIAAJLAVE urrium \nowitowse \nSIU1.14 \n6200 41/013 \nIii \nI !anorak,: Mark Vilip \nMA\" 27. 211011 \nrage\nli? \n:hal tilw Swtc Attorney has nil:. despite J ;V.I. \nIt. INC \n'.Ii. lipetein's counsel must also sueccesittlly expedite a plea \nnn a date prim. (0 July t. 200X. which rS tile 11111C IltirSently scl by the shoe court \nFuniter. the unnecessary deadline is even mom problematic he:mance :.1r. ;weren't etwo \niv reconcile the state charge and sentence with the terms or the Agreement requites an tatustial \nand unpreuedemed threatened application 01 letleral law. \nThus. tt places Mr \nPpsten ill the \nItit;lits unusual position of having lit thanand Mal the Stale acquiesce \n:More SA Ch.: \npunishment than it had already detennioad was aPProPriale-\nWe have attempted to resolve these and other issues through the I GUI and CFA )S \nneludia \nraisiu6; our vouverm: about the USAO's inappro white I.:undue, with respect to this \nmatter. But those avenues have now been shut down. Mi \ne letter purports w p.rohibit \nany Rather contact between Mr. F.ptdcin's defense team and I :.S. Attorney Acosta, and tretietai \nrequites us to communicate with the tit:AO only though Mr. SlOnntrn: NUE18/111iIta..N. \nWhile k pains us to say this, this misguided moseettlion lion, the outset aka:: the \nappearance that it may have been politically motivated Mr. QI‘clein is a lat!Ili). sueecteatil. \nmade businessman and rthilanthropiet who entered the puhiic ;trona nn ty h \nt 6vie :if ill( elow \npersonal asst:-:alit. \nWith l'ornicr President Bill Clinton. There is little tioubt ii; oar :Mods that \nthe US.NC) :levet would have contemplated a prosecution in this case it Mr. Ensa.pin were just \nanother \"John.-\ntt.S. Annracy Acosta prcointisty has mmetl that be is - sympathetic-  In :our We:AI/SIP' \nraated concerns. but be has taken the position that his authority is limited b) enforcement \npolicies set forth in 1N7ashinglon. D.C. \nAs expressed \nour prior\n... [truncated, 2648 chars — for the full page use /api/corpus/document/EFTA01718407/91 or ?id=EFTA01718407&page=91]", "char_count": 2648}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 92, "text_content": "J.7; Ze i\"; \ns nut: Dag\" AI c\non IP an \n)ION ia:2I FA): I \nGACA.U11Vt. urrnx. \nDU/ODAG \nliTRELAXDAELLIN \nLLP \n1(yV V4 \n4100S/013 \nKIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP \nFax Transmittal \nge \nPhone \nFax: \nPlease notify us immediately if any pages are not received. \nSP? Ceitj \nTHE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS COMMUNICATION IS CONFIDENTIAL. MAY \nBC ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED. MAY CONSTITUTE INSIDE INFORMATION. AND \nIS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE ADDRESSEE UNAUTHORIZED USE. \nDISCLOSURE OR COPYING IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED AND MAY BE UNLAWFUL. \nIF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, \nPLEASE NOTIF \nTELY AT: \nTo: \nCompany: \nFax X: \nDirect It: \ne of thc Deputy Attorney Ge \n-Honvreible Mark Filip \nOffic\nUnite \nate\nd St\ns Depanment ofJ \nusrieeneral\nFrom: \nDate: \nPegesmicoyen \nFax It: \nDirect X: \nKenneth W. Starr \nMay 19, 2008 \n. 9 \nMessage' \nEFTA01718499\n", "char_count": 853}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 93, "text_content": "UO/UC/VO ~fl 44:Dd \nu4,40, LVVO UW:tif VAS. \nIlt.. i It • a d \n?ION \na : 2 \nELECUT1VE UFF10E \nDOJIOUKU \nK I KKISNIISKI.I.15 \nU005 \n1/40 006/013 \nteJ11112 \nKenneth W. Starr \nKirkland & \n• \n• \nPhottE: \nPax: \nVfA PA CSIMILE \nIlonorable Mark Filip \nGalge of the Depury Atterney General \nUnited St \n'cc \nas ungton, D.C. 20530 \nDear Judge Filip: \nMay 19.2008 \nJoe D. Whitley \n_43ston & Bird \nas ungton, DC :1000 -li 0 \nCONFIDE.NTML \nEFTA01718500\n", "char_count": 440}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 94, "text_content": "1:0/ US, \n..10 \nsun \n10: LW \n%twins \nton itz.\nwieemosyyy \nW0\nv., \nman \nb5. I9.0A \nMON \nmiuKLAMMELLIs \n• \nISIUUD \n40cionots \n100113 \nIlonorable Mark Filip \nMay 19. 2008 \nPage 2 \nEFTA01718501\n", "char_count": 190}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 95, "text_content": "TiVot°A1 \n• Oh J \n'09 \n!ION 13:23 \nLAZAAJAAVG %atilt \nDOJ/ODAC \nKlIthl.ANIMELLI 5 \n1.1.1' \nYO YVt \nQ008/013 \nCO 004 \nflonorableMalicBip \nMay :9,2008 \nPage 3 \nEFTA01718502\n", "char_count": 171}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 96, "text_content": "muivcivo sun so.u4 \n05/28/2008 09:09 FAX \n• \n03 In pa )ION 13:23 \nCAMAJIIVIS Urrlt.t. \nD0J/ODAG \nKIRKLANDAELLIS \nIUU6 \n009/013 \n006 \nHonorable Mark Filip \nMay 19, 2003 \nl'age 4 \nEFTA01718503\n", "char_count": 191}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 97, "text_content": "VOOLOA/U0 sun sous \n03/2o/zoos moo \nFAX \n-05 19 on \nmoN 1 3 :2.1 \nHonorable Mark Filip \nMay 19.2008 \nPage'5. \nCAMAJILIII urrst& \nWM), \nvovowic \nNpotvol3 \nKIKELAND&ELLIS LLP \n0000 \nEFTA01718504\n", "char_count": 193}, {"efta_number": "EFTA01718407", "page_number": 98, "text_content": "U0/114/U0 AUP 10:U4 \n05128/2008 00:10 FAX \nmoN 13:Z5 \nHonorable Mark Pilip \nMay 19, 2008 \nPage 6 \nZAZUU11•11 UrriA.C. \nqUus.0 \nDOVODAC \nQ011/013 \nKLIEKLANDLELLIS \nwoo' \nEFTA01718505\n", "char_count": 182}]}