{"efta_number": "EFTA00732316", "page_count": 2, "url": "https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00732316", "pdf_url": "https://epstein-data.com/pdf/EFTA00732316.pdf", "pages": [{"efta_number": "EFTA00732316", "page_number": 0, "text_content": "From: \"Martin Weinberg\"\nTo: \"Jeffery Edwards\" <jeevacation@gmail.com - \nCc: ' \n„ti \n- \n-\nSubject: Fw: SORNA Letter \nDate: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 19:09:46 +0000 \nHopefully, with several minor edits. you will be receiving Stephanie's opinion letter today \nOriginal Message \nFrom: Martin Weinberg \nTo: Ste  hanie Thacker • Darren Indyke \nCc: \nSent: Friday, October 01, 2010 2:19 PM \nSubject: Re: SORNA Letter \n1. I would now omit fn 1 \n2. I would consider, at the very end of your conclusory bulletpoints on pg 10 of the attached letter, \nadding language from your transmittal email: \n\"in my view federal SORNA obligations as to individuals who are classified as sex offenders are limited to the \nact of registering and updating registration. Knowing failures to conform to those federal obligations can alone \nput a citizen at risk of federal prosecution. However, all other sex offender registration issues are subject to state \nlaw. In particular, the requirements for individual state registration, and maintaining such registration, are within \nthe purview of the individual state registration schemes\" \n3. Note I have eliminated the \"especially\" believing it creates an unnecessary question regarding which law to \nfollow as to states that have conformed eg Florida if there remain differences \n4. I would also consider adding a final sentence \"Further, issues including those relating to the manner of \nproviding notice of travel are matters exclusively governed by the laws of the respective states in which you have \nregistererd\" \n--- Original Message ----\nFrom: Stephanie Thacker \nTo: Darren Indyke \nCc: Martin Weinberg \nSent: Friday, October 01, 2010 1:10 PM \nSubject: SORNA Letter \nAttached for your consideration is a draft of my analysis of the interplay between SORNA registration \nrequirements and what is required to maintain registration with relevant state sex offender \nregistries-specifically, the Virgin islands. \nFor the record, please disregard my September 24, 2010 letter in this regard inasmuch as it was based on a \nmisapprehension of certain key facts. \nAs detailed in the attached, in my view federal SORNA obligations as to individuals who are classified as sex \noffenders are limited to the act of registering and updating registration. Knowing failures to conform to those \nEFTA00732316\n", "char_count": 2311}, {"efta_number": "EFTA00732316", "page_number": 1, "text_content": "federal obligations can alone put a citizen at risk of federal prosecution. However, all other sex offender \nregistration issues are subject to state law. In particular, the requirements for individual state registration, and \nmaintaining such registration, are within the purview of the individual state registration schemes-especially \nwhen such states have not implemented SORNA. \nPlease let me know if you have questions. \nStephanie D. Thacker \nAllen Guthrie & Thomas. PLLC \n500 Lee Street East \nSuite 800 \nCharleston, West Virginia 25301 \n(direct) \n(fax) \nEFTA00732317\n", "char_count": 574}]}