{"efta_number": "EFTA00037804", "page_count": 1, "url": "https://epstein-data.com/EFTA00037804", "pdf_url": "https://epstein-data.com/pdf/EFTA00037804.pdf", "pages": [{"efta_number": "EFTA00037804", "page_number": 0, "text_content": "From: \nTo: \nCc: \nSubject: RE: Evidence for transport \nDate: Sat, 16 Mar 2019 22:18:31 +0000 \nImportance: Normal \nAttachments: 2019-03-16,_JE,evidence_list_(prior investigation).xlsx \nThis was from a while back, but wanted to follow up on the question of physical evidence. I've reviewed the list (I thought \nit was really difficult to read, so I reformatted it significantly, though without any substantive changes — see attached) and \nI think the answer is we should have everything transferred up here with the exception of extremely large items. \nSpecifically, I think at this stage we do not need to be housing the following: \n1B2 — 31: Green massage table \n182 —43: Peach massage table \n181 —6: Beige massage table \n181 — 7: Brown massage table \nAlso, for some of the entries there are numbers next to the descriptions in parentheses. For most of those, it looks like \neither the number of the type of thing or just a repeat of the sub-number of the various item numbers in the first \ncolumn. For item number 1B2, a bunch of the entries have numbers (following the descriptions) that don't seem to be \neither of those things. Is there any significance to those numbers?? I just want to make sure there are no issues with our \nrecords of what exists. \nLet us know if any questions or issues — and obviously anybody please say the word if you disagree about holding off on \nbringing up the massage tables — and thanks. \nAssistant U.S. Attorney \nSouthern District of New York \nEFTA00037804\n", "char_count": 1492}]}