The volunteers, between the ages of 23 and 31, donated their eggs anonymously and were "financially compensated for the time, effort, discomfort and inconvenience associated with the donation process," the study authors wrote. The success of the experiments rekindled debate among bioethicists, who have long anticipated that human cloning would become a reality. In 2002, a commission of bioethicists established by then-President George W. Bush unanimously urged a ban on reproductive cloning. But the panel was deeply divided about the propriety of "therapeutic cloning" for research and medical treatment. Though 13 states have passed laws banning reproductive cloning, the United States is one of just a few industrialized countries that has not prohibited the practice. Seven states also have banned therapeutic cloning. Oregon is not one of them. The OHSU team's success underscores the urgent need for federal rules that spell out consistent national limits on therapeutic cloning and put a clear ban on the technology's use in fertility clinics, said Johns Hopkins University bioethicist Jeffrey Kahn. Researchers are also likely to step up their demand for donated eggs so they can conduct similar experiments. That lends urgency to the need for standardized practices for compensating women who donate their eggs. Some states, including California, have set strict limits on such payments, while others have allowed a market for donated eggs to flourish unregulated, Kahn added. Among the methodological innovations outlined in the Cell paper was a trick that stem cell scientist Michael D. West, who was not involved in the study, dubbed "the Starbucks effect." The OHSU team added caffeine to the growth medium that nourished the eggs after they were stripped of their original DNA and awaited the new DNA from a skin cell. Unlike its stimulating effect on coffee-drinkers, the caffeine chemically slowed the rush to divide and grow that had doomed earlier efforts. The OHSU scientists a