The Russian government owned banks, making up the 8.4% of the banking assets, are heavily undercapitalised being below the required norms because of underprovided problematic loan portfolios with NBU imposing certain sanctions. Moreover, there have been many aggressive actions from Ukrainian activists because of the war conflict and all of them, namely Sberbank, VTB (controls two banks in Ukraine, VTB and BM Bank) and Prominvestbank, have announced their departure by selling the banks. So far the sale of Sberbank has been agreed to Norvik bank of Latvia that belongs to individuals of Russian origin, pending the approval from the NBU. The banks with Ukrainian capital in the top 20 banks share 6% of assets with the most notable being FUIB of Mr Akhmetov. Proposal I would propose the acquisition of a profitable bank with lower than the average NPL portfolio, operated by a West European shareholder, with a reasonable market share and of a digestible acquisition price in order to capture the projected 4-year economic growth trend in Ukraine (base scenario by IMF and EBRD) in a market with: = Small competition Analysing the current landscape of the top 20 banks that command around 90% market share of assets, there are very few banks that would be competent to pursue business development given their specific circumstances. The state owned banks that command the 52% are obviously bothered with trapped legacy and corporate governance issues. All four banks are also preparing for their potential privatisation, however, the task of transforming the mentality of the staff of these banks to that similar of a private one should be close to impossible, at least for a period of 3 years. I would have thought that their liquidity would be most probably invested in government titles rather than pursuing loans aggressively by competing at low interest rates. The Russian government owned banks that command 8.4% are already at the “sales process” stage and I believe that there will be no