6.1.13 The Company may not engage in certain businesses On February 24, 1998, without admitting or denying liability, Michael R. Milken consented to the entry of a final judgment in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in Securities and Exchange Commission v. Michael R. Milken et al., which judgment was entered on February 26, 1998 restraining and enjoining Michael Milken from associating with any broker, dealer, investment advisor, investment company or municipal securities dealer, and from violating Section 15(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act"). On March 711, 1991, in the action entitled In the Matter of Michael R. Milken, the SEC instituted a proceeding pursuant to Section 15(b}(6) of the Exchange Act and ordered that Michael Milken be barred from association with any broker, dealer, investment advisor, investment company or municipal securities dealer. On April 24, 1990, concurrently with a plea agreement covering criminal violations of federal securities laws, Michael Milken also consented, without admitting or denying liability, to the entry of a final judgment in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in the civil action entitled Securities and Exchange Commission v. Drexel Burnham Lambert Incorporated, et al., restraining and enjoining Michael Milken from engaging in transactions, acts, practices and courses of business which constitute or would constitute viclations of, or which aid and abet or would aid and abet violations of, Sections 7(c), 7{f), 9(a)(2), 10(b), 13(d), 14(e}, 15(¢)(3) and 17(a)(1) of the Exchange Act, and Regulations T and X and Rules 10b-5, 10b-6, 13d-1, 13d-2, 14e-3, 15c3-1, 174-3 and 17a-4 promulgated thereunder, and Section 17(a) of the Securities Act. The Company cannot be in the business of or associated with a broker, dealer, investment company, investment advisor, or municipal securities dealer (collectively, “prohibited businesses’). As a resu