Forthcoming (August 2011) Future Science edited by Max Brockman, Vintage Press, New York. “best choice” fish increased an average of 29 percent per week, sales of yellow-tagged “proceed with caution” seafood declined an average of 27 percent per week, but the sales of the red-tagged “worst choice” seafood—i.e., the heavily overfished species—remained the same.’ Between 1980 and 2008, sales of pesticides increased 36 percent in the state of California, the birthing ground of the organic food eco-label.* Despite sporadic instances of such measures as cat- pooling and use of cloth grocery bags in lieu of plastic-or-paper, the demand for oil in the U.S. has grown 30 percent overall and 5 percent per capita since 1990.’ The positive effect of idealistic consumers does exist, but it is masked by the growing demand and numbers of other consumers. Guilt is a valuable emotion, but it is felt by individuals and therefore motivates only individuals. Another drawback is that guilt is triggered by an existing value within an individual. If the value does not exist, there is no guilt and hence no action (e.g., sales for red “worst choice” seafood remained the same). What if the aim were to promote a value felt by the group but not necessarily by every individual in the group? Many problems, like most concerning the environment, are group problems. Perhaps to solve these problems we need a group emotion. Maybe we need shame. Shaming, as noted, is unwelcome in regulating personal conduct that does not harm others. But what about shaming conduct that does harm others? The U.S. National Sex Offender Registry provides an online database with the names, photographs, and addresses of sex offenders in every state. In March 2010, Nebraska lawmakers approved a bill that allows the 7E. Hallstein & S. B. Villas-Boas, “Are consumers color blind? An empirical investigation of a traffic light advisory for sustainable seafood,” http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/29v6wS5sp#page-11 (2009) * B