In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001., 2012 WL 257568 (2012) ee JA4394. Be JA3662, 3665, 3671, 3677-81, 4399-4401. 9 JA4024-30, 100 JA3785, 3870, 4318-19, 4529. _ JA3832-33, 4302-05, 4314-20, 4528-45. 102 JA3870, 4528-45. 103 JA3724-28, 3832-33, 4302-05, 4314-20. _ The district court dismissed the Burnett ATA claim against Al Rajhi Bank. SPA55-57 (Terrorist Attacks I). The district court also dismissed the remaining ATA claims against Al Rajhi Bank brought on behalf of the other plaintiff groups. SPA63, 65-66. IOS SPA99-103 (SAMBA J); SPA57-58 (Terrorist Attacks I), The district court also denied plaintiffs’ motions for leave to amend their pleadings, SPA103-04 (SAMBA J), and for reconsideration of the denial of their leave to amend, SPA111-15 (SAMBA IN). See infra 82 n.113. LOG SPA245 (Terrorist Attacks V). LO SPA246-47 (Terrorist Attacks V); SPA109-10 (DMI-Kamel); SPA59-60 (Terrorist Attacks I). NOS SPA246-47 (Terrorist Attacks V); SPA109-10 (DMI-Kamel); SPA59-60 (Terrorist Attacks I). 108 See infra pp. Point I.-C (discussing treatment of support in mid-1990s). 0 See infra pp. Point I.B (discussing district court’s treatment of pleadings regarding defendants’ mental state). TA SPA245-46 (Terrorist Attacks V); SPA106, 110 (DMd-Kamel); SPA102-03 (SAMBA I); SPA55 (Terrorist Attacks I). ie A bank’s provision of banking services constitutes material support of terrorism if the services were provided “knowing or intend[ing] that such provision would generally facilitate ... terrorist activities ...” Wultz, 755 F. Supp. 2d at 44-46; see also Linde, 384 F. Supp. 2d at 588 (“[Gl]iven plaintiffs’ allegations regarding the knowing and intentional nature of the Bank’s activities, there is nothing ‘routine’ about the services the Bank is alleged to provide”); Weiss, 453 F. Supp. 2d at 625 (“Where the Bank knows that the groups to which it provides services are engaged in terrorist activities even the provision of basic banking services may qualify as