In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001., 2012 WL 257568 (2012) Clinton v. City of New York, 524 U.S. 417 (1998) cesses 94, 141 Doe v. Bin Laden, 663 F.3d 64, 2011 U.S. App. Lexis 22516 passim Ex parte Quirin, 317 U.S. 1 (1942) eee ceecesseceesseeesseesseseceeeereneesneesees 126 Federal Ins. Co. v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, 129 8S. Ct. 16 Federal Ins. Co. v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, 2009 WL ii, 15 Filartiga v. Pena-Irala, 630 F.2d 876 (2d Cir. 1980)... eee 126 Fin. One Pub. Co. v. Lehman Bros. Special Fin., Inc., 414 148 F.3d 325 (2d Cir, 2005) eeeseccsnsesssssnssescesnseeecesnseeecesnsesceesnseeecesnseeeeanseeess Flores v. S. Peru Copper Corp., 414 F.3d 233 (2d Cir. 2003) 126, 137 Foster v. Auburn Univ., No. 11-CV-503, 2011 U.S. Dist. 100 LEXIS 141056 (M.D. Ala. Dec. 8, 2011) ie ceeesecseeeesesneeeseenees Frontera Res. Azer. Corp. v. State Oil Co. of the Azer. Rep., 23, 156 582 F.3d 393 (2d Cir, 2009) ooccececcsssscssesneecesnseeesesnseseesnseseerenseseetensess Goldberg v. UBS AG, 660 F. Supp. 2d 410 (E.D.N.Y. 2009) .. 101, 153 Hamilton v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp., 96 N.Y¥.2d 222 (2001) ........ 143, 146 Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project, 130 8. Ct. 2705 (2010) 68, 71, 72 Holmes v. Lorch, 329 F. Supp. 2d 516 (S.D.N.Y. 2004) ......... 148 In re Chiquita Brands Int'l, Inc., 690 F. Supp. 2d 1296 (S.D. 99 Fla, 2010) ..cceessccsssssscsssseeceseseseeesnseseeesnneseeesnseseeesnseseersnseseeesnseseeesnseeeneanseeess In re Issuer Plaintiff Initial Pub. Offering Antitrust Litig., 00 150 CTV 7804 (LMM), 2004 WL 487222 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 12, *vii In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001,349 F. passim Supps 2d. 765 (S-D.NGY 2005). sscisscenevccnnencnmennencnien In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001, 392 F. Supp. passim 204539 (S:DINGY 2005)» ssccscscivevsesssvcesesewversssiveevennvereninevennnrenivvenn In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001, 462 F. Supp. passim 24561, (S:DIN GY: 2006), ccccssivevsessivcescseivensessiveevennvenenineevenneneniveenn In