HOUSE OVERSIGHT 023351 your personal bottom line has increased dramatically, if you had thought of me as your partner in this endeavor , instead of an employee, i think your reaction to sharing t benefits would be different. If you recall, you wanted me to be paid , unlike others at the END of my work. we discussed this ad nauseum, and agreed OCT 15, last year was the end. You had wanted more comfort initially on the art partnership so that date was delayed. It has now been six monhts since then, your concept of aftercare. . for free. was already unique, in your words this has to have an end.( weaned ) if the actions of josh and mark led to one hundred million dollars , what would be their share. Im not sure why it is different in your mind, but i respect the fact that it is, Is it because their work seems harder. it cannot be simply because they devote more time to you .or it appears to involve more effort. I am happy to continue to play a partnership role. as I have been in many areas of your life.. I am also happy to move on and have no more of these emails. I find them as tedious as you do. if you prefer a partnership structure, ok with me, I tried to minimize the amount of money i would recieve by making it a flat fee . as i wanted you to feel good and have no second thoguths somehow if the payment comes from a partnership structure you seem relaxed as opposed to writing a check, I focus on trust and friendship first, and the fact that you don't include josh and mark in that category, gives me great pause . I proposed 33 percent of money made for you.. in the past you agreed that amount. it will be huge, but ok with me, I can talk today at 945 as you suggested. or if you woudl rather over the weekend ok Date: Fri, May 1, 2015 at 7:08 PM Subject: Fwd: Picasso agreement - question To: Melanie Spinella silly Date: Fri, May 1, 2015 at 12:27 PM Subject: Picasso agreement - question To: Brad Wechsler L <[email protected]> _ 1>, "Jeffrey