HOUSE OVERSIGHT 023337 can do it. I will have no real further involvement apart from confirming the outcome of my proposed structure, I will not risk the admonition of- they thought you said, they thought you meant, they understood it to be. but they said you said, ( i e ,I asked at our meeting that accounting be done properly for bens house, what came back was ada thought that I meant that we needed to go back to the 97 trust and give him a full third party accounting of where his money had gone??!! I kid you not). I dont think brad should talk to jane heller without a fully fleshed out plan in place and even then it should be you. Date: Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:21 AM Subject: agenda To: Melanie Spinella__________________________________ 1 fees, amount and to what entities when and responsiblitis. 2. gagosian idea to save a minimum of 10 mill and maybe more. 3. i can walk you through carlyns screw up, 50 % would have made little difference and maybe made it worse. 4. we should have an all hands meeting with your family to talk about art distribution on death. . 5. phaidon, decantings ( already firmly in progress ) loans. ( alan ) pent. ( with follow up ) all part of same elegant transaction, 6 asymetric risk worth at least 50- 60 no matter how you calculate. I can explain. 7 lets get the money issue out of the way once and for all. I have my team set to start. Date: Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 8:07 AM Subject: Fwd: moving forward To: Melanie Spinella_________________________________ I had forgotten that Alan was actually at the table when i explained my note deal to you. it was at the end of the meeting described below. . as you will recall, not once , not even a peep did alan suggest contemporaneously his hand in the crafting, in fact brad said it was an idea. that HE brad, HAD HAD, from the begiining . my emails between alan and I that you can read, further confirm authorship. Im sure you recall the obnoxious tooting when alan said he agreed with