order to make clear that, consistent with enforcement policy at the time, 281 See, e.g, Judgments, United States v. Esquenazi, supra note 44, ECF criminal penalties would not be imposed “for inadvertent or insignificant Nos. 182, 816, 824 (judgments against foreign official defendants). errors in books and records, or inadvertent violations of accounting 282 Criminal Information, United States v. SSI Int'l, supra note 235 controls.” See S. Rep. No. 100-85, at 49; H.R. Rep. No. 100-576, at (alleging violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1343, 1346); Plea Agreement, United 916 (“The Conferees intend to codify current Securities and Exchange States v. SSI Int'l, supra note 235, (Oct. 10, 2006), available at hetp:// Commission (SEC) enforcement policy that penalties not be imposed for www.justice.gov/ criminal/fraud/ fcpa/ cases/control-inc/07-24-09cci- insignificant or technical infractions or inadvertent conduct.”). plea-agree.pdf. 2415 US.C. § 78ff(a). *83 See Ex-Im Bank, Form of Exporter’s Certificate, EBD-M-56 (Jan. 265 See United States v. Alcatel-Lucent, S.A., supra note 48; see also United 2007), available at http://www.exim.gov/pub/ins/pdf/ebd-m-56.pdf. States v. Alcatel-Lucent France, supra note 56. 284 See 18 US.C. § 1001. 266 See Deferred Prosecution Agreement, United States v. Alcatel-Lucent, 78599 CER. §§ 130.2, 130.9. S.A., supra note 48, ECF No. 10, available at hetp:/ /www.justice.gov/ 286 For example, in United States v. BAE Systems ple, BAE pleaded guilty criminal/fraud/ fcpa/ cases/alcatel-etal/02-22-1 lalcatel-dpa.pdf. to conspiring to defraud the United States by impairing and impeding its 267 See Plea Agreement, United States v. Siemens AG, supra note 48, ECF lawful functions, to making false statements about its FCPA compliance No. 14, available at http: //wwwjustice.gov/ criminal/fraud/ fepa/ cases/ program, and to violating the AECA and ITAR. BAE paid a $400 siemens/ 12-15-08siemensakt-plea.pdf. million fine and agreed toan independent corp